A Bilevel Model for Network Design and Pricing Based on a Level-of-Service Assessment

References

• Andersen J, Crainic TG, Christiansen M (2009) Service network design with asset management: Formulations and comparative analyses. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 17(2):197–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumol WJ, Vinod HD (1970) An inventory theoretic model of freight transport demand. Management Sci. 16(7):413–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva M, Meersman H, Van de Voorde E (2013) Freight Transport Modelling (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, vol. 9 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bierlaire M (2003) Biogeme: A free package for the estimation of discrete choice models. Proc. 3rd Swiss Transportation Res. Conf., Ascona, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• Boland N, Hewitt M, Marshall L, Savelsbergh M (2017) The continuous-time service network design problem. Oper. Res. 65(5):1303–1321.Link, Google Scholar
• Bontekoning YM, Macharis C, Trip JJ (2004) Is a new applied transportation research field emerging?—A review of intermodal rail–truck freight transport literature. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 38(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bracken J, McGill JT (1973) Mathematical programs with optimization problems in the constraints. Oper. Res. 21(1):37–44.Link, Google Scholar
• BRAIN-TRAINS (2014) BRAIN-TRAINS. Accessed May 29, 2019, http://www.brain-trains.be.Google Scholar
• Brotcorne L, Labbé M, Marcotte P, Savard G (2000) A bilevel model and solution algorithm for a freight tariff-setting problem. Transportation Sci. 34(3):289–302.Link, Google Scholar
• Brotcorne L, Labbé M, Marcotte P, Savard G (2001) A bilevel model for toll optimization on a multicommodity transportation network. Transportation Sci. 35(4):345–358.Link, Google Scholar
• Brotcorne L, Labbé M, Marcotte P, Savard G (2008) Joint design and pricing on a network. Oper. Res. 56(5):1104–1115.Link, Google Scholar
• Caris A, Macharis C, Janssens GK (2013) Decision support in intermodal transport: A new research agenda. Comput. Indust. 64(2):105–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carreira J, Santos B, Limbourg S (2012) Inland intermodal freight transport modelling. Eur. Transport Conf. Proc., Glasgow, Scotland.Google Scholar
• Community of European Railway and Infrastructure Companies (2016) Longer trains: Facts & experiences in Europe. Results of the CER working group on longer and heavier trains. Technical report, Community of European Railways, Brussels.Google Scholar
• Crainic T, Ferland J-A, Rousseau J-M (1984) A tactical planning model for rail freight transportation. Transportation Sci. 18(2):165–184.Link, Google Scholar
• Crainic TG (2000) Service network design in freight transportation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 122(2):272–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crevier B, Cordeau J-F, Savard G (2012) Integrated operations planning and revenue management for rail freight transportation. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 46(1):100–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erera A, Hewitt M, Savelsbergh M, Zhang Y (2013) Improved load plan design through integer programming based local search. Transportation Sci. 47(3):412–427.Link, Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011) Roadmap to a single European transport area—Toward a competitive and resource efficient transport system. White paper, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2015) North Sea–Baltic—Work plan of the European coordinator Catherine Trautmann. Regulatory and technical report, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2016a) EU transport in figures. Statistical pocket book 2016. Statistical and technical report, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2016b) Evaluation of regulation (EU) 913/2010 concerning a European rail network for competitive freight. Regulatory and technical report, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2017) RFC North Sea–Baltic corridor information document - Book 1: Generalities timetable 2017. Regulatory and technical report, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
• European Court of Auditors (2016) Rail freight transport in the EU: Still not on the right track. Special report, European Court of Auditors, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency (2007) Size, structure and distribution of transport subsidies in Europe. EEA Technical Report No. 3/2007, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
• Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure (2017) Rail freight masterplan, Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure Rail Freight Masterplan Project Group, Berlin.Google Scholar
• Friedlaender AF, Spady RH (1981) Freight Transport Regulation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Gilbert F, Marcotte P, Savard G (2014) Mixed-logit network pricing. Comput. Optim. Appl. 57(1):105–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert F, Marcotte P, Savard G (2015) A numerical study of the logit network pricing problem. Transportation Sci. 49(3):706–719.Link, Google Scholar
• Infrabel (2016) Document de référence du réseau. Technical report, Infrabel, Brussels.Google Scholar
• Kimes SE (1989) Yield management: A tool for capacity-considered service firms. J. Oper. Management 8(4):348–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreutzberger, E (2003) Impact of innovative technical concepts for load unit exchange on the design of intermodal freight networks. Transportation Res. Record (1820):1–10.Google Scholar
• Kreutzberger E, Macharis C, Vereecken L, Woxenius J (2003) Is intermodal freight transport more environmentally friendly than all-road freight transport? A review. Nectar Conf. Number 7, Umeå, Sweden, 13–15.Google Scholar
• Labbé M, Violin A (2013) Bilevel programming and price setting problems. 4OR 11(1):73–86.Google Scholar
• Labbé M, Marcotte P, Savard G (1998) A bilevel model of taxation and its application to optimal highway pricing. Management Sci. 44(12-part-1):1–30.Google Scholar
• Li L, Tayur S (2005) Medium-term pricing and operations planning in intermodal transportation. Transportation Sci. 39(1):73–86.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu D, Yang H (2015) Joint slot allocation and dynamic pricing of container sea–rail multimodal transportation. J. Traffic Transportation Engrg. 2(3):198–208.Google Scholar
• Marcotte P, Savard G, Schoeb A (2013) A hybrid approach to the solution of a pricing model with continuous demand segmentation. EURO J. Comput. Optim. 1(1–2):117–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mersha AG, Dempe S (2006) Linear bilevel programming with upper level constraints depending on the lower level solution. Appl. Math. Comput. 180(1):247–254.Google Scholar
• Mostert M, Limbourg S (2016) External costs as competitiveness factors for freight transport—A state of the art. Transportation Rev. 36(6):692–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newton S (2009) Deliverable 7. Freight flows final. Worldnet project (Worldnet. worldwide cargo flows) deliverable 7. Funded by the European Community under the Scientific Support to Policies (Framework 6). Accessed May 29, 2019, https://trimis.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/project/documents/20130205_103529_41836_D7_Freight_Flows.pdf.Google Scholar
• Phillips RL (2005) Pricing and Revenue Optimization (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schroten A, Van Essen H, Otten M, Rijkee A, Schreyer C, Gohel N, Herry M, Sedlacek N (2011) External and infrastructure costs of freight transport Paris-Amsterdam corridor. Part 1. Overview of cost, taxes and levies. Technical report, CE Delft, Delft, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Stackelberg Hv (1952) Theory of the Market Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Tawfik C, Limbourg S (2018) Pricing problems in intermodal freight transport: Research overview and prospects. Sustainability 10(9):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Troch F, Vanelslander T, Belboom S, Léonard A, Limbourg S, Merchan Arribas A, Mostert M, Pauwels T, Vidar S, Sys C (2015) Brain trains: Intermodal rail freight transport and hinterland connections a SWOT analysis to assess the Belgian rail practice. Technical report, Department of Transport and Regional Economics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.Google Scholar
• Troch F, Vanelslander T, Belboom S, Léonard A, Limbourg S, Merchan Arribas A, Mostert M, Pauwels T, Vidar S, Sys C (2017) A road map for explorative scenario creation on belgian rail freight transport development. Competition Regulation Network Indust. 18(1–2):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vieira LFM (1992) The value of service in freight transportation. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Bilegan IC, Crainic TG, Artiba A (2016) A revenue management approach for network capacity allocation of an intermodal barge transportation system. Internat. Conf. Computational Logistics (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 243–257.Google Scholar
• Wieberneit N (2008) Service network design for freight transportation: A review. OR Spectrum 30(1):77–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ypsilantis P (2016) The design, planning and execution of sustainable intermodal port-hinterland transport networks. PhD thesis, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Ypsilantis P, Zuidwijk R (2013) Joint design and pricing of intermodal port-hinterland network services: Considering economies of scale and service time constraints. ERIM Report Series Reference No. ERS-2013-011-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management, Erasmus University of Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar