Governance-Knowledge Fit in Systems Development Projects

References

• Adelson B., Soloway E. The role of domain experience in software design. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1985) 11(11):1351–1360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler P. S. Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination—The case of the design/manufacturing interface. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(2):147–167Link, Google Scholar
• Anand K., Mendelson H. Information and organization for horizontal multimarket coordination. Management Sci. (1997) 43(12):1609–1627Link, Google Scholar
• Armstrong C., Sambamurthy V. Information technology assimilation in firms: The influence of senior leadership and IT infrastructures. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(4):304–327Link, Google Scholar
• Baronas A. K., Louis M. Restoring a sense of control during implementation: How user involvement leads to system acceptance. MIS Quart. (1988) 12(1):111–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown C. V. Examining the emergence of hybrid IS governance solutions: Evidence from a single case site. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(1):69–94Link, Google Scholar
• Chin W., Marcoulides G. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research (1998) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 295–336Google Scholar
• Choudhury V., Sabherwal R. Portfolios of control in outsourced software development projects. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(3):291–314Link, Google Scholar
• CIO Magazine When bad things happen to good projects. (2007) . Retrieved November 7, http://www.cio.com/article/101505/When_Bad_Things_Happen_to_Good_ProjectsGoogle Scholar
• Dessein W. Authority and communication in organizations. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2002) 69(2):811–838Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E., Jensen M. Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. (1983) 26(2):301–327Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S., Sproull L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. (2000) 46(12):1554–1568Link, Google Scholar
• Hann J., Weber R. Information systems planning: A model and empirical tests. Management Sci. (1996) 42(7):1043–1064Link, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):232–248Link, Google Scholar
• Henderson J. C., Lee S. Managing I/S design teams: A control theories perspective. Management Sci. (1992) 38(6):757–777Link, Google Scholar
• Henry R. The role of knowledge in information technology project governance. (2004) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
• Ives B., Olson M. User involvement and MIS success: A review of research. Management Sci. (1984) 30(5):586–603Link, Google Scholar
• Iyer A., Schwarz L., Zenios S. A principal-agent model for product specification and production. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):106–119Link, Google Scholar
• Jensen M., Meckling W., Werin L., Wijkander H. Specific and general knowledge and organizational structure. Contract Economics (1992) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 251–274Google Scholar
• Keil M., Montealegre R. Cutting your losses: Extricating your organization when a big project goes awry. Sloan Management Rev. (2000) 41(3):55–68Google Scholar
• Keil M., Tiwana A., Bush A. Reconciling user and project manager perceptions of IT project risk: A Delphi study. Inform. Systems J. (2002) 12:103–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirsch L. The management of complex tasks in organizations: Controlling the systems development process. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(1):1–21Link, Google Scholar
• Kirsch L. J. Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):215–239Link, Google Scholar
• Kirsch L. Deploying common systems globally: The dynamics of control. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(4):374–395Link, Google Scholar
• Kirsch L., Beath C. The enactments and consequences of token, shared and compliant participation in information systems development. Accounting, Management and Inform. Tech. (1996) 6(4):221–254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirsch L., Sambamurthy V., Ko D., Purvis R. Controlling information systems development projects: The view from the client. Management Sci. (2002) 48(4):484–498Link, Google Scholar
• Kirsch L. J. Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):215–239Link, Google Scholar
• Kraut R., Streeter L. Coordination in software development. Comm. ACM (1995) 38(3):69–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V., Ulrich K. Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):1–21Link, Google Scholar
• Lindell M., Whitney D. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(1):114–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lohmeyer D., Pogreb S., Robinson S. Who's accountable for IT? McKinsey Quart. (2002) 4):39–47Google Scholar
• Mähring M. IT project governance. (2002) . Doctoral thesis, Economic Research Institute, StockholmGoogle Scholar
• Malhotra N., Kim S., Patil A. Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Sci. (2006) 52(12):1865–1883Link, Google Scholar
• Marengo L., Dosi P., Legrenzi P., Pasquali C. The structure of problem-solving knowledge and the structure of organizations. Indust. Corporate Change (2000) 9(4):757–788Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marwaha S., Willmot P. Managing IT for scale, speed, and innovation. McKinsey Quart. (2006) 2006(3):1–8Google Scholar
• Nault B. Information technology and organization design: Locating decisions and information. Management Sci. (1998) 44(10):1321–1335Link, Google Scholar
• Nelson K., Cooprider J. The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(4):409–429Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nidumolu S. The effect of coordination and uncertainty on software project performance: Residual performance risk as an intervening variable. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(3):191–219Link, Google Scholar
• Nidumolu S., Subramani M. The matrix of control: Combining process and structure approaches to managing software development. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 20(3):159–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P., MacKenzie S., Lee J., Podsakoff N. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A., Sambamurthy V. The growth of interest in services management: Opportunities for IS scholars. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(4):327–331Link, Google Scholar
• Reich B., Benbasat I. Factors that influence the social dimension of alignment between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(1):81–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross J., Beath C., Goodhue D. Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Rev. (1996) 38(1):31–42Google Scholar
• Rus I., Lindvall M. Knowledge management in software engineering. IEEE Software (2002) 19(3):26–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. Arrangements for technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(2):261–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sethi R. Superordinate identity in cross-functional product development teams: Its antecedents and effect on new product performance. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2000) 28(3):330–344Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrout P., Fleiss J. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psych. Bull. (1979) 86(2):420–428Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N. Misperceiving interactions among complements and substitutes: Organizational consequences. Management Sci. (2002) 48(7):900–916Link, Google Scholar
• Tavakolian H. Linking the information technology structure with organizational competitive strategy. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):309–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A. The influence of knowledge integration on project execution success. (2001) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
• Tiwana A. Knowledge partitioning in outsourced software development: A field study. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2003) Seattle:259–270Google Scholar
• Tiwana A. Does technological modularity substitute for control? A study of alliance performance in software outsourcing. Strategic Management J. (2008) 29(7):769–780Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A., Keil M. Does peripheral knowledge complement control? An empirical test in technology outsourcing alliances. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(6):623–634Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A., Bharadwaj A., Sambamurthy V. The antecedents of information systems development capability in firms: A knowledge integration perspective. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2003) Seattle:246–258Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A.Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research (2007) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vazquez X. Allocating decision rights on the shop floor: A perspective from transaction cost economics and organization theory. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(4):463–480Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatraman N. The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(3):423–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weill P., Ross J.IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results (2004) 4(Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Xia W., Lee G. Grasping the complexity of IS development projects. Comm. ACM (2004) 47(3):68–74Crossref, Google Scholar