Demand Heterogeneity in IT Infrastructure Services: Modeling and Evaluation of a Dynamic Approach to Defining Service Levels

References

• Bhargava H. K., Sun D. Performance-contingent pricing for broadband services. Proc. 38th Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. Systems Sci., HICSS '05, 211b (2005) Big Island, HICrossref, Google Scholar
• Bhargava H. K., Sundaresan S. Computing as utility: Managing availability, commitment, and pricing through contingent bid auctions. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 21(2):201–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng H. K., Koehler G. J. Optimal pricing policies of web-enabled application services. Decision Support Systems (2003) 35(3):259–272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cocchi R., Estrin D., Shenker S., Zhang L. A study of priority pricing in multiple service class networks. Proc. Comm. Architecture and Protocols (1991) Zurich:123–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deloitte Consulting Calling a change in the outsourcing market: The realities for the world's largest organizations. (2005) April). Report http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/cda/doc/content/us_outsourcing_callingachange.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Dewan S., Mendelson H. User delay costs and internal pricing for a service facility. Management Sci. (1990) 36(12):1502–1516Link, Google Scholar
• Gross D., Harris C. M.Fundamentals of Queueing Theory (1998) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Gupta A., Stahl D. O., Whinston A. B. An economic approach to networked computing with priority classes. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce (1996) 6(1):71–95Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamblen M. The chargeback CONUNDRUM. Computerworld (2005) 39(7):38Google Scholar
• Haviv M., Ritov Y. A. Externalities, tangible externalities, and queue disciplines. Management Sci. (1998) 44(6):850–858Link, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B., Milgrom P. Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica (1987) 55(2):308–328Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jewkes E. M., Stanford D. A. A two priority queue with crossover feedback. Queueing Systems (2003) 43(1–2):129–135Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keon N. J., Anandalingam G. Optimal pricing for multiple services in telecommunications networks offering quality-of-service guarantees. Networking, IEEE/ACM Trans. (2003) 11(1):66–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konana P., Gupta A., Whinston A. B. Integrating user preferences and real-time workload in information services. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(2):177–196Link, Google Scholar
• Litten K. IT service management: Selecting the right metrics for performance management. (2004) April 1). White Paper, International Network Services, Santa Clara, CAGoogle Scholar
• Maglaras C., Zeevi A. Pricing and design of differentiated services: Approximate analysis and structural insights. Oper. Res. (2005) 53(2):242–262Link, Google Scholar
• Marbach P. Analysis of a static pricing scheme for priority services. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking (2004) 12(2):312–325Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H. Pricing computer services—Queuing effects. Comm. ACM (1985) 28(3):312–321Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H., Whang S. Optimal incentive-compatible priority pricing for the M/M/1. Oper. Res. (1990) 38(5):870–883Link, Google Scholar
• Nadiminti R., Mukhopadhyay T., Kriebel C. H. Research report: Intrafirm resource allocation with asymmetric information and negative externalities. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(4):428–434Link, Google Scholar
• Neeleman D. JetBlue's customer bill of rights. (2007) . http://www.jetblue.com/about/ourcompany/promise/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Oliva R., Sterman J. D. Cutting corners and working overtime: Quality erosion in the service industry. Management Sci. (2001) 47(7):894–914Link, Google Scholar
• Open GroupSLA Management Handbook: Enterprise Perspective (2004) 4The Open Group. http://www.opengroup.org/pubs/catalog/g045.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Paich M., Sterman J. D. Boom, bust, and failures to learn in experimental markets. Management Sci. (1993) 39(12):1439Link, Google Scholar
• Quinlan T. Value of an IT chargeback system—Part two. J. Bank Cost Management Accounting (2003) 16(1):39–47Google Scholar
• Raghu T. S., Sen P. K., Rao H. R. Relative performance of incentive mechanisms: Computational modeling and simulation of delegated investment decisions. Management Sci. (2003) 49(2):160–178Link, Google Scholar
• Rehme J. Prices and contracts for service selling: Service level agreements, contracts, and price models. (2006) . Technical report, Industrializing After Sales Service (IASS)Google Scholar
• Ricardo A. Pay-As-You-Drive: Dynamic insurance emerges in Europe. (2006) . Technical report, Forrester Research. http://www.forrester.com/Research/Document/Excerpt/0,7211,38860,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Ross J. W., Vitale M. R., Beath C. M. The untapped potential of IT chargeback. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(2):215–237Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sapiera J. How SLAs are used. Network Comput. (2003) March 21):71–75Google Scholar
• Sleptchenko A. Multi-class, multi-server queues with non-preemptive priorities. (2003) . Technical Report 2003-016, EURANDOM, Eindhoven, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
• Son J. H., Kim M. H. An analysis of the optimal number of servers in distributed client/server environments. Decision Support Systems (2004) 36(3):297–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stanford D. A. Waiting and interdeparture times in priority queues with poisson- and general-arrival streams. Oper. Res. (1997) 45(5):725–735Link, Google Scholar
• Wierman A., Osogami T., Harchol-Balter M. Analyzing the effect of prioritized background tasks in multiserver systems. (2003) . Technical Report CMU-CS-03-213. Carnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar