Liner Shipping Service Planning Under Sulfur Emission Regulations

References

• Abadie LM, Goicoechea N, Galarraga I (2017) Adapting the shipping sector to stricter emissions regulations: Fuel switching or installing a scrubber? Transportation Res. Part D: Transportation Environ. 57(December):237–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersson H, Fagerholt K, Hobbesland K (2015) Integrated maritime fleet deployment and speed optimization: Case study from RoRo shipping. Comput. Oper. Res. 55(March):233–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angelus A, Zhu W (2017) Looking upstream: Optimal policies for a class of capacitated multi-stage inventory systems. Production Oper. Management 26(11):2071–2088.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldacci R, Battarra M, Vigo D (2008) Routing a heterogeneous fleet of vehicles. Golden B, Raghavan S, Wasil E, eds. The Vehicle Routing Problem: Latest Advances and New Challenges (Springer, Boston), 3–27.Google Scholar
• Bockmann MW (2020) Dry bulk and containerships lead ‘flood’ of scrubber cancellations. Accessed May 1, 2020, https://lloydslist.maritimeintelligence.informa.com/LL1131688/Dry-bulk-and-containerships-lead-flood-of-scrubber-cancellations.Google Scholar
• Chen H, Solak S (2015) Lower cost arrivals for airlines: Optimal policies for managing runway operations under optimized profile descent. Production Oper. Management 24(3):402–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chong KC, Henderson SG, Lewis ME (2015) The vehicle mix decision in emergency medical service systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(3):347–360.Link, Google Scholar
• Christiansen M, Fagerholt K, Ronen D (2004) Ship routing and scheduling: Status and perspectives. Transportation Sci. 38(1):1–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Christiansen M, Fagerholt K, Nygreen B, Ronen D (2013) Ship routing and scheduling in the new millennium. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 228(3):467–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cordeau JF, Toth P, Vigo D (1998) A survey of optimization models for train routing and scheduling. Transportation Sci. 32(4):380–404.Link, Google Scholar
• Doudnikoff M, Lacoste R (2014) Effect of a speed reduction of containerships in response to higher energy costs in sulphur emission control areas. Transportation Res. Part D: Transportation Environ. 28(May):51–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• European Maritime Safety Agency (2017) Sulphur directive. Accessed June 24, 2017, http://www.emsa.europa.eu/main/air-pollution/sulphur-directive.html.Google Scholar
• Fagerholt K, Psaraftis HN (2015) On two speed optimization problems for ships that sail in and out of emission control areas. Transportation Res. Part D: Transportation Environ. 39(August):56–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fagerholt K, Laporte G, Norstad I (2010) Reducing fuel emissions by optimizing speed on shipping routes. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 61(3):523–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fagerholt K, Gausel NT, Rakke JG, Psaraftis HN (2015) Maritime routing and speed optimization with emission control areas. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Techn. 52(March):57–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fransoo JC, Lee CY (2013) The critical role of ocean container transport in global supply chain performance. Production Oper. Management 22(2):253–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu Y, Wallace SW (2017) Scrubber: A potentially overestimated compliance method for the emission control areas: The importance of involving a ship’s sailing pattern in the evaluation. Transportation Res. Part D: Transportation Environ. 55(August):51–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hand M (2015) Maersk still concerned over non-compliance with 0.1% sulphur ECA. Accessed May 22, 2019, http://www.seatrade-maritime.com/news/europe/maersk-still-concerned-over-non-compliance-with-01-sulphur-eca.html.Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Environmental Protection Department (2017) A guide to the air pollution control regulation. Accessed May 22, 2017, http://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/english/top.html.Google Scholar
• Hvattum LM, Norstad I, Fagerholt K, Laporte G (2013) Analysis of an exact algorithm for the vessel speed optimization problem. Networks 62(2):132–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• IMO (2019) International Maritime Organization. Accessed May 22, 2019, http://www.imo.org/en/Pages/Default.aspx.Google Scholar
• Jiang L, Kronbak J, Christensen LP (2014) The costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: Sulphur scrubbers vs. marine gas oil. Transportation Res. Part D: Transportation Environ. 28(May):19–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee CY, Song DP (2017) Ocean container transport in global supply chains: Overview and research opportunities. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 95(January):442–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee CY, Lee HL, Zhang J (2015) The impact of slow ocean steaming on delivery reliability and fuel consumption. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 76(April):176–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Legros B, Bouchery Y, Fransoo J (2019) A time-based policy for empty container management by consignees. Production Oper. Management 28(6):1503–1527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li C, Qi X, Song D (2016) Real-time schedule recovery in liner shipping service with regular uncertainties and disruption events. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological. 93:762–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lo HK, McCord MR (1998) Adaptive ship routing through stochastic ocean currents: General formulations and empirical results. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 32(7):547–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maersk (2017) Maersk’s ocean segment revenue in FY 2012 and FY 2018. Accessed May 22, 2019, https://www.statista.com/statistics/326014/revenue-of-maersk-line/.Google Scholar
• Mak HY, Rong Y, Shen ZJM (2013) Infrastructure planning for electric vehicles with battery swapping. Management Sci. 59(7):1557–1575.Link, Google Scholar
• Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (2016) Extension and enhancement to the maritime Singapore green initiative. Accessed May 22, 2017, https://www.mpa.gov.sg/web/portal/home/media-centre/news-releases/detail/271360c6-fd43-472e-b122-0d1338d0d97d.Google Scholar
• Meng Q, Wang T (2011) A scenario-based dynamic programming model for multi-period liner ship fleet planning. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 47(4):401–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meng Q, Wang S, Andersson H, Thun K (2014) Containership routing and scheduling in liner shipping: Overview and future research directions. Transportation Sci. 48(2):265–280.Link, Google Scholar
• MI-News-Network (2017) Maersk Triple-E vessels: Why size matters? Accessed July 16, 2019, https://www.marineinsight.com/shipping-news/size-matters/.Google Scholar
• Ng MW (2014) Distribution-free vessel deployment for liner shipping. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 238(3):858--862.Google Scholar
• Nikopoulou Z (2017) Incremental costs for reduction of air pollution from ships: A case study on North European emission control area. Maritime Policy Management 44(8):1056–1077.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norstad I, Fagerholt K, Laporte G (2011) Tramp ship routing and scheduling with speed optimization. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Techn. 19(5):853–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Notteboom TE, Vernimmen B (2009) The effect of high fuel costs on liner service configuration in container shipping. J. Transportation Geography 17(5):325–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oil Price (2020) WTI Crude oil price charts. Accessed May 22, 2020, https://oilprice.com/oil-price-charts/45.Google Scholar
• Papadakis NA, Perakis AN (1990) Deterministic minimal time vessel routing. Oper. Res. 38(3):426–438.Link, Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou DJ, Keha AB, Nemhauser GL, Sokol J (2014) Two-stage decomposition algorithms for single product maritime inventory routing. INFORMS J. Comput. 26(4):825–847.Link, Google Scholar
• Park JH, Kazaz B, Webster S (2018) Surface vs. air shipment of humanitarian goods under demand uncertainty. Production Oper. Management 27(5):928–948.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perakis AN, Papadakis NA (1989) Minimal time vessel routing in a time-dependent environment. Transportation Sci. 23(4):266–276.Link, Google Scholar
• Pisinger D (1995) A minimal algorithm for the multiple-choice knapsack problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 83(2):394–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Psaraftis HN (2019a) Decarbonization of maritime transport: To be or not to be? Maritime Econom. Logist. 21(3):353–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Psaraftis HN (2019b) Speed optimization vs. speed reduction: Are speed limits better than a bunker levy? Maritime Econom. Logist. 21(4):524–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Psaraftis HN, Kontovas CA (2014) Ship speed optimization: Concepts, models and combined speed-routing scenarios. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Techn. 44(July):52–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qi X, Song DP (2012) Minimizing fuel emissions by optimizing vessel schedules in liner shipping with uncertain port times. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 48(4):863–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ronen D (2011) The effect of oil price on containership speed and fleet size. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 62(1):211–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seatrade-ShipTech-Middle-East (2019) Triple-E class container ships. Accessed July 16, 2019, https://www.ship-technology.com/projects/triple-e-class/.Google Scholar
• Ship and Bunker (2020) World bunker prices. Accessed May 2, 2020, https://shipandbunker.com/prices.Google Scholar
• UNCTAD (2018) Review of maritime transportation 2018, Presentation, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Accessed May 22, 2019, https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/rmt2018_en.pdf.Google Scholar
• UNCTAD (2019) Review of maritime transportation 2019, Presentation, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Accessed May 2, 2020, https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/rmt2019_en.pdf.Google Scholar
• Wang S (2016) Fundamental properties and pseudo-polynomial-time algorithm for network containership sailing speed optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250(1):46–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang S, Meng Q (2012) Sailing speed optimization for container ships in a liner shipping network. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 48(3):701–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang S, Wang X (2016) A polynomial-time algorithm for sailing speed optimization with containership resource sharing. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 93(November):394–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zis T, Psaraftis HN (2019) Operational measures to mitigate and reverse the potential modal shifts due to environmental legislation. Maritime Policy Management 46(1):117–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zis T, Angeloudis P, Bell MGH, Psaraftis HN (2016) Payback period for emissions abatement alternatives: Role of regulation and fuel prices. Transportation Res. Record J. Transportation Res. Board 2549:37–44.Crossref, Google Scholar