From Corridor to Network Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams: A Semi-Analytical Approximation Approach

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2022.0402

References

  • Aghamohammadi R, Laval JA (2022) Parameter estimation of the macroscopic fundamental diagram: A maximum likelihood approach. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Tech. 140:103678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ambühl L, Loder A, Leclercq L, Menendez M (2021) Disentangling the city traffic rhythms: A longitudinal analysis of mfd patterns over a year. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Tech. 126:103065.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ambühl L, Loder A, Bliemer MC, Menendez M, Axhausen KW (2020) A functional form with a physical meaning for the macroscopic fundamental diagram. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 137:119–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barmpounakis E, Geroliminis N (2020) On the new era of urban traffic monitoring with massive drone data: The pneuma large-scale field experiment. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Tech. 111:50–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Batista SF, Tilg G, Menéndez M (2022a) Exploring the potential of aggregated traffic models for estimating network-wide emissions. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 109:103354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Batista SF, Cantelmo G, Menéndez M, Antoniou C (2022b) A gaussian sampling heuristic estimation model for developing synthetic trip sets. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 37(1):93–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chiabaut N (2015) Evaluation of a multimodal urban arterial: The passenger macroscopic fundamental diagram. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 81:410–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Courant R, Friedrichs K, Lewy H (1928) Über die partiellen differenzengleichungen der mathematischen physik. Math. Ann. 100(1):32–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo CF (1994) The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 28(4):269–287.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo CF (1995) The cell transmission model, part ii: Network traffic. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 29(2):79–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo CF (2005a) A variational formulation of kinematic waves: Basic theory and complex boundary conditions. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 39(2):187–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo CF (2005b) A variational formulation of kinematic waves: Solution methods. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 39(10):934–950.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo CF (2007) Urban gridlock: Macroscopic modeling and mitigation approaches. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 41(1):49–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo CF (2014) Singularities in kinematic wave theory: Solution properties, extended methods and duality revisited. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 69:50–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo CF, Geroliminis N (2008) An analytical approximation for the macroscopic fundamental diagram of urban traffic. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological (42):771–781.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo CF, Knoop VL (2016) Traffic flow on pedestrianized streets. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 86:211–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo CF, Lehe LJ (2016) Traffic flow on signalized streets. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 90:56–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo CF, Gayah VV, Gonzales EJ (2011) Macroscopic relations of urban traffic variables: Bifurcations, multivaluedness and instability. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 45(1):278–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dakic I, Ambühl L, Schümperlin O, Menendez M (2020) On the modeling of passenger mobility for stochastic bi-modal urban corridors. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 113(November 2018):146–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edie L (1963) Discussion of traffic stream measurements and definitions. Almond J, ed., Proc. 2nd Internat. Sympos. Theory Traffic Flow (OECD, Paris, France), 139–154.Google Scholar
  • Gan QJ, Jin WL, Gayah VV (2017) Analysis of traffic statics and dynamics in signalized networks: A poincaré map approach. Transportation Sci. 51(3):1009–1029.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Geroliminis N, Boyaci B (2012) The effect of variability of urban systems characteristics in the network capacity. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 46(10):1607–1623.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geroliminis N, Daganzo CF (2008) Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 42(9):759–770.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geroliminis N, Sun J (2011) Properties of a well-defined macroscopic fundamental diagram for urban traffic. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 45(3):605–617.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geroliminis N, Haddad J, Ramezani M (2012) Optimal perimeter control for two urban regions with macroscopic fundamental diagrams: A model predictive approach. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 14(1):348–359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geroliminis N, Zheng N, Ampountolas K (2014) A three-dimensional macroscopic fundamental diagram for mixed bi-modal urban networks. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 42:168–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Girault JT, Gayah VV, Guler I, Menendez M (2016) Exploratory analysis of signal coordination impacts on macroscopic fundamental diagram. Transportation Res. Record J. Transportation Res. Board 2560(2560):36–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ji Y, Geroliminis N (2012) On the spatial partitioning of urban transportation networks. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 46(10):1639–1656.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jin WL, Gan QJ, Gayah VV (2013) A kinematic wave approach to traffic statics and dynamics in a double-ring network. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 57:114–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johari M, Keyvan-Ekbatani M, Leclercq L, Ngoduy D, Mahmassani HS (2021) Macroscopic network-level traffic models: Bridging fifty years of development toward the next era. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Tech. 131(June):103334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knoop VL, Van Lint H, Hoogendoorn SP (2015) Traffic dynamics: Its impact on the macroscopic fundamental diagram. Phys. A. 438:236–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laval JA, Castrillón F (2015) Stochastic approximations for the macroscopic fundamental diagram of urban networks. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 81:904–916.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leclercq L, Geroliminis N (2013) Estimating mfds in simple networks with route choice. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 57:468–484.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leclercq L, Paipuri M (2019) Macroscopic traffic dynamics under fast-varying demand. Transportation Sci. 53(6):1526–1545.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leclercq L, Parzani C, Knoop VL, Amourette J, Hoogendoorn SP (2015) Macroscopic traffic dynamics with heterogeneous route patterns. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Tech. 59:292–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loder A, Ambühl L, Menendez M, Axhausen KW (2019) Understanding traffic capacity of urban networks. Sci. Rep. 9. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-51539-5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahmassani HS, Saberi M, Zockaie A (2013) Urban network gridlock: Theory, characteristics, and dynamics. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Tech. 36:480–497.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazloumian A, Geroliminis N, Helbing D (2010) The spatial variability of vehicle densities as determinant of urban network capacity. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A. 368:4627–4647.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moskowitz K (1965) Discussion of ‘freeway level of service as influenced by volume and capacity characteristics’ by D. R. Drew and C. J. Keese. Highw. Res. Rec. 99:43–44.Google Scholar
  • Newell GF (1993) A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, part i: General theory, part ii: Queueing at freeway bottlenecks, part iii: Multi-destination flows. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 27(4):281–313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tilg G, Amini S, Busch F (2020) Evaluation of analytical approximation methods for the macroscopic fundamental diagram. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Tech. 114:1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tilg G, Ambühl L, Batista SF, Menendez M, Busch F (2021) On the application of variational theory to urban networks. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 150:435–456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu G, Yu Z, Gayah VV (2020) Analytical method to approximate the impact of turning on the macroscopic fundamental diagram. Transp. Res. Rec. 2674(9):933–947.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang K, Zheng N, Menendez M (2018) Multi-scale perimeter control approach in a connected-vehicle environment. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 94:32–49, iSTTT22.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.