Evaluating Urban Logistics Schemes Using Agent-based Simulation

References

• Allen J, Browne M, Woodburn A, Leonardi J (2014) A review of urban consolidation centres in the supply chain based on a case study approach. Supply Chain Forum 15(4):100–112.Google Scholar
• Allen J, Bektaş T, Cherrett T, Friday A, McLeod F, Piecyk M, Piotrowska M, Zaltz Austwick M (2017) Enabling a freight traffic controller for collaborative multidrop urban logistics: Practical and theoretical challenges. Transportation Res. Record J. Transportation Res. Board 2609:77–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand N, Van Duin JHR, Tavasszy LA (2016) Framework for modelling multi-stakeholder city logistics domain using the agent based modelling approach. Transportation Res. Procedia 16:4–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand N, Quak HJ, Van Duin JHR, Tavasszy LA (2012) City logistics modeling efforts: Trends and gaps—A review. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 39:101–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldacci R, Mingozzi A, Roberti R, Calvo RW (2013) An exact algorithm for the two-echelon capacitated vehicle routing problem. Oper. Res. 61(2):298–314.Link, Google Scholar
• Bektaş T, Crainic TG, Van Woensel T (2015) From managing urban freight to smart city logistics networks. Technical report CIRRELT 2015-17, CIRRELT, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
• Bektaş T, Demir E, Laporte G (2016) Green vehicle routing. Psaraftis HN, ed. Green Transportation Logistics: The Quest for Win-Win Solutions (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 243–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borsenberger C (2018) Consolidation in urban logistics: What could we learn from past experiences and economy theory? Parcu PL, Brennan TJ, Glass V, eds. New Business and Regulatory Strategies in the Postal Sector (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 79–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Browne M, Sweet M, Woodburn A, Allen J (2005) Urban freight consolidation centres. Technical report, University of Westminster, London.Google Scholar
• Cattaruzza D, Absi N, Feillet D, González-Feliu J (2015) Vehicle routing problems for city logistics. EURO J. Transportation Logist. 6(1):1–29.Google Scholar
• Chen W, Mes MRK, Schutten JMJ, Quint J (2019) A ride-sharing problem with meeting points and return restrictions. Transportation Sci. 53(2):401–426.Link, Google Scholar
• Cheng C, Qi M, Wang X, Zhang Y (2016) Multi-period inventory routing problem under carbon emission regulations. Internat. J. Production Econom. 182:263–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cherrett T, Allen J, McLeod F, Maynard S, Hickford A, Browne M (2012) Understanding urban freight activity: Key issues for freight planning. J. Transportation Geography 24:22–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crainic TG, Ricciardi N, Storchi G (2009) Models for evaluating and planning city logistics systems. Transportation Sci. 43(4):432–454.Link, Google Scholar
• Cuda R, Guastaroba G, Speranza MG (2015) A survey on two-echelon routing problems. Comput. Oper. Res. 55:185–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dablanc L (2011) City distribution, a key element of the urban economy: Guidelines for practitioners. Macharis C, Melo S, eds. City Distribution and Urban Freight Transport: Multiple Perspectives (Edward Elger, Cheltenham, UK), 37–56.Google Scholar
• Dahlberg J (2015) Cooperative transportation planning and cost allocation. Licentiate thesis SE-601 74, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.Google Scholar
• Dellaert N, Dashty Saridarq F, Van Woensel T, Crainic TG (2018) Branch-and-price–based algorithms for the two-echelon vehicle routing problem with time windows. Transportation Sci. 53(2):463–479.Link, Google Scholar
• Donnelly R, Thompson RG, Wigan M (2012) Process validation of urban freight and logistics models. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 39:400–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehmke JF, Campbell AM, Thomas BW (2016) Vehicle routing to minimize time-dependent emissions in urban areas. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 251(2):478–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elbert R, Friedrich C (2018) Simulation-based evaluation of urban consolidation centers considering urban access regulations. Rabe M, Juan AA, Mustafee N, Skoogh A, Jain S, Johansson B, eds. 2018 Winter Simulation Conf. (WSC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 2827–2838.Google Scholar
• Faure L, Burlat P, Marquès G (2016) Evaluate the viability of urban consolidation centre with regards to urban morphology. Transportation Res. Procedia 12:348–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geelen BP, Veelenturf LP, Van Woensel T, Van Heeswijk WJA (2016) City logistics game. Accessed November 4, 2019, https://citylogisticsgame.com.Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Feliu J, Morana J, Grau JMS, Ma TY (2013) Design and scenario assessment for collaborative logistics and freight transport systems. Internat. J. Transport Econom. 40(2):207–240.Google Scholar
• Hafezalkotob A, Makui A (2015) Cooperative maximum-flow problem under uncertainty in logistic networks. Appl. Math. Comput. 250:593–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hemmelmayr VC, Cordeau JF, Crainic TG (2012) An adaptive large neighborhood search heuristic for two-echelon vehicle routing problems arising in city logistics. Comput. Oper. Res. 39(12):3215–3228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kant G, Quak HJ, Peeters R, Van Woensel T (2016) Urban freight transportation: Challenges, failures and successes. Zijm WHM, Klumpp M, Clausen U, Ten Hompel M, eds. Logistics and Supply Chain Innovation (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 127–139.Google Scholar
• Kim G, Ong YS, Heng CK, Tan PS, Zhang NA (2015) City vehicle routing problem (city VRP): A review. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 16(4):1654–1666.Google Scholar
• Kin B, Verlinde S, van Lier T, Macharis C (2016) Is there life after subsidy for an urban consolidation centre? An investigation of the total costs and benefits of a privately-initiated concept. Transportation Res. Procedia 12:357–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kok AL, Hans EW, Schutten JMJ, Zijm WHM (2010) A dynamic programming heuristic for vehicle routing with time-dependent travel times and required breaks. Flexible Services Manufacturing J. 22(1–2):83–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lange P, Huber S (2015) Backcasting in freight transport demand modelling—chances and challenges. Technical report, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Cologne, Germany.Google Scholar
• Macharis C (2007) Multi-criteria analysis as a tool to include stakeholders in project evaluation: The MAMCA method. Haezendonck E, ed. Transport Project Evaluation: Extending the Social Cost–Benefit Approach (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 115–131.Google Scholar
• Macharis C, Turcksin L, Lebeau K (2012) Multi actor multi criteria analysis (MAMCA) as a tool to support sustainable decisions: State of use. Decision Support Systems 54(1):610–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcucci E, Le Pira M, Gatta V, Inturri G, Ignaccolo M, Pluchino A (2017) Simulating participatory urban freight transport policy-making: Accounting for heterogeneous stakeholders’ preferences and interaction effects. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 103:69–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MDS Transmodal Limited (2012) DG MOVE European Commission: Study on urban freight transport. Technical report, MDS Transmodal Limited, Chester, UK.Google Scholar
• Morana J, Gonzalez-Feliu J, Semet F (2014) Urban consolidation and logistics pooling. Gonzalez-Feliu J, Semet F, Routhier J-L, eds. Sustainable Urban Logistics: Concepts, Methods and Information Systems (Springer, Berlin), 187–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muñuzuri J, Cortés P, Guadix J, Onieva L (2012) City logistics in Spain: Why it might never work. Cities 29(2):133–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nordtømme ME, Bjerkan KY, Sund AB (2015) Barriers to urban freight policy implementation: The case of urban consolidation center in Oslo. Transportation Policy 44:179–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ploos Van Amstel W (2015) City logistics: Working on livable cities through sustainable city logistics. Technical report, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
• Quak HJ (2011) Urban freight transport: The challenge of sustainability. Macharis C, Melo S, eds. City Distribution and Urban Freight Transport: Multiple Perspectives (Edward Elger, Cheltenham, UK), 37–56.Google Scholar
• Quak HJ (2012) Improving urban freight transport sustainability by carriers–best practices from the Netherlands and the EU project citylog. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 39:158–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quak HJ, van Duin RJH, Hendriks B (2019) Running an urban consolidation centre: Binnenstadservice 10 years back and forth. Taniguchi E, Thompson RG, eds. 11th Internat. Conf. City Logist. (Institute for City Logistics, Kyoto, Japan), 125–133.Google Scholar
• Reyes PM (2005) Logistics networks: A game theory application for solving the transshipment problem. Appl. Math. Comput. 168(2):1419–1431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roca-Riu M, Estrada M (2012) An evaluation of urban consolidation centers through logistics systems analysis in circumstances where companies have equal market shares. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 39:796–806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sampaio A, Savelsbergh M, Veelenturf L, Van Woensel T (2019) Crowd-based city logistics. Faulin J, Grasman SE, Juan AA, Hirsch P, eds. Sustainable Transportation and Smart Logistics: Decision-making Models and Solutions (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 381–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savelsbergh M, Van Woensel T (2016) 50th Anniversary invited article—city logistics: Challenges and opportunities. Transportation Sci. 50(2):579–590.Link, Google Scholar
• Stathopoulos A, Valeri E, Marcucci E (2012) Stakeholder reactions to urban freight policy innovation. J. Transportation Geography 22:34–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suzuki Y (2011) A new truck-routing approach for reducing fuel consumption and pollutants emission. Transportation Res. Part D: Transportation Environ. 16(1):73–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tamagawa D, Taniguchi E, Yamada T (2010) Evaluating city logistics measures using a multi-agent model. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2(3):6002–6012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taniguchi E, Thompson RG, Yamada T (2014) Concepts and visions for urban transport and logistics relating to human security. Taniguchi E, Fwa TF, Thompson RG, eds. Urban Transportation and Logistics: Health, Safety, and Security Concerns (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL), 1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taniguchi E, Yamada T, Okamoto M (2007) Multi-agent modelling for evaluating dynamic vehicle routing and scheduling systems. J. Eastern Asia Soc. Transportation Stud. 7:933–948.Google Scholar
• Teo JSE, Taniguchi E, Qureshi AG (2014) Evaluation of load factor control and urban freight road pricing joint schemes with multi-agent systems learning models. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 125:62–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Der Putten S, Robu V, La Poutré H, Jorritsma A, Gal M (2006) Automating supply chain negotiations using autonomous agents: A case study in transportation logistics. Nakashima H, Wellman M, eds. 6th Internat. Joint Conf. Autonomous Agents Multiagent Systems (ACM, New York), 1506–1513.Google Scholar
• Van Duin JHR, Quak HJ, Muñuzuri J (2010) New challenges for urban consolidation centres: A case study in The Hague. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2(3):6177–6188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Duin JHR, Van Dam T, Wiegmans B, Tavasszy LA (2016) Understanding financial viability of urban consolidation centres: Regent street (London), Bristol/Bath & Nijmegen. Transportation Res. Procedia 16:61–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Duin JHR, Van Kolck A, Anand N, Taniguchi E (2012) Toward an agent-based modelling approach for the evaluation of dynamic usage of urban distribution centres. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 39:333–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Heeswijk WJA (2017) Consolidation and coordination in urban freight logistics. PhD thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Van Heeswijk WJA, Larsen R, Larsen A (2019) An urban consolidation center in the city of Copenhagen: A simulation study. Internat. J. Sustainable Transportation 13(9):675–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Heeswijk WJA, Mes MRK, Schutten JMJ (2016) An agent-based simulation framework to evaluate urban logistics schemes. Mes M, Schutten M, eds. Computational Logistics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9855 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 369–383.Google Scholar
• Van Heeswijk WJA, Mes MRK, Schutten JMJ (2019) The delivery dispatching problem with time windows for urban consolidation centers. Transportation Sci. 53(1):203–221.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Rooijen T, Quak HJ (2010) Local impacts of a new urban consolidation centre—The case of Binnenstadservice.nl. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2(3):5967–5979.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Woensel T, Kerbache L, Peremans H, Vandaele N (2008) Vehicle routing with dynamic travel times: A queueing approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 186(3):990–1007.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verlinde S, Macharis C, Witlox F (2012) How to consolidate urban flows of goods without setting up an urban consolidation centre? Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 39:687–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verlinde S, Macharis C, Milan L, Kin B (2014) Does a mobile depot make urban deliveries faster, more sustainable and more economically viable: Results of a pilot test in Brussels. Transportation Res. Procedia 4:361–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ville S, Gonzalez-Feliu J, Dablanc L (2013) The limits of public policy intervention in urban logistics: Lessons from Vicenza (Italy). Eur. Planning Stud. 21(10):1528–1541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wangapisit O, Taniguchi E, Teo JSE, Qureshi AG (2014) Multi-agent systems modelling for evaluating joint delivery systems. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 125:472–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang D, Odani M (2007) An analysis on city freight cooperative transportation system using game theory. J. Eastern Asia Soc. Transportation Stud. 7:989–1001.Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Campbell AM, Ehmke JF (2019) Impact of congestion pricing schemes on costs and emissions of commercial fleets in urban areas. Networks 73(4):466–489.Crossref, Google Scholar