Modeling Multimodal Curbside Usage in Dynamic Networks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0522

References

  • Arnott R, de Palma A, Lindsey R (1991) A temporal and spatial equilibrium analysis of commuter parking. J. Public Econom. 45(3):301–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Axhausen K, Polak J, Boltze M, Puzicha J (1994) Effectiveness of the parking guidance information system in Frankfurt/Main. Traffic Engrg. Control 35(5):304–309.Google Scholar
  • Ben-Akiva M, Bierlaire M, Koutsopoulos H, Mishalani R (1998) Dynamit: A simulation-based system for traffic prediction. Proc. DACCORD Short-Term Forecasting Workshop, vol. 12 (Delft, Netherlands).Google Scholar
  • Brederode L, Pel A, Wismans L, Rijksen B, Hoogendoorn S (2023) Travel demand matrix estimation for strategic road traffic assignment models with strict capacity constraints and residual queues. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 167:1–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brudner A (2023) On the management of residential on-street parking: Policies and repercussions. Transport Policy 138:94–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cao Y, Tang K, Sun J, Ji Y (2021) Day-to-day dynamic origin–destination flow estimation using connected vehicle trajectories and automatic vehicle identification data. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 129:103241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Q, Conway A, Cheng J (2017) Parking for residential delivery in New York City: Regulations and behavior. Transport Policy 54:53–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dalla Chiara G, Krutein KF, Ranjbari A, Goodchild A (2022) Providing curb availability information to delivery drivers reduces cruising for parking. Sci. Rep. 12(1):19355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duchi J, Hazan E, Singer Y (2011) Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization. J. Machine Learn. Res. 12(7):2121–2159.Google Scholar
  • Facchinei F, Pang JS (2003) Finite-Dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems (Springer, Cham, Switzerland).Google Scholar
  • Gao J, Zuo F, Ozbay K, Hammami O, Barlas ML (2022) A new curb lane monitoring and illegal parking impact estimation approach based on queueing theory and computer vision for cameras with low resolution and low frame rate. Transportation Res. Part A Policy Practice 162:137–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gu Z, Safarighouzhdi F, Saberi M, Rashidi TH (2021) A macro-micro approach to modeling parking. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 147:220–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gu Z, Najmi A, Saberi M, Liu W, Rashidi TH (2020) Macroscopic parking dynamics modeling and optimal real-time pricing considering cruising-for-parking. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 118:102714.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guarda P, Battifarano M, Qian S (2024) Estimating network flow and travel behavior using day-to-day system-level data: A computational graph approach. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 158:104409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hao H, Wang Y, Du L, Chen S (2023) Enabling smart curb management with spatiotemporal deep learning. Comput. Environ. Urban Systems 99:101914.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iacobucci E, McDonald N, Edwards CH, Steiner R (2022) Using social media to understand challenges faced by US urban parcel delivery drivers: Reports from the curb. Transportation Policy 126:96–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jin X, Yin L, Rui Y, Ran B (2022) Study on the impact of curb parking on traffic capacity. CICTP 2022 (ASCE LIBRARY, Reston, VA), 2347–2353.Google Scholar
  • Ke Z, Qian S (2023) Leveraging ride-hailing services for social good: Fleet optimal routing and system optimal pricing. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 155:104284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koch J, Maxner T, Amatya V, Ranjbari A, Dowling C (2022) Physics-informed machine learning of parameterized fundamental diagrams. Preprint, submitted August 1, https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.00880.Google Scholar
  • Leclercq L, Sénécat A, Mariotte G (2017) Dynamic macroscopic simulation of on-street parking search: A trip-based approach. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 101:268–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu J, Ma W, Qian S (2023) Optimal curbside pricing for managing ride-hailing pick-ups and drop-offs. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 146:103960.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lu J, Li C, Wu XB, Zhou XS (2023) Physics-informed neural networks for integrated traffic state and queue profile estimation: A differentiable programming approach on layered computational graphs. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 153:104224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ma W, Qian ZS (2018) Estimating multi-year 24/7 origin-destination demand using high-granular multi-source traffic data. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 96:96–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ma W, Pi X, Qian S (2020) Estimating multi-class dynamic origin-destination demand through a forward-backward algorithm on computational graphs. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 119:102747.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Machado-León JL, MacKenzie D, Goodchild A (2023) An empirical analysis of passenger vehicle dwell time and curb management strategies for ride-hailing pick-up/drop-off operations. Transportation 1–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahmassani H (1992) Dynamic traffic assignment and simulation for advanced network informatics (dynasmart). 2nd Internat. Seminar Urban Traffic Networks 1992.Google Scholar
  • Mandhan S, Gregg K (2023) Managing the curb–public space and use of curbside cafes during the coronavirus pandemic. Cities 132:104070.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nazir N, Dowling C, Choudhury S, Zoepf S, Ma K (2022) Optimal, centralized dynamic curbside parking space zoning. 2022 IEEE 25th Internat. Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 91–98.Google Scholar
  • Nie Y (2006) A Variational Inequality Approach for Inferring Dynamic Origin-Destination Travel Demands (University of California, Davis, CA).Google Scholar
  • Pi X, Ma W, Qian S (2018) Regional traffic planning and operation using mesoscopic car-truck traffic simulation. Technical report, Traffic21 Institute, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  • Pi X, Ma W, Qian ZS (2019) A general formulation for multi-modal dynamic traffic assignment considering multi-class vehicles, public transit and parking. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 104:369–389.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pochowski AL, Crim S, Liu L, Trask L, Sherman Baker C, Woodworth S, Klion J (2022) Solving the curb space puzzle through the development of a curb space allocation tool. Transportation Res. Record 2676(10):601–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qian ZS (2016) Dynamic network analysis & real-time traffic management for Philadelphia metropolitan area. Technical report, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Harrisburg, PA.Google Scholar
  • Qian ZS, Rajagopal R (2014) Optimal dynamic parking pricing for morning commute considering expected cruising time. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 48:468–490.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qian Z, Zhang HM (2011a) Computing individual path marginal cost in networks with queue spillbacks. Transportation Res. Record 2263(1):9–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qian ZS, Zhang HM (2011b) Modeling multi-modal morning commute in a one-to-one corridor network. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 19(2):254–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qian Z, Zhang HM (2013) A hybrid route choice model for dynamic traffic assignment. Networks Spatial Econom. 13:183–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qian ZS, Shen W, Zhang H (2012) System-optimal dynamic traffic assignment with and without queue spillback: Its path-based formulation and solution via approximate path marginal cost. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 46(7):874–893.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qian ZS, Xiao FE, Zhang H (2012) Managing morning commute traffic with parking. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 46(7):894–916.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qian ZS, Li J, Li X, Zhang M, Wang H (2017) Modeling heterogeneous traffic flow: A pragmatic approach. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 99:183–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Radvand T, Bahrami S, Yin Y, Laberteaux K (2022) Curbing cruising-as-substitution-for-parking in automated mobility. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 143:103853.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu X, Guo J, Xian K, Zhou X (2018) Hierarchical travel demand estimation using multiple data sources: A forward and backward propagation algorithmic framework on a layered computational graph. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 96:321–346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu Z, Chen Z, Yin Y, Ye J (2021) Equilibrium analysis of urban traffic networks with ride-sourcing services. Transportation Sci. 55(6):1260–1279.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ye Q, Feng Y, Qiu J, Stettler M, Angeloudis P (2022) Approximate optimum curbside utilisation for pick-up and drop-off (PUDO) and parking demands using reinforcement learning. 2022 IEEE 25th Internat. Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 2628–2633.Google Scholar
  • Yin S, Cui Z, Wang Y (2022) Reinforcement learning for curbside space management with infrastructure autonomy and mixed vehicle connectivity. 2022 IEEE 25th Internat. Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 3276–3282.Google Scholar
  • Zhang P, Qian S (2020) Path-based system optimal dynamic traffic assignment: A subgradient approach. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 134:41–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zheng N, Geroliminis N (2016) Modeling and optimization of multimodal urban networks with limited parking and dynamic pricing. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 83:36–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou X, Taylor J (2014) DTAlite: A queue-based mesoscopic traffic simulator for fast model evaluation and calibration. Cogent Engrg. 1(1):961345.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.