Partial Demand Information and Commitment in Dynamic Transportation Procurement

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2019.0966

References

  • Alp O, Erkip NK, Güllü R (2003) Outsourcing logistics: Designing transportation contracts between a manufacturer and a transporter. Transportation Sci. 37(1):23–39.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Angelus A, Özer Ö (2016) Knowledge you can act on: Optimal policies for assembly systems with expediting and advance demand information. Oper. Res. 64(6):1338–1371.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anupindi R, Bassok Y (1999) Supply contracts with quantity commitments and stochastic demand. Tayur S, Ganeshan R, Magazine M, eds. Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management (Springer, Boston), 197–232.Google Scholar
  • Atamtürk A, Hochbaum DS (2001) Capacity acquisition, subcontracting, and lot sizing. Management Sci. 47(8):1081–1100.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Atamtürk A, Küçükyavuz S (2005) Lot sizing with inventory bounds and fixed costs: Polyhedral study and computation. Oper. Res. 53(4):711–730.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bassok Y, Anupindi R (1997) Analysis of supply contracts with total minimum commitment. IIE Trans. 29(5):373–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bassok Y, Anupindi R (2008) Analysis of supply contracts with commitments and flexibility. Naval Res. Logist. 55(5):459–477.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein F, DeCroix GA (2014) Advance demand information in a multiproduct system. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(1):52–65.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boyer KK, Prud’homme AM, Chung W (2009) The last mile challenge: Evaluating the effects of customer density and delivery window patterns. J. Bus. Logist. 30(1):185–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buschkühl L, Sahling F, Helber S, Tempelmeier H (2010) Dynamic capacitated lot-sizing problems: A classification and review of solution approaches. OR Spectrum 32(2):231–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Copil K, Wörbelauer M, Meyr H, Tempelmeier H (2017) Simultaneous lotsizing and scheduling problems: A classification and review of models. OR Spectrum 39(1):1–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferguson ME (2003) When to commit in a serial supply chain with forecast updating. Naval Res. Logist. 50(8):917–936.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferguson ME, DeCroix GA, Zipkin PH (2005) Commitment decisions with partial information updating. Naval Res. Logist. 52(8):780–795.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garrido RA (2007) Procurement of transportation services in spot markets under a double-auction scheme with elastic demand. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 41(9):1067–1078.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldman D (2016) Amazon shares soar on fourth straight profitable quarter. CNN Money (April 28), https://money.cnn.com/2016/04/28/technology/amazon-earnings//.Google Scholar
  • Haksöz Ç, Seshadri S (2007) Supply chain operations in the presence of a spot market: A review with discussion. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 58(11):1412–1429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inderfurth K, Kelle P, Kleber R (2013) Dual sourcing using capacity reservation and spot market: Optimal procurement policy and heuristic parameter determination. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 225(2):298–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karaesmen F (2013) Value of advance demand information in production and inventory systems with shared resources. Smith MJ, Tan B, eds. Handbook of Stochastic Models and Analysis of Manufacturing System Operations (Springer, New York), 139–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karaesmen F, Liberopoulos G, Dallery Y (2004) The value of advance demand information in production/inventory systems. Ann. Oper. Res. 126(1−4):135–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kay MG, Warsing DP (2009) Estimating ltl rates using publicly available empirical data. Internat. J. Logist.: Res. Appl. 12(3):165–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martínez-Costa C, Mas-Machuca M, Benedito E, Corominas A (2014) A review of mathematical programming models for strategic capacity planning in manufacturing. Internat. J. Production Econom. 153:66–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martínez-de Albéniz V, Simchi-Levi D (2005) A portfolio approach to procurement contracts. Production Oper. Management 14(1):90–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Naim MM, Potter AT, Mason RJ, Bateman N (2006) The role of transport flexibility in logistics provision. Internat. J. Logist. Management 17(3):297–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • NRP (2016) 2016 Retail Holiday Planning Playbook (National Retail Federation, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Özkaya E, Keskinocak P, Joseph VR, Weight R (2010) Estimating and benchmarking less-than-truckload market rates. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 46(5):667–682.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Papier F (2016) Supply allocation under sequential advance demand information. Oper. Res. 64(2):341–361.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Prasad A, Stecke KE, Zhao X (2011) Advance selling by a newsvendor retailer. Production Oper. Management 20(1):129–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sargut FZ, Romeijn HE (2007) Capacitated production and subcontracting in a serial supply chain. IIE Trans. 39(11):1031–1043.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shen B, Choi TM, Minner S (2019) A review on supply chain contracting with information considerations: information updating and information asymmetry. Internat. J. Production Res. 57(15–16):4898–4936.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song J, Regan A (2005) Approximation algorithms for the bid construction problem in combinatorial auctions for the procurement of freight transportation contracts. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 39(10):914–933.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • SteadieSeifi M, Dellaert NP, Nuijten W, Van Woensel T, Raoufi R (2014) Multimodal freight transportation planning: A literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 233(1):1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tibben-Lembke RS (2004) N-period contracts with ordering constraints and total minimum commitments: optimal and heuristic solutions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156(2):353–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tjokroamidjojo D, Kutanoglu E, Taylor GD (2006) Quantifying the value of advance load information in truckload trucking. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 42(4):340–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Topan E, Tan T, Van Houtum GJ, Dekker R (2018) Using imperfect advance demand information in lost-sales inventory systems with the option of returning inventory. IISE Trans. 50(3):246–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai MT, Saphores JD, Regan A (2011) Valuation of freight transportation contracts under uncertainty. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 47(6):920–932.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Urban TL (2000) Supply contracts with periodic, stationary commitment. Production Oper. Management 9(4):400–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Viet NQ, Behdani B, Bloemhof J (2018) The value of information in supply chain decisions: A review of the literature and research agenda. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 120(June):68–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang T, Toktay BL (2008) Inventory management with advance demand information and flexible delivery. Management Sci. 54(4):716–732.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wieberneit N (2008) Service network design for freight transportation: A review. OR Spectrum 30(1):77–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zolfagharinia H, Haughton M (2014) The benefit of advance load information for truckload carriers. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 70(October):34–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zolfagharinia H, Haughton M (2016) Effective truckload dispatch decision methods with incomplete advance load information. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 252(1):103–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuidwijk RA, Veenstra AW (2014) The value of information in container transport. Transportation Sci. 49(3):675–685.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.