Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0096

References

  • Adams D. A., Nelson R. R., Todd P. A. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quart. (1992) 16(2):227–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Karahanna E. Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(4):665–694CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alavi M., Henderson J. C. An evolutionary strategy for implementing a decision support system. Management Sci. (1981) 27(11):1309–1322LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Auer T. Quality of IS use. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (1998) 7(3):192–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barkin S. R., Dickson G. W. An investigation of information system utilization. Inform. Management (1977) 1(1):35–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beal D. J., Cohen R. R., Burke M. J., McLendon C. L. Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(6):989–1004CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau M.-C., Gefen D., Straub D. W. Validation in information systems research: A state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(1):1–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton-Jones A. New perspectives on the system usage construct. (2005) . Doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Information Systems, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  • Calder B. J., Phillips L. W., Tybout A. M. Designing research for application. J. Consumer Res. (1981) 8:197–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell D. T., Fiske D. W. Convergent and discriminant validity by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psych. Bull. (1959) 56:81–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell J. P., Dunnette M. D., Hough L. M. Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1990) 2nd ed.(Consulting Psychologists' Press, Palo Alto, CA) 687–732Google Scholar
  • Carlsson S. A. A longitudinal study of spreadsheet program use. J. Management Inform. Systems (1988) 5(1):82–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chidambaram L., Zmud R. W., Karahannas M., Kambhammettu S. S. Measuring the business value of information technology (IT): A review and analysis of IT metrics. Business Performance Measurement: Toward Organizational Excellence (2005) (Le Magnus University Press, Hyderabed, India) 1–16Google Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Marcolin B. L. The future of diffusion research. DATA BASE Adv. Inform. Systems (2001) 32(3):8–12CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Newsted P. R. The importance of specification in causal modeling: The case of end-user computing satisfaction. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(1):73–81LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Gopal A., Salisbury W. D. Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: The development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(4):342–367LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Marcolin B. L., Newsted P. R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic mail emotion/adoption study. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):189–217LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1988) 2nd ed.(Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Cronbach L. J., Thorndike R. L. Test validation. Educational Measurement (1971) 2nd ed.(American Council on Education, Washington, D.C.) 443–507Google Scholar
  • Cronbach L. J., Meehl P. E. Construct validation in psychological tests. Psych. Bull. (1955) 52(4):281–302CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and end user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):318–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(1):60–95LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year review. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 19(4):9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Devaraj S., Kohli R. Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):273–289LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Doll W. J., Torkzadeh G. The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quart. (1988) 12(2):259–274CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doll W. J., Torkzadeh G. Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context. Inform. Management (1998) 33(4):171–185CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dubin R.Theory Building (1978) rev. ed.(Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Edwards J. R. Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytic framework. Organ. Res. Methods (2001) 4(2):144–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C., Larcker D. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(1):39–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fromkin H. L., Streufert S., Dunnette M. D. Laboratory experimentation. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1976) (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL) 415–465Google Scholar
  • Ginzberg M. J. Early diagnosis of MIS implementation failure. Management Sci. (1981) 27(4):459–478LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goodhue D. L. Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Sci. (1995) 41(12):1827–1844LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goodhue D. L., Thompson R. L. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):213–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffith T. L. Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(3):472–488CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffith T. L., Northcraft G. B. Distinguishing between the forest and the trees: Media, features, and methodology in electronic communications research. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):272–285LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Black W. C.Multivariate Data Analysis (1998) 5th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Hartwick J. H., Barki H. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Sci. (1994) 40(4):440–465LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hilbert D. M., Redmiles D. F. Extracting usability information from user interface events. ACM Comput. Surveys (2000) 32(4):384–421CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hunter J. E., Schmidt F. L.Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (1990) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Igbaria M., Tan M. The consequences of information technology acceptance on subsequent individual performance. Inform. Management (1997) 32(3):113–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Igbaria M., Zinatelli N., Cragg P., Cavaye A. L. M. Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(3):279–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvis C. B., MacKenzie S. B., Podsakoff P. M. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30(2):199–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jasperson J., Carter P. E., Zmud R. W. A comprehensive conceptualization of the post-adoptive behaviors associated with IT-enabled work systems. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):525–557CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lamb R., Kling R. Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):197–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Landry M., Banville C. A disciplined methodological pluralism for MIS research. Accounting, Management Inform. Tech. (1992) 2(2):77–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Law K. S., Wong C.-S., Mobley W. H. Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):741–755CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee A. S., Baskerville R. Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(3):221–243LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lohmoller J.-B.Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares (1989) (Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucas H. C. Empirical evidence for a descriptive model of implementation. MIS Quart. (1978) 2(2):27–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucas H. C., Spitler V. K. Technology use and performance: A field study of broker workstations. Decision Sci. (1999) 30(2):1–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marcolin B. L., Compeau D., Munro M. C., Huff S. L. Assessing user competence: Conceptualization and measurement. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 11(1):37–60LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mathieson K., Peacock E., Chin W. W. Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources. DATA BASE Adv. Inform. Systems (2001) 32(3):86–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meister D.Human Factors Testing and Evaluation (1986) (Elsevier, West Lafayette, IN) Google Scholar
  • Meister D. B., Compeau D. R. Infusion of innovation adoption: An individual perspective. Annual Conf. Admin. Sci. Assoc. Canada (ASAC) (2002) May 25–28Winnipeg, Canada:23–33Google Scholar
  • Melone N. A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research. Management Sci. (1990) 36(1):76–91LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moore G. C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting and information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(3):192–222LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Motl R. W., DiStefano C. Longitudinal invariance of self-esteem and method effects associated with negatively worded items. Structural Equation Model (2002) 9(4):562–578CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nance W. D. Task/technology fit and knowledge worker use of information technology: A study of auditors. (1992) . Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, MNGoogle Scholar
  • Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Panko R. R. What we know about spreadsheet errors. J. End User Comput. (1998) 10(2):15–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland B. T. Use and productivity in personal computing: An empirical test. 10th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1989) DecemberBoston, MA:211–222Google Scholar
  • Robey D. Diversity in information systems research: Threat, promise, and responsibility. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(4):400–408LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Saga V. L., Zmud R. W. The nature & determinants of information technology infusion at an organizational level of analysis. Acad. Management, Distinguished Poster Session, Technology & Innovation Management (1994) . Dallas, TX (August)Google Scholar
  • Seddon P.B. A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):240–253LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sonnentag S., Frese M., Sonnentag S. Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance (2002) (Wiley, UK) 3–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srinivasan A. Alternative measures of system effectiveness: Associations and implications. MIS Quart. (1985) 9(3):243–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strassman P. A., Berger P., Swanson E. B., Kriebel C. H., Kauffman R. J.Measuring Business Value of Information Technologies (1988) (ICIT Press, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
  • Straub D., Limayem M., Karahanna-Evaristo E. Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Management Sci. (1995) 41(8):1328–1342LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Subramani M. How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(1):45–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szajna B. Determining information systems usage: Some issues and examples. Inform. Management (1993) 25(3):147–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trice A. W., Treacy M. E. Utilization as a dependent variable in MIS research. Proc. 7th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1986) San Diego, CA:227–239Google Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Davis F. D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. (2000) 46(2):186–204LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B., Davis F. D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):425–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber R.Ontological Foundations of Information Systems (1997) (Coopers & Lybrand and Accounting Association of Australia and New Zealand, Melbourne, Australia) Google Scholar
  • Webster J., Martocchio J. J. Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Quart. (1992) 16(2CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yuthas K., Young S. T. Material matters: Assessing the effectiveness of materials management IS. Inform. Management (1998) 33(3):115–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zigurs I., Jessup L. M., Valacich J. S. Methodological and measurement issues in group support system research. Group Support Systems: New Perspectives (1993) (Macmillan, New York) 112–122Google Scholar
  • Zigurs I., Buckland B. K. A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(3):313–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.