Information Technology, Network Structure, and Competitive Action

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0296

References

  • Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(3):425–455CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Associated Press Newswires Volkswagen rolls out new Golf compact. (2003) August 25). http://www.factiva.comGoogle Scholar
  • Baltagi H. B.Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (2008) (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex, UK) Google Scholar
  • Basu A., Blanning R. W. Synthesis and decomposition of processes in organizations. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(4):337–355LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Calabrese T., Silverman B. S. Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):267–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau P. M.Inequality and Heterogeneity (1977) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C.Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis (2002) (Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA) Google Scholar
  • Brent P. Chrysler boasts of Crossfire sports car's German lineage: Blurring of brands: U.S. advertising emphasize 39% Mercedes content. Financial Post (2003) June 13). http://www.factiva.comGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Yang S. Information technology and productivity: A review of literature. Adv. Comput. (1996) 43:179–214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. Amer. J. Sociol. (1987) 92(6):1287–1335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S., Sutton R. I., Staw B. M. The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior (2000) 22(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 345–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (2005) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen M.-J. Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21(1):100–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen M.-J., Hambrick D. C. Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(2):453–482CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen M.-J., Smith K. G., Grimm C. M. Action characteristics as predictors of competitive responses. Management Sci. (1992) 38(3):439–455LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chi L., Holsapple C. W., Srinivasan C. Competitive dynamics in electronic networks: A model and the case of interorganizational systems. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2007a) 11(3):7–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chi L., Holsapple C. W., Srinivasan C. The linkage between IOS use and competitive action: A competitive dynamics perspective. Inform. Systems e-Bus. Management (2007b) 5(4):319–356CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chi L., Holsapple C. W., Srinivasan C. Digital systems, social networks, and competition: The co-evolution of IOS use and structural position as antecedents of competitive action. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce (2008) 18(1):61–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christiaanse E., Venkatraman N. Beyond SABRE: An empirical test of expertise exploitation in electronic channels. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(1):15–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J. S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 94(Suppl.):S95–S120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Copeland D. G., McKenney J. L. Airline reservations systems: Lessons from history. MIS Quart. (1988) 12(3):353–370CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Lengel R. H., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. Research in Organizational Behavior (1984) 6(JAI Press, Homewood, IL) 191–233Google Scholar
  • D'Aveni R. A.Hypercompetition (1994) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 19(4):9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dow Jones Newswires Ford's Lincoln unit reduces tracer model price by $234. (1992) July 1). http://www.factiva.comGoogle Scholar
  • Erickson B., Wellman B., Berkowitz S. The relational basis of attitudes. Social Structures (1988) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 99–121Google Scholar
  • Ferrier W. J. Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(4):858–877CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferrier W., Lyon D. Competitive repertoire simplicity and firm performance: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. Managerial Decision Econom. (2004) 25(6–7):317–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferrier W. J., Smith K. G., Grimm C. M. The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(4):372–388CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferrier W. J., MacFhionnlaoich C., Smith K. G., Grimm C. M. The impact of performance distress on aggressive competitive behavior: A reconciliation of conflicting views. Managerial Decision Econom. (2002) 23(4–5):301–316CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gargiulo M., Benassi M. Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptations of social capital. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(2):183–196LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gimeno J. C. Reciprocal threats in multimulmarket rivalry: Staking out “spheres of influence” in the U.S. airline industry. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:101–128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gimeno J., Woo C. Y. Hypercompetition in a multimarket environment: The role of strategic similarity and multimarket contact in competitive de-escalation. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(3):322–341LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gnyawali D. R., Madhavan R. Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26(3):431–447CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1360–1380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91(3):481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2003) 4th ed.(Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Grimm C. M., Smith K. G.Strategy as Action: Industry Rivalry and Coordination (1997) (South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati) Google Scholar
  • Gosain S., Malhotra A., El Sawy O. A. Coordinating for flexibility in e-business supply chains. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 21(3):7–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(4):619–652CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(4):293–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Nohria N., Zaheer A. Strategic networks. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):203–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Cho T. S., Chen M.-J. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firm's competitive moves. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:659–688CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayek F. A.Individualism and Economic Order (1948) (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Hitt L. M., Brynjolfsson E. Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(2):121–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman T. Nissan finds an answer. InformationWeek (1991) July 8Google Scholar
  • Hogue T. Krall jazzes up Sebring ads for Chrysler. Hamilton Spectator (2002) February 14). http://www.factiva.comGoogle Scholar
  • Homans G. C.The Human Group (1950) (Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York) Google Scholar
  • Japan Corporate News Network Mazda builds presence in China with 323 launch. (2002) July 18). http://www.factiva.comGoogle Scholar
  • Jauch L. R., Osborn R. N., Martin T. N. Structured content analysis of cases: A complementary method for organizational research. Acad. Management Rev. (1980) 5(4):517–525CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirzner I. M.Competition and Entrepreneurship (1973) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Kohli R., Devaraj S. Measuring information technology payoff: A meta-analysis of structural variables in firm-level empirical research. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):127–145LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Konicki S. GM to mine supply chain for design partners—Automaker plans to tie 10,000 suppliers into new network. InformationWeek (2002) April 15Google Scholar
  • Krackhardt D., Kramer R., Neale M. Simmelian ties: Super strong and sticky. Power and Influence in Organizations (1998) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 21–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lavie D. Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(12):1187–1212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liverpool Leader Mitsubishi upgrades. (2001) September 19). http://www.factiva.comGoogle Scholar
  • Magretta J. The power of virtual integration: An interview with Dell Computer's Michael Dell. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1998) 76(2):73–84Google Scholar
  • Malone T. W., Yates J., Benjamin R. I. Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Comm. ACM (1987) 30(6):484–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D., Chen M.-J. Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the U.S. airline industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(1):1–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D., Chen M.-J. The simplicity of competitive repertoires: An empirical analysis. Strategic Management J. (1996a) 17(6):419–439CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D., Chen M.-J. Nonconformity in competitive repertoires: A sociological view of markets. Soc. Forces (1996b) 74(4):1209–1234CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mises L. V.Human Action: A Treatise on Economics (1949) (Yale University Press, New Haven, MA) Google Scholar
  • Monts R. Toyota is offering dealers up to $2,500 on the 1994 Supra. Automotive News (1994) November). http://www.factiva.comGoogle Scholar
  • Mooney J. G., Gurbaxani V., Kraemer K. L. A process-oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology. DATA BASE Adv. Inform. Systems (1996) 27(2):68–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Offstein E., Gnyawali D. CEO compensation and firm competitive behavior: Empirical evidence from the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. J. Engrg. Tech. Management (2005) 22:201–225CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oh L. B., Teo H. H., Ravichandran T. Service-oriented architecture and organizational integration: An empirical study of IT-enabled sustained competitive advantage. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2007) Montreal:1–17Google Scholar
  • Overby E., Bharadwaj A., Sambamurthy V. Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. Eur. J. Info. Systems (2006) 15(2):120–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perreault W., Leigh L. Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(2):135–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G.The External Control of Organizations (1978) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J. Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991) (University of Chicago Press)183–203CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(1):116–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Premkumar G., Ramamurthy K., Saunders C. S. Information processing view of organizations: An exploratory examination of fit in the context of interorganizational relationships. J. Management Inform. Systems (2005) 22(1):257–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • PRS Automotive Service Toyota opens new U.S. plant to supply Camry. (1993) July 7). http://www.factiva.comGoogle Scholar
  • Ravichandran T. IT competencies, innovation capacity and organizational agility: Performance impacts and the moderating effects of environmental characteristics. Conf. Inform. Systems Tech. (2007) (INFORMS, Baltimore) Google Scholar
  • Ravichandran T., Lertwongsatien C. Effects of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: A resource-based perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems (2005) 21(4):231–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reuters News Mazda launches MX-3, takes aim at Europe. (1991) March 6). http://www.factiva.comGoogle Scholar
  • Ross J. W., Beath C. M. New approaches to IT investment. Sloan Management Rev. (2002) 43(2):51–59Google Scholar
  • Ryan G. W., Bernard H. R., Denzin N., Lincoln Y. Data management and analysis methods. Handbook of Qualitative Research (2000) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 769–802Google Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. W. IT management competency assessment: A tool for creating business value through IT. (1994) . Financial Executives Research Foundation, Morristown, NJGoogle Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A., Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):237–263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanchez R. Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16(Special Issue):135–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M. A. Understanding the alliance data. Strategic Management J. (2009) 30(3):233–260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schultze U., Orlikowski W. J. A practice perspective on technology-mediated network relations: The use of Internet-based self-serve technologies. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(1):87–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Scott J.Social Network Analysis: A Handbook (1991) (Sage Publications, London) Google Scholar
  • Shannon C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical J. (1948) 27:379–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith K. G., Ferrier W. J., Ndofor H., Hitt M. A., Freeman R. E., Harrison J. S. Competitive dynamics research: Critique and future directions. Handbook of Strategic Management (2001) (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA) 315–361Google Scholar
  • Smith K. G., Grimm C. M., Gannon M. J., Chen M.-J. Organizational information processing, competitive responses, and performance in the U.S. domestic airline industry. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(1):60–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soh C., Markus M. L., DeGross J. I., Ariav G., Beath C., Hoyer R., Kemerer C. How IT creates business value: A process theory synthesis. Proc. 16th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1995) Amsterdam:29–41Google Scholar
  • Songini M. L., Copeland L. Toyota Web-enables dealers, supply chain—Following rivals, carmaker projects huge savings in transportation, inventory. Computerworld (2000) October 16Google Scholar
  • Stuart T. E. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(8):791–811CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tanriverdi H. Performance effects of information technology synergies in multibusiness firms. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(1):57–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):35–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B., Lancaster R. Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan manager and their clients. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):383–399LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weill P., Subramani M., Broadbent M. Building IT infrastructure for strategic agility. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2002) 44(1):57–65Google Scholar
  • Whiting R. Virtual Focus Group—The Internet provides a fast way for manufacturers to solicit and test product ideas from customers. InformationWeek (2001) July 30Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wooldridge J. M.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Young G., Smith K. G., Grimm C. M. “Austrian” and industrial organization perspectives on firm-level competitive activity and performance. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(3):243–254LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Young G., Smith K. G., Grimm C. M., Simon D. Multimarket contact and resource dissimilarity: A competitive dynamics perspective. J. Management (2000) 26(6):1217–1236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu T., Cannella A. A. Interactions between multinational enterprises in host countries: An event-history approach. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(3):663–684CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer A., Bell G. G. Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26:809–825CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zammuto R. F., Griffith T. L., Majchrzak A., Dougherty D. J., Faraj S. Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(5):749–762LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zuboff S.In the Age of Smart Machines (1988) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.