The Ombudsman: Reaping Benefits from Management Research: Lessons from the Forecasting Principles Project

References

• Armstrong J. S.Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners (2001) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong J. S. Discovery and communication of important marketing findings: Evidence and proposals. J. Bus. Res. (2003) 56(1):69–84(commentaries and reply, pp. 85–92) Full text at jscottarmstrong.comCrossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong J. S., Schultz R. L. Principles involving marketing policies: An empirical assessment. Marketing Lett. (1993) 4(3):253–265Full text at jscottarmstrong.comCrossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong J. S., Brodie R., Parsons A. Hypotheses in marketing science: Literature review and publication audit. Marketing Lett. (2001) 12(2):171–187Full text at jscottarmstrong.comCrossref, Google Scholar
• Campanario J. M. The competition for journal space among referees, editors, and other authors and its influence on journals' impact factors. J. American Soc. Inform. Sci. (1996) 47(3):184–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox J. E., Loomis D. G., Armstrong J. S. Diffusion of forecasting principles through books. Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners (2001) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hubbard R., Lindsay R. M. How the emphasis on ‘original’ empirical marketing research impedes knowledge development. Marketing Theory (2002) 2(4):381–388Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laband D. N., Piette M. J. Favoritism versus search for good papers: Empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal editors. J. Political Econom. (1994) 102:194–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maier Norman R. F.Problem Solving Discussions and Conferences (1963) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• March J. G., Simon H. S.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Rodman H., Mancini J. A. Errors, manuscripts, and equal treatment. Res. Higher Ed. (1977) 7:369–374Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherrell D. L., Hair J. F., Griffin M. Marketing academicians' perceptions of ethical research and publishing behavior. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1989) 17(4):315–324Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith K., Laband D. N. The role of editors' professional connections in determining which papers get published: Evidence from accounting research journals. Accounting Perspectives (1995) 1(1):21–30Google Scholar
• Tashman L. J., Hoover J., Armstrong J. S. Diffusion of forecasting principles through software. Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners (2001) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong J. Scott, Pagell Ruth. Reaping benefits from management research: Lessons from the forecasting principles project. Interfaces (2003) 33:91–111Google Scholar
• Atkinson D. R., Furlong M. J., Wampold B. W. Statistical significance, reviewer evaluations and the scientific process: Is there a (statistically) significant relationship? J. Counseling Psych. (1982) 29(2):189–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bem D. J., Honorton C. Does Psi exist? Replicable evidence for an anomalous process of information transfer. Psych. Bull. (1994) 115(1):4–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beyer J., Chanove R. G., Fox W. B. The review process and the fates of manuscripts submitted to AMJ. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(5):1219–1260Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campanario J. M. Peer review for journals as it stands today’Part 1. Sci. Comm. (1998a) 19(3):181–211Available at http://www.uah.es/otrosweb/jmcCrossref, Google Scholar
• Campanario J. M. Peer review for journals as it stands today’Part 2. Sci. Comm. (1998b) 19(4):277–306Available at http://www.uah.es/otrosweb/jmcCrossref, Google Scholar
• Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. J. Amer. Medical Association (1990) 263(10):1385–1389Crossref, Google Scholar
• Easterbrook P. J., Berlin J. A., Gopalan R., Mattews D. R. Publication bias in clinical research. The Lancet (1991) 337(8746):867–872Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glass G. V. Meta-analysis: An approach to the synthesis of research results. J. Res. Sci. Teaching (1982) 19(2):93–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hubbard R., Armstrong J. S. Are null results becoming an endangered species in marketing? Marketing Lett. (1992) 3(2):127–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hubbard R., Vetter D. E. An empirical comparison of published replication research in accounting, economics, finance, management and marketing. J. Bus. Res. (1996) 35(2):153–164Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr S., Tolliver J., Petree D. Manuscript characteristics which influence acceptance for management and social science journals. Acad. Management J. (1977) 20(1):132–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scargle Jeffrey D. Publication bias: The “file-drawer” problem in scientific inference. J. Sci. Exploration (2000) 14(1):91–106Retrieved April 4, 2003, http://www.scientificexploration.org/jse/articles/pdf/scargle.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Weller A. C.Editorial Peer Review. Its Strengths and Weaknesses (2001) (ASIST Monograph Series, Medford, NJ) Google Scholar
• Chatfield C. Calculating interval forecasts. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1993) 11(2):121–144Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makridakis S., Hibon M. The M3-Competition: Results, conclusions and implications. Internat. J. Forecasting (2000) 16(4):451–476Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Neill L., Kanyamibwa F. A journal citation analysis using MDS. Proc. Northeast Decision Sci. Inst. (1995) 377–379Google Scholar
• Ord J. K. Commentaries on the M3-Competition. Internat. J. Forecasting (2001) 17(4):537–584Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant John. The New Marketing Manifesto (1999) (Texere, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Hamel Gary. Leading the Revolution (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Hubbard Raymond, Murray Lindsay R. How the emphasis on ‘original’ empirical marketing research impedes knowledge development. Marketing Theory (2002) 2(4):381–402Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindblom Charles E. The science of “muddling through.”. Public Administration Rev. (1959) 19(2):79–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• McIntyre Shelby H., Sutherland Max. A critical analysis into the accumulation of marketing knowledge at the level of the firm. Marketing Theory (2002) 2(4):403–418Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossiter John. What is marketing knowledge? Stage 1: Forms of marketing knowledge. Marketing Theory (2001) 1(1):9–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossiter John. The five forms of transmissible, usable marketing knowledge. Marketing Theory (2002) 2(4):369–380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trout Jack, Rivkin Steve. The New Positioning (1996) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Uncles Mark. From marketing knowledge to marketing principles. Marketing Theory (2002) 2(4):345–353Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morwitz V. G., Armstrong J. S. Methods for forecasting from intentions data. Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners (2001) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) 33–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen P. Geoffrey, Fildes Robert, Armstrong J. S. Econometric forecasting. Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners (2001) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong J. Scott. Management folklore and management science’On portfolio planning, escalation bias, and such. Interfaces (1996) 26(4):28–42Link, Google Scholar
• Barber Bernard. Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery. Science (1961) 134:596–602Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green Kesten C. A comparison of forecasting decisions in conflict situations: Game theory, role-playing, and unaided judgment. Internat. J. Forecasting (2002) 18(3):321–344commentary, pp. 345–395Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hubbard Raymond, Vetter Daniel E. An empirical comparison of published replication research in accounting, economics, finance, management, and marketing. J. Bus. Res. (1996) 35(2):153–164Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn Thomas S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Lomborg Bjørn. The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World (2001) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon Julian L.The Ultimate Resource (1981) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Smith Richard. Where is the wisdom: The poverty of medical evidence. British Medical J. (1991) 303(6806):798–799Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sobel Dava. Longitude (1995) (Walker Publishing, New York) Google Scholar