Supplier Menus for Dynamic Matching in Peer-to-Peer Transportation Platforms
Published Online:22 Mar 2022https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2022.1133
References
- (2012) Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223(2):295–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) The vehicle routing problem with occasional drivers. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 254(2):472–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Crowdsourced delivery—A dynamic pickup and delivery problem with ad hoc drivers. Transportation Sci. 53(1):222–235.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Ride acceptance behaviour of ride-sourcing drivers. Preprint, submitted July 16, https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.07864.Google Scholar
- (2020) Understanding ride-sourcing drivers’ behaviour and preferences: Insights from focus groups analysis. Res. Transportation Bus. Management 37:100516.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) The concept and impact analysis of a flexible mobility on demand system. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 56:373–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Scenario-based planning for partially dynamic vehicle routing with stochastic customers. Oper. Res. 52(6):977–987.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Collaborative urban transportation: Recent advances in theory and practice. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 273(3):801–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Crowdshipping and same-day delivery: Employing in-store customers to deliver online orders. Production Oper. Management 29(9):2153–2174.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Optimization of dynamic ridesharing systems. Transp. Res. Record 2359(1):44–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) To bid or not to bid: An empirical study of the supply determinants of crowd-shipping. Transportation Res. Part A Policy Practice 116:468–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Ridesharing: The state-of-the-art and future directions. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 57:28–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Optimizing driver menus under stochastic selection behavior for ridesharing and crowdsourced delivery. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 153:102419.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Ride solo or pool: Designing price-service menus for a ride-sharing platform. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 295(3):1008–1024.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Design and modeling of a crowdsource-enabled system for urban parcel relay and delivery. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 99:62–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Dynamic ride-hailing with electric vehicles. Transportation Sci., ePub ahead of print July 29, https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2021.1042. Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Discrete choice experiments: A guide to model specification, estimation and software. PharmacoEconom. 35:697–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Supply, demand, operations, and management of crowd-shipping services: A review and empirical evidence. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 103:83–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Dynamic ridesharing: Is there a role for dedicated drivers? Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 81:483–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Path-based dynamic pricing for vehicle allocation in ridesharing systems with fully compliant drivers. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 132:60–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) The share-a-ride problem: People and parcels sharing taxis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 238(1):31–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Pricing scheme design of ridesharing program in morning commute problem. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 79:156–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) A framework to integrate mode choice in the design of mobility-on-demand systems. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 105:648–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Bundle generation for last-mile delivery with occasional drivers. Omega 108:102582.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) When is it beneficial to provide freelance suppliers with choice? A hierarchical approach for peer-to-peer logistics platforms. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 126:1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) A survey of models and algorithms for optimizing shared mobility. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 123:323–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Ride-sourcing modeling and pricing in non-equilibrium two-sided markets. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 132:340–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Agent based model for dynamic ridesharing. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 64:117–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Dynamic matching for real-time ride sharing. Stochastic Systems 10(1):29–70.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) A partition-based match making algorithm for dynamic ridesharing. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 16(5):2587–2598.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) On the value of optimal myopic solutions for dynamic routing and scheduling problems in the presence of user noncompliance. Transportation Sci. 34(1):67–85.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Modeling the acceptability of crowdsourced goods deliveries: Role of context and experience effects. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 105:18–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Ride-hailing order dispatching at DiDi via reinforcement learning. INFORMS J. Appl. Analytics 50(5):272–286.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Crowd logistics: An opportunity for more sustainable urban freight transport? Eur. Transportation Res. Rev. 9(3):39.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The meal delivery routing problem. Preprint, submitted April 10, http://www.optimization-online.org/DB_HTML/2018/04/6571.html.Google Scholar
- (2016) Co-utile P2P ridesharing via decentralization and reputation management. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 73:147–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Building trust in home services-stochastic team-orienteering with consistency constraints. Transportation Sci. 54(3):823–838.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Matching drivers and transportation requests in crowdsourced delivery systems. Proc. 23rd Americas Conf. Inform. Systems (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 1–10.Google Scholar
- (2020) Frontiers in service science: Ride matching for peer-to-peer ride sharing: A review and future directions. Service Sci. 12(2–3):44–60.Link, Google Scholar
- Uber (2021) How does Uber match riders with drivers? Accessed April 27, https://www.uber.com/us/en/marketplace/matching/.Google Scholar
- (2020) On modeling stochastic dynamic vehicle routing problems. Eur. J. Transportation Logist. 9(2):100008.Crossref, Google Scholar
- U.S. Bureau of Public Roads (1964) Traffic Assignment Manual for Application with a Large, High Speed Computer (U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
- (2019) Simultaneous customer interaction in online booking systems for attended home delivery. Technical Report ERS-2019-011-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
- (2019) Ridesourcing systems: A framework and review. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 129:122–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Stable matching for dynamic ride-sharing systems. Transportation Sci. 52(4):850–867.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) An integrated decomposition and approximate dynamic programming approach for on-demand ride pooling. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 21(9):3811–3820.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Mobility sharing as a preference matching problem. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 20(7):2584–2592.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Preference-aware task assignment in on-demand taxi dispatching: An online stable matching approach. Proc. AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI, Menlo Park, CA), 2245–2252.Google Scholar

