Rational Behavior Adjustment Process with Boundedly Rational User Equilibrium

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2016.0715

References

  • Braess D (1968) Über ein Paradoxon aus der Verkehrsplanung. Unternehmensforschung 12(1):258–268.Google Scholar
  • Braess D, Nagurney A, Wakolbinger T (2005) On a paradox of traffic planning. Transportation Sci. 39(4):446–450.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bureau of Public Roads (1964) Traffic Assignment Manual (U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Chellaboina V, Leonessa A, Haddad WM (1999) Generalized Lyapunov and invariant set theorems for nonlinear dynamical systems. Systems Control Lett. 38(4–5):289–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chorus CG, Timmermans HJP (2009) Measuring user benefits of changes in the transport system when traveler awareness is limited. Transportation Res. Part A 43(5):536–547.Google Scholar
  • Conlisk J (1996) Why bounded rationality? J. Econom. Literature 34(2):669–700.Google Scholar
  • Cortes J (2008) Discontinuous dynamical systems. IEEE Control Systems 28(3):36–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dafermos S (1980) Traffic equilibrium and variational inequalities. Transportation Sci. 14(1):42–54.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Di X, Liu HX (2016) Boundedly rational route choice behavior: A review of models and methodologies. Transportation Res. Part B 85:142–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Di X, Liu HX, Ban X (2016a) Second best toll pricing within the framework of bounded rationality. Transportation Res. Part B 83:74–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Di X, He X, Guo X, Liu HX (2014) Braess paradox under the boundedly rational user equilibria. Transportation Res. Part B 67:86–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Di X, Liu H, Ban X, Yu J (2015) Submission to the DTA 2012 special issue: On the stability of a boundedly rational day-to-day dynamic. Networks Spatial Econom. 15(3):537–557.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Di X, Liu HX, Pang J, Ban X (2013) Boundedly rational user equilibria (BRUE): Mathematical formulation and solution sets. Transportation Res. Part B 57:300–313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Di X, Liu HX, Zhu S, Levinson DM (2016b) Indifference bands for boundedly rational route switching. Transportation, ePub ahead of print May 5, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9699-1 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emmerink RHM, Axhausen KW, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P (1995a) The potential of information provision in a simulated road transport network with non-recurrent congestion. Transportation Res. Part C 3(5):293–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emmerink RM, Axhausen K, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P (1995b) Effects of information in road transport networks with recurrent congestion. Transportation 22(1):21–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Facchinei F, Pang J (2003) Finite-Dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems (Springer-Verlag, New York).Google Scholar
  • Friesz TL, Bernstein D, Mehta NJ, Tobin RL, Ganjalizadeh S (1994) Day-to-day dynamic network disequilibria and idealized traveler information systems. Oper. Res. 42(6):1120–1136.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gabaix X, Laibson DI, Moloche G, Weinberg S (2006) Costly information acquisition: Experimental analysis of a boundedly rational model. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(4):1043–1068.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gao S, Frejinger E, Ben-Akiva M (2011) Cognitive cost in route choice with real-time information: An exploratory analysis. Transportation Res. Part A 45(9):916–926.Google Scholar
  • Guo RY, Yang H, Huang HJ (2013) A discrete rational adjustment process of link flows in traffic networks. Transportation Res. Part C 34:121–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo RY, Yang H, Huang HJ, Tan ZJ (2015) Link-based day-to-day network traffic dynamics and equilibria. Transportation Res. Part B 71:248–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo RY, Yang H, Huang HJ, Tan ZJ (2016) Day-to-day flow dynamics and congestion control. Transportation Sci. 50(3):982–997.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guo X (2013) Toll sequence operation to realize target flow pattern under bounded rationality. Transportation Res. Part B 56:203–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo X, Liu HX (2011) Bounded rationality and irreversible network change. Transportation Res. Part B 45(10):1606–1618.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Han K, Szeto WY, Friesz TL (2015) Formulation, existence, and computation of boundedly rational dynamic user equilibrium with fixed or endogenous user tolerance. Transportation Res. Part B 79:16–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Han L, Du L (2012) On a link-based day-to-day traffic assignment model. Transportation Res. Part B 46(1):72–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He X, Guo X, Liu HX (2010) A link-based day-to-day traffic assignment model. Transportation Res. Part B 44(4):597–608.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu T, Mahmassani HS (1997) Day-to-day evolution of network flows under real-time information and reactive signal control. Transportation Res. Part C 5(1):51–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jayakrishnan R, Mahmassani HS, Hu T (1994) An evaluation tool for advanced traffic information and management systems in urban networks. Transportation Res. Part C 2(3):129–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jou R, Hensher DA, Liu Y, Chiu C (2010) Urban commuters’ mode-switching behaviour in Taipai, with an application of the bounded rationality principle. Urban Stud. 47(3):650–665.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jou R, Lam S, Liu Y, Chen K (2005) Route switching behavior on freeways with the provision of different types of real-time traffic information. Transportation Res. Part A 39(5):445–461.Google Scholar
  • Khalil HK (2002) Nonlinear Systems, 3rd ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • LaSalle JP (1960) Some extensions of Liapunov’s second method. IRE Trans. Circuit Theory 7(4):520–527.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Y, Tan Z, Chen Q (2012) Dynamics of a transportation network model with homogeneous and heterogeneous users. Discrete Dynam. Nature Soc. 2012:1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lou Y, Yin Y, Lawphongpanich S (2010) Robust congestion pricing under boundedly rational user equilibrium. Transportation Res. Part B 44(1):15–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahmassani HS, Chang G (1987) On boundedly rational user equilibrium in transportation systems. Transportation Sci. 21(2):89–99.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mahmassani HS, Jayakrishnan R (1991) System performance and user response under real-time information in a congested traffic corridor. Transportation Res. Part A 25(5):293–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahmassani HS, Liu Y (1999) Dynamics of commuting decision behaviour under advanced traveller information systems. Transportation Res. Part C 7(2–3):91–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagurney A, Zhang D (1997) Projected dynamical systems in the formulation, stability analysis, and computation of fixed-demand traffic network equilibria. Transportation Sci. 31(2):147–158.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nguyen S, Dupuis C (1984) An efficient method for computing traffic equilibria in networks with asymmetric transportation costs. Transportation Sci. 18(2):185–202.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ortega J, Rheinboldt W (2000) Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables (SIAM, Philadelphia).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandholm WH (2002) Evolutionary implementation and congestion pricing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 69(3):667–689.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandholm WH (2005) Excess payoff dynamics and other well-behaved evolutionary dynamics. J. Econom. Theory 124(2):149–170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith MJ (1979) The existence, uniqueness and stability of traffic equilibria. Transportation Res. Part B 13(4):295–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith MJ (1984) The stability of a dynamic model of traffic assignment—An application of a method of Lyapunov. Transportation Sci. 18(3):245–252.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith M, Mounce R (2011) A splitting rate model of traffic re-routing and traffic control. Transportation Res. Part B 45(9):1389–1409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szeto WY, Lo HK (2006) Dynamic traffic assignment: Properties and extensions. Transportmetrica 2(1):31–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu J, Sun H, Wang DZW, Zhong M, Han L, Gao Z (2013) Bounded-rationality based day-to-day evolution model for travel behavior analysis of urban railway network. Transportation Res. Part C 31:73–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang F, Zhang D (2009) Day-to-day stationary link flow pattern. Transportation Res. Part B 43(1):119–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ye H, Yang H, Tan Z (2015) Learning marginal-cost pricing via a trial-and-error procedure with day-to-day flow dynamics. Transportation Res. Part B 81(3):794–807.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang D, Nagurney A, Wu J (2001) On the equivalence between stationary link flow patterns and traffic network equilibria. Transportation Res. Part B 35(8):731–748.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao C, Huang H (2016) Experiment of boundedly rational route choice behavior and the model under satisficing rule. Transportation Res. Part C 68:22–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.