A Probabilistic Traffic-Theoretic Network Loading Model Suitable for Large-Scale Network Analysis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2017.0804

References

  • Boel R, Mihaylova L (2006) A compositional stochastic model for real time freeway traffic simulation. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 40(4):319–334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo C (2005) A variational formulation of kinematic waves: Basic theory and complex boundary conditions. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 39(2):187–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deng W, Lei H, Zhou X (2013) Traffic state estimation and uncertainty quantification based on heterogeneous data sources: A three detector approach. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 57:132–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dumont AG, Bert E (2006) Simulation de l’agglomération lausannoise, SIMLO. Report, Laboratoire des voies de circulation, ENAC, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. http://web.mit.edu/osorioc/www/papers/dumont06BertRapport.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Endres DM, Schindelin JE (2003) A new metric for probability distributions. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 49(7):1858–1860.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flötteröd G, Osorio C (2017) Stochastic network link transmission model. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 102:180–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heidemann D (2001) A queueing theory model of nonstationary traffic flow. Transportation Sci. 35(4):405–412.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jabari SE (2012) A stochastic model of macroscopic traffic flow: Theoretical foundations. Doctoral thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  • Jabari SE, Liu HX (2012) A stochastic model of traffic flow: Theoretical foundations. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 46(1):156–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jabari SE, Liu HX (2013) A stochastic model of traffic flow: Gaussian approximation and estimation. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 47:15–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jabari SE, Zheng J, Liu HX (2014) A probabilistic stationary speed-density relation based on Newell’s simplified car-following model. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 68:205–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kullback S, Leibler RA (1951) On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Statist. 22(1):79–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lam WH, Shao H, Sumalee A (2008) Modeling impacts of adverse weather conditions on a road network with uncertainties in demand and supply. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 42(10):890–910.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larson RC, Odoni AR (1981) Urban Operations Research (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Laval JA, Castrillón F (2015) Stochastic approximations for the macroscopic fundamental diagram of urban networks. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 81:904–916.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laval JA, Chilukuri BR (2014) The distribution of congestion on a class of stochastic kinematic wave models. Transportation Sci. 48(2):217–224.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lighthill M, Whitham J (1955) On kinematic waves. II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 229(1178):317–345.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MATLAB (2016) Optimization Toolbox: User’s Guide (R2016a) (MathWorks, Natick, MA).Google Scholar
  • Morse PM (1958) Queues, Inventories and Maintenance: The Analysis of Operational Systems with Variable Demand and Supply (John Wiley & Sons, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newell G (1993) A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, part I: General theory. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 27(4):281–287.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osorio C (2010) Mitigating network congestion: Analytical models, optimization methods and their applications. Doctoral thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  • Osorio C, Chong L (2015) A computationally efficient simulation-based optimization algorithm for large-scale urban transportation problems. Transportation Sci. 49(3):623–636.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Osorio C, Flötteröd G (2015) Capturing dependency among link boundaries in a stochastic dynamic network loading model. Transportation Sci. 49(2):420–431.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Osorio C, Wang C (2017) On the analytical approximation of joint aggregate queue-length distributions for traffic networks: A stationary finite capacity Markovian network approach. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 95:305–339.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osorio C, Yamani J (2017) Analytical and scalable analysis of transient tandem Markovian finite capacity queueing networks. Transportation Sci. 51(3):823–840.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Osorio C, Flötteröd G, Bierlaire M (2011) Dynamic network loading: A stochastic differentiable model that derives link state distributions. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 45(9):1410–1423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osorio C, Chen X, Gao J, Talas M, Marsico M (2015) On the control of highly congested urban networks with intricate traffic patterns: A New York City case study. Technical report, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. http://web.mit.edu/osorioc/www/papers/osoChenNYCDOTOfflineSO.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Reibman A (1991) A splitting technique for Markov chain transient solution. Stewart WJ, ed. Numerical Solution of Markov Chains (Marcel Dekker, New York), 373–400.Google Scholar
  • Richards PI (1956) Shock waves on highways. Oper. Res. 4(1):42–51.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stafford R (2006) Random vectors with fixed sum. Accessed June 1,2015. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/9700.Google Scholar
  • Sumalee A, Zhong RX, Pan TL, Szeto WY (2011) Stochastic cell transmission model (SCTM): A stochastic dynamic traffic model for traffic state surveillance and assignment. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 45(3):507–533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trafficware (2011) Synchro Studio 8 User Guide (Trafficware, Sugar Land, TX).Google Scholar
  • Transport for London (2010) Traffic modelling guidelines: TfL traffic manager and network performance best practice, version 3.0. Technical report, Transport for London, London.Google Scholar
  • Transport Simulation Systems (2014) AIMSUN 8.1 Microsimulator User’s Manual (Transport Simulation Systems, Barcelona).Google Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Transportation (2008) Transportation vision for 2030. Technical report, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Yperman I, Tampere C, Immers B (2007) A kinematic wave dynamic network loading model including intersection delays. Transportation Res. Board Annual Meeting, Washington DC.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.