Solving the Drift Control Problem

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/12-SSY087

References

  • Anderson, E. J., Nash, P. and Perold, A. F. (1983). Some properties of a class of continuous linear programs. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 21 758–765. MR0710999Google Scholar
  • Anderson, E. J. and Nash, P. (1989). Linear Programming in Infinite-Dimensional Spaces. John Wiley, Chichester. MR0893179Google Scholar
  • Ata, B., Harrison, J. M. and Shepp, L. A. (2005). Drift rate control of a Brownian processing system. The Annals of Applied Probability 15 1145–1160. MR2134100Google Scholar
  • Avram, F. and Karaesmen, F. (1996). A method for computing Double Band Policies for switching between two diffusions. Probability in Engineering Sciences 10 569–590. MR1408617Google Scholar
  • Buie, R. N. and Abrham, J. (1973). Numerical solutions to continuous linear programming problems. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research 17 107–117. MR0429103Google Scholar
  • Chernoff, H. and Petkau, A. J. (1978). Optimal control of a Brownian motion. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 34 717–731. MR0491451Google Scholar
  • Cunningham, W. H. (1976). A network simplex method. Mathematical Programming 11 105–116. MR0462532Google Scholar
  • Feldman, R. M. and Valdez-Flores, C. (1996). Applied Probability and Stochastic Processes. PWS Pub Co, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Floudas, C. A. and Pardalos, P. M. (2001). Encyclopedia of Optimization 6. Springer.Google Scholar
  • Ghosh, A. P. and Weerasinghe, A. P. (2007). Optimal buffer size for a stochastic processing network in heavy traffic. Queueing Systems 55 147–159. MR2319488Google Scholar
  • Ghosh, A. P. and Weerasinghe, A. P. (2010). Optimal buffer size and dynamic rate control for a queueing system with impatient customers in heavy traffic. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 120 2103–2141. MR2684738Google Scholar
  • Harrison, J. M. (1985). Brownian Motion and Stochastic Flow Systems. Wiley, New York. MR0798279Google Scholar
  • Helmes, K. and Stockbridge, R. H. (2000). Numerical comparison of controls and verification of optimality for stochastic control problems. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 106 107–127. MR1780110Google Scholar
  • Helmes, K. and Stockbridge, R. H. (2008). Determining the optimal control of singular stochastic processes using linear programming. In Markov Processes and Related Fields: A Festschrift in Honor of Thomas G. Kurtz, (S. N. Ethier, J. Feng and R. H. Stockbridge, eds.). IMS Collections 137–153. IMS, Ohio. MR2574229Google Scholar
  • Hernández-Hernández, D. and Hernández-Lerma, O. (1994). Discounted cost Markov decision processes on Borel spaces: The linear programming formulation. J. Math. Anal. Appl 183 335–351. MR1274144Google Scholar
  • Hernández-Hernández, D., Hernández-Lerma, O. and Taksar, M. (1996). The linear programming approach to deterministic optimal control problems. Applicationes Mathematicae 24 17–33. MR1404981Google Scholar
  • Hernández-Lerma, O. and González-Hernández, J. (1998). Infinite linear programming and multichain Markov control processes in uncountable spaces. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 36 313–335. MR1616582Google Scholar
  • Hernández-Lerma, O. and Lasserre, J. B. (1998). Approximation schemes for infinite linear programs. SIAM Journal on Optimization 8 973–998. MR1641282Google Scholar
  • Klabjan, D. and Adelman, D. (2006). Existence of optimal policies for semi-Markov decision processes using duality for infinite linear programming. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 44 2104–2122. MR2248177Google Scholar
  • Kumar, S. and Muthuraman, K. (2004). A numerical method for solving singular stochastic control problems. Operations Research 52 563–582. MR2075794LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kushner, H. J. and Dupuis, P. (2001). Numerical Methods for Stochastic Control Problems in Continuous Time, second ed. Applications of Mathematics: Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability 24. Springer-Verlag, New York. MR1800098 (2001g:93002)Google Scholar
  • Liao, Y.-C. (1984). Switching and impulsive control of reflected diffusion. Applied Mathematical Optimization 11 153–159. MR0743924Google Scholar
  • Manne, A. S. (1960). Linear programming and sequential decisions. Management Science 6 259–267. MR0129022LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlin, J. B. (1985). On the simplex algorithm for networks and generalized networks. Mathematical Programming Studies 24 166–178. MR0820998Google Scholar
  • Ormeci Matoglu, M. and Vande Vate, J. (2010). A Technical note on drift control with changeover cost. www.isye.gatech.edu/~jvandeva/DriftControlNote.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Ormeci Matoglu, M. and Vande Vate, J. (2011). Drift contol with changeover costs. Operations Research 59 427–439. MR2830168LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Perry, D. and Bar-Lev, S. K. (1989). A control of a Brownian storage system with two switchover drifts. Stochastic Analysis and Applications 7 103–115. MR0977253Google Scholar
  • Protter, P. (2004). Stochastic Integration and Differential Equations. Springer-Verlag Berlin. MR2020294Google Scholar
  • Pullan, M. C. (1993). An algorithm for a class of continuous linear programs. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 31 1558–1577. MR1242216Google Scholar
  • Puterman, M. L. (2005). Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming. Wiley, New York. MR1270015Google Scholar
  • Rath, J. H. (1977). The optimal policy for a controlled Brownian motion process. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 32 115–125. MR0423599Google Scholar
  • Taksar, M. I. (1997). Infinite-dimensional linear programming approach to singular stochastic control. SIAM Journal of Control and Optimization 35 604–625. MR1436641Google Scholar
  • Tijms, H. C. (2004). A First Course in Stochastic Models. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. MR2190630Google Scholar
  • Veinott, A. F. (1968). Extreme points of Leontief substitution systems. Linear Algebra and Applications 1 181–194. MR0232590Google Scholar
  • Weiss, G. (2008). A simplex based algorithm to solve separated continuous linear programs. Mathematical Programming 115 151–198. MR2403756Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.