The Day-to-Day Departure Time Choice of Heterogeneous Commuters Under an Anonymous Toll Charge for System Optimum

References

• Akamatsu T, Wada K, Iryo T, Hayashi S (2021) A new look at departure time choice equilibrium models with heterogeneous users. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 148:152–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ameli M, Faradonbeh MSS, Lebacque JP, Abouee-Mehrizi H, Leclercq L (2022) Departure time choice models in urban transportation systems based on mean field games. Transportation Sci. 56(6):1483–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Arnott R, Buli J (2018) Solving for equilibrium in the basic bathtub model. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 109:150–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnott R, Kilani M (2022) Social optimum in the basic bathtub model. Transportation Sci. 56(6):1505–1529.Link, Google Scholar
• Arnott R, Kraus M (1998) When are anonymous congestion charges consistent with marginal cost pricing? J. Public Econom. 67(1):45–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnott R, de Palma A, Lindsey R (1990) Economics of a bottleneck. J. Urban Econom. 27(1):111–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cascetta E, Cantarella GE (1991) A day-to-day and within-day dynamic stochastic assignment model. Transportation Res. Part A: General 25(5):277–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daly A, Bar-Gera H (2021) Exploration of maximum-to-minimum shifts in generic methods for departure time choice models. Transportation Res. Record 2675(10):907–915.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniel TE, Gisches EJ, Rapoport A (2009) Departure times in Y-shaped traffic networks with multiple bottlenecks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(5):2149–2176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Facchinei F, Pang JS (2003) Finite-Dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Friesz TL, Bernstein D, Mehta NJ, Tobin RL, Ganjalizadeh S (1994) Day-to-day dynamic network disequilibrium and idealized traveler information systems. Oper. Res. 42(6):1120–1136.Link, Google Scholar
• Garcia A, Hong M, Barrera J (2012) “Cap and trade” for congestion control. Dynamic Games Appl. 2(3):280–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo RY, Yang H, Huang HJ (2018) Are we really solving the dynamic traffic equilibrium problem with a departure time choice? Transportation Sci. 52(3):603–620.Link, Google Scholar
• Guo RY, Yang H, Huang HJ, Li X (2018) Day-to-day departure time choice under bounded rationality in the bottleneck model. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 117:832–849.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo RY, Yang H, Huang HJ, Tan Z (2016) Day-to-day flow dynamics and congestion control. Transportation Sci. 50(3):982–997.Link, Google Scholar
• Han L, Du L (2012) On a link-based day-to-day traffic assignment model. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 46(1):72–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He X, Guo X, Liu HX (2010) A link-based day-to-day traffic assignment model. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 44(4):597–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iryo T (2008) An analysis of instability in a departure time choice problem. J. Adv. Transportation 42(3):333–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iryo T (2019) Instability of departure time choice problem: A case with replicator dynamics. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 126:353–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin WL (2020) Stable day-to-day dynamics for departure time choice. Transportation Sci. 54(1):42–61.Link, Google Scholar
• Jin WL (2021) Stable local dynamics for day-to-day departure time choice. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 149:463–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knockaert J, Verhoef ET, Rouwendal J (2016) Bottleneck congestion: Differentiating the coarse charge. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 83:59–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamotte R, Geroliminis N (2021) Monotonicity in the trip scheduling problem. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 146:14–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larsson T, Patriksson M (1995) An augmented Lagrangean dual algorithm for link capacity constrained traffic assignment problems. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 29(6):433–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li ZC, Huang HJ, Yang H (2020) Fifty years of the bottleneck model: A bibliometric review and future research directions. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 139:311–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li ZC, Lam WHK, Wong SC (2017) Step tolling in an activity-based bottleneck model. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 101:306–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindsey R (2004) Existence, uniqueness, and trip cost function properties of user equilibrium in the bottleneck model with multiple user classes. Transportation Sci. 38(3):293–314.Link, Google Scholar
• Lindsey CR, van den Berg VAC, Verhoef ET (2012) Step tolling with bottleneck queuing congestion. J. Urban Econom. 72(1):46–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Nie Y, Hall J (2015) A semi-analytical approach for solving the bottleneck model with general user heterogeneity. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 71:56–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagurney A, Zhang D (1997) Projected dynamical systems in the formulation, stability analysis, and computation of fixed-demand traffic network equilibria. Transportation Sci. 31(2):147–158.Link, Google Scholar
• Ramadurai G, Ukkusuri SV (2007) Dynamic traffic equilibrium: Theoretical and experimental network game results in single-bottleneck model. Transportation Res. Record 2029(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramadurai G, Ukkusuri SV, Zhao J, Pang JS (2010) Linear complementarity formulation for single bottleneck model with heterogeneous commuters. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 44(2):193–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simoni MD, Claudel CG (2020) A fast Lax–Hopf algorithm to solve the Lighthill–Whitham–Richards traffic flow model on networks. Transportation Sci. 54(6):1516–1534.Google Scholar
• Small KA (2015) The bottleneck model: An assessment and interpretation. Econom. Transportation 4(1–2):110–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith MJ (1983) The existence and calculation of traffic equilibria. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 17(4):291–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith MJ (1984) The stability of a dynamic model of traffic assignment—An application of a method of Lyapunov. Transportation Sci. 18(3):245–252.Link, Google Scholar
• van den Berg V, Verhoef ET (2011) Winning or losing from dynamic bottleneck congestion pricing?: The distributional effects of road pricing with heterogeneity in values of time and schedule delay. J. Public Econom. 95(7–8):983–992.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vickrey WS (1969) Congestion theory and transport investment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 59(2):251–260.Google Scholar
• Xiao LL, Huang HJ, Liu R (2013) Congestion behavior and tolls in a bottleneck model with stochastic capacity. Transportation Sci. 49(1):46–65.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang F (2005) An evolutionary game theory approach to the day-to-day traffic dynamics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison.Google Scholar
• Yang F, Zhang D (2009) Day-to-day stationary link flow pattern. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 43(1):119–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ziegelmeyer A, Koessler F, My KB, Denant-Boèmont L (2008) Road traffic congestion and public information: An experimental investigation. J. Transport Econom. Policy 42(1):43–82.Google Scholar