A Microscopic Investigation Into the Capacity Drop: Impacts of Longitudinal Behavior on the Queue Discharge Rate

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2017.0745

References

  • Banks HJ (1991) The two-capacity phenomenon: Some theoretical issues. Transportation Res. Record 1320:234–241.Google Scholar
  • Bertini RL, Leal MT (2005) Empirical study of traffic features at a freeway lane drop. J. Transportation Engrg. 131(6):397–407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cassidy MJ, Bertini RL (1999) Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 33(1):25–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cassidy MJ, Rudjanakanoknad J (2005) Increasing the capacity of an isolated merge by metering its on-ramp. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 39(10):896–913.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen D, Ahn S, Laval J, Zheng Z (2014) On the periodicity of traffic oscillations and capacity drop: The role of driver characteristics. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 59:117–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen D, Laval JA, Ahn S, Zheng Z (2012) Microscopic traffic hysteresis in traffic oscillations: A behavioral perspective. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 46(10):1440–1453.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chung K, Rudjanakanoknad J, Cassidy MJ (2007) Relation between traffic density and capacity drop at three freeway bottlenecks. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 41(1):82–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coifman B, Kim S (2011) Extended bottlenecks, the fundamental relationship, and capacity drop on freeways. Procedia—Soc. Behavioral Sci. 17:44–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo CF (2005) A variational formulation of kinematic waves: Basic theory and complex boundary conditions. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 39(2):187–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duret A, Bouffier J, Buisson C (2010) Onset of congestion from low-speed merging maneuvers within free-flow traffic stream. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2188:96–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goemans WHH, Daamen JW (2011) Dutch Highway Capacity Manual (“Handboek Capaciteitswaarden Infrastructuur Autosnelwegen (CIA) Volledig Vernieuwd”).Google Scholar
  • Hall FL, Agyemang-Duah K (1991) Freeway capacity drop and the definition of capacity. Transportation Res. Record 1320:91–98.Google Scholar
  • Kerner BS (1998) Experimental features of self-organization in traffic flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81:3797–3800.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koutsopoulos HN, Farah H (2012) Latent class model for car following behavior. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 46(5):563–578.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laval JA, Daganzo CF (2006) Lane-changing in traffic streams. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 40(3):251–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lebacque J (2003) Two-phase bounded-acceleration traffic flow model: Analytical solutions and applications. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 1852:220–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leclercq L, Laval JA, Chiabaut N (2011) Capacity drops at merges: An endogenous model. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 45(9):1302–1313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leclercq L, Knoop VL, Marczak F, Hoogendoorn SP (2016) Capacity drops at merges: New analytical investigations. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 62:171–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lighthill MJ, Whitham GB (1955) On kinematic waves: II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. Proc. Royal Soc. London A 229(1178):317–345.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newell GF (2002) A simplified car-following theory: A lower order model. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 36(3):195–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nishinari K, Treiber M, Helbing D (2003) Interpreting the wide scattering of synchronized traffic data by time gap statistics. Phys. Rev. E 68(6):067101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oh S, Yeo H (2015) Impact of stop-and-go waves and lane changes on discharge rate in recovery flow. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 77:88–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Papageorgiou M, Papamichail I, Spiliopoulou AD, Lentzakis AF (2008) Real-time merging traffic control with applications to toll plaza and work zone management. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 16(5):535–553.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reiss R-D (1989) Approximate Distributions of Order Statistics: With Applications to Nonparametric Statistics (Springer-Verlag, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richards PI (1956) Shock waves on the highway. Oper. Res. 4(1):42–51.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Srivastava A, Geroliminis N (2013) Empirical observations of capacity drop in freeway merges with ramp control and integration in a first-order model. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 30:161–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tampère C (2004) Human-kinetic multiclass traffic flow theory and modelling with application to advanced driver assistance systems in congestion. Doctoral thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  • Treiber M, Kesting A, Helbing D (2006) Understanding widely scattered traffic flows, the capacity drop, and platoons as effects of variance-driven time gaps. Phys. Rev. E 74(1):016123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wong GCK, Wong SC (2002) A multi-class traffic flow model—an extension of LWR model with heterogeneous drivers. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 36(9):827–841.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yeo H (2008) Asymmetric microscopic driving behavior theory. Doctoral thesis, University of California Transportation Center, University of California Berkeley.Google Scholar
  • Yuan K, Knoop VL, Hoogendoorn SP (2015) Capacity drop: Relation between speed in congestion and the queue discharge rate. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2491:72–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yuan K, Knoop VL, Leclercq L, Hoogendoorn SP (2016) Capacity drop: A comparison between stop-and-go wave and standing queue at lane-drop bottleneck. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynam. 5(2):149–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang HM, Kim T (2005) A car-following theory for multiphase vehicular traffic flow. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 39(5):385–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.