Is Query Reuse Potentially Harmful? Anchoring and Adjustment in Adapting Existing Database Queries

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0189

References

  • Allen G., March S. The effects of state-based and event-based data representations on user performance in query formulation tasks. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(2):269–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson J. R. Problem solving and learning. Amer. Psychologist (1993) 48(1):35–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Batra D., Hoffer J., Bostrom R. A comparison of user performance between the relational and the extended entity relationship models in the discovery phase of database design. Comm. ACM (1990) 33(2):126–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borthick A., Bowen P., Jones D., Tse M. The effects of information request ambiguity and construct incongruence on query development. Decision Support Systems (2001) 32:33–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowen P., O'Farrell R., Rohde F. Analysis of competing data structures: Does ontological clarity produce better end user query performance? J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2006) 7(8):514–544Google Scholar
  • Burton-Jones A., Weber R. Understanding relationships with attributes in entity-relationship diagrams. Proc. Twentieth Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1999) 214–228Google Scholar
  • Chan C., Wei K. K., Siau K. User-database interface: The effect of abstraction levels on query performance. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(4):441–464CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox B. Planning the software industrial revolution. IEEE Software (1990) 7(6):25–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dettinger R., Stevens R., Tenner J. SQL query construction using durable query components. (2004) . United States Patent Application 20040068489. Retrieved February 2, 2008, http://www.uspto.govGoogle Scholar
  • Dettinger R., Glowacki J., Kolz D., Rao P., Sperber M., Wenzel S. Query reuse through recommend parameter flexibility. (2007) . United States Patent Application 20070276825. Retrieved February 2, 2008, http://www.uspto.govGoogle Scholar
  • Edlund S., Emens M., Kraft R., Yim P. Labeling and describing search queries for reuse. (2002) . United States Patent 6,484,162. Retrieved February 2, 2008, http://www.uspto.govGoogle Scholar
  • Epley N., Gilovich T. The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic: Why adjustments are insufficient. Psych. Sci. (2006) 17(4):311–318CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fagan M., Corley S. CBR for the reuse of corporate SQL knowledge. Eur. Workshop on Case Based Reasoning (EWCBR'98) (1998) 1488Dublin, Ireland:382–392Lecture Notes in Artificial IntelligenceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fichman R., Kemerer C. F. Object technology and reuse: Lessons from early adopters. IEEE Comput. (1997) 30(10):47–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischhoff B., Lichtenstein S. Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? The calibration of probability judgments. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1977) 20(2):159–183CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frakes W. B., Succi G. An industrial study of reuse, quality and productivity. J. Systems Software (2001) 57(2):99–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frakes W. B., Terry C. Software reuse: Metrics and models. ACM Comput. Surveys (1996) 28(2):415–435CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • George J. F., Duffy K., Ahuja M. Countering the anchoring and adjustment bias with decision support systems. Decision Support Systems (2000) 29:195–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwald A. G. Within-subjects designs: To use or not to use. Psych. Bull. (1976) 83(2):314–320CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griss M. Software reuse: From library to factory. IBM Systems J. (1993) 32(4):548–566CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Irwin G. The role of similarity in the reuse of object-oriented analysis models. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19(2):221–250Google Scholar
  • Johnson E. J., Payne J. W. Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Sci. (1985) 31(4):395–414LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Khatri V., Vessey I., Ramesh V., Clay P., Park S. Understanding conceptual schemas: Exploring the role of application and IS domain knowledge. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(3):81–99LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim Y., Stohr E. A. Software reuse: Survey and research directions. J. Management Inform. Systems (1998) 14(4):113–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leitheiser R., March S. The influence of database structure representation on database system learning and use. J. Management Inform. Systems (1996) 12(4):187–213CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li G., Zhang L., Xie B., Shao W. Shortening retrieval sequences in browsing-based component retrieval using information entropy. J. Systems and Software (2006) 79(2):216–230CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lim W. Effects of reuse on quality, productivity, and economics. IEEE Software (1994) 11(5):23–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mili H., Mili F., Mili A. Reusing software: Issues and research directions. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1995) 21(6):528–561CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morisio M., Erzan M., Tully C. Success and failure factors in software reuse. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (2002) 28(4):340–357CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ogden W. C. Implications of a cognitive model of database query: Comparison of a natural language, a formal language, and direct manipulation interface. ACM SIGCHI Bull. (1985) 18(2):51–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oussalah C., Seriai A. How to reuse former queries to facilitate the formulation of new ones. Proc. Internat. Database Engrg. Appl. Sympos. (Ideas'00) (2000a) Yokohama, Japan:92–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oussalah C., Seriai A. A reuse-based object-oriented framework towards easy formulation of complex queries. Proc. Internat. Conf. Conceptual Modeling (ER2000) (2000b) Springer, Berlin:470–483CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parsons J., Cole L. What do the pictures mean? Guidelines for experimental evaluation of representation fidelity in diagrammatical conceptual modeling techniques. Data Knowledge Engrg. (2005) 55(3):327–342CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parsons J., Saunders C. Cognitive heuristics in software engineering: Applying and extending anchoring and adjustment to artifact reuse. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (2004) 30(12):873–888CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pittman M. Lessons learned in managing object-oriented development. IEEE Software (1993) 10(1):43–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plous S.The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making (1993) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Purao S., Storey V., Han T. Improving pattern reuse in conceptual design: Augmenting automated processes with supervised learning. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(3):269–290LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson M., Johnson J., Herndon F. Reaction time and assessments of cognitive effort as predictors of eyewitness memory accuracy and confidence. J. Appl. Psych. (1997) 82(3):416–425CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Speier C., Morris M. The influence of query interface design on decision-making performance. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):397–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stacy W., MacMillan J. Cognitive bias in software engineering. Comm. ACM (1995) 38(6):57–69CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Succi G., Benedicenti L., Vernazza T. Analysis of the effects of software reuse on customer satisfaction in an RPG environment. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (2001) 27(5):473–479CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185(4157):1124–1131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright W. F., Anderson U. Effects of situation familiarity and financial incentives on use of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic for probability assessment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1989) 44(1):68–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yates J.Judgment and Decision Making (1990) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.