Getting Personal: A Deep Learning Artifact for Text-Based Measurement of Personality

References

• Abbasi A, Chen H (2008) CyberGate: A design framework and system for text analysis of computer-mediated communication. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 32(4):811–837.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abbasi A, Kitchens B, Ahmad F (2019) The risks of AutoML and how to avoid them. Harvard Business Review (October 24), https://hbr.org/2019/10/the-risks-of-automl-and-how-to-avoid-them.Google Scholar
• Abbasi A, Sarker S, Chiang RH (2016) Big Data research in information systems: Toward an inclusive research agenda. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 17(2):3.Google Scholar
• Abbasi A, Zhou Y, Deng S, Zhang P (2018) Text analytics to support sense-making in social media: A language-action perspective. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(2):427–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adamopoulos P, Ghose A, Todri V (2018) The impact of user personality traits on word of mouth: Text-mining social media platforms. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):612–640.Link, Google Scholar
• Agastya IMA, Handayani DOD, Mantoro T (2019) A systematic literature review of deep learning algorithms for personality trait recognition. Proc. 5th Internat. Conf. on Comput. Engrg. and Design (IEEE, New York), 1–6.Google Scholar
• Ahmad H, Asghar MZ, Khan AS, Habib A (2020a) A systematic literature review of personality trait classification from textual content. Open Comput. Sci. 10:175–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahmad F, Abbasi A, Kitchens B, Adjeroh DA, Zeng D (2022) Deep learning for adverse event detection from web search. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg., Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Ahmad F, Abbasi A, Li J, Dobolyi DG, Netemeyer R, Clifford G, Chen H (2020b) A deep learning architecture for psychometric natural language processing. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems 38(1):Article No. 6.Google Scholar
• Alam F, Stepanov EA, Riccardi G (2013) Personality traits recognition on social network-Facebook. Proc. 7th Internat. AAAI Conf. on Weblogs and Social Media (AAAI, California), 1–4.Google Scholar
• Arazy O, Kumar N, Shapira B (2010) A theory-driven design framework for social recommender systems. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 11(9):2.Google Scholar
• Aschwanden D, Gerend MA, Luchetti M, Stephan Y, Sutin AR, Terracciano A (2019) Personality traits and preventive cancer screenings in the Health Retirement Study. Preventative Medicine 126:105763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aschwanden D, Strickhouser JE, Sesker AA, Lee JH, Luchetti M, Stephan Y, Sutin AR, et al. (2021) Psychological and behavioural responses to coronavirus disease 2019: The role of personality. Eur. J. Personality 35(1):51–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Back MD, Stopfer JM, Vazire S, Gaddis S, Schmukle SC, Egloff B, Gosling SD (2010) Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psych. Sci. 21(3):372–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barth ME, Cram DP, Nelson KK (2001) Accruals and the prediction of future cash flows. Accounting Rev. 76(1):27–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beltagy I, Lo K, Cohan A (2019) SciBERT: A pretrained language model for scientific text. Inui K, Jiang J, Ng V, Wan X, eds. Proc. Conf. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (ACL, Pennsylvania), 3615–3620.Google Scholar
• Bender EM, Gebru T, McMillan-Major A, Shmitchell S (2021) On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proc. ACM Conf. on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM, New York), 610–623.Google Scholar
• Bertozzi AL, Franco E, Mohler G, Short MB, Sledge D (2020) The challenges of modeling and forecasting the spread of COVID-19. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 117(29):16732–16738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Schoar A (2003) Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. Quart. J. Econom. 118(4):1169–1208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3:993–1022.Google Scholar
• Bonsall SB, Holzman ER, Miller BP (2017) Managerial ability and credit risk assessment. Management Sci. 63(5):1425–1449.Link, Google Scholar
• Bravo-Lillo C, Cranor LF, Downs J, Komanduri S (2010) Bridging the gap in computer security warnings: A mental model approach. IEEE Security Privacy 9(2):18–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brick IE, Palmon O, Wald JK (2006) CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: Evidence of cronyism? J. Corporate Finance 12(3):403–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown DE, Abbasi A, Lau RY (2015) Predictive analytics: Predictive modeling at the micro level. IEEE Intelligence Systems 30(3):6–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown TB, Mann B, Ryder N, Subbiah M, Kaplan J, Dhariwal P, Neelakantan A, et al. (2020) Language models are few-shot learners. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 33:1877–1901.Google Scholar
• Celli F, Pianesi F, Stillwell D, Kosinski M, et al. (2013) Workshop on computational personality recognition (shared task). Proc. 7th Internat. AAAI Conf. on Weblogs and Social Media (AAAI, California), 2–5.Google Scholar
• Chelba C, Mikolov T, Schuster M, Ge Q, Brants T, Koehn P (2013) One billion word benchmark for measuring progress in statistical language modeling. Preprint, submitted December 11, http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3005.Google Scholar
• Chen H, Chiang RHL, Storey VC (2012) Business intelligence and analytics: From Big Data to big impact. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(4):1165–1188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen D, Wang W, Gao W, Zhou Z (2018) Tri-net for semi-supervised deep learning. Proc. 27th Internat. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI, Palo Alto, CA), 2014–2020.Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Zhao S, Zhang J, King I, Zhang X, Wang H (2017) Aspect-level sentiment classification with heat (hierarchical attention) network. Proc. ACM Conf. on Inform. and Knowledge Management (ACM, New York), 97–106.Google Scholar
• Chu CI, Chatterjee B, Brown A (2013) The current status of greenhouse gas reporting by Chinese companies. Management Audit J. 28(2):114–139.Google Scholar
• Cobb-Clark D, Schurer S (2012) The stability of big-five personality traits. Econom. Lett. 115:11–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crayne MP, Medeiros KE (2020) Making sense of crisis: Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leadership in response to Covid-19. Amer. Psychologist. 76(3):462–474.Google Scholar
• DeSalvo KB, Wang YC, Harris A, Auerbach J, Koo D, O’Carroll P (2017) Public health 3.0: A call to action for public health to meet the challenges of the 21st century. Prevention Chronic Dis. 14:1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devaraj S, Easley RF, Crant JM (2008) Research note—How does personality matter? Relating the five-factor model to technology acceptance and use. Inform. Systems Res. 19(1):93–105.Link, Google Scholar
• Devlin J, Chang M, Lee K, Toutanova K (2019) BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proc. Conf. of the NAACL-HLT (ACL, Pennsylvania), 4171–4186.Google Scholar
• Dubofsky P, Varadarajan PR (1987) Diversification and measures of performance: Additional empirical evidence. Acad. Management J. 30(3):597–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edunov S, Ott M, Auli M, Grangier D (2018) Understanding back-translation at scale. Proc. Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (ACL, Pennsylvania), 489–500.Google Scholar
• Farnadi G, Zoghbi S, Moens MF, Cock MD (2013) Recognising personality traits using Facebook status updates. Proc. 7th Internat. AAAI Conf. on Weblogs and Social Media (AAAI, California), 14–18.Google Scholar
• Feng S, Wang Y, Liu L, Wang D, Yu G (2019) Attention based hierarchical LSTM network for context-aware microblog sentiment classification. World Wide Web (Bussum) 22(1):59–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman HS (2000) Long‐term relations of personality and health: Dynamisms, mechanisms, tropisms. J. Personality 68(6):1089–1107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman HS, Kern ML (2014) Personality, well-being, and health. Annu. Rev. Psych. 65:719–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gal Y, Islam R, Ghahramani Z (2017) Deep Bayesian active learning with image data. Proc. Internat. Conf. on Machine Learn. (PMLR), 1183–1192.Google Scholar
• Galassi A, Lippi M, Torroni P (2020) Attention in natural language processing. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. System 32(10):1–18.Google Scholar
• Gao S, Ramanathan A, Tourassi G (2018) Hierarchical convolutional attention networks for text classification. Proc. 3rd Workshop on Representation Learn. for NLP, 11–23.Google Scholar
• Gill AJ, Oberlander J (2003) Perception of email personality at zero-acquaintance: Extraversion takes care of itself; neuroticism is a worry. Proc. Cognitive Sci. Soc., 456–461.Google Scholar
• Gjurković M, Karan M, Vukojević I, Bošnjak M, Šnajder J (2021) PANDORA talks: Personality and demographics on Reddit. Proc. 9th Internat. ACL Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media (ACL, Pennsylvania), 138–152.Google Scholar
• Go A, Bhayani R, Huang L (2009) Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision. Accessed December 1, 2009, https://cs.stanford.edu/people/alecmgo/papers/TwitterDistantSupervision09.pdf.Google Scholar
• Goldberg LR (1990) An alternative description of personality: The big-five factor structure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59(6):1216–1229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregor S, Hevner A (2013) Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(2):337–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guan Z, Wu B, Wang B, Liu H (2020) Personality2vec: Network representation learning for personality. Proc. IEEE 5th Internat. Conf. on Data Sci. in Cyberspace (IEEE, New York), 30–37.Google Scholar
• Guest JL, Rio CD, Sanchez T (2020) The three steps needed to end the Covid-19 pandemic: Bold public health leadership, rapid innovations, and courageous political will. JMIR Public Health 6(2):e19043.Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Hanssens D, Hardie B, Kahn W, Kumar V, Lin N, Ravishanker N, et al. (2006) Modeling customer lifetime value. J. Service Res. 9(2):139–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halliday MAK, Hasan R (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd ed. (Routledge, Oxfordshire, England, UK).Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC (2007) Upper echelons theory: An update. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):334–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haussler D, Kearns M, Schapire RE (1994) Bounds on the sample complexity of Bayesian learning using information theory and the VC dimension. Machine Learn. 14:83–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heavey C, Simsek Z, Kyprianou C, Risius M (2020) How do strategic leaders engage with social media? A theoretical framework for research and practice. Strategic Management J. 41(8):1490–1527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson AD, Miller D, Hambrick DC (2006) How quickly do CEOs become obsolete? Industry dynamism, CEO tenure, and company performance. Strategic Management J. 27(5):447–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hevner A, March S, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in IS research. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 28(1):75–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hough JR, Ogilvie OT (2005) An empirical test of cognitive style and strategic decision outcomes. J. Management Stud. 42(2):417–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard J, Ruder S (2018) Fine-tuned language models for text classification. Preprint, submitted January 18, https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.06146.Google Scholar
• Hrazdil K, Novak J, Rogo R, Wiedman C, Zhang R (2020) Measuring executive personality using machine-learning algorithms: A new approach and validation tests. J. Bus. Finance Accounting 47(3–4):519–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang A, Wang H, Yang Y (2020) FinBERT—A deep learning approach to extracting textual information. Preprint, submitted July 28, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3910214.Google Scholar
• Hutson M (2020) The mess behind the models: Too many of the COVID-19 models led policymakers astray. Here’s how tomorrow’s models will get it right. IEEE Spectrum 57(10):30–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacobelli F, Gill AJ, Nowson S, Oberlander J (2011) Large scale personality classification of bloggers. Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (Springer, Berlin), 568–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janson MA, Woo CC (1996) A speech act lexicon: An alternative use of speech act theory in information systems. Inform. Systems J. 6(4):301–329.Google Scholar
• Jayaratne M, Jayatilleke B (2020) Predicting personality using answers to open-ended interview questions. IEEE Access 8:115345–115355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jing R (2019) A self-attention based LSTM network for text classification. J. Phys. 1207(1):1–5.Google Scholar
• John GH, Kohavi R, Pfleger K (1994) Irrelevant features and the subset selection problem. Proc. 11th Internat. Conf. on Machine Learn., 121–129.Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Piccolo RF, Kosalka T (2009) The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. Leadership Quart. 20(6):855–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Bono JE, Ilies R, Gerhardt MW (2002) Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. J. Appl. Psych. 87(4):765–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Jernite Y, Sontag D, Rush AM (2016) Character-aware neural language models. Proc. 30th AAAI Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI, California), 2741–2749.Google Scholar
• Laine S, Aila T (2016) Temporal ensembling for semi-supervised learning. Preprint, submitted October 7, https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.02242.Google Scholar
• Lalor JP, Yang Y, Smith K, Forsgren N, Abbasi A (2022) Benchmarking intersectional biases in NLP. Proc. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (Association for Computational Linguistics, Pennsylvania).Google Scholar
• Le Q, Mikolov T (2014) Distributed representations of sentences and documents. Proc. Internat. Conf. on Machine Learn., 1188–1196.Google Scholar
• Lee DH (2013) Pseudo-label: The simple and efficient semi-supervised learning method for deep neural networks, Proc. ICML Workshop on Challenges in Representation Learning 3(2):896.Google Scholar
• Lee J, Yoon W, Kim S, Kim D, Kim S, So CH, Kang J (2020) BioBERT: A pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining. Bioinformatics 36(4):1234–1240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi S, Monti D, Rizzo G, Morisio M (2020) Multilingual transformer-based personality traits estimation. Information (Basel) 11(4):179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LePine JA, Van Dyne L (2001) Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. J. Appl. Psych. 86(2):326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li M, Simerly RL (1998) The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the ownership and performance relationship. Strategic Management J. 19(2):169–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li J, Larsen K, Abbasi A (2020) TheoryOn: A design framework and system for unlocking behavioral knowledge through ontology learning. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 44(4):1733–1777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Ott M, Goyal N, Du J, Joshi M, Chen D, Levy O, et al. (2019) RoBERTa: A robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach. Preprint, submitted July 26, https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11692.Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Wang Y, Mahmud J, Akkiraju R, Schoudt J, Xu A, Donovan B (2016) To buy or not to buy? Understanding the role of personality traits in predicting consumer behaviors. Spiro E, Ahn YY, eds. Social Informatics, vol. 10047, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Springer, Cham), 337–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynn V, Balasubramanian N, Schwartz HA (2020) Hierarchical modeling for user personality prediction: The role of message-level attention. Proc. 58th Annual Meeting of the ACL (ACL, Pennsylvania), 5306–5316.Google Scholar
• Lyytinen KJ (1985) Implications of theories of language for information systems. MIS Quart. 9(1):61–74.Google Scholar
• Mairesse F, Walker MA, Mehl MR, Moore RK (2007) Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. 30:457–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majumder N, Poria S, Gelbukh A, Cambria E (2017) Deep learning-based document modeling for personality detection from text. IEEE Intelligence Systems 32(2):74–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masli A, Richardson VJ, Watson MW, Zmud RW (2016) Senior executives’ IT management responsibilities: Serious IT-related deficiencies and CEO/CFO turnover. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 40(3):687–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Medcof JW (2007) CTO power. Res. Tech. Management 50(4):23–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehl MR, Gosling SD, Pennebaker JW (2006) Personality in its natural habitat: manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(5):862.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehta Y, Majumder N, Gelbukh A, Cambria E (2020) Recent trends in deep learning based personality detection. Artificial Intelligence Rev. 53(4):2313–2339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohamed N, Ahmad MH, Ismail Z, Suhartono S (2010) Short term load forecasting using double seasonal arima model. Proc. Regional Conf. on Statist. Sci, (10):57–73.Google Scholar
• Murphy J, Vallières F, Bentall RP, Shevlin M, McBride O, Hartman TK, et al. (2021) Psychological characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Ireland and the United Kingdom. Nature Comm. 12(1):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadkarni S, Herrmann POL (2010) CEO personality, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The case of the Indian business process outsourcing industry. Acad. Management J. 53(5):1050–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nygren TE, White RJ (2005) Relating decision making styles to predicting self-efficacy and a generalized expectation of success and failure. Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Soc. Meeting, 432–434.Google Scholar
• Pan SJ, Yang Q (2009) A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 22(10):1345–1359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parrish JL Jr, Bailey JL, Courtney JF (2009) A Personality Based Model for Determining Susceptibility to Phishing Attacks (University of Arkansas, Little Rock).Google Scholar
• Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M (2011) Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J. Machine Learn. Res. 12:2825–2830.Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, King LA (1999) Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(6):1296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters ME, Neumann M, Iyyer M, Gardner M, Clark C, Lee K, Zettlemoyer L (2018) Deep contextualized word representations. Proc. NAACL-HLT (ACL, Pennsylvania), 2227–2237.Google Scholar
• Peterson RS, Smith DB, Martorana PV, Owens PD (2003) The impact of chief executive officer personality on top management team dynamics: One mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performance. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):795–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratama BY, Sarno R (2015) Personality classification based on Twitter text using naive Bayes, KNN and SVM. Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. on Data and Software Engrg. (IEEE, New York), 170–74.Google Scholar
• Prechelt L (1998) Automatic early stopping using cross validation. Neural Networks 11(4):761–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riaz MN, Riaz MA, Batool N (2012) Personality types as predictors of decision making styles. J. Behav. Sci. 22(2):99–114.Google Scholar
• Ryan J, Herleman H (2015) A Big Data platform for workforce analytics. Tonidandel S, King EB, Cortina JM, eds. Big Data at Work: The Data Science Revolution and Organizational Psychology (Routledge, Oxfordshire, England, UK), 19–42.Google Scholar
• Shi Z, Lee GM, Whinston AB (2016) Toward a better measure of business proximity: Topic modeling for industry intelligence. Management Inform. Systems. Quart. 40(4):1035–1056.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shmueli G, Koppius O (2011) Predictive analytics in information systems research. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(3):553–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun X, Liu B, Cao J, Luo J, Shen X (2018) Who am I? Personality detection based on deep learning for texts. Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. on Comm. (IEEE, New York), 1–6.Google Scholar
• Tadesse MM, Lin H, Xu B, Yang L (2018) Personality predictions based on user behavior on the Facebook social media platform. IEEE Access 6:61959–61969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tausczik YR, Pennebaker JW (2010) The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J. Language Soc. Psych. 29(1):24–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torrey L, Shavlik J (2010) Transfer learning. Handbook of Research on Machine Learning Applications and Trends: Algorithms, Methods, and Techniques (IGI Global), 242–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vinciarelli A, Mo G (2014) Survey of personality computing. IEEE Trans. Affective Comput. 5:273–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walls JG, Widmeyer GR, El Sawy OA (1992) Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Inform. Systems Res. 3(1):36–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Lau RYK, Xie H (2021) The impact of social executives on firms’ mergers and acquisitions strategies: A difference-in-difference analysis. J. Bus. Res. 123:343–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Wu CH, Li QB, Yan B, Zheng KF (2020) Encoding text information with graph convolutional networks for personality recognition. Appl. Sci. (Switzerland) 10(12):4081.Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Wu C, Zheng K, Niu X, Wang X (2019b) SMOTETomek-based resampling for personality recognition. IEEE Access 7:129678–129689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Chen Q, Ahmed M, Li Z, Pan W, Liu H (2019a) Joint inference for aspect-level sentiment analysis by deep neural networks and linguistic hints. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 33(5):1–12.Google Scholar
• Weng PS, Chen WY (2017) Doing good or choosing well? Corporate reputation, CEO reputation, and corporate financial performance. North Amer. J. Econom. Finance 39:223–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilcoxon F (1992) Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods. Breakthroughs in Statistics (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Wright WR, Chin DN (2014) Personality profiling from text: Introducing part-of-speech N-grams. Proc. Internat. Conf. on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (Springer, Berlin), 243–253.Google Scholar
• Xie Q, Dai Z, Hovy E, Luong MT, Le QV (2020) Unsupervised data augmentation for consistency training. Ranzato M, Beygelzimer A, Nguyen K, Liang PS, Vaughan JW, Dauphin Y, eds. Proc. 34th Conf. on Neural Inform. Processing Systems, vol. 33 (Curran Associates, Red Hook, New York), 6256–6268.Google Scholar
• Xue D, Wu L, Hong Z, Guo S, Gao L, Wu Z, Zhong X, Sun J (2018) Deep learning-based personality recognition from text posts of online social networks. Appl. Intelligence 48(11):4232–4246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Yang D, Dyer C, He X, Smola A, Hovy E (2016) Hierarchical attention networks for document classification. Proc. Conf. of the NAACL: Human Language Technologies (ACL, Pennsylvania), 1480–1489.Google Scholar
• Yu J, Markov K (2017) Deep learning based personality recognition from Facebook status updates. Proc. 8th IEEE Internat. Conf. on Awareness Sci. and Tech. (IEEE, New York), 383–387.Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Huang JX, Chen Q, Hu QV, Wang T, He L (2019) Deep learning for aspect-level sentiment classification: Survey, vision, and challenges. IEEE Access 7:78454–78483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zimbra D, Abbasi A, Zeng D, Chen H (2018) The state-of-the-art in Twitter sentiment analysis: A review and benchmark evaluation. ACM Trans. Management Inform. Systems 9(2):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar