Hypercongestion, Autonomous Vehicles, and Urban Spatial Structure

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0519

References

  • Aboudolas K, Geroliminis N (2013) Perimeter and boundary flow control in multi-reservoir heterogeneous networks. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 55:265–281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alonso W (1964) Location and Land Use (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ameli M, Faradonbeh MSS, Lebacque JP, Abouee-Mehrizi H, Leclercq L (2022) Departure time choice models in urban transportation systems based on mean field games. Transportation Sci. 56(6):1483–1504.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ampountolas K, Zheng N, Geroliminis N (2017) Macroscopic modelling and robust control of bi-modal multi-region urban road networks. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 104:616–637.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anas A, Arnott R, Small KA (1998) Urban spatial structure. J. Econom. Literature 36(3):1426–1464.Google Scholar
  • Arnott R (1998) Congestion tolling and urban spatial structure. J. Regional Sci. 38(3):495–504.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arnott R (2013) A bathtub model of downtown traffic congestion. J. Urban Econom. 76:110–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arnott R, de Palma A, Lindsey R (1993) A structural model of peak-period congestion: A traffic bottleneck with elastic demand. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(1):161–179.Google Scholar
  • Balzer L, Ameli M, Leclercq L, Lebacque JP (2023) Dynamic tradable credit scheme for multimodal urban networks. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 149:104061.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bao Y, Verhoef ET, Koster P (2021) Leaving the tub: The nature and dynamics of hypercongestion in a bathtub model with a restricted downstream exit. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 152:102389.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Batista SF, Ingole D, Leclercq L, Menéndez M (2021) The role of trip lengths calibration in model-based perimeter control strategies. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 23(6):5176–5186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen S, Fu H, Wu N, Wang Y, Qiao Y (2022b) Passenger-oriented traffic management integrating perimeter control and regional bus service frequency setting using 3D-PMFD. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 135:103529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen C, Huang Y, Lam W, Pan T, Hsu S, Sumalee A, Zhong R (2022a) Data efficient reinforcement learning and adaptive optimal perimeter control of network traffic dynamics. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 142:103759.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chiabaut N (2015) Evaluation of a multimodal urban arterial: The passenger macroscopic fundamental diagram. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 81:410–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo CF (2007) Urban gridlock: Macroscopic modeling and mitigation approaches. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 41(1):49–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dantsuji T, Fukuda D, Zheng N (2021) Simulation-based joint optimization framework for congestion mitigation in multimodal urban network: A macroscopic approach. Transportation 48(2):673–697.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dantsuji T, Takayama Y, Fukuda D (2023) Perimeter control in a mixed bimodal bathtub model. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 173:267–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dantsuji T, Hirabayashi S, Ge Q, Fukuda D (2020) Cross comparison of spatial partitioning methods for an urban transportation network. Internat. J. Intelligent Transportation Systems Res. 18:412–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dantsuji T, Hoang NH, Zheng N, Vu HL (2022) A novel metamodel-based framework for large-scale dynamic origin–destination demand calibration. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 136:103545.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Almeida Correia GH, Looff E, van Cranenburgh S, Snelder M, van Arem B (2019) On the impact of vehicle automation on the value of travel time while performing work and leisure activities in a car: Theoretical insights and results from a stated preference survey. Transportation Res. Part A Policy Practice 119:359–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ding H, Guo F, Zheng X, Zhang W (2017) Traffic guidance–perimeter control coupled method for the congestion in a macro network. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 81:300–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fagnant DJ, Kockelman K (2015) Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Res. Part A Policy Practice 77:167–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fosgerau M (2015) Congestion in the bathtub. Econom. Transportation 4(4):241–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fosgerau M, Kim J (2019) Commuting and land use in a city with bottlenecks: Theory and evidence. Regional Sci. Urban Econom. 77:182–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fosgerau M, Small KA (2013) Hypercongestion in downtown metropolis. J. Urban Econom. 76:122–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fosgerau M, Kim J, Ranjan A (2018) Vickrey meets Alonso: Commute scheduling and congestion in a monocentric city. J. Urban Econom. 105:40–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fu H, Chen S, Chen K, Kouvelas A, Geroliminis N (2021) Perimeter control and route guidance of multi-region MFD systems with boundary queues using colored petri nets. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 23(8):12977–12999.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fujita M (1989) Urban Economic Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fujita M, Ogawa H (1982) Multiple equilibria and structural transition of non-monocentric urban configurations. Regional Sci. Urban Econom. 12(2):161–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Genser A, Kouvelas A (2022) Dynamic optimal congestion pricing in multi-region urban networks by application of a multi-layer-neural network. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 134:103485.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geroliminis N (2015) Cruising-for-parking in congested cities with an MFD representation. Econom. Transportation 4(3):156–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geroliminis N, Daganzo CF (2008) Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 42(9):759–770.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geroliminis N, Levinson DM (2009) Cordon pricing consistent with the physics of overcrowding. Lam W, Wong S, Lo H, eds. Transportation and Traffic Theory 2009: Golden Jubilee (Springer, Boston), 219–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geroliminis N, Haddad J, Ramezani M (2012) Optimal perimeter control for two urban regions with macroscopic fundamental diagrams: A model predictive approach. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 14(1):348–359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geroliminis N, Zheng N, Ampountolas K (2014) A three-dimensional macroscopic fundamental diagram for mixed bi-modal urban networks. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 42:168–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Godfrey J (1969) The mechanism of a road network. Traffic Engrg. Control 11(7):323–327.Google Scholar
  • Gonzales EJ (2015) Coordinated pricing for cars and transit in cities with hypercongestion. Econom. Transportation 4(1–2):64–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gonzales EJ, Daganzo CF (2012) Morning commute with competing modes and distributed demand: User equilibrium, system optimum, and pricing. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 46(10):1519–1534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gubins S, Verhoef ET (2014) Dynamic bottleneck congestion and residential land use in the monocentric city. J. Urban Econom. 80:51–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo Q, Ban XJ (2020) Macroscopic fundamental diagram based perimeter control considering dynamic user equilibrium. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 136:87–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haddad J (2017) Optimal perimeter control synthesis for two urban regions with aggregate boundary queue dynamics. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 96:1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haddad J, Geroliminis N (2012) On the stability of traffic perimeter control in two-region urban cities. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 46(9):1159–1176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haddad J, Shraiber A (2014) Robust perimeter control design for an urban region. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 68:315–332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haddad J, Zheng Z (2020) Adaptive perimeter control for multi-region accumulation-based models with state delays. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 137:133–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haitao H, Yang K, Liang H, Menendez M, Guler SI (2019) Providing public transport priority in the perimeter of urban networks: A bimodal strategy. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 107:171–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall JD (2018) Pareto improvements from Lexus lanes: The effects of pricing a portion of the lanes on congested highways. J. Public Econom. 158:113–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang Y, Ye Y, Sun J, Tian Y (2023) Characterizing the impact of autonomous vehicles on macroscopic fundamental diagrams. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 24(6):6530–6541.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang Y, Xiong J, Sumalee A, Zheng N, Lam W, He Z, Zhong R (2020) A dynamic user equilibrium model for multi-region macroscopic fundamental diagram systems with time-varying delays. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 131:1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ji Y, Geroliminis N (2012) On the spatial partitioning of urban transportation networks. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 46(10):1639–1656.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jin WL (2020) Generalized bathtub model of network trip flows. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 136:138–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johari M, Keyvan-Ekbatani M (2024) Macroscopic modeling of mixed bi-modal urban networks: A hybrid model of accumulation-and trip-based principles. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 182:102921.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanemoto Y (1980) Theories of Urban Externalities (North-Holland, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  • Kolarova V, Cherchi E (2021) Impact of trust and travel experiences on the value of travel time savings for autonomous driving. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 131:103354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kouvelas A, Saeedmanesh M, Geroliminis N (2023) A linear-parameter-varying formulation for model predictive perimeter control in multi-region MFD urban networks. Transportation Sci. 57(6):1496–1515.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Kumarage S, Yildirimoglu M, Ramezani M, Zheng Z (2021) Schedule-constrained demand management in two-region urban networks. Transportation Sci. 55(4):857–882.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lamotte R, Geroliminis N (2018) The morning commute in urban areas with heterogeneous trip lengths. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 117:794–810.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lamotte R, De Palma A, Geroliminis N (2017) On the use of reservation-based autonomous vehicles for demand management. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 99:205–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li ZC, Cheng L, de Palma A (2024) Ring road investment, cordon tolling, and urban spatial structure. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 182:102905.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Y, Mohajerpoor R, Ramezani M (2021) Perimeter control with real-time location-varying cordon. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 150:101–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li ZC, Yu DP, de Palma A (2024) Bottleneck congestion and urban spatial structure with heterogeneous households: Equilibrium, capacity expansion and congestion tolling (No. 2024-04). THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise, Cergy, France.Google Scholar
  • Liu W, Geroliminis N (2016) Modeling the morning commute for urban networks with cruising-for-parking: An MFD approach. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 93:470–494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loder A, Ambühl L, Menendez M, Axhausen KW (2019a) Understanding traffic capacity of urban networks. Sci. Rep. 9(1):1–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loder A, Dakic I, Bressan L, Ambühl L, Bliemer MC, Menendez M, Axhausen KW (2019b) Capturing network properties with a functional form for the multi-modal macroscopic fundamental diagram. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 129:1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lu Q, Tettamanti T, Hörcher D, Varga I (2020) The impact of autonomous vehicles on urban traffic network capacity: An experimental analysis by microscopic traffic simulation. Transportation Lett. 12(8):540–549.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mariotte G, Leclercq L, Laval JA (2017) Macroscopic urban dynamics: Analytical and numerical comparisons of existing models. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 101:245–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moshahedi N, Kattan L (2022) A macroscopic dynamic network loading model using variational theory in a connected and autonomous vehicle environment. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 145:103911.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ni W, Cassidy M (2020) City-wide traffic control: Modeling impacts of cordon queues. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 113:164–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osawa M, Akamatsu T (2020) Equilibrium refinement for a model of non-monocentric internal structures of cities: A potential game approach. J. Econom. Theory 187:105025.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramezani M, Haddad J, Geroliminis N (2015) Dynamics of heterogeneity in urban networks: Aggregated traffic modeling and hierarchical control. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 74:1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simoni MD, Pel AJ, Waraich RA, Hoogendoorn SP (2015) Marginal cost congestion pricing based on the network fundamental diagram. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 56:221–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sirmatel II, Geroliminis N (2017) Economic model predictive control of large-scale urban road networks via perimeter control and regional route guidance. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 19(4):1112–1121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sirmatel II, Tsitsokas D, Kouvelas A, Geroliminis N (2021) Modeling, estimation, and control in large-scale urban road networks with remaining travel distance dynamics. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 128:103157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Small KA, Chu X (2003) Hypercongestion. J. Transport Econom. Policy 37(3):319–352.Google Scholar
  • Steck F, Kolarova V, Bahamonde-Birke F, Trommer S, Lenz B (2018) How autonomous driving may affect the value of travel time savings for commuting. Transportation Res. Record 2672(46):11–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Takayama Y (2020) Who gains and who loses from congestion pricing in a monocentric city with a bottleneck? Econom. Transportation 24:100189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Takayama Y, Kuwahara M (2017) Bottleneck congestion and residential location of heterogeneous commuters. J. Urban Econom. 100:65–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Takayama Y, Kuwahara M (2020) Scheduling preferences, parking competition, and bottleneck congestion: A model of trip timing and parking location choices by heterogeneous commuters. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 117:102677.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsekeris T, Geroliminis N (2013) City size, network structure and traffic congestion. J. Urban Econom. 76:1–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van den Berg VA, Verhoef ET (2016) Autonomous cars and dynamic bottleneck congestion: The effects on capacity, value of time and preference heterogeneity. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 94:43–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vickrey W (2020) Congestion in midtown Manhattan in relation to marginal cost pricing. Econom. Transportation 21:100152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu S, Li ZC (2023) Managing a bi-modal bottleneck system with manned and autonomous vehicles: Incorporating the effects of in-vehicle activity utilities. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 152:104179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu SX, Liu R, Liu TL, Huang HJ (2018) Pareto-improving policies for an idealized two-zone city served by two congestible modes. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 117:876–891.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yildirimoglu M, Ramezani M, Geroliminis N (2015) Equilibrium analysis and route guidance in large-scale networks with MFD dynamics. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 59:404–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yildirimoglu M, Sirmatel II, Geroliminis N (2018) Hierarchical control of heterogeneous large-scale urban road networks via path assignment and regional route guidance. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 118:106–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zheng N, Geroliminis N (2013) On the distribution of urban road space for multimodal congested networks. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 57(C):326–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zheng N, Dantsuji T, Wang P, Geroliminis N (2017) Macroscopic approach for optimizing road space allocation of bus lanes in multimodal urban networks through simulation analysis. Transportation Res. Record 2651(1):42–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zheng N, Waraich RA, Axhausen KW, Geroliminis N (2012) A dynamic cordon pricing scheme combining the macroscopic fundamental diagram and an agent-based traffic model. Transportation Res. Part A Policy Practice 46(8):1291–1303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhong H, Li W, Burris MW, Talebpour A, Sinha KC (2020) Will autonomous vehicles change auto commuters’ value of travel time? Transportation Res. Part D Transport Environ. 83:102303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou D, Gayah VV (2023) Scalable multi-region perimeter metering control for urban networks: A multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 148:104033.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.