Rejecting Work Inequality: Women Say “No” to Unequal Workloads or Unequal Earnings?

References

• Amanatullah ET, Tinsley CH (2013) Punishing female negotiators for asserting too much…or not enough: Exploring why advocacy moderates backlash against assertive female negotiators. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 120(1):110–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aycinena D, Bogliacino F, Kimbrough EO (2024) Measuring norms: Assessing the threat of social desirability bias to the Bicchieri and Xiao elicitation method. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 222:225–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azmat G, Ferrer R (2017) Gender gaps in performance: Evidence from young lawyers. J. Political Econom. 125(5):1306–1355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Laschever S (2003) Women Don’t Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Peyser B, Vesterlund L, Weingart L (2022) The No Club: Putting a Stop to Women’s Dead-End Work (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Recalde MP, Vesterlund L, Weingart L (2017) Gender differences in accepting and receiving requests for tasks with low promotability. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(3):714–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker M, Halberstam Y, Kroft K, Mas A, Messacar D (2023) Pay transparency and the gender gap. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 15(2):157–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benson A, Li D, Shue K (2026) “Potential” and the gender promotion gap. Amer. Econom. Rev. 116(2):375–417.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Hallock KF (2001) The gender gap in top corporate jobs. ILR Rev. 55(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Goldin C, Katz LF (2010) Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 2(3):228–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bicchieri C, Xiao E (2009) Do the right thing: But only if others do so. J. Behav. Decision Making 22:191–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau FD, Kahn LM (2017) The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. J. Econom. Lit. 55(3):789–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohnet I (2016) What Works: Gender Equality by Design (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles HR, Babcock L, Lai L (2007) Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(1):84–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Charness G (2011) The strategy versus the direct-response method: A first survey of experimental comparisons. Experiment. Econom. 14:375–398.Google Scholar
• Branson R, Armstrong D (2004) General practitioners’ perceptions of sharing workload in group practices: Qualitative study. BMJ 329(7462):381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bursztyn L, González AL, Yanagizawa-Drott D (2020) Misperceived social norms: Women working outside the home in Saudi Arabia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(10):2997–3029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card D, Mas A, Moretti E, Saez E (2012) Inequality at work: The effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2981–3003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Gurun U, Bugra Ozel N (2023) Too many managers: The strategic use of titles to avoid overtime payments. NBER Working Paper No. 30826, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Dube A, Giuliano L, Leonard J (2019) Fairness and frictions: The impact of unequal raises on quit behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(2):620–663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel C, Grossman PJ (2001) Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum game. Econom. Inquiry 39(2):171–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel C, De Oliveira A, Grossman PJ (2008) Gender and negotiation in the small: Are women (perceived to be) more cooperative than men? Negotiation J. 24(4):429–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Exley CL, Kessler JB (2022) The gender gap in self-promotion. Quart. J. Econom. 137(3):1345–1381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Exley CL, Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2020) Knowing when to ask: The cost of leaning-in. J. Political Econom. 128(3):816–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Fernandez R (2016) Bending the pipeline? Executive search and gender inequality in hiring for top management jobs. Management Sci. 62(12):3636–3655.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldin C (2014) A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(4):1091–1119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krupka EL, Weber RA (2013) Identifying social norms using coordination games: Why does dictator game sharing vary? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):495–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell S, Hesli V (2013) Women don’t ask? Women don’t say no? Bargaining and service in the political science profession. Political Sci. Politics 46(2):355–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Meara K, Kuvaeva A, Nyunt G (2017) Constrained choices: A view of campus service inequality from annual faculty reports. J. Higher Educ. 88(5):672–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Meara K, Culpepper D, Misra J, Jaeger A (2022) Equity-minded faculty workloads: What we can and should do now. Report, American Council on Education, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Obloj T, Zenger T (2022) The influence of pay transparency on (gender) inequity, inequality, and the performance basis of pay. Nature Human Behav. 6:646–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palan S, Schitter C (2018) Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 17:22–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peer E, Rothschild D, Gordon A, Evernden Z, Damer E (2022) Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behav. Res. Methods 54(4):1643–1662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perez-Truglia R (2020) The effects of income transparency on well-being: Evidence from a natural experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(4):1019–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purvanova RK, Muros JP (2010) Gender differences in burnout: A meta-analysis. J. Vocational Behav. 77(2):168–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riach PA, Rich J (2002) Field experiments of discrimination in the market place. Econom. J. 112(483):F480–F518.Google Scholar
• Richman WL, Kiesler S, Weisband S, Drasgow F (1999) A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. J. Appl. Psych. 84(5):754–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small D, Gelfand M, Babcock L, Gettman H (2007) Who goes to the bargaining table? The influence of gender and framing on the initiation of negotiation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(4):600–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solnick SJ (2001) Gender differences in the ultimatum game. Econom. Inquiry 39(2):189–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutter M, Bosman R, Kocher MG, van Winden F (2009) Gender pairing and bargaining—Beware the same sex. Experiment. Econom. 12(3):318–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler R (1988) Anomalies: The ultimatum game. J. Econom. Perspect. 2(4):195–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whaley CM, Koo T, Arora VM, Ganguli I, Gross N, Jena AB (2021) Female physicians earn an estimated $2 million less than male physicians over a simulated 40-year career. Health Affairs 40(12):1856–1864.Crossref, Google Scholar