Macroscopic Traffic Dynamics Under Fast-Varying Demand

References

• Arnott R (2013) A bathtub model of downtown traffic congestion. J. Urban Econom. 76(1):110–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buisson C, Ladier C (2009) Exploring the impact of homogeneity of traffic measurements on the existence of macroscopic fundamental diagrams. Transportation Res. Record 2124:127–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daganzo CF (2011) On the macroscopic stability of freeway traffic. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 45:782–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daganzo CF (2007) Urban gridlock: Macroscopic modelling and mitigation approaches. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 41(1):49–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daganzo CF (2005a) A variational formulation of kinematic waves: Basic theory and complex boundary conditions. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 39(2):187–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daganzo CF (2005b) A variational formulation of kinematic waves: Solution methods. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 39(10):934–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daganzo CF, Geroliminis N (2008) An analytical approximation for the macroscopic fundamental diagram of urban traffic. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 42(9):771–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daganzo CF (2003) A Theory of Supply Chains (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dial RB (1971) A probabilistic multipath traffic assignment model which obviates path enumeration. Transportation Res. 5:83–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fosgerau M (2015) Congestion in the bathtub. Econom. Transportation 4(4):241–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friesz TL, Luque J, Tobin RL, Wie BW (1989) Dynamic network traffic assignment considered as a continuous time optimal control problem. Oper. Res. 37(6):893–901.Link, Google Scholar
• Godfrey J (1969) The mechanism of a road network. Traffic Engrg. Control 11(7):323–327.Google Scholar
• Geroliminis N, Sun J (2011) Hysteresis phenomena of a macroscopic fundamental diagram in freeway networks. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 45:966–979.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geroliminis N, Daganzo C (2007) Macroscopic modeling of traffic in cities. Proc. 88th Transportation Res. Board Annual Meeting #07-0413 (Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Geroliminis N, Daganzo CF (2008) Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 42(9):759–770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hajiahmadi M, Knoop V, De Schutter B, Hellendoorn H (2013) Optimal dynamic route guidance: A model predictive approach using the macroscopic fundamental diagram. IEEE 16th Internat. Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1022–1028.Google Scholar
• Herman R, Prigogine I (1979) A two-fluid approach to town traffic. Science 204:148–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knoop VL, Hoogendoorn SP (2014) Network transmission model: A dynamic traffic model at network level. Proc. 93rd Transportation Res. Board Annual Meeting #14-1104 (Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Knoop VL, Hoogendoorn SP (2013) Empirics of a generalized macroscopic fundamental diagram for urban freeways. Transportation Res. Record 2391(1):133–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamotte R, Geroliminis N (2017) The morning commute in urban areas with heterogeneous trip lengths. Transportation Res. Proc. 23:591–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laval JA, Leclercq L, Chiabaut N (2018) Minimal parameter formulations of the dynamic user equilibrium using macroscopic urban models: Freeway vs city streets revisited. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 117:676–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laval JA, Chilukuri BR (2016) Symmetries in the kinematic wave model and a parameter-free representation of traffic flow. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 89:168–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laval JA, Castrillon F (2015) Stochastic approximations for the macroscopic fundamental diagram of urban networks. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 81(3):904–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laval JA, Leclercq L (2013) The Hamilton–Jacobi partial differential equation and the three representations of traffic flow. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 52:17–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leclercq L, Parzani C, Knoop VL, Amourette J, Hoogendoorn SP (2015) Macroscopic traffic dynamics with heterogeneous route patterns. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 55:292–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leclercq L, Geroliminis N (2013) Estimating MFDs in simple networks with route choice. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 57:468–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leclercq L, Laval JA, Chevallier E (2007) The Lagrangian coordinates and what it means for first order traffic flow models. Allsop RE, Bell MGH, Heydecker BG, eds. Proc. Transportation Traffic Theory (ISTT '17) (Elsevier, London), 735–753.Google Scholar
• Lentzakis AF, Ware SI, Su R (2016) Region-based dynamic forecast routing for autonomous vehicles. IEEE 19th Internat. Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 1464–1469.Google Scholar
• Lighthill MJ, Whitham JB (1955) On kinematic waves II: A theory of traffic flow in long crowded roads. Proc. Royal Society London A 229:317–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lopez C, Leclercq L, Krishnakumari P, Chiabaut N, Van Lint H (2017) Revealing the day-to-day regularity of urban congestion patterns with 3D speed maps. Sci. Rep. 7(1):Article No. 14029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahmassani HS, Saberi M, Zockaie A (2013) Urban network gridlock: Theory, characteristics, and dynamics. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 36:480–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahmassani HS, Williams JC, Herman R (1987) Performances of urban traffic networks. Gartner NH, Wilson NHM, eds. Proc. 10th Internat. Sympos. Transportation Traffic Theory (Elsevier, Cambridge, MA), 1–20.Google Scholar
• Mahmassani HS, Williams JC, Herman R (1984) Investigation of network-level traffic flow relationships: Some simulation results. Transportation Res. Record 971:121–130.Google Scholar
• Mariotte G, Leclercq L (2019) Flow exchanges in multi-reservoir systems with spillbacks. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 122(April):327–349.Google Scholar
• Mariotte G, Leclercq L, Laval JA (2017) Macroscopic urban dynamics: Analytical and numerical comparisons of existing models. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 101:268–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazloumian A, Geroliminis N, Helbing D (2010) The spatial variability of vehicle densities as determinant of urban network capacity. Philosophical Trans. Royal Society A 368:4627–4648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merchant DK, Nemhauser GL (1978) A model and an algorithm for the dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transportation Sci. 12(3):183–199.Link, Google Scholar
• Newell GF (2002) A simplified car-following theory: A low-order model. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 36(3):195–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newell GF (1993) A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, part I: general theory; part II: queuing at freeway bottlenecks; part III: multi-destination flows. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 27(4):281–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richards PI (1956) Shockwaves on the highway. Oper. Res. 4:42–51.Link, Google Scholar
• Saberi M, Mahmassani HS (2013) Hysteresis and capacity drop phenomena in freeway networks: Empirical characterization and interpretation. Transportation Res. Record 2391:44–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saberi M, Mahmassani HS (2012) Exploring properties of networkwide flow-density relations in a freeway network. Transportation Res. Record 2315:153–163.Crossref, Google Scholar