Quantile-Parameterized Distributions for Expert Knowledge Elicitation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2024.0219

References

  • Aas K, Czado C, Frigessi A, Bakken H (2009) Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence. Insurance Math. Econom. 44(2):182–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akbarov A (2009) Probability elicitation: Predictive approach. PhD thesis, University of Salford.Google Scholar
  • Arachchige CNPG, Prendergast LA, Staudte RG (2022) Robust analogs to the coefficient of variation. J. Appl. Statist. 49(2):268–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basikhasteh M, Lak F, Tahmasebi S (2021) Bayesian estimation of Morgenstern type bivariate Rayleigh distribution using some types of ranked set sampling. Rev. Colomb. Estad. 44(2):279–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berkson J (1951) Why I prefer logits to probits. Biometrics 7(4):327–339.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Best N, Dallow N, Montague T (2020) Prior elicitation. Lesaffre E, Baio G, Boulanger B, eds. Bayesian Methods in Pharmaceutical Research (Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL), 87–109.Google Scholar
  • Bowley AL (1920) Elements of Statistics (Scribner’s, New York).Google Scholar
  • Burgman M, Layman H, French S (2021) Eliciting model structures for multivariate probabilistic risk analysis. Front. Appl. Math. Statist. 7(668037):1–10.Google Scholar
  • Castillo E, Sarabia JM, Hadi AS (1997) Fitting continuous bivariate distributions to data. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. D 46(3):355–369.Google Scholar
  • Chalabi Y, Scott DJ, Wuertz D (2012) Flexible distribution modeling with the generalized lambda distribution. Working Paper MPRA Paper No. 43333, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  • Cook J (2010) Determining distribution parameters from quantiles. Working paper, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.Google Scholar
  • Cullen AC, Frey HC, Frey CH (1999) Probabilistic Techniques in Exposure Assessment: A Handbook for Dealing with Variability and Uncertainty in Models and Inputs (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
  • Czado C (2019) Analyzing Dependent Data with Vine Copulas (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drovandi CC, Pettitt AN (2011) Likelihood-free Bayesian estimation of multivariate quantile distributions. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 55(9):2541–2556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Durrleman V, Nikeghbali A, Roncalli T (2000) A simple transformation of copulas. Preprint, submitted July 31, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1032543.Google Scholar
  • EFSA PoPH, Bragard C, Baptista P, Chatzivassiliou E, Di Serio F, Gonthier P, Jaques Miret JA, Justesen AF, et al. (2023) Risk assessment of Citripestis sagittiferella for the EU. EFSA J. 21(2):1–41.Google Scholar
  • Elfadaly FG, Garthwaite PH (2017) Eliciting Dirichlet and Gaussian copula prior distributions for multinomial models. Statist. Comput. 27(2):449–467.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faber I, Jung J (2021) Rmetalog: The Metalog Distribution (CRAN).Google Scholar
  • Field C, Genton MG (2006) The multivariate g-and-h distribution. Technometrics 48(1):104–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiori AM, Zenga M (2009) Karl Pearson and the origin of kurtosis. Internat. Statist. Rev. 77(1):40–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freimer M, Kollia G, Mudholkar GS, Lin CT (1988) A study of the generalized Tukey lambda family. Commun. Statist. Methods 17(10):3547–3567.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Genest C, Favre AC (2007) Everything you always wanted to know about copula modeling but were afraid to ask. J. Hydrol. Engrg. 12(4):347–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Genest C, Quessy JF, Rémillard B (2006) Goodness-of-fit procedures for copula models based on the probability integral transformation. Scandinavian J. Statist. 33(2):337–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Genest C, Rémillard B, Beaudoin D (2009) Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas: A review and a power study. Insurance Math. Econom. 44(2):199–213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilchrist W (2000) Statistical Modelling with Quantile Functions (Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gosling JP (2018) SHELF: The Sheffield elicitation framework. Dias LC, Morton A, Quigley J, eds. Elicitation (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 61–93.Google Scholar
  • Groeneveld RA (1998) A class of quantile measures for kurtosis. Amer. Statist. 52(4):325–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gumbel EJ (1960) Bivariate exponential distributions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 55(292):698–707.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gumbel EJ (1961) Bivariate logistic distributions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 56(294):335–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hadlock CC (2017) Quantile-parameterized methods for quantifying uncertainty in decision analysis. PhD thesis, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
  • Hadlock CC, Bickel JE (2017) Johnson quantile-parameterized distributions. Decision Anal. 14(1):35–64.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hadlock CC, Bickel JE (2019) The generalized Johnson quantile-parameterized distribution system. Decision Anal. 16(1):67–85.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hanea AM, Nane GF, Bedford T, French S, eds. (2021) Expert Judgement in Risk and Decision Analysis, International Series Operations Research Management Science, vol. 293 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hartmann M, Agiashvili G, Bürkner P, Klami A (2020) Flexible prior elicitation via the prior predictive distribution. Preprint, submitted February 23, https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.09868.Google Scholar
  • Haynes M, Mengersen K (2005) Bayesian estimation of g-and-k distributions using MCMC. Comput. Statist. 20(1):7–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haynes MA, MacGillivray HL, Mengersen KL (1997) Robustness of ranking and selection rules using generalised g-and-k distributions. J. Statist. Plan. Inference 65(1):45–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hemming V, Burgman MA, Hanea AM, McBride MF, Wintle BC (2018) A practical guide to structured expert elicitation using the IDEA protocol. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9(1):169–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herrerías-Velasco JM, Herrerías-Pleguezuelo R, van Dorp JR (2009) The generalized two-sided power distribution. J. Appl. Statist. 36(5):573–587.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoff PD (2007) Extending the rank likelihood for semiparametric copula estimation. Ann. Appl. Statist. 1(1):265–283.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holzhauer B, Hampson LV, Gosling JP, Bornkamp B, Kahn J, Lange MR, Luo WL, et al. (2022) Eliciting judgements about dependent quantities of interest: The SHeffield ELicitation Framework extension and copula methods illustrated using an asthma case study. Pharm. Statist. 21(5):1005–1021.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram B (2020) Rjqpd: The Johnson Quantile-Parameterised Distribution (CRAN).Google Scholar
  • Jeong-Soo P (2005) Wakeby distribution and the maximum likelihood estimation algorithm in which probability density function is not explicitly expressed. Commun. Statist. Appl. Methods 12(2):443–451.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson D (1997) The triangular distribution as a proxy for the beta distribution in risk analysis. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. D 46(3):387–398.Google Scholar
  • Johnson NL, Kotz S, Balakrishnan N (1994) Continuous Univariate Distributions. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Jones MC, Rosco JF, Pewsey A (2011) Skewness-invariant measures of kurtosis. Amer. Statist. 65(2):89–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kadane JB (1980) Predictive and structural methods for eliciting prior distributions. Zellner A, ed. Bayesian Analysis in Econometrics and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Jeffreys (North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam), 89–93.Google Scholar
  • Kadane J, Wolfson LJ (1998) Experiences in elicitation. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. D Statist. 47(1):3–19.Google Scholar
  • Keelin TW (2016) The metalog distributions. Decision Anal. 13(4):243–277.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keelin TW (2017) The metalog distributions—feasibility. Accessed July 3, 2024, http://www.metalogdistributions.com/equations/feasibility.html.Google Scholar
  • Keelin TW, Howard RA (2021) The metalog distributions: Virtually unlimited shape flexibility, combining expert opinion in closed form, and Bayesian updating in closed form. Preprint, submitted October 12, https://osf.io/xdg5e/.Google Scholar
  • Keelin TW, Powley BW (2011) Quantile-parameterized distributions. Decision Anal. 8(3):206–219.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Khan I (2020) Jqpd: The python JQPD. Accessed July 3, 2024, https://pypi.org/project/jqpd/.Google Scholar
  • Kim TH, White H (2004) On more robust estimation of skewness and kurtosis. Finance Res. Lett. 1(1):56–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kotz S, Van Dorp JR (2004) Beyond Beta: Other Continuous Families of Distributions with Bounded Support and Applications (World Scientific, Singapore/Hackensack, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kotz S, Van Dorp JR (2005) A link between two-sided power and asymmetric Laplace distributions: With applications to mean and variance approximations. Statist. Probab. Lett. 71(4):383–394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kurowicka D, Cooke R (2006) Uncertainty Analysis with High Dimensional Dependence Modelling. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics (Wiley, Chichester, UK/Hoboken, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kurowicka D, Joe H, eds. (2011) Dependence Modeling: Vine Copula Handbook (World Scientific, Singapore).Google Scholar
  • Lampasi D (2008) An alternative approach to measurement based on quantile functions. Measurement 41(9):994–1013.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mac Gillivray H (1992) Shape properties of the g-and-h and Johnson families. Commun. Statist. Theory Methods 21(5):1233–1250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mikkola P, Martin OA, Chandramouli S, Hartmann M, Pla OA, Thomas O, Pesonen H, et al. (2023) Prior knowledge elicitation: The past, present, and future. Bayesian Anal. 1(1):1–33.Google Scholar
  • Moors JJA (1988) A quantile alternative for kurtosis. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. D Statist. 37(1):25–32.Google Scholar
  • Morgan MG (2014) Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(20):7176–7184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myerson RB (2005) Probability Models for Economic Decisions. Duxbury Applied Series (Thomson/Brooke/Cole, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
  • Nair NU, Vineshkumar B (2023) Properties of bivariate distributions represented through quantile functions. Amer. J. Math. Management Sci. 42(1):1–12.Google Scholar
  • O’Hagan A (2019) Expert knowledge elicitation: Subjective but scientific. Amer. Statist. 73(sup1):69–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Hagan A, Buck CE, Daneshkhah A, Eiser JR, Garthwaite PH, Jenkinson DJ, Oakley JE, Rakow T (2006) Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts’ Probabilities: O’Hagan/Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts’ Probabilities (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palisade Corp (2009) Guide to using@ RISK.: Risk analysis and simulation add-in for Microsoft Excel. Technical report, Palisade Corporation, Newfield, NY.Google Scholar
  • Parzen E (1979) Nonparametric statistical data modeling. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 74(365):105–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perepolkin D (2019) Qpd: Tools for Quantile-Parameterized Distributions. Accessed July 3, 2024, https://github.com/dmi3kno/qpd.Google Scholar
  • Perepolkin D, Goodrich B, Sahlin U (2023) The tenets of quantile-based inference in Bayesian models. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 187(107795):1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perepolkin D, Goodrich B, Sahlin U (2024) Hybrid elicitation and quantile-parametrized likelihood. Statist. Comput. 34(11):1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powley BW (2013) Quantile function methods for decision analysis. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Paolo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  • Prangle D (2017) gk: An R package for the g-and-k and generalised g-and-h distributions. Preprint, submitted June 21, https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.06889.Google Scholar
  • Rahman A, Zaman MA, Haddad K, El Adlouni S, Zhang C (2015) Applicability of Wakeby distribution in flood frequency analysis: A case study for eastern Australia. Hydrol. Processes 29(4):602–614.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramberg JS, Schmeiser BW (1974) An approximate method for generating asymmetric random variables. Commun. ACM 17(2):78–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rayner GD, MacGillivray HL (2002) Numerical maximum likelihood estimation for the g-and-k and generalized g-and-h distributions. Statist. Comput. 12(1):57–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sajeevkumar N, Irshad M (2014) Estimation of a parameter of Morgenstern type bivariate logistic distribution with equal coefficients of variation by concomitants of order statistics. Calcutta Statist. Assoc. Bull. 66(3–4):213–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharma R, Das S (2018) Regularization and variable selection with copula prior. Preprint, submitted September 16, https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.05514.Google Scholar
  • Shih N (2015) The model identification of beta distribution based on quantiles. J. Statist. Comput. Simul. 85(10):2022–2032.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith MS (2013) Bayesian approaches to copula modelling. Preprint, submitted December 18, https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.4204.Google Scholar
  • Smith C, Jefferies T, Faber I (2021) Pymetalog: The python metalog distribution. https://github.com/tjefferies/pymetalog.Google Scholar
  • Spetzler CS, Staël Von Holstein CAS (1975) Probability encoding in decision analysis. Management Sci. 22(3):340–358.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tarsitano A (2005) Fitting Wakeby model using maximum likelihood. Statistica e Ambiente 1(1):253–256.Google Scholar
  • Tukey JW (1965) Which part of the sample contains the information? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 53(1):127–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Dorp JR, Mazzuchi TA (2000) Solving for the parameters of a beta a distribution under two quantile constraints. J. Statist. Comput. Simul. 67(2):189–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Dorp JR, Mazzuchi TA (2021) Three-point lifetime distribution elicitation for maintenance optimization in a Bayesian context. Hanea A, Nane GF, Bedford T, French S, eds. Expert Judgement in Risk and Decision Analysis, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 147–177.Google Scholar
  • van Dorp JR, Shittu E (2023) The generalized two-sided beta distribution with applications in project risk analysis. J. Statist. Theory Pract. 17(38):1–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vineshkumar B, Nair NU (2019) Bivariate quantile functions and their applications to reliability modelling. Statistics 79(1):3–21.Google Scholar
  • Wang W, Wells MT (2000) Model selection and semiparametric inference for bivariate failure-time data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 95(449):62–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Welsh MB, Begg SH (2018) More-or-less elicitation (MOLE): Reducing bias in range estimation and forecasting. EURO J. Decision Process 6(1):171–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson KJ (2018) Specification of informative prior distributions for multinomial models using vine copulas. Bayesian Anal. 13(3):749–766.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson KJ, Elfadaly FG, Garthwaite PH, Oakley JE (2021) Recent advances in the elicitation of uncertainty distributions from experts for multinomial probabilities. Hanea AM, Nane GF, Bedford T, French S, eds. Expert Judgement in Risk and Decision Analysis, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 19–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson KJ, Farrow M, French S, Hartley D (2023) Reconciliation of expert priors for quantities and events and application within the probabilistic Delphi method. Preprint, submitted November 24, https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.14487.Google Scholar
  • Winkler RL (1980) Prior information, predictive distributions, and Bayesian model-building. Zellner A, ed. Bayesian Analysis in Econometrics and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Jeffreys (Studies in Bayesian Econometrics) (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam), 95–109.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.