The “Third Hand”: IT-Enabled Competitive Advantage in Turbulence Through Improvisational Capabilities

References

• Alavi M., Leidner D. E. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(1):107–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong J. S., Overton T. S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14(3):396–402Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima K., Li H. Strategic decision comprehensiveness and new product development outcomes in new technology ventures. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(4):583–597Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bahrami H., Evans S.Super-Flexibility for Knowledge Enterprises (2005) (Springer Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Baron R., Kenny D. The moderator—Mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett A., Bennett D., Burstein F., Holsapple C. W. The decision-making process for complex situations in a complex environment. Handbook on Decision Support Systems (2008) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(2):343–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):1–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carte T. A., Russell C. J. In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):479–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen M.-J. Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21:100–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen M.-J., Su K. H., Tsai W. Competitive tension: The awareness-motivation-capability perspective. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(1):101–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng Y.-T., Van de Ven A. Learning the innovation journey: Order out of chaos. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(6):593–614Link, Google Scholar
• Chi L., Holsapple C. W., Srinivasan C. Competitive dynamics in electronic networks: A model and the case of interorganizational systems. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2007) 11(3):7–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chi L., Hartono E., Holsapple C., Li X., Burstein F., Holsapple C. Organizational decision support systems: Parameters and benefits. Handbook on Decision Support Systems: Volume 1—Basic Themes (2008a) (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg/Berlin) 433–468Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chi L., Holsapple C. W., Srinivasan C. Digital systems, partnership networks, and competition: The co-evolution of IOS use and network position as antecedents of competitive action. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce (2008b) 18:61–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin W. W., Marcoulides G. A. The partial least square approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research (1998) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) 295–336Google Scholar
• Ciborra C. The platform organization: Recombining stategies, structures, and surprises. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(2):103–118Link, Google Scholar
• Clark K., Fujimoto T.Product Development Performance (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Cohen M. A., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Fortune favors the prepared firm. Management Sci. (1994) 40(2):227–251Link, Google Scholar
• Collis D. J. How valuable are organizational capabilities. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:143–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crossan M. Improvisation in action. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(5):593–599Link, Google Scholar
• Crossan M., Cunha M. P., Vera D., Cunha J. Time and organizational improvisation. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30(1):129–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crossan M. M., Lane H. W., White R. E., Klus L. The improvising organization: Where planning meets opportunity. Organ. Dynam. (1996) 24(4):20–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crowston K. A coordination theory approach to organizational process design. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(2):157–175Link, Google Scholar
• Cunha M. P., Cunha J. V., Kamoche K. Organizational improvisation: What, when, how, and why. Internat. J. Management Rev. (1999) 1(3):299–341Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danneels E. The dynamic of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(9):1095–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• D'Aveni R.Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Management (1994) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Desouza K.Agile Information Systems: Conceptualization, Construction, and Management (2007) (Elsevier, Burlington, MA) Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos A., Winklhofer H. M. Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(2):269–277Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32(3):543–576Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K., Martin J. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1105–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K., Tabrizi B. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(1):84–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• El Sawy O. A., Evans F. Proactive surprise managers. The President (1985) November):1–2Google Scholar
• El Sawy O. A., Pavlou P. A. IT-enabled business capabilities for turbulent environments. MIS Quart. Executive (2008) 7(3):57–68Google Scholar
• El Sherif H., El Sawy O. A. Career improvisation in the evolving information systems function. (1990) . Unpublished paper, Society for Information Management Juried Paper Competition, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
• Ettlie J., Pavlou P. A. Technology-based new product development partnerships. Decision Sci. (2006) 37(2):117–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrier W. J., Holsapple C. W., Sabherwal R. Call for papers—Information Systems Research Special Issue: Digital systems and competition. Inform. Systems Res. (2007) 18(2):228–230Link, Google Scholar
• Ferrier W. J., Smith K. G., Grimm C. M. The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:372–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith C. S. Transferring core manufacturing technologies in high-technology firms. California Management Rev. (1990) 32(1):56–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson C. B., Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(2):209–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimm C. M., Smith K. G.Strategy as Action: Industry Rivalry and Coordination (1997) (South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati) Google Scholar
• Hatch M. J. The Vancouver Academy of Management Jazz Symposium: Jazz as a metaphor for organizing in the 21st century. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(5):556–568Link, Google Scholar
• Hitt M. A., Keats B. W., DeMarie S. M. Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Acad. Management Executive (1998) 12(1):22–42Google Scholar
• Holsapple C. W., Jin J. Connecting some dots: E-commerce, supply chains, and collaborative decision making. Decision Line (2007) 38(5):14–21Google Scholar
• Houghton B., El Sawy O. A., Gray P., Donegan C., Joshi A. Vigilant information systems for managing enterprises in dynamic supply chains: Real-time dashboards at Western Digital. MIS Quart. Executive (2004) 3(1):19–35Google Scholar
• Hutchins E. Organizing work by adaptation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):14–39Link, Google Scholar
• Im G., Rai A. Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships. Management Sci. (2008) 54(7):1281–1296Link, Google Scholar
• Jap S. D. Perspectives on joint competitive advantage in buyer-supplier relationships. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2001) 18(1):19–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaworski B. J., Kohli A. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. J. Marketing (1993) 57:53–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamoche K., Cunha M. P., Cunha J. V. Towards a theory of organizational improvisation: Looking beyond the jazz metaphor. J. Management Stud. (2003) 40(8):2023–2041Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenny D., Judd C. Estimating the non-linear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psych. Bull. (1984) 96:201–210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Lee H. The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82(10):102–112Google Scholar
• Lee H., Smith K. G., Grimm C., Schomburg A. Timing, order, and durability of new product advantages with imitation. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(1):23–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee O., Sambamurthy V., Lim K., Wei K. K. IT-enabled organizational agility and sustainable competitive advantage. (2009) . Presentation, ISR Workshop Digital Systems and Competition, February, RPI, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(Summer Special Issue):111–125Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin A. Y. Jazz improvisation as a metaphor for organization theory. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(5):539Link, Google Scholar
• Maclean N.Young Men and Fire (1992) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A., Logan D., McCurdy R., Kirchmer M. Four keys to managing emergence. Sloan Management Rev. (2006) 47(2):14–18Google Scholar
• Mata F. J., Fuerst W. L., Barney J. B. Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(4):487–505Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKnight B., Bontis N. E-improvisation: Collaborative groupware technology expands the reach and effectiveness of organizational improvisation. J. Knowledge Process Management (2002) 9(4):219–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H. Organizational architecture and success in the information technology industry. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):513–529Link, Google Scholar
• Mendonça D. Decision support for improvisation in response to extreme events: Learning from the response to the 2001 World Trade Center attack. Decision Support Systems (2007) 43:952–967Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miner A., Bassoff P., Moorman C. Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(2):304–337Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorman C., Miner A. S. Organizational improvisation and organization memory. Acad. Management Rev. (1998a) 23(4):698–723Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorman C., Miner A. S. The convergence between planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development. J. Marketing (1998b) 62(1):1–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorman C., Miner A. S. Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(2):304–339Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay T., Kekre S., Kalathur S. Business value of information technology: A study of electronic data interchange. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):137–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nambisan S. Information systems as a reference discipline for new product development. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(1):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newell S., Wagner E. L., David G., Desouza K. C. Clumsy information systems: A critical review of enterprise systems. Agile Information Systems: Conceptualization, Construction, and Management (2007) (Elsevier, Burlington, MA) 163–177Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(1):63–92Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J., Hofman J. D. An improvisational model for change management: The case of groupware technologies. Sloan Management Rev. (1997) 38(2):11–21Google Scholar
• Pascale R. T. The Honda effect: Excerpted from perspectives on strategy: The real story behind Honda's success. California Management Rev. (1984) 26(1):47–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou P. A., Dimoka A. The nature and role of feedback text comments in online marketplaces: Implications for trust building, price premiums, and seller differentiation. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(4):391–412Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou P. A., El Sawy O. A. From IT competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(3):198–227Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou P. A., Gefen D. Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(1):37–60Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou P. A., Gefen D. Psychological contract violation in online marketplaces: Antecedents, consequences, and moderating role. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(4):372–399Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou P. A., Liang H., Xue Y. Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online buyer-seller relationships: A principal agent perspective. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(1):105–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry L. T. Strategic improvising: How to formulate and implement competitive strategies in concert. Organ. Dynam. (1991) 19(4):51–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano G. Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:85–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management (1986) 12(4):531–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M.Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (1980) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Pressing J., Crozier W. R., Chapman A. J. Improvisation: Methods and models. Generative Processes in Music: The Psychology of Performance, Improvisation, and Composition (1984) (Oxford University Press, New York) 129–178Google Scholar
• Rangaswamy A., Lilien G. L. Software tools for new product development. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(1):177–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A. S., Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of IT in contemporary organizations. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):237–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. A.The Theory of Economic Development (1934) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Sethi R., Smith D. C., Park W. Cross-functional product development teams, creativity, and the innovativeness of new consumer products. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38:73–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slotegraaf R. J., Dickson P. R. The paradox of a marketing planning capability. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2004) 32:71–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith K. G., Ferrier W. J., Ndofor H., Hitt M. A., Freeman R. E., Harrison J. S. Competitive dynamics research: Critique and future directions. The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management (2001) (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK) 315–361Google Scholar
• Song M. X., Parry M. E. A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United States. J. Marketing (1997) 61(2):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stalk G., Hout T.Competing Against Time: How Time-Based Competition Is Reshaping Global Markets (1990) (Free Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stein E. W., Zwass V. Actualizing organizational memory with information systems. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(2):82–117Link, Google Scholar
• Sull D. How to thrive in turbulent markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2009) 77(1):78–88Google Scholar
• Teece D. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(13):1319–1350Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tippins M. J., Sohi R. S. IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:745–761Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich K., Eppinger S. D.Product Design and Development (1995) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Varian H. Hal Varian on how the Web challenges managers. McKinsey Quart. (2009) 1Google Scholar
• Vera D., Crossan M. Strategic leadership and organization learning. Acad. Management Rev. (2004) 29(2):222–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vera D., Crossan M. Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(3):203–224Link, Google Scholar
• Vorhies D. W., Harker M. The capabilities and performance advantages of market-driven firms: An empirical investigation. Australian J. Management (2000) 25(2):145–171Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E.The Social Psychology of Organizing (1979) 2nd ed.(Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:628–652Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. Introductory essay: Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organ. Sci. (1994) 9(5):543–555Link, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E.Sensemaking in Organizations (1995) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. Drop your tools: An allegory for organizational studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:301–313Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(5):543–555Link, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E.Making Sense of the Organization (2001) (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Weick K. E., Roberts K. H. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(3):357–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheeler B. C., Dennis A. R., Press L. I. Groupware comes to the Internet: Charting a new world. The DATABASE Adv. Inform. Systems (1999) 30(3/4):8–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter S. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(10):991–995Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu T., Cannella A. A. Rivalry between multinational enterprises: An event history approach. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(3):663–684Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zack M. Jazz improvisation and organizing: Once more from the top. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(2):227–234Link, Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A., George G. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(2):185–203Crossref, Google Scholar