The Evolution of Digital Platform Ecosystems: An Identity Domain Perspective

References

• Adner R (2017) Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. J. Management 43(1):39–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Kapoor R (2016) Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re-examining technology S-curves. Strategic Management J. 37(4):625–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alaimo C, Kallinikos J, Valderrama E (2020) Platforms as service ecosystems: Lessons from social media. J. Inform. Tech. 35(1):25–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albert S, Whetten DA (1985) Organizational identity. Res. Organ. Behav. 7:263–295.Google Scholar
• Amadeo R (2014) New Android OEM licensing terms leak; “Open” comes with a lot of restrictions. Ars Technica (February 13), https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2014/02/new-android-oem-licensing-terms-leak-open-comes-with-restrictions/.Google Scholar
• Ansari S, Garud R, Kumaraswamy A (2016) The disruptor’s dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. television ecosystem. Strategic Management J. 37(9):1829–1853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barua A, Mukherjee R (2021) Multi-homing revisited: Level of adoption and competitive strategies. MIS Quart. 45(2):897–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basque J, Langley A (2018) Invoking Alphonse: The founder figure as a historical resource for organizational identity work. Organ. Stud. 39(12):1685–1708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• BlackBerry (2008) 2008 Annual report. Research in motion. Accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/B/TSX_BB_2008.pdf.Google Scholar
• Blix Inc. v. Apple Inc. (2021) Case 1:19-cv-01869-LPS. Accessed December 12, 2025, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/21-2203/21-2203-2022-12-06.html.Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ (2012) Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409–1427.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Jeppesen LB (2015) Unpaid crowd complementors: The platform network effect mirage. Strategic Management J. 36(12):1761–1777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandt R (2009) The Google Guys: Inside the Brilliant Minds of Google Founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin (Portfolio/Penguin, New York).Google Scholar
• Brewer MB (1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 17(5):475–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brickson SL (2005) Organizational identity orientation: Forging a link between organizational identity and organizations’ relations with stakeholders. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(4):576–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C (2018) Building the value of next-generation platforms: The paradox of diminishing returns. J. Management 44(8):3038–3069.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C (2021) Competing in digital markets: A platform-based perspective. Acad. Management Perspect. 35(2):265–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C, Santalo J (2013) Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management J. 34(11):1331–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C, Santaló J (2019) Generativity tension and value creation in platform ecosystems. Organ. Sci. 30(3):617–641.Link, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C, Kretschmer T, Constantinides P, Alaimo C, Santaló J (2023) Digital platforms regulation: An innovation-centric view of the EU’s Digital Markets Act. J. Eur. Competition Law Practice 14(1):44–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Tong TW, Tang S, Han N (2022) Governance and design of digital platforms: A review and future research directions on a meta-organization. J. Management 48(1):147–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Constantinides P (2023) Digital Transformation in Healthcare: An Ecosystem Approach (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Constantinides P, Henfridsson O, Parker GG (2018) Platforms and infrastructures in the digital age. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):381–400.Link, Google Scholar
• Cusumano MA, Gawer A, Yoffie DB (2019) The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power (Harper Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Dwoskin E (2021) Zuckerberg slams Apple in an earnings call casting Facebook as a victim. Washington Post (January 27), https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/01/27/zuckerberg-facebook-apple-anti-competitive/.Google Scholar
• Eaton B, Elaluf-Calderwood S, Sørensen C, Yoo Y (2015) Distributed tuning of boundary resources: The case of Apple’s iOS service system. MIS Quart. 39(1):217–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman B (2014) Secret ties in Google’s “open” Android. Ben Edelman Blog (February 13), https://www.benedelman.org/news-021314/.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (2021) What is the Eisenhardt Method, really? Strategic Organ. 19(1):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenmann TR, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2009) Opening platforms: How, when and why? Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 131–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc. (2021) Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR (N.D. Cal. Accessed December 12, 2025, https://cand.uscourts.gov/wp-content/uploads/cases-of-interest/epic-games-v-apple/20-5640_Epic_Games_Dkt_276_Joint_Submission_Regarding_Trial_Elements_Legal_Framework_and_Remedies.pdf.Google Scholar
• Epic Games Inc. v. Google LLC (2020) Case No. 3:20-cv-05671 (N.D. Cal. Accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17443962/epic-games-inc-v-google-llc/.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2018) Antitrust case 40099. Google Android. Accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.europeansources.info/record/antitrust-case-40099-google-android/.Google Scholar
• European Union v. Apple Inc. (2020) Apple - App store practices. AT. 4037. Accessed December 10, 2025, https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/cases/AT.40437.Google Scholar
• European Union v. Google LLC (2018) Google android. AT.40099. Accessed December 10, 2025, https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/cases/AT.40099.Google Scholar
• Felin T, Foss N (2023) Microfoundations of ecosystems: The theory-led firm and capability growth. Strategic Organ. 21(2):476–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foerderer J, Kude T, Mithas S, Heinzl A (2018) Does platform owner’s entry crowd out innovation? Evidence from Google Photos. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):444–460.Link, Google Scholar
• Fürstenau D, Baiyere A, Schewina K, Schulte-Althoff M, Rothe H (2023) Extended generativity theory on digital platforms. Inform. Systems Res. 34(4):1686–1710.Link, Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Harracá M (2025) Inconsistent platform governance and social contagion of misconduct in digital ecosystems: A complementors perspective. Res. Policy 54(8):105300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Patvardhan SD, Hamilton AL, Corley KG (2013) Organizational identity formation and change. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):123–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Price KN, Hamilton AL, Thomas JB (2010) Forging an identity: An insider-outsider study of processes involved in the formation of organizational identity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):1–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goode L (2017) New report suggests app makers should charge more if they want people to buy subscriptions. Verge (August 15), https://www.theverge.com/2017/8/15/16147954/liftoff-report-apple-ios-android-app-subscriptions-conversion-rate-2017.Google Scholar
• Google Founders Letter (2008) Alphabet investor relations 2008. Accessed December 10, 2025, https://abc.xyz/investor/founders-letters/2008/default.aspx.Google Scholar
• Guo W, Yu T, Gimeno J (2017) Language and competition: Communication vagueness, interpretation difficulties, and market entry. Acad. Management J. 60(6):2073–2098.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hildenbrand J (2013) Google Play Services gives control of Android back to Google. Android Central (May 17), https://www.androidcentral.com/new-google-play-services.Google Scholar
• Huber TL, Kude T, Dibbern J (2017) Governance practices in platform ecosystems: Navigating tensions between cocreated value and governance. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):563–584.Link, Google Scholar
• Isaacson W (2011) Steve Jobs (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2018) Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2255–2276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2024) Externalities and complementarities in platforms and ecosystems: From structural solutions to endogenous failures. Res. Policy 53(1):104906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Agarwal S (2017) Sustaining superior performance in business ecosystems: Evidence from application software developers in the iOS and Android smartphone ecosystems. Organ. Sci. 28(3):531–551.Link, Google Scholar
• Karhu K, Gustafsson R, Lyytinen K (2018) Exploiting and defending open digital platforms with boundary resources: Android’s five platform forks. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):479–497.Link, Google Scholar
• Kazemargi N, Spagnoletti P, Constantinides P, Prencipe A (2023) Data control coordination in cloud-based ecosystems: The EU GAIA-X ecosystem. Cennamo C, Dagnino GB, Zhu F, eds. Research Handbook on Digital Strategy, Research Handbooks in Business and Management Series (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 289–307.Google Scholar
• Kenney M, Pon B (2011) Structuring the smartphone industry: Is the mobile internet OS platform the key? J. Indust. Competition Trade 11(3):239–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kroezen J, Heugens P (2012) Organizational identity formation: Processes of identity imprinting and enactment in the Dutch microbrewing landscape. Schultz M, Maguire S, Langley A, Tsoukas H, eds. Constructing Identity in and Around Organizations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 89–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindgren R, Eriksson O, Lyytinen K (2015) Managing identity tensions during mobile ecosystem evolution. J. Inform. Tech. 30(3):229–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Livengood RS, Reger RK (2010) That’s our turf! Identity domains and competitive dynamics. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1):48–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mickle T (2022) After Steve: How Apple Became a Trillion-Dollar Company and Lost Its Soul (William Morrow, New York).Google Scholar
• Miric M, Pagani M, El Sawy OA (2021) When and who do platform companies acquire? Understanding the role of acquisitions in the growth of platform companies. MIS Quart. 45(4):2159–2174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nag R, Corley KG, Gioia DA (2007) The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Acad. Management J. 50(4):821–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Koçak Ö, Hsu G (2010) Categories in markets: Origins and evolution. Negro GN, Koçak Ö, Hsu G, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Emerald Group Publishing, Leeds, UK), 3–35.Google Scholar
• Nicas J, Collins K (2019) How Apple’s apps topped rivals in the App Store it controls. New York Times (September 9), https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/09/09/technology/apple-app-store-competition.html.Google Scholar
• NMA (2019) Market study into mobile app stores (case no. ACM/18/032693). The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets. Market study into mobile app stores (case no. ACM/18/032693). Accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.acm.nl/sites/default/files/documents/2019-04/marktstudies-appstores.pdf.Google Scholar
• Ozalp H, Ozcan P, Dinckol D, Zachariadis M, Gawer A (2022) “Digital colonization” of highly regulated industries: An analysis of Big Tech platforms’ entry into health care and education. Calif. Management Rev. 64(4):78–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2018) Innovation, openness, & platform control. Management Sci. 64(7):3015–3032.Link, Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne M, Jiang X (2017) Platform ecosystems: How developers invert the firm. MIS Quart. 41(1):255–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paul R (2008) Google talks up Android Open ecosystems lead to innovation. Ars Technica (April 15), https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2008/04/google-talks-up-android-open-ecosystems-lead-to-innovation/.Google Scholar
• Privacy International (2021) New Android 12 privacy features don’t mean Google actually care about your privacy. (May 20), https://privacyinternational.org/news-analysis/4517/new-android-12-privacy-features-dont-mean-google-actually-care-about-your.Google Scholar
• Ravasi D, Phillips N (2011) Strategies of alignment: Organizational identity management and strategic change at Bang & Olufsen. Strategic Organ. 9(2):103–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravasi D, Tripsas M, Langley A (2020) Exploring the strategy-identity nexus. Strategic Organ. 18(1):5–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rietveld J, Schilling MA (2021) Platform competition: A systematic and interdisciplinary review of the literature. J. Management 47(6):1528–1563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rietveld J, Ploog JN, Nieborg DB (2020) Coevolution of platform dominance and governance strategies: Effects on complementor performance outcomes. Acad. Management Discoveries 6(3):488–513.Google Scholar
• Rietveld J, Schilling MA, Bellavitis C (2019) Platform strategy: Managing ecosystem value through selective promotion of complements. Organ. Sci. 30(6):1232–1251.Link, Google Scholar
• Sawers P (2018) Google will charge Android device makers a licensing fee to preinstall its apps in Europe. Venture Beat (October 16), https://venturebeat.com/mobile/google-will-charge-android-device-makers-a-licensing-fee-to-preinstall-its-apps-in-europe.Google Scholar
• Schmidt E, Rosenberg J (2015) How Google Works (Grand Central Publishing, New York).Google Scholar
• Schultz M, Hernes T (2020) Temporal interplay between strategy and identity: Punctuated, subsumed, and sustained modes. Strategic Organ. 18(1):106–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott Morton FM (2025) Digital platform regulation: Making markets work for people. Accessed December 12, 2025, https://som.yale.edu/centers/thurman-arnold-project-yale/digital-platform-regulation.Google Scholar
• Shi R, Aaltonen A, Henfridsson O, Gopal RD (2023) Comparing platform owners’ early and late entry into complementary markets. MIS Quart. 47(4):1727–1744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sillince JAA, Simpson B (2010) The strategy and identity relationship: Towards a processual understanding. Baum JAC, Lampel J, eds. Advances in Strategic Management (Emerald Group Publishing, Leeds, UK), 111–143.Google Scholar
• Sokol DD, Zhu F (2021) Harming competition and consumers under the guise of protecting privacy: An analysis of Apple’s iOS 14 policy updates. Cornell Law Rev. Online 107:94.Google Scholar
• Spagnoletti P, Kazemargi N, Constantinides P, Prencipe A (2025) Data control coordination in the formation of ecosystems in highly regulated sectors. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 26(4):977–1008.Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• The Stigler Committee on Digital Platforms (2019) Final report. Univ. Chicago Booth School Bus. (September 16), https://www.chicagobooth.edu/research/stigler/news-and-media/committee-on-digital-platforms-final-report.Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2015) Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):266–281.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2018) Platform synergy: Architectural origins and competitive consequences. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):829–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (2009) Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of “The Digital Photography Company.” Organ. Sci. 20(2):441–460.Link, Google Scholar
• UK Competition and Markets Authority (2022) Mobile ecosystems market study. (June 10), https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/mobile-ecosystems-market-study.Google Scholar
• UK Competition and Markets Authority (2023) AI foundational models initial report. (September 18), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65081d3aa41cc300145612c0/Full_report_.pdf.Google Scholar
• UK Competition and Markets Authority (2025) Cloud services market investigation. (July 31), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/688b8891fdde2b8f73469544/final_decision_report.pdf.Google Scholar
• Um S, Zhang B, Wattal S, Yoo Y (2023) Software components and product variety in a platform ecosystem: A dynamic network analysis of WordPress. Inform. Systems Res. 34(4):1339–1374.Link, Google Scholar
• Ungureanu P, Bertolotti F, Mattarelli E, Bellesia F (2020) Collaboration and identity formation in strategic interorganizational partnerships: An exploration of swift identity processes. Strategic Organ. 18(1):171–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• United States of America v. Apple Inc. (2024) Case 2:24-cv-04055 (D.N.J). Accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68362334/united-states-v-apple-inc/.Google Scholar
• United States of America v. Google LLC (2024) Case 1:20-cv-03010 (D.D.C). Accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/press/Google%20Search%20Engine%20Monopoly%20Ruling.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law (2020a) Investigation of competition in digital markets: Majority staff report and recommendations (Part I). Accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CPRT-117HPRT47832/pdf/CPRT-117HPRT47832.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law (2020b) Investigation of competition in digital markets: Majority staff report and recommendations (Part II). Accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/117/cprt/HPRT47833/CPRT-117HPRT47833.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law (2020c) Online platforms and market power: Part 2—Innovation and entrepreneurship. Accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/event/116th-congress/house-event/109793.Google Scholar
• U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law (2020d) Online platforms and market power: Part 3—The role of data and privacy in competition. Accessed December 12, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/event/116th-congress/house-event/110098.Google Scholar
• Van den Steen E (2017) A formal theory of strategy. Management Sci. 63(8):2616–2636.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Yue LQ, Rajagopalan N, Wu B (2024) The entry-deterring effects of synergies in complementor acquisitions: Evidence from Apple’s digital platform market, the iOS App Store. Strategic Management J. 45(13):2791–2817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wareham J, Fox PB, Cano Giner JL (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1195–1215.Link, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 5(2):171–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson (1979) Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. J. Law Econom. 22(2):233–261.Google Scholar
• Wortham J (2010) Apple places limits on app developers. New York Times (April 13), https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/13/technology/companies/13apple.html.Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Kallinikos J, Gregory R, Burtch G, Chatterjee S, Sarker S (2024) The next frontiers of digital innovation research. Inform. Systems Res. 35(4):1507–1523.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Li J, Tong TW (2022) Platform governance matters: How platform gatekeeping affects knowledge sharing among complementors. Strategic Management J. 43(3):599–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Glynn MA (2022) Optimal distinctiveness: On being the same and different. Organ. Theory 3(1):26317877221079340.Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Liu Q (2018) Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon.com. Strategic Management J. 39(10):2618–2642.Crossref, Google Scholar