Passenger-Centric Integrated Airline Schedule and Aircraft Recovery

References

• Ahmadbeygi S, Cohn A, Lapp M (2010) Decreasing airline delay propagation by re-allocating scheduled slack. IIE Trans. 42(7):478–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antunes D, Vaze V, Antunes A (2019) A robust pairing model for airline crew scheduling. Transportation Sci. 53(6):1751–1771.Link, Google Scholar
• Arıkan U, Gürel S, Aktürk MS (2017) Flight network-based approach for integrated airline recovery with cruise speed control. Transportation Sci. 51(4):1259–1287.Link, Google Scholar
• Barnhart C, Vaze V (2015) Irregular operations: Schedule recovery and robustness. Belobaba P, Odoni A, Barnhart C, eds. The Global Airline Industry, 2nd ed. (Wiley, West Sussex, UK).Google Scholar
• Bratu S, Barnhart C (2006) Flight operations recovery: New approaches considering passenger recovery. J. Scheduling 9(3):279–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cacchiani V, Salazar-González JJ (2016) Optimal solutions to a real-world integrated airline scheduling problem. Transportation Sci. 51(1):250–268.Link, Google Scholar
• Cadarso L, de Celis R (2017) Integrated airline planning: Robust update of scheduling and fleet balancing under demand uncertainty. Transportation Res., Part C Emerging Tech. 81:227–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cadarso L, Marín Á (2013) Robust passenger-oriented timetable and fleet assignment integration in airline planning. J. Air Transportation Management 26:44–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cadarso L, Marín Á, Maróti G (2013) Recovery of disruptions in rapid transit networks. Transportation Res., Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 53:15–33.Google Scholar
• Cadarso L, Maróti G, Marín Á (2015) Smooth and controlled recovery planning of disruptions in rapid transit networks. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 16(4):2192–2202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cadarso L, Vaze V, Barnhart C, Marín Á (2017) Integrated airline scheduling: Considering competition effects and the entry of the high speed rail. Transportation Sci. 51(1):132–154.Link, Google Scholar
• Chiraphadhanakul V, Barnhart C (2013) Robust flight schedules through slack re-allocation. EURO J. Transportation Logist. 2(4):277–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clausen J, Larsen A, Larsen J, Rezanova NJ (2010) Disruption management in the airline industry—Concepts, models and methods. Comput. Oper. Res. 37(5):809–821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Court of Justice of the European Union (2009) Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of November 19, 2009. Accessed September 19, 2022, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:62007CJ0402&from=EN.Google Scholar
• Delgado L, Prats X (2009) Fuel consumption assessment for speed variation concepts during the cruise phase. Proc. ATM Econom. Conf. Accessed September 19, 2022, https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/download/69a2e722e6960f7b6093396db54962b0ae7d74c9b06c46ac5bbecc32d8752404/446834/Fuel_consumption-ATM_Economic_conference-Paper_Delgado%20%26%20Prats.pdf.Google Scholar
• Department of Transportation, United States (USDOT) (2008) PART 250—Oversales. Accessed September 19, 2022, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2008-title14-vol4/pdf/CFR-2008-title14-vol4-part250.pdf.Google Scholar
• Department of Transportation, United States (USDOT) (2010) PART 259—Enhanced protections for airline passengers. Accessed September 19, 2022, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2010-title14-vol4/pdf/CFR-2010-title14-vol4-part259.pdf.Google Scholar
• Dunbar M, Froyland G, Wu CL (2012) Robust airline schedule planning: Minimizing propagated delay in an integrated routing and crewing framework. Transportation Sci. 46(2):204–216.Link, Google Scholar
• Dunbar M, Froyland G, Wu CL (2014) An integrated scenario-based approach for robust aircraft routing, crew pairing and re-timing. Comput. Oper. Res. 45:68–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2004) Regulation (EC) no 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of February 11, 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancelation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91. Accessed September 19, 2022, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:439cd3a7-fd3c-4da7-8bf4-b0f60600c1d6.0004.02/DOC_1&format=PDF.Google Scholar
• Gao C, Johnson E, Smith B (2009) Integrated airline fleet and crew robust planning. Transportation Sci. 43(1):2–16.Link, Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Song Y, Zhao K, Xu B (2016) Integrated recovery of aircraft and passengers after airline operation disruption based on a GRASP algorithm. Transportation Res., Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 87:97–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• International Air Transport Association (IATA) (1999) Montreal Convention 1999. Accessed September 19, 2022, https://www.iata.org/contentassets/fb1137ff561a4819a2d38f3db7308758/mc99-full-text.pdf.Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Barnhart C (2013) Robust airline schedule design in a dynamic scheduling environment. Comput. Oper. Res. 40(3):831–840.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lan S, Clarke JP, Barnhart C (2006) Planning for robust airline operations: Optimizing aircraft routings and flight departure times to minimize passenger disruptions. Transportation Sci. 40(1):15–28.Link, Google Scholar
• Lettovský L, Johnson EL, Nemhauser GL (2000) Airline crew recovery. Transportation Sci. 34(4):337–348.Link, Google Scholar
• Liang Z, Xiao F, Qian X, Zhou L, Jin X, Lu X, Karichery S (2018) A column generation-based heuristic for aircraft recovery problem with airport capacity constraints and maintenance flexibility. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 113:70–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maher SJ (2015a) Solving the integrated airline recovery problem using column-and-row generation. Transportation Sci. 50(1):216–239.Link, Google Scholar
• Maher SJ (2015b) A novel passenger recovery approach for the integrated airline recovery problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 57:123–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marla L, Vaaben B, Barnhart C (2016) Integrated disruption management and flight planning to trade off delays and fuel burn. Transportation Sci. 51(1):88–111.Link, Google Scholar
• Marla L, Vaze V, Barnhart C (2018) Robust optimization: Lessons learned from aircraft routing. Comput. Oper. Res. 98:165–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen JD, Sölveling G, Clarke JP, Johnson EL, Shebalov S (2012) An optimization approach to airline integrated recovery. Transportation Sci. 46(4):482–500.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenberger JM, Johnson EL, Nemhauser GL (2003) Rerouting aircraft for airline recovery. Transportation Sci. 37(4):408–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Sinclair K, Cordeau JF, Laporte G (2014) Improvements to a large neighborhood search heuristic for an integrated aircraft and passenger recovery problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 233(1):234–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sohoni M, Lee YC, Klabjan D (2011) Robust airline scheduling under block-time uncertainty. Transportation Sci. 45(4):451–464.Link, Google Scholar
• Wei K, Vaze V, Jacquillat A (2020) Airline timetable development and fleet assignment incorporating passenger choice. Transportation Sci. 54(1):139–163.Link, Google Scholar
• Yan C, Kung J (2018) Robust aircraft routing. Transportation Sci. 52(1):118–133.Link, Google Scholar
• Yan C, Barnhart C, Vaze V (2022) Choice-based airline schedule design and fleet assignment: A decomposition approach. Transportation Sci., ePub ahead of print May 17, https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2022.1141.Google Scholar
• Yu G, Argüello M, Song G, McCowan SM, White A (2003) A new era for crew recovery at continental airlines. Interfaces 33(1):5–22.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Lau HH, Yu C (2015) A two-stage heuristic algorithm for the integrated aircraft and crew schedule recovery problems. Comput. Industry Engrg. 87:436–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Yu C, Desai J, Lau HH (2016) A math-heuristic algorithm for the integrated air service recovery. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 84:211–236.Crossref, Google Scholar