IS Application Capabilities and Relational Value in Interfirm Partnerships

References

• Achrol R. S. Marketing in the network economy. J. Marketing (1999) 63(Special Issue):146–163Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler P. S., Goldoftas B., Levine D. Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(1):43–68Link, Google Scholar
• Allen B. R., Boynton A. C. Information architecture: In search of efficient flexibility. MIS Quart. (1991) 15(4):435–445Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson J. C., Hakansson H., Johanson J. Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. J. Marketing (1994) 58(4):1–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y. J., Brynjolfsson E. From vendors to partners: Information technologies and incomplete contracts in buyer-seller relationships. J. Organ. Comput. (1993) 3(3):301–328Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barua A., Kriebel C. H., Mukhopadhyay T. Information technologies and business value: An analytic and empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(1):3–23Link, Google Scholar
• Bensaou M., Venkatraman N. Inter-organizational relationships and information technology: A conceptual synthesis and a research framework. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (1996) 5(2):84–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A. S. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(1):169–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broadbent M., Weill P., Neo B. S. Strategic context and patterns of IT infrastructure capability. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (1999) 8(2):157–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrd T. A., Turner D. E. An exploratory examination of the relationship between flexible IT infrastructure and competitive advantage. Inform. Management (2001) 39(1):41–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannon J. P., Perreault W. D. Buyer-seller relationships in business markets. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(4):439–460Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlsson B. Flexibility and the theory of the firm. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1989) 7(2):179–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carte T. A., Russell C. J. In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):479–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan Y., Huff S., Barclay D., Copeland D. Business strategic orientation, information systems strategic orientation, and strategic alignment. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(2):125–150Link, Google Scholar
• Chin W. Issues and opinions on structural equation modeling. MIS Quart. (1998a) 22(1):vii–xviGoogle Scholar
• Chin W., Marcoulides G. A. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research (1998b) 304(Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 295–336Google Scholar
• Christiaanse E., Venkatraman N. Beyond SABRE: An empirical test of expertise exploitation in electronic channels. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(1):15–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colombo R. A model for diagnosing and reducing non-response bias. J. Advertising Res. (2000) 40(1/2):85–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronbach L. J., Thorndike R. L. Test validation. Educational Measurement (1971) (American Council on Education, Washington, D.C.) 443–507Google Scholar
• D'Adderio L. Configuring software, reconfiguring memories: The influence of integrated systems on the reproduction of knowledge and routines. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12(2):321–350Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danneels E. Tight-loose coupling with customers: The enactment of customer orientation. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(6):559–576Crossref, Google Scholar
• Day G. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. J. Marketing (1994) 58(4):37–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan R. M., Seidmann A., Sundaresan S. Strategic choices in IS infrastructure: Corporate standards versus “best of breed” systems. 16th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1995) Amsterdam, The Netherlands:97–108Google Scholar
• Dietrich A. J., Kirn S., Sugumaran V. A service-oriented architecture for mass customization a shoe industry case study. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2007) 54(1):190–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncan N. Capturing flexibility of information technology infrastructure: A study of resource characteristics and their measure. J. Management Inform. Systems (1995) 12(2):37–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H. Does governance matter? Keiretsu alliances and asset specificity as sources of Japanese competitive advantage. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(6):649–666Link, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H., Nobeoka K. Creating and managing a high perfomance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):345–367Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H., Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):660–679Crossref, Google Scholar
• El Sawy O. A., Bowles G. Redesigning the customer support process for the electronic economy: Insights from storage dimensions. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(4):457–483Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(1):39–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S., Moran P. Bad for practice: A critique of transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21(1):13–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson C. B., Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(2):209–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gosain S., Malhotra A., El Sawy O. A. Coordinating for flexibility in e-business supply chains. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 21(3):7–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1360–1380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):375–387Link, Google Scholar
• Grewal R., Tanushaj P. Building organizational capabilities for managing economics crisis: The role of market orientation and strategic flexibility. J. Marketing (2001) 65(2):67–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R., Lawrence P. R., Puranam P. Adaptation in vertical relationships: Beyond incentive conflict. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(5):415–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Häcki R., Lighton J. The future of the networked economy. McKinsey Quart. (2001) 2001(3):26–39Google Scholar
• Hagel J., Brown J. B.The Only Sustainable Edge (2005) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Hagel J. I., Brown J. S. Your next IT strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2001) 79(9):105–113Google Scholar
• Hair J., Anderson R., Tatham R., Black W.Multivariate Data Analysis (1998) 5th ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multi-unit companies. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):232–248Link, Google Scholar
• Harmon H. H.Modern Factor Analysis (1967) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Hart P., Estrin D. Inter-organization networks, computer integration, and shifts in interdependence: The case of the semiconductor industry. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems (1991) 9(4):370–398Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart P. J., Saunders C. S. Emerging electronic partnerships: Antecedents and dimensions of EDI use from the supplier's perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems (1998) 14(4):87–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hasselbring W. Information system integration. Comm. ACM (2000) 43(6):33–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homburg C., Pflesser C. A multiple-layer of market-oriented organizational culture: Measurement issues and performance outcomes. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(4):449–462Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber G. P., McDaniel R. R. The decision-making paradigm of organizational design. Management Sci. (1986) 32(5):572–589Link, Google Scholar
• Keen P. G. W.Shaping the Future: Business Design Through Information Technology (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Kohli A. K., Jaworski B. J. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. J. Marketing (1990) 54(2):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar R. A framework for assessing the business value of information technology infrastructures. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 21(2):11–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Little R. J. A., Rubin D. A.Statistical Analysis with Missing Data (1987) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni G., Lipparini A. The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. (1996) 20(4):317–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A., Gosain S., El Sawy O. A. Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):145–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus L. Paradigm shifts in e-business and business/systems integration. Comm. AIS (2000) 4(10Google Scholar
• Massetti B., Zmud R. W. Measuring the extent of EDI usage in complex organizations: Strategies and illustrative examples. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(3):331–345Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsuno K., Mentzer J. T., Ozsomer A. The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and market orientation on business performance. J. Marketing (2002) 66(3):18–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H., Pillai R. Clockspeed and information response: Evidence from the information technology industry. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(4):415–433Link, Google Scholar
• Monczka R. M., Petersen K. J., Handfield R. B., Ragatz G. L. Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: The buying company perspective. Decision Sci. (1998) 29(3):553–577Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narus J. A., Anderson J. C. Rethinking distribution. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74(4):112–120Google Scholar
• Narver J. C., Slater S. F. The effect of market orientation on business profitability. J. Marketing (1990) 54(4):20–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson K. M., Ghods M. Measuring technology flexibility. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (1998) 7(4):232–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orton J. D., Weick K. E. Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15(2):203–223Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips L. W., Bagozzi R. P. On measuring the organizational properties of distribution channels: Methodological issues in the use of key informants. Res. Marketing (1986) 8:313–369Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P., Organ D. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management (1986) 12(4):531–545Crossref, Google Scholar
• Premkumar G., Richardson V. J., Zmud R. Sustaining competitive advantage through a value net: The case of enterprise rent-a-car. MISQ Executive (2004) 3(4):189–199Google Scholar
• Rai A., Patnayakuni R., Patnayakuni N. Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(2):225–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ray G., Muhanna W., Barney J. Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(4):625–652Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ring P. S., Van de Ven A. H. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(1):90–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. W., Siggelkow N. Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):290–311Link, Google Scholar
• Robicheaux R. A., Coleman J. S. The structure of marketing channel relationships. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1994) 22(1):38–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sa Vinhas A., Anderson E. How potential conflict drives channel structure: Concurrent (direct and indirect) channels. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(4):507–515Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R., Chan Y. Alignment between business and IS strategies: A study of prospectors, analyzers and defenders. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(1):11–33Link, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A., Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):237–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos F. M., Eisenhardt K. M.Constructing Markets and Organizing Boundaries: Entrepreneurial Action in a Nascent Field (2004) (Academy of Management, New Orleans, LA) Google Scholar
• Schlueter Langdon C. Information systems architecture styles and business interaction patterns: Toward theoretic correspondence. J. Inform. Systems E-Bus. (2003a) 1(3):283–304Google Scholar
• Schlueter Langdon C. The state of Web services. IEEE Comput. (2003b) 36(7):93–95Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlueter Langdon C. Designing information systems capabilities to create business value: A theoretical conceptualizaton of the role of flexibility and integration. J. Database Management (2006) 17(3):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Short J. E., Venkatraman N. Beyond business process redesign—Redefining Baxter business network. Sloan Management Rev. (1992) 34(1):7–21Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N., Levinthal D. A. Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):650–669Link, Google Scholar
• Slater S. F., Narver J. C. Market orientation, customer value, and superior performance. Bus. Horizons (1994) 37(2):22–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slater S. F., Narver J. C. Market orientation and the learning organization. J. Marketing (1995) 59(3):63–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub D. W., Watson R. T. Research commentary: Transformational issues in researching IS and net-enabled organizations. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(4):337–345Link, Google Scholar
• Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S.Using Multivariate Statistics (1989) (Allyn & Bacon, Harper, NY) Google Scholar
• Tenkasi R. V., Boland R. J. J. Exploring knowledge diversity in knowledge intensive firms: A new role for information systems. J. Organ. Change Management (1996) 9(1):79–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• The McKinsey Quarterly How businesses are using Web 2.0: A McKinsey Global Survey. McKinsey Quart. (2007) 2–9Google Scholar
• Truman G. E. Integration in electronic environment. J. Management Inform. Systems (2000) 17(1):209–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W. Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(2):179–190Link, Google Scholar
• Tucker A. L. The impact of operational failures on hospital nurses and their patients. J. Oper. Management (2004) 22(2):151–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):35–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Camp S. New platform distributes marketing content to CE partners. Adweek Magazines' Tech. Marketing (2004) Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Delbecq A. L., Koenig R. J. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1976) 41(2):322–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatraman N., Ramanujam V. Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Acad. Management Rev. (1986) 11(4):801–814Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E.The Sources of Innovation (1994) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Wall T. B., Jonathan M., Patterson M., Wood S. J., Sheehan M., Clegg C. W., West M. On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psych. (2004) 57(1):95–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weill P., Vitale M. Assessing the health of an information systems applications portfolio: An example from process manufacturing. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(4):601–624Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiss A. M., Kurland N. Holding distribution channel relationships together: The role of transaction-specific assets and length of prior relationships. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(6):612–623Link, Google Scholar
• Williamson O.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E., Clegg S., Hardy C., Nord W., Clegg S., Hardy C., Nord W. R. Transaction cost economics and organization theory. Handbook of Organization Studies (1996) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Yang J., Papazoglou M. P. Interoperation support for electronic business. Comm. ACM (2000) 43(6):39–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A., Venkatraman N. Determinants of electronic integration in the insurance industry: An empirical test. Management Sci. (1994) 40(5):549–566Link, Google Scholar