A Paradox of Telecommuting and Staggered Work Hours in the Bottleneck Model

References

• Akamatsu T, Wada K (2017) Tradable network permits: A new scheme for the most efficient use of network capacity. Transportation Res. Part C Emerg. Tech. 79:178–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akamatsu T, Wada K, Hayashi S (2015) The corridor problem with discrete multiple bottlenecks. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 81(3):808–829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akamatsu T, Wada K, Iryo T, Hayashi S (2021) A new look at departure time choice equilibrium models with heterogeneous users. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 148:152–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnott R, de Palma A, Lindsey R (1990) Departure time and route choice for the morning commute. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 24(3):209–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnott R, de Palma A, Lindsey R (1993) Properties of dynamic traffic equilibrium involving bottlenecks, including a paradox and metering. Transportation Sci. 27(2):148–160.Link, Google Scholar
• Asgari H, Jin X (2018) An evaluation of part-day telecommute impacts on work trip departure times. Travel Behav. Soc. 12:84–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva M, Cyna M, de Palma A (1984) Dynamic model of peak period congestion. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 18(4):339–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Nie Y, Yin Y (2015) Optimal Multi-Step toll design under general user heterogeneity. Transportation Res. Procedia 7:341–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daganzo CF (1985) The uniqueness of a time-dependent equilibrium distribution of arrivals at a single bottleneck. Transportation Sci. 19(1):29–37.Link, Google Scholar
• Delventhal MJ, Kwon E, Parkhomenko A (2022) JUE insight: How do cities change when we work from home? J. Urban Econom. 127:103331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fosgerau M, Small K (2017) Endogenous scheduling preferences and congestion. Internat. Econom. Rev. 58(2):585–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu H, Akamatsu T, Satsukawa K, Wada K (2022) Dynamic traffic assignment in a corridor network: Optimum vs. equilibrium. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 161:218–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gubins S, Verhoef ET (2011) Teleworking and congestion: A dynamic bottleneck analysis. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper (TI 11-096/3). Preprint, submitted July 19, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1888241.Google Scholar
• He D, Liu Y, Zhong Q, Wang DZW (2022) On the morning commute problem in a y-shaped network with individual and household travelers. Transportation Sci. 56(4):848–876.Link, Google Scholar
• Henderson JV (1981) The economics of staggered work hours. J. Urban Econom. 9(3):349–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendrickson C, Kocur G (1981) Schedule delay and departure time decisions in a deterministic model. Transportation Sci. 15(1):62–77.Link, Google Scholar
• Higano Y, Orishimo I (1990) Impact of spatially separated work places on urban residential location, consumption and time allocation. Papers Regional Sci. J. Regional Sci. Assoc. Internat. 68(1):9–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janelle DG (1986) Metropolitan expansion and the communications—Transportation trade-off. Hanson S, ed. The Geography of Urban Transportation (The Guilford Press, New York), 357–385.Google Scholar
• Kuwahara M, Akamatsu T (1993) Dynamic equilibrium assignment with queues for a one-to-many OD pattern. Daganzo CF, ed. Proc. 12th Internat. Symposium Transportation Traffic Theory (Elsevier, Berkeley, CA), 185–204.Google Scholar
• Lachapelle U, Georges A, Tanguay LN-G (2018) Telecommuting and sustainable travel: Reduction of overall travel time, increases in non-motorised travel and congestion relief? Urban Stud. 55(10):2226–2244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laih C-H (1994) Queueing at a bottleneck with single- and multi-step tolls. Transportation Res. Part A Policy Pract. 28(3):197–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindsey R (2004) Existence, uniqueness, and trip cost function properties of user equilibrium in the bottleneck model with multiple user classes. Transportation Sci. 38(3):293–314.Link, Google Scholar
• Lindsey R, de Palma A, Silva HE (2019) Equilibrium in a dynamic model of congestion with large and small users. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 124:82–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindsey R, Vincent A, van den Berg C, Verhoef ET (2012) Step tolling with bottleneck queuing congestion. J. Urban Econom. 72(1):46–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loo BPY, Huang Z (2022) Spatio-temporal variations of traffic congestion under work from home (WFH) arrangements: Lessons learned from COVID-19. Cities 124:103610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lund JR, Mokhtarian PL (1994) Telecommuting and residential location: Theory and implications for commute travel in monocentric metropolis. Transportation Res. Rec. 1463:10–14.Google Scholar
• Mun S-I, Yonekawa M (2006) Flextime, traffic congestion and urban productivity. J. Transportation Econom. Policy 40(3):329–358.Google Scholar
• Nilles JM (1988) Traffic reduction by telecommuting: A status review and selected bibliography. Transportation Res. Part A Gen. 22(4):301–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nilles JM (1991) Telecommuting and urban sprawl: Mitigator or inciter? Transportation 18(4):411–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ory DT, Mokhtarian PL (2006) Which came first, the telecommuting or the residential relocation? An empirical analysis of causality. Urban Geogr. 27(7):590–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osawa M, Fu H, Akamatsu T (2018) First-best dynamic assignment of commuters with endogenous heterogeneities in a corridor network. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 117:811–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rachev ST, Rüschendorf L (1998) Mass Transportation Problems, Volume 1: Theory (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Rhee H-J (2009) Telecommuting and urban sprawl. Transportation Res. Part D Transportation Environ. 14(7):453–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Safirova E (2002) Telecommuting, traffic congestion, and agglomeration: A general equilibrium model. J. Urban Econom. 52(1):26–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sakai T (2023) Queue replacement principle in dynamic traffic equilibrium with departure time choice and its applications. PhD thesis, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.Google Scholar
• Sakai T, Akamatsu T, Satsukawa K (2022a) Queue replacement principle for corridor problems with heterogeneous commuters. Preprint, submitted October 7, https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03357.Google Scholar
• Sakai T, Satsukawa K, Akamatsu T (2022b) Non-existence of queues for system optimal departure patterns in tree networks. Preprint, submitted May 12, https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.06015.Google Scholar
• Shabanpour R, Golshani N, Tayarani M, Auld J, Mohammadian A (2018) Analysis of telecommuting behavior and impacts on travel demand and the environment. Transportation Res. Part D Transportation Environ. 62:563–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tahlyan D, Said M, Mahmassani H, Stathopoulos A, Walker J, Shaheen S (2022) For whom did telework not work during the pandemic? Understanding the factors impacting telework satisfaction in the US using a multiple indicator multiple cause (MIMIC) model. Transportation Res. Part A Policy Pract. 155:387–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takayama Y (2015) Bottleneck congestion and distribution of work start times: The economics of staggered work hours revisited. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 81:830–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wada K, Akamatsu T (2013) A hybrid implementation mechanism of tradable network permits system which obviates path enumeration: An auction mechanism with day-to-day capacity control. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Trans. Rev. 60:94–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wada K, Iwami Y (2023) Work from home, temporal agglomeration (dis-)economies, and morning commute. J. Japan Soc. Civil Engrg. 78(5):I_899–I_909.Google Scholar
• Wöhner F (2022) Work flexibly, travel less? The impact of telework and flextime on mobility behavior in Switzerland. J. Transportation Geogr. 102:103390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu P, Guo Y (2022) Telecommuting and trip chaining: Pre-pandemic patterns and implications for the post-pandemic world. Transportation Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 113:103524.Crossref, Google Scholar