Does Dockless Bike-Sharing Create a Competition for Losers?

References

• Arrow KJ, Debreu G (1954) Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econom. J. Econom. Soc. 22(3):265–290. Google Scholar
• Baydin AG, Pearlmutter BA, Radul AA, Siskind JM (2018) Automatic differentiation in machine learning: A survey. J. Machine Learn. Res. 18:1–43.Google Scholar
• Borak M (2017) Mobike vs ofo: The race for the world’s bike rental market. Accessed May 20, 2025, http://technode.com/2017/09/22/how-mobike-and-ofo-are-planning-to-win-the-global-bike-rental-race/.Google Scholar
• Brouwer LEJ (1911) Über abbildung von mannigfaltigkeiten. Math. Ann. 71(1):97–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao G, Jin GZ, Weng X, Zhou LA (2021) Market-expanding or market-stealing? Competition with network effects in bike-sharing. Rand J. Econom. 52(4):778–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper WW, Kirby MJL, Raike W (1972) Regulatory models for pricing and evaluation of transport services. Transportation Sci. 6(1):15–31.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Van Lierop D, Ettema D (2020) Dockless bike-sharing systems: What are the implications? Transport Rev. 40(3):333–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Wang D, Chen K, Zha Y, Bi G (2019) Optimal pricing and availability strategy of a bike-sharing firm with time-sensitive customers. J. Cleaner Prod. 228:208–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi TM, Chung SH, Zhuo X (2020) Pricing with risk sensitive competing container shipping lines: Will risk seeking do more good than harm? Transportation Res. B Methodological 133:210–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daganzo CF (1978) An approximate analytic model of many-to-many demand responsive transportation systems. Transportation Res. 12(5):325–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deb K (2013) Multi-Objective Optimization. Search Methodologies: Introductory Tutorials in Optimization and Decision Support Techniques (Springer Science+Business Media, New York), 403–449.Google Scholar
• Douglas GW (1972) Price regulation and optimal service standards: The taxicab industry. J. Transport Econom. Policy 6(2):116–127.Google Scholar
• Fishman E (2016) Bikeshare: A review of recent literature. Transport Rev. 36(1):92–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freund D, Henderson SG, Shmoys DB (2022) Minimizing multimodular functions and allocating capacity in bike-sharing systems. Oper. Res. 70(5):2715–2731.Link, Google Scholar
• Fu C, Ma S, Zhu N, He QC, Yang H (2022) Bike-sharing inventory management for market expansion. Transportation Res. B Methodological 162:28–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA; London, UK).Google Scholar
• Gu T, Kim I, Currie G (2019) To be or not to be dockless: Empirical analysis of dockless bikeshare development in China. Transportation Res. A Policy Practice 119(November 2018):122–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He P, Zheng F, Belavina E, Girotra K (2021) Customer preference and station network in the london bike-share system. Management Sci. 67(3):1392–1412.Link, Google Scholar
• Hyland M, Mahmassani HS (2020) Operational benefits and challenges of shared-ride automated mobility-on-demand services. Transportation Res. A Policy Practice 134:251–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jara-Díaz S, Latournerie A, Tirachini A, Quitral F (2022) Optimal pricing and design of station-based bike-sharing systems: A microeconomic model. Econom. Transportation 31:100273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Ouyang Y (2022) Pricing and resource allocation under competition in a docked bike-sharing market. Transportation Res. C Emerging Technol. 143:103833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Lei C, Ouyang Y (2020) Optimal investment and management of shared bikes in a competitive market. Transportation Res. B Methodological 135:143–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jing Y (2019) How China is coping with its piles of abandoned shared bikes. Accessed May 20, 2025, https://news.cgtn.com/news/2019-09-27/How-China-is-coping-with-its-piles-of-abandoned-shared-bikes-KjemNhws4E/index.html.Google Scholar
• Jordan SW, Ivey S (2021) Complete streets: Promises and proof. J. Urban Planning Development 147(2):04021011.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kabra A, Belavina E, Girotra K (2020) Bike-share systems: Accessibility and availability. Management Sci. 66(9):3803–3824.Link, Google Scholar
• Ke J, Yang H, Li X, Wang H, Ye J (2020) Pricing and equilibrium in on-demand ride-pooling markets. Transportation Res. B Methodological 139:411–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kubota Y (2018) Bike-share startup in China veers off course. Wall Street Journal (December 21), https://www.wsj.com/articles/bike-share-startup-in-china-veers-off-course-11545400157.Google Scholar
• Kurata H, Yao DQ, Liu JJ (2007) Pricing policies under direct vs. indirect channel competition and national vs. store brand competition. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 180(1):262–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laporte G, Meunier F, Wolfler Calvo R (2018) Shared mobility systems: An updated survey. Ann. Oper. Res. 271(1):105–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, Li Y, Chen YJ (2022) Strategic inventories under supply chain competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(1):77–90.Link, Google Scholar
• Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic Theory, vol. 1 (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1980) Industry structure and competitive strategy: Keys to profitability. Financial Analysts J. 36(4):30–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaheen S, Guzman S, Zhang H (2010) Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia. Transportation Res. Record 2143(1):159–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaheen SA, Martin EW, Cohen AP, Chan ND, Pogodzinsk M, Martin EW, Chan ND (2014) Public bikesharing in North America during a period of rapid expansion: Understanding business modelsindustry trends & user impacts. Mineta Transportation Institute Report 12-29 2–3.Google Scholar
• Shui CS, Szeto WY (2020) A review of bicycle-sharing service planning problems. Transportation Res. C Emerging Technologies 117(April 2019):102648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soriguera F, Jiménez-Meroño E (2020) A continuous approximation model for the optimal design of public bike-sharing systems. Sustainable Cities Soc. 52:101826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spinney J, Lin WI (2018) Are you being shared? Mobility, data and social relations in Shanghai’s Public Bike Sharing 2.0 sector. Appl. Mobilities 3(1):66–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thiel P, Masters B (2014) Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Ülkü MA, Bookbinder JH (2012) Optimal quoting of delivery time by a third party logistics provider: The impact of shipment consolidation and temporal pricing schemes. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 221(1):110–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Jin H, Zheng S, Shang WL, Wang K (2023) Bike-sharing duopoly competition under government regulation. Appl. Energy 343:121121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang J (2020) Bike sharing in China –– From bicycle graveyards to a regulated industry. Accessed May 20, 2025, https://www.law.georgetown.edu/environmental-law-review/blog/bike-sharing-in-china-from-bicycle-graveyards-to-a-regulated-industry/.Google Scholar
• Zheng W, Li B, Song DP (2017) Effects of risk-aversion on competing shipping lines’ pricing strategies with uncertain demands. Transportation Res. B Methodological 104:337–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Zhang K, Nie M, Yan P, Qu Y (2023) How many are too many? Analyzing dockless bikesharing systems with a parsimonious model. Transportation Sci. 58(1):152–175.Google Scholar
• Zhou WH, Lee CY (2009) Pricing and competition in a transportation market with empty equipment repositioning. Transportation Res. B Methodological 43(6):677–691.Crossref, Google Scholar