Impacts of Metering-Based Dynamic Priority Schemes

References

• Agatz N, Erera A, Savelsbergh M, Wang X (2012) Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223(2):295–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akamatsu T, Wada K, Iryo T, Hayashi S (2018) Departure time choice equilibrium and optimal transport problems. Working paper, Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University. https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/90361.html.Google Scholar
• Arnott R, de Palma A, Lindsey R (1988) Schedule delay and departure time decisions with heterogeneous commuters. Transportation Res. Rec. (1197):56–67.Google Scholar
• Arnott R, de Palma A, Lindsey R (1993) A structural model of peak-period congestion: A traffic bottleneck with elastic demand. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(1):161–179.Google Scholar
• Chen C, Varaiya P, Kwon J (2005) An empirical assessment of traffic operations. Proc. 16th Internat. Sympos. Transportation Traffic Theory (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 105–124.Google Scholar
• Daganzo CF (1985) The uniqueness of a time-dependent equilibrium distribution of arrivals at a single bottleneck. Transportation Sci. 19(1):29–37.Link, Google Scholar
• Daganzo CF, Garcia RC (2000) A Pareto improving strategy for the time-dependent morning commute problem. Transportation Sci. 34(3):303–311.Link, Google Scholar
• Daganzo CF, Lehe LJ (2015) Distance-dependent congestion pricing for downtown zones. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 75(0):89–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Palma A, Ben-Akiva M, Lefevre C, Litinas N (1983) Stochastic equilibrium model of peak period traffic congestion. Transportation Sci. 17(4):430–453.Link, Google Scholar
• de Palma A, Proost S, Seshadri R, Ben-Akiva M (2018) Congestion tolling - dollars vs. tokens: A comparative analysis. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 108:261–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (2017) National household travel survey (NHTS). Accessed August 2019, http://nhts.ornl.gov.Google Scholar
• Fosgerau M (2011) How a fast lane may replace a congestion toll. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 45(6):845–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galichon A (2016) Optimal Transport Methods in Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geroliminis N, Srivastava A, Michalopoulos P (2011) A dynamic-zone-based coordinated ramp-metering algorithm with queue constraints for Minnesota’s freeways. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 12(4):1576–1586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant-Muller S, Xu M (2014) The role of tradable credit schemes in road traffic congestion management. Transportation Rev. 34(2):128–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guler SI, Menendez M (2014) Analytical formulation and empirical evaluation of pre-signals for bus priority. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 64:41–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iryo T, Yoshii T (2007) Equivalent optimization problem for finding equilibrium in the bottleneck model with departure time choices. 4th IMA Internat. Conf. Math. Transportation (Elsevier, Oxford, UK), 231–244.Google Scholar
• Knockaert J, Verhoef ET, Rouwendal J (2016) Bottleneck congestion: Differentiating the coarse charge. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 83:59–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konishi H, Mun S (2010) Carpooling and congestion pricing: HOV and hot lanes. Reg. Sci. Urban Econom. 40(4):173–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lago A, Daganzo CF (2007) Spillovers, merging traffic and the morning commute. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 41(6):670–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamotte R, de Palma A, Geroliminis N (2017) On the use of reservation-based autonomous vehicles for demand management. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 99:205–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindsey R (2004) Existence, uniqueness, and trip cost function properties of user equilibrium in the bottleneck model with multiple user classes. Transportation Sci. 38(3):293–314.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Li Y (2017) Pricing scheme design of ridesharing program in morning commute problem. Transportation Res., Part C Emerg. Tech. 79:156–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma R, Zhang H (2017) The morning commute problem with ridesharing and dynamic parking charges. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 106:345–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monchambert G (2020) Why do (or don’t) people carpool for long distance trips? A discrete choice experiment in France. Transportation Res. Part A Policy Practice 132:911–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papamichail I, Kotsialos A, Margonis I, Papageorgiou M (2010) Coordinated ramp metering for freeway networks: A model-predictive hierarchical control approach. Transportation Res., Part C Emerg. Tech. 18(3):311–331.Google Scholar
• Picard N, Dantan S, de Palma A (2018) Mobility decisions within couples. Theory Decision 84(2):149–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qian Z, Zhang M (2011) Modeling multi-modal morning commute in a one-to-one corridor network. Transportation Res., Part C Emerg. Tech. 19(2):254–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramezani M, Haddad J, Geroliminis N (2015) Dynamics of heterogeneity in urban networks: aggregated traffic modeling and hierarchical control. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 74:1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers CA (1985) Effects of ramp metering with HOV bypass lanes on vehicle occupancy. Transportation Res. Rec. (1021):10–15.Google Scholar
• Shen W, Zhang H (2010) Pareto-improving ramp metering strategies for reducing congestion in the morning commute. Transportation Res. Part A Policy Practice 44(9):676–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small KA (1983) Bus priority and congestion pricing on urban expressways. Res. Transportation Econom. 1:1.Google Scholar
• Small KA, Winston C, Yan J (2006) Differentiated road pricing, express lanes, and carpools: Exploiting heterogeneous preferences in policy design. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 53–96.Google Scholar
• Smith MJ (1984) The existence of a time-dependent equilibrium distribution of arrivals at a single bottleneck. Transportation Sci. 18(4):385–394.Link, Google Scholar
• van den Berg V, Verhoef ET (2011) Winning or losing from dynamic bottleneck congestion pricing? The distributional effects of road pricing with heterogeneity in values of time and schedule delay. J. Public Econom. 95(7–8):983–992.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vickrey WS (1969) Congestion theory and transport investment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 59(2):251–260.Google Scholar
• Villani C (2008) Optimal Transport: Old and New. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 338 (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Wang X, Yang H, Zhu D (2018) Driver-rider cost-sharing strategies and equilibria in a ridesharing program. Transportation Sci. 52(4):868–881.Link, Google Scholar
• Wu J, Hounsell N (1998) Bus priority using pre-signals. Transportation Res. Part A Policy Practice 32(8):563–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu Xy, Liu J, Li Hy, Hu JQ (2014) Analysis of subway station capacity with the use of queueing theory. Transportation Res., Part C Emerg. Tech. 38:28–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu X, van den Berg VA, Verhoef ET (2019) Carpooling with heterogeneous users in the bottleneck model. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 127:178–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhong L, Zhang K, (Marco) Nie Y, Xu J (2020) Dynamic carpool in morning commute: Role of high-occupancy-vehicle (HOV) and high-occupancy-toll (HOT) lanes. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 135:98–119.Crossref, Google Scholar