Web Personalization as a Persuasion Strategy: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective

References

• Allen C., Kania D., Yacckel B.Internet World Guide to One-To-One Web Marketing (1998) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Ardissono L., Goy A., Petrone G., Segnan M. Personalization in business-to-customer interaction. Comm. ACM (2002) 45(5):52–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Areni C. S., Ferrell M. E., Wilcox J. B. The persuasive impact of reported group opinions on individuals low vs. high in need for cognition: Rationalization vs. biased elaboration? Psych. Marketing (2000) 17(10):855–875Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bargh J. A. Losing consciousness: Automatic influences on consumer judgment, behavior, and motivation. J. Consumer Res. (2002) 29(2):280–285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cacioppo J. T., Petty R. E. The need for cognition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1982) 42:116–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cacioppo J. T., Petty R. E., Morris K. Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1983) 45(4):805–818Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohan P. S.E-Profit: High-Payoff Strategies for Capturing the E-Commerce Edge (2000) (AMACOM, New York) Google Scholar
• Cohen A. R., Stotland E., Wolfe D. M. An experimental investigation of need for cognition. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. (1955) 51:291–294Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1988) 2nd ed(Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Collins A. M., Loftus E. G. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psych. Rev. (1975) 83:407–428Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dillard J. P., Pfau M.The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice (2002) (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Eagly A. H., Chaiken S.The Psychology of Attitudes (1993) (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Orlando, FL) Google Scholar
• Eastman C. M. 30,000 hits may be better than 300: Precision anomalies in Internet searches. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. (2002) 53(11):879–882Crossref, Google Scholar
• You’re hired (under Technology Quarterly)Economist, The (2004) September 18):21–22Google Scholar
• Ferguson T. J., Rule G. R., Carlson D. Memory for personally relevant information. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1983) 44(2):251–261Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festa P. Report slams Web personalization. (2003) . http://news.com. com/2100-1038-5090716.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Fletcher G. J. O., Danilovis P., Fernandez G., Peterson D., Reeder G. D. Attributional complexity: An individual difference measure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(4):875–884Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwald A. G., Leavitt C. Audience involvement in advertising: Four levels. J. Consumer Res. (1984) 11(1):581–592Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haugtvedt C., Petty R., Cacioppo R. Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. J. Consumer Psych. (1992) 1(3):239–260Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong W. Y., Thong J. Y. L., Tam K. Y. Does animation attract online consumers’ attention? The effect of Flash on information search tasks. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(1):60–86Link, Google Scholar
• Jupiter Research Reports That Web Site “Personalization” Does Not Always Provide Positive Results. (2003) October 14). http://www. jupitermedia.com / corporate / releases / 03.10.14-newjupresearch. htmlGoogle Scholar
• Kim J. W., Lee B. H., Shaw M. J., Chang H. L., Nelson M. Application of decision-tree induction techniques to personalized advertisements on Internet storefronts. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2001) 5(3):45–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein S. B., Kihlstrom J. F. Elaboration, organization, and the self-reference effect in memory. J. Experiment. Psych. (1986) 115(1):26–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein S. B., Loftus J. The nature of self-referent encoding: The contributions of elaborative and organizational processes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1988) 55(1):5–11Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lachman R., Lachman J. L., Butterfield E. C.Cognitive Psychology and Information Processing (1979) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Larsen V., Wright N. D., Hergert T. R. Advertising montage: Two theoretical perspectives. Psych. Marketing (2004) 21(1):1–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ledford J. A. L.Content Personalization Market Trends (2002) (Faulkner Information Services, Pennsauken, NJ) Google Scholar
• Light M., Maybury M. T. The adaptive web: Personalized multimedia information access. Comm. ACM (2002) 45(5):54–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacInnis D. J., Jaworski B. J. Information processing from advertisements: Toward an integrative framework. J. Marketing (1989) 53(4):1–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAlister L., Pessemier E. Variety seeking behavior: An interdisciplinary review. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(3):311–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mick D. G. Levels of subjective comprehension in advertising processing and their relations to ad perceptions, attitudes, and memory. J. Consumer Res. (1992) 18(4):411–424Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murthi B. P. S., Sarkar S. The role of the management sciences in research on personalization. Management Sci. (2003) 49(10):1344–1362Link, Google Scholar
• Nachshon I. Directional preferences in perception of visual stimuli. Internat. J. Neuroscience (1985) 25(3/4):161–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayana C. L., Markin R. J. Consumer behavior and product performance: An alternative conceptualization. J. Marketing (1975) 39(4):1–6Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parkes C. The power of personalization Web technologies get personalized to increase profits. (2001) . http://www.esj.com/ features/article.asp?EditorialsID=35 Google Scholar
• Peppers D., Rogers M.Enterprise One to One: Tools for Competing in the Interactive Age (1997) (Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
• Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T.Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches (1981) (W.C. Brown, Dubuque, IA) Google Scholar
• Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T.Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change (1986a) (Springer Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1986b) 19:123–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roehm M. L., Sternthal B. The moderating effect of knowledge and resources on the persuasive impact of analogies. J. Consumer Res. (2001) 28(2):257–272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers T. B., Kuiper N. A., Kirker W. S. Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1977) 35:677–688Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust R. T., Lemon K. N. E-service and the customer. Internal J. Electronic Commerce (2001) 5(3):85–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scharine A. A., McBeath M. K. Right-handers and Americans favor turning to the right. Human Factors (2002) 44(2):248–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A.Models of Thought (1979) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
• Taylor S. E., Thompson S. C. Stalking the elusive “vividness” effect. Psych. Rev. (1982) 89(2):155–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden A. H. C.Selective Attention in Vision (1992) (Routledge, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vecera S. P., Farah M. J. Does visual attention select objects or locations? J. Experiment. Psych.: General (1994) 123(2):146–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verplanken B. Need for cognition and external information search: Responses to time pressure during decision-making. J. Res. Personality (1993) 27(September):238–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wyer R. S., Srull T. K.Memory and Cognition in Its Social Context (1989) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Zhang P. A. The effects of animation on information seeking performance on the world wide web: Securing attention or interfering with primary tasks? J. AIS (2000) 1:1–28Google Scholar