Driver-Rider Cost-Sharing Strategies and Equilibria in a Ridesharing Program

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2017.0801

References

  • Agatz N, Erera A, Savelsbergh M, Wang X (2012) Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223(2):295–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agatz NA, Erera AL, Savelsbergh MW, Wang X (2011) Dynamic ride-sharing: A simulation study in metro Atlanta. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 45(9):1450–1464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benkler Y (2004) Sharing nicely: On shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production. Yale Law J. 114(2):273–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brownstone D, Golob TF (1992) The effectiveness of ridesharing incentives: Discrete-choice models of commuting in Southern California. Regional Sci. Urban Econom. 22(1):5–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buliung R, Soltys K, Habel C, Lanyon R (2009) Driving factors behind successful carpool formation and use. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2118:31–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burlacu A (2015) No sidecar in 2016: Ride-sharing service shutting down as Uber and Lyft dominate the scene. Tech. Times (December 31). http://www.techtimes.com/articles/120470/20151231/no-sidecar-in-2016-ride-sharing-service-shutting-down -as-uber-and-lyft-dominate-the-scene.htm.Google Scholar
  • Chan ND, Shaheen SA (2012) Ridesharing in North America: Past, present, and future. Transport Rev. 32(1):93–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Correia G, Viegas JM (2011) Carpooling and carpool clubs: Clarifying concepts and assessing value enhancement possibilities through a stated preference web survey in Lisbon, Portugal. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 45(2):81–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dailey DJ, Loseff D, Meyers D (1999) Seattle smart traveler: Dynamic ridematching on the World Wide Web. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 7(1):17–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deakin E, Frick K, Shively K (2010) Markets for dynamic ridesharing? Case of Berkeley, California. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2187:131–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Furuhata M, Dessouky M, Ordóñez F, Brunet ME, Wang X, Koenig S (2013) Ridesharing: The state-of-the-art and future directions. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 57:28–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghoseiri K, Haghani AE, Hamedi M, Center MAUT (2011) Real-time rideshare matching problem. Mid-Atlantic Universities Transportation Center, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
  • Herbawi W, Weber M (2012) The ride matching problem with time windows in dynamic ridesharing: A model and a genetic algorithm. Abbass H, Essam D, Sarker R, eds. Proc. 2012 IEEE Congress Evolutionary Comput., 3547–3554.Google Scholar
  • International Energy Agency (2005) Saving oil in a hurry: Measures for rapid demand restraint in transport. Report, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  • Levin IP (1982) Measuring tradeoffs in carpool driving arrangement preferences. Transportation 11(1):71–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li J, Embry P, Mattingly S, Sadabadi K, Rasmidatta I, Burris M (2007) Who chooses to carpool and why? Examination of Texas carpoolers. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2021:110–117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marcotte P, Zhu DL (1997) Equilibria with infinitely many differentiated classes of customers. Pang JS, Ferries M, eds. Complementarity and Variational Problems, State of Art (SIAM, Philadelphia), 234–258.Google Scholar
  • Morency C (2007) The ambivalence of ridesharing. Transportation 34(2):239–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nourinejad M, Roorda MJ (2016) Agent based model for dynamic ridesharing. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 64:117–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stiglic M, Agatz N, Savelsbergh M, Gradisar M (2015) The benefits of meeting points in ride-sharing systems. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 82:36–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stiglic M, Agatz N, Savelsbergh M, Gradisar M (2016) Making dynamic ride-sharing work: The impact of driver and rider flexibility. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 91: 190–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teal RF (1987) Carpooling: Who, how and why. Transportation Res. Part A: General 21(3):203–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tischer ML, Dobson R (1979) An empirical analysis of behavioral intentions of single-occupant auto drivers to shift to high occupancy vehicles. Transportation Res. Part A: General 13(3):143–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu H, Ordóñez F, Dessouky M (2015a) A traffic assignment model for a ridesharing transportation market. J. Adv. Transportation 49(7):793–816.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu H, Pang JS, Ordóñez F, Dessouky M (2015b) Complementarity models for traffic equilibrium with ridesharing. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 81:161–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.