50th Anniversary Invited Article—Autonomous Vehicles and Connected Vehicle Systems: Flow and Operations Considerations

References

• Ausubel JH, Herman R (1988) Cities and Their Vital Systems: Infrastructure Past, Present, and Future (National Academy Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Batty M, Axhausen KW, Giannotti F, Pozdnoukhov A, Bazzani A, Wachowicz M, Ouzounis G, Portugali Y (2012) Smart cities of the future. Eur. Physical J. Special Topics 214(1):481–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhaumik M, DasGupta S, Saha S (2012) Affinity based clustering routing protocol for vehicular ad hoc networks. Procedia Engrg. 38:673–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bose A, Ioannou P (1999) Analysis of traffic flow with mixed manual and semi-automated vehicles. Proc. IEEE Amer. Control Conf., Vol. 3, 2173–2177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brackstone M, McDonald M (1999) Car-following: A historical review. Transportation Res. Part F: Traffic Psych. Behav. 2(4):181–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler RE, Herman R, Montroll EW (1958) Traffic dynamics: Studies in car following. Oper. Res. 6(2):165–184.Link, Google Scholar
• Choffnes DR, Bustamante FE (2005) An integrated mobility and traffic model for vehicular wireless networks. Proc. 2nd ACM Internat. Workshop Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (ACM, New York), 69–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dirks S, Keeling M (2009) A vision of smarter cities: How cities can lead the way into a prosperous and sustainable future. IBM Institute for Business Value, Somers, NY. http://www-03.ibm.com/press/attachments/IBV_Smarter_Cities_-_Final.pdf.Google Scholar
• Dong J, Mahmassani H (2009) Flow breakdown and travel time reliability. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2124:203–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong J, Mahmassani HS, Erdoğan S, Lu CC (2011) State-dependent pricing for real-time freeway management: Anticipatory versus reactive strategies. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 19(4):644–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eichler S, Ostermaier B, Schroth C, Kosch T (2005) Simulation of car-to-car messaging: Analyzing the impact on road traffic. 13th IEEE Internat. Sympos. Modeling, Anal., Simulation Comput. Telecom. Systems (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC),507–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fagnant DJ, Kockelman K (2015) Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 77:167–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fajardo D, Au TC, Waller S, Stone P, Yang D (2011) Automated intersection control: Performance of future innovation versus current traffic signal control. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2259:223–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan L, Yu W (2007) Routing in vehicular ad hoc networks: A survey. Vehicular Tech. Magazine 2(2):12–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (2005) Next generation simulation: I-80 Highway data set. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/trafficanalysistools/ngsim.htm.Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Head KL, Khoshmagham S, Zamanipour M (2015) A real-time adaptive signal control in a connected vehicle environment. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 55:460–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey BJ, Dueck D (2007) Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science 315(5814):972–976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gartner NH (1985) Demand-responsive traffic signal control research. Transportation Res. Part A: General 19(5–6):369–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gazis DC, Herman R, Rothery RW (1961) Nonlinear follow the leader model of traffic flow. Oper. Res. 19(4):545–567.Link, Google Scholar
• Glauche I, Krause W, Sollacher R, Greiner M (2003) Continuum percolation of wireless ad hoc communication networks. Physica A: Statist. Mech. Appl. 325(3–4):577–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godbole DN, Eskafi F, Singh E, Varaiya P (1995) Design of entry and exit maneuvers for IVHS. Proc. IEEE Amer. Control Conf. 1995, Vol. 5, 3576–3580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodall N, Smith B, Park B (2013) Traffic signal control with connected vehicles. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2381:65–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenshields BD, Channing W, Miller H (1935) A study of traffic capacity. Highway Res. Board Proc. 1935, National Research Council, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Guler SI, Menendez M, Meier L (2014) Using connected vehicle technology to improve the efficiency of intersections. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 46:121–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamdar S, Mahmassani H (2008) From existing accident-free car-following models to colliding vehicles: Exploration and assessment. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2088:45–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamdar SH, Mahmassani HS, Treiber M (2015) From behavioral psychology to acceleration modeling: Calibration, validation, and exploration of drivers’ cognitive and safety parameters in a risk-taking environment. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 78:32–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamdar S, Treiber M, Mahmassani HS, Kesting A (2008) Modeling driver behavior as sequential risk-taking task. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2088:208–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Härri J, Filali F, Bonnet C, Fiore M (2006) VanetMobiSim: Generating realistic mobility patterns for VANETs. Proc. 3rd Internat. Workshop Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (ACM, New York), 96–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC (1967) Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, I–III. Part I. The basic model. Management Sci. 14(3):159–182.Link, Google Scholar
• Herman R, Rothery RW (1965) Car following and steady-state flow. Almond J, ed. Proc. 2nd Internat. Sympos. Theory Traffic Flow (OECD, Paris).Google Scholar
• Ioannou P, Xu Z, Eckert S, Clemons D, Sieja T (1993) Intelligent cruise control: Theory and experiment. Proc. 32nd IEEE Conf. Decision Control, 1885–1890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang D, Delgrossi L (2008) IEEE 802.11p: Towards an international standard for wireless access in vehicular environments. Vehicular Tech. Conf., 2036–2040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson D, Maltz D (1996) Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. Mobile Computing, Vol. 353 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA), 153–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karnadi FK, Mo ZH, Lan K (2007) Rapid generation of realistic mobility models for VANET. Wireless Comm. Networking Conf., 2506–2511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kesting A, Treiber M, Helbing D (2010) Enhanced intelligent driver model to access the impact of driving strategies on traffic capacity. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A: Math., Physical Engrg. Sci. 368(1928):4585–4605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J, Mahmassani HS (2011) Correlated parameters in driving behavior models. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2249:62–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krajzewicz D, Erdmann J, Behrischs M, Bieker L (2012) Recent development and applications of SUMO—Simulation of urban mobility. Internat. J. Adv. Systems Measurements 5(3&4):128–138.Google Scholar
• Kuklinski S, Wolny G (2009) Density based clustering algorithm for VANETs. 5th Internat. Conf. Testbeds Res. Infrastructures Development Networks Communities Workshops, TridentCom 2009, 1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee J, Park B (2012) Development and evaluation of a cooperative vehicle intersection control algorithm under the connected vehicles environment. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 13(1):81–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lioris J, Pedarsani R, Tascikaraoglu FY, Varaiya P (2015) Platoons of connected vehicles can double throughput in urban roads. arXiv Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Lochert C, Barthels A, Cervantes A, Mauve M, Caliskan M (2005) Multiple simulator interlinking environment for IVC. Proc. 2nd ACM Internat. Workshop Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (ACM, New York), 87–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahmassani HS (2014) Autonomous vehicles: Adoption factors, activity system impacts. Workshop Travel Demand Modeling Implications of Driverless Cars, 93rd Annual Meeting Transportation Res. Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Mahmassani HS (2016) Technological innovation and the future of urban personal travel. Schofer J, Mahmassani HS, eds. MOBILITY 2050: A Vision for Transportation Infrastructure (Northwestern University Transportation Center, Evanston, IL), 41–62.Google Scholar
• Mahmassani HS, Chang GL (1987) On boundedly rational user equilibrium in transportation systems. Transportation Sci. 21(2):89–99.Link, Google Scholar
• Mahmassani H, Rakha M, Hubbard E, Lukasik D (2012) Concept development and needs identification for intelligent network flow optimization (INFLO): Concept of operations. Final Report FHWA-JPO-13-013. United States Department of Transportation ITS Joint Program Office. http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/48000/48200/48294/ED9816D5.pdf.Google Scholar
• McGurrin M, Vasudevan M, Tarnoff P (2012) Benefits of dynamic mobility applications: Preliminary estimates from the literature. Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Mearian L (2016) MIT: Red lights could someday be a thing of the past. Computerworld (March 18). http://www.computerworld.com/article/3045942/car-tech/mit-hopes-to-eliminate-traffic-lights.html.Google Scholar
• Monteil J (2014) Investigating the effects of cooperative vehicles on highway traffic flow homogenization: Analytical and simulation studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2010) Frequency of target crashes for intellidrive safety systems. http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo16917.Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2013) Preliminary statement of policy concerning automated vehicles. http://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/rulemaking/pdf/Automated_Vehicles_Policy.pdf ns-3. In, http://www.nsnam.org/.Google Scholar
• ns-3 (2016) ns-3 Manual: Release ns-3.26. https://www.nsnam.org/docs/release/3.26/manual/ns-3-manual.pdf.Google Scholar
• Ossen S, Hoogendoorn S, Gorte B (2006) Interdriver differences in car-following: A vehicle trajectory-based study. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 1965:121–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peeta S, Mahmassani HS (1995) Multiple user classes real-time traffic assignment for online operations: A rolling horizon solution framework. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 3(2):83–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perkins CE, Royer EM (1999) Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing. Second IEEE Workshop Mobile Comput. Systems Appl. Proc. WMCSA ’99, 90–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Priemer C, Friedrich B (2009) A decentralized adaptive traffic signal control using V2I communication data. 12th Internat. IEEE Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems, 1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rawshdeh ZY, Mahmud SM (2009) Toward strongley connected clustering structure in vehicular ad hoc networks. Vehicular Tech. Conf. (VTC 2009-Fall), 1–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reece DA, Shafer SA (1993) A computational model of driving for autonomous vehicles. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 27(1):23–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothery RW (2001) Car following models. Traffic flow theory: A state-of-the-art report. Traffic Flow Theory and Characteristics Committee of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC). http://tft.ceng.calpoly.edu/docs/revised_monograph_2001.pdf.Google Scholar
• Shladover SE, Desoer CA, Hedrick JK, Tomizuka M, Walrand J, Zhang WB, McMahon DH, Peng H, Sheikholeslam S, McKeown N (1991) Automated vehicle control developments in the PATH program. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Tech. 40(1):114–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talebpour A (2015) Modeling driver behavior in a connected environment: Integration of microscopic traffic simulation and telecommunication systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
• Talebpour A, Mahmassani HS (2014) Modeling acceleration behavior in a connected environment. Celebrating 50 Years of Traffic Flow Theory: Sympos. Transportation Research Circular E-C197, Transportation Research Board, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
• Talebpour A, Mahmassani HS (2016) Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 71:143–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talebpour A, Mahmassani HS, Bustamante FE (2016) Modeling driver behavior in a connected environment: Integrated microscopic simulation of traffic and mobile wireless telecommunication systems. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talebpour A, Mahmassani HS, Elfar A (2017) Investigating the effects of reserved lanes for autonomous vehicles on congestion and travel time reliability. Proc. Transportation Res. Board 96th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talebpour A, Mahmassani HS, Hamdar S (2011) Multiregime sequential risk-taking model of car-following behavior. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2260:60–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talebpour A, Mahmassani H, Hamdar S (2013) Speed harmonization: Evaluation of effectiveness under congested conditions. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2391:69–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talebpour A, Mahmassani HS, Hamdar SH (2015) Modeling lane-changing behavior in a connected environment: A game theory approach. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 59:216–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• TRB Traffic Flow Theory and Characteristics Committee (2011) 75 Years of the Fundamental Diagram for Traffic Flow Theory: Greenshields Sympos. Transportation Research Circular E-C149, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Treiber M, Kesting A (2013) Traffic Flow Dynamics: Data, Models and Simulation (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treiber M, Kesting A, Helbing D (2007) Influence of reaction times and anticipation on stability of vehicular traffic flow. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 1999:23–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Arem B, de Vos A, Schuurman H (1998) Simulation of traffic flow on a special lane for intelligent vehicles. Rysgaard R, ed. Third Internat. Sympos. Highway Capacity, Vol. 1 (National Research Council: Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC),71–83.Google Scholar
• Van Arem B, Van Driel CJG, Visser R (2006) The impact of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic-flow characteristics. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 7(4):429–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanderbilt T (2012) Autonomous cars through the ages. Gear (February 6). http://www.wired.com/2012/02/autonomous-vehicle-history/.Google Scholar
• Varaiya P (1993) Smart cars on smart roads: Problems of control. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 38(2):195–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varotto SF, Hoogendoorn RG, Van Arem B, Hoogendoorn SP (2015) Empirical longitudinal driving behaviour in case of authority transitions between adaptive cruise control and manual driving. Transportation Res. Record 2489:105–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang SY, Lin CC, Chou CL (2005) A practical routing protocol for vehicle-formed mobile ad hoc networks on the roads. Intelligent Transportation Systems Proc. 161–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang SY, Chou CL, Chiu YH, Tzeng YS, Hsu MS, Cheng YW, Liu WL, Ho TW (2007) NCTUns 4.0: An integrated simulation platform for vehicular traffic, communication, and network researches. Vehicular Tech. Conf., 2007, 2081–2085.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward JA (2009) Heterogeneity, lane-changing and instability in traffic: A mathematical approach. Department of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
• Weber M (2014) Where to? A history of autonomous vehicles. http://www.computerhistory.org/atchm/where-to-a-history-of-autonomous-vehicles/.Google Scholar
• Wilson RE, Ward JA (2010) Car-following models: Fifty years of linear stability analysis—A mathematical perspective. Transportation Planning Tech. 34(1):3–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeng X, Balke K, Songchitruksa P (2012) Potential connected vehicle applications to enhance mobility, safety, and environmental security. Final Report, Southwest Region University Transportation Center, College Station, TX.Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Ahn S, Chen D, Laval J (2011) Applications of wavelet transform for analysis of freeway traffic: Bottlenecks, transient traffic, and traffic oscillations. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 45(2):372–384.Crossref, Google Scholar