Factors Influencing Blind Conflict Risk in En Route Sectors Under Free-Flight Conditions

References

  • Ball M., DeArmon J., Pyburn J. Is free flight feasible? Results from initial simulations. J. Air Traffic Control (1995) 37:14–17Google Scholar
  • Barnett A. A “parallel approach” path to estimating collision risk during simultaneous landings. Management Sci. (1999) 45:382–394LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett A. Free-flight and en route air safety: A first-order analysis. Oper. Res. (2000) 48:833–845LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bicci A., Pallottino L. On optimal cooperative conflict resolution for air traffic management systems. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems (2000) 1:221–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Datta K., Oliver R. M. Predicting risk of near midair collisions in controlled airspace. Transportation Res. (1991) 25B:237–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • FAA/Eurocontrol Collision Risk Modeling Group A concept paper for separation safety modeling. (1998) (FAA, Washington, D.C)Google Scholar
  • Faure P., Duong V. On the applicability of free-flight mode in European airspace. 2nd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar (1998) (Orlando, FL)Google Scholar
  • Gifford J. L., Sinha P. Airport congestion and near-midair collisions. Transportation Res. (1991) 25A:91–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison D., Moek G. European studies to investigate the feasibility of using 1,000-ft. vertical separation minima above FL-290.2. Precision radar data-analysis and collision risk assessment. J. Navigation (1992) 45:91–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hockaday S. L. M., Chatziioanou A. An analytical method for aircraft collision risk estimation. Transportation Res. (1986) 20B:415–428CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inselberg A., Dimsdale B. Multidimensional lines, II: Proximity and applications. SIAM J. Appl. Math. (1994) 54:578–596CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuchar J. K., Yang L. C. A review of conflict detection and resolution modeling methods. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems (2000) 1:179–189CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGill S. A. N. The effect of direct routing on ATC capacity. 2nd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar (1998) (Orlando, FL)Google Scholar
  • Prandini M., Hu J., Lygeros J., Sastry S. A probabilistic approach to aircraft conflict detection. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems (2000) 1:199–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Remington R. W., Johnston J. C., Ruthruff E., Gold M., Romera M. Visual search in complex displays: Factors affecting conflict detection by air traffic controllers. Human Factors (2000) 42:349–366CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H. D., Smith J. C., Trani A. A., Sale S. National airspace sector occupancy and conflict analysis models for evaluating scenarios under the free-flight paradigm. Transportation Sci. (2000) 34:321–336LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith K., Scallen S. F., Knecht W., Hancock P. A. An index of dynamic density. Human Factors (1998) 40:69–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sridhar B., Chatterji G. B., Grabbe S. R. Benefits of Direct-to-Tool in National Airspace System. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems (2000) 1:190–198CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sridhar B., Sheth K. S., Grabbe S. Airspace complexity and its application in air traffic management. 2nd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar (1998) (Orlando, FL)Google Scholar
  • Tomlin C., Pappa G. J., Sastry S. Conflict resolution for air traffic management: A study in multiagent hybrid systems. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control (1998) 43:509–521CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.