New Formulations of the Stochastic User Equilibrium with Logit Route Choice as an Extension of the Deterministic Model

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2018.0839

References

  • Beckmann M, McGuire C, Winston C (1956) Studies in the Economics of Transportation (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Bekhor S, Prashker JN (2001) Stochastic user equilibrium formulation for generalized nested logit model. Transportation Res. Record 1752:84–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bekhor S, Toledo T (2005) Investigating path-based solution algorithms to the stochastic user equilibrium problem. Transportation Res. Part B 39:279–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bekhor S, Chorus C, Toledo T (2012) Stochastic user equilibrium for route choice model based on random regret minimization. Transportation Res. Record 2284:100–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bekhor S, Toledo T, Reznikova L (2008) A path-based algorithm for the cross-nested logit stochastic user equilibrium traffic assignment. Comput.-Aided Civil Infrastructure Engrg. 24:15–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell MGH (1995) Alternatives to Dial’s logit assignment algorithm. Transportation Res. Part B 29:287–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell MGH, Iida Y (1997) Transport Network Analysis (Wiley, West Sussex, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bellei G, Gentile G, Papola N (2002) Network pricing optimization in multiuser and multimodal context with elastic demand. Transportation Res. Part B 36:779–798.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bellei G, Gentile G, Papola N (2005) A within-day dynamic traffic assignment model for urban road networks. Transportation Res. Part B 39:1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Akiva ME, Bierlaire M (1999) Discrete choice methods and their applications to short term travel decisions. Hall RW, ed. Handbook of Transportation Science, Internat. Series Oper. Res. Management Sci., Vol. 23 (Springer, Boston), 5–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsekas DP, Gafni EM (1982) Projection methods for variational inequalities with application to the traffic assignment problem. Math. Programming Stud. 17:139–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cantarella GE (1997) A general fixed-point approach to multimode multiuser equilibrium assignment with elastic demand. Transportation Sci. 31(2):107–128.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cascetta E, Nuzzolo A, Russo F, Vitetta A (1996) A modified logit route choice model overcoming path overlapping problems: Specification and some calibration results for interurban networks. Proc. 13th Internat. Sympos. Transportation Traffic Theory, 697–711.Google Scholar
  • Chen M, Alfa AS (1991) Algorithms for solving Fisk’s stochastic traffic assignment model. Transportation Res. Part B 25:405–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dafermos S (1980) Traffic equilibrium and variational inequalities. Transportation Sci. 14(1):42–54.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo CF (1983) Stochastic network equilibrium with multiple vehicle types and asymmetric, indefinite link cost Jacobians. Transportation Sci. 17(3):282–300.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo CF, Sheffi Y (1977) On stochastic models of traffic assignment. Transportation Sci. 11(3):253–274.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Damberg O, Lundgren JT, Patriksson M (1996) An algorithm for the stochastic user equilibrium problem. Transportation Res. Part B 30:115–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dial RB (1971) A probabilistic multipath traffic assignment model which obviates path enumeration. Transportation Res. 5:83–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dial RB (2006) A path-based user-equilibrium traffic assignment algorithm that obviates path storage and enumeration. Transportation Res. Part B 40:917–936.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisk C (1980) Some developments in equilibrium traffic assignment methodology. Transportation Res. Part B 14:243–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabow HN, Tarjan RE (1983) A linear-time algorithm for a special case of disjoint set union. Proc. 15th ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (ACM, New York), 246–251.Google Scholar
  • Gentile G (2014) Local user cost equilibrium: A bush-based algorithm for traffic assignment. Transportmetrica A 10:15–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gentile G (2016) Solving a dynamic user equilibrium model based on splitting rates with gradient projection algorithms. Transportation Res. Part B 92:120–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gentile G, Papola A (2006) An alternative approach to route choice simulation: The sequential models. Proc. Eur. Transport Conf., Strasbourg, France.Google Scholar
  • Gentile G, Meschini L, Papola N (2007) Spillback congestion in dynamic traffic assignment: A macroscopic flow model with time-varying bottlenecks. Transportation Res. Part B 41:1114–1138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gentile G, Velonà P, Cantarella GE (2014) Uniqueness of stochastic user equilibrium with asymmetric volume-delay functions for merging and diversion. Eur. J. Transportation Logist. 3(3–4):309–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leurent FM (1997) Curbing the computational difficulty of the logit equilibrium assignment model. Transportation Res. Part B 31:315–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leurent FM (2005) Contributions to the logit assignment model. Transportation Res. Record 1493:207–212.Google Scholar
  • Maher M (1998) Algorithms for logit-based stochastic user equilibrium assignment. Transportation Res. Part B 32:539–549.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nakayama S (2013) Q-generalized logit route choice and network equilibrium model. Procedia Soc. Behavioral Sci. 80:753–763.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Patriksson M (2015) The Traffic Assignment Problem: Models and Methods (Dover Publications, New York).Google Scholar
  • Powell WB, Sheffi Y (1982) The convergence of equilibrium algorithms with predetermined step sizes. Transportation Sci. 16(1):45–55.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rasmussen TK, Watling DP, Prato CG, Nielsen OA (2015) Stochastic user equilibrium with equilibrated choice sets: Part II—Solving the restricted SUE for the logit family. Transportation Res. Part B 77:146–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russo F, Vitetta A (2003) An assignment model with modified logit, which obviates enumeration and overlapping problems. Transportation 30:177–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sheffi Y (1985) Urban Transport Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programing Methods (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Smith M (1979) The existence, uniqueness and stability of traffic equilibrium. Transportation Res. Part B 13:295–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wardrop JG (1952) Road paper: Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proc. Institution Civil Engineers 1(3):352–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watling DP, Rasmussen TK, Prato CG, Nielsen OA (2015) Stochastic user equilibrium with equilibrated choice sets: Part I—Model formulations under alternative distributions and restrictions. Transportation Res. Part B 77:166–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou Z, Chen A, Bekhor S (2012) C-logit stochastic user equilibrium model: Formulations and solution algorithm. Transportmetrica 8:17–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.