Changing the Competitive Landscape: Continuous Innovation Through IT-Enabled Knowledge Capabilities

References

• Aboulnasr K., Narasimhan O., Blair E., Chandy R. Competitive response to radical product innovations. J. Marketing (2008) 72(3):94–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquah H. Comparison of Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) in selection of an asymmetric price relationship. J. Development Agricultural Econom. (2010) 2(1):1–6Google Scholar
• Akaike H. Maximum likelihood identification of Gaussian autoregressive moving average models. Biometrika (1973) 60(2):255–265Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alavi M., Leidner D. E. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(1):107–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich H. E.Organizations Evolving (2000) (Sage Publications, London) Google Scholar
• Andrew J. P., Sirkin H. L. Innovating for cash. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2003) 81(9):76–83Google Scholar
• Bacheldor B. Keep pace on the innovation speedway—Vehicle manufacturers use IT to stay in tune with changing tastes. InformationWeek 500 (2003) September 22Google Scholar
• Basberg B. L. Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature. Res. Policy (1987) 16(2–4):131–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Korn H. J. Competitive dynamics of interfirm rivalry. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(2):255–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A. S. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(1):169–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A., Bharadwaj S., Konsynski B. Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's Q. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):1008–1024Link, Google Scholar
• Bound J., Cummins C., Griliches Z., Hall B. H., Jaffe A., Griliches Z. Who does R&D and who patents? R&D, Patents, and Productivity (1984) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 21–54Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. (1996) 42(4):541–558Link, Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A., Grove A. S. Strategic dissonance. California Management Rev. (1996) 38(2):8–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A., Christensen C. M., Wheelright S. C.Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation (2006) (McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York) Google Scholar
• Carr N. IT doesn't matter. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2003) 81(5):41–49Google Scholar
• Chandy R., Hopstaken B., Narasimhan O., Prabhu J. From invention to innovation: Conversion ability in product development. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(3):1547–7193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chi L., Holsapple C. W., Srinivasan C. Competitive dynamics in electronic networks: A model and the case of interorganizational systems. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2007) 11(3):7–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chi L., Holsapple C. W., Srinivasan C. Digital systems, partnership networks, and competition: The co-evolution of IOS use and network position as antecedents of competitive action. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce (2008) 18(1):61–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conner K. R., Prahalad C. K. A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):477–501Link, Google Scholar
• Cooper B. L., Watson H. J., Wixom B. H., Goodhue D. L. Data warehousing supports corporate strategy at First American Corporation. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(4):547–567Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davenport T. H.Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology (1993) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Davenport T. H., Harris J. G.Competing on Analytics (2007) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Davenport T. H., Prusak L., Strong B. Putting ideas to work: Knowledge management can make a difference—but it needs to be more pragmatic. MIT Sloan Management Rev. Bus. Insights Online (2008) 47(3). http://ai.arizona.edu/mis480/other_materials/4_Putting-Ideas-to-Work.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Decarolis D. M., Deeds D. L. The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(10):953–968Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. The Delone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 19(4):9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denzin N. K., Lincoln Y. S., Denzin N. K., Lincoln Y. S. Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. Handbook of Qualitative Research (2000) (Sage Publications, London) 1–28Google Scholar
• Devaraj S., Kohli R. Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):273–289Link, Google Scholar
• Dutta S., Weiss A. M. The relationship between a firm's level of technological innovativeness and its pattern of partnership agreements. Management Sci. (1997) 43(3):343–356Link, Google Scholar
• Elliott T. Why business intelligence projects fail—And what to do about it. Bus. Objects User Conf. Europe 2008 (2009) BerlinGoogle Scholar
• Ferrier W. J. Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(4):858–877Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrier W. J., Smith K. G., Grimm C. M. The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(4):372–388Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman J. L., Porter M. E., Stern S. The determinants of national innovative capacity. Res. Policy (2002) 31(6):899–933Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galunic D. C., Eisenhardt K. M. The evolution of intracorporate domains: Losing divisional charters in high technology, mulidivisional corporations. Organ. Sci. (1996) 16(5):491–508Google Scholar
• Gold A. H., Malhotra A., Segars A. H. Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 18(1):185–214Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golder P. N., Tellis G. J. Will it ever fly? Modeling the takeoff of really new consumer durables. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(3):256–270Link, Google Scholar
• Griffith T. L., Sawyer J. E., Neale M. A. Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):265–287Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J. Econom. Literature (1990) 28(4):1661–1707Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T., Birkinshaw J. The innovation value chain. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2007) 85(6):121–130Google Scholar
• Heeley M. B., Jacobson R. The recency of technological inputs and financial performance. Strategic Management J. (2008) 29(7):723–744Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R., Cockburn I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:63–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt L. M., Brynjolfsson E. Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(2):121–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holsapple C. W., Joshi K. D. Knowledge manipulation activities: Results of a Delphi study. Inform. Management (2002) 39(6):477–490Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holsapple C. W., Joshi K. D. A formal knowledge management ontology: Conduct, activities, resources, and influences. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. (2004) 55(7):593–612Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holsapple C. W., Singh M., Holsapple C. W. The knowledge chain model: Activities for competitiveness. The Handbook on Knowledge Management (2003) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) 215–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hurley R. F., Hult G. T. M. Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. J. Marketing (1998) 62(3):42–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huston L., Sakkab N. Connect and develop: Inside Procter & Gamble's new model for innovation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2006) 84(3):58–67Google Scholar
• Jansen J., Vanden Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(5):999–1015Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen P. H., Webster E. Achieving the optimal power of patent rights. Australian Econom. Rev. (2004) 37(4):419–426Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R. New product search over time: Past ideas in their prime? Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(5):995–1010Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kazanjian R. K., Drazin R., Glynn M. A., Hitt M. A., Ireland R. D., Camp S. M., Sexton D. L. Implementing strategies for corporate entrepreneurship: A knowledge-based perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Mindset (2002) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 173–200Google Scholar
• Kedia B. L., Bhagat R. S. Cultural constraints on transfer of technology across nations: Implications for research in international and comparative management. Acad. Management Rev. (1988) 13(4):559–571Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J.From Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning (1997a) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Kim L. The dynamics of Samsung's technological learning in semiconductors. California Management Rev. (1997b) 39(3):86–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koestler A.The Act of Creation (1966) (Hutchinson, London) Google Scholar
• Kohli R., Devraj S. Measuring information technology payoff: A meta-analysis of structural variables in firm-level empirical research. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):127–145Link, Google Scholar
• Koza M. P., Lewin A. Y. The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(3):255–264Link, Google Scholar
• Lane P. J., Lubatkin M. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(5):461–477Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D.Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Source of Innovation (1995) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg F. R. The output contributions of computer equipment and personnel: A firm-level analysis. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (1995) 3(3):201–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loveman G. Diamonds in the data mine. Harvard Business Rev. (2003) 81:109–113Google Scholar
• Luecke R., Katz R.Managing Creativity and Innovation (2003) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Lyles M. A., Schwenk C. R. Top management, strategy and organizational knowledge structures. J. Management Stud. (1992) 29:155–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A., Gosain S., El Sawy O. A. Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):145–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee A. The diminishment of Don Draper. Andrew McAfee's Blog (2009) . http://andrewmcafee.org/2009/05/the-diminishment-of-don-draper/Google Scholar
• McGee M. K. InformationWeek 500: Kimberly-Clark's virtual product demo center yields real ideas on how to sell more products. InformationWeek (2007) September 18Google Scholar
• McKinsey Global Survey Results Assessing innovation metrics. The McKinsey Quarterly (2008) OctoberGoogle Scholar
• Miller D., Cheng M.-J. Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the U.S. airline industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(1):1–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery D. C., Oxley J. E. Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: The role of national innovation systems. Cambridge J. Econom. (1995) 19(1):67–93Google Scholar
• Nambison S., Sawhney M. A buyer's guide to the innovation bazaar. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2007) 85(6):109–118Google Scholar
• Nerkar A., Roberts P. W. Technological and product-market experience and the success of new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(8–9):779–799Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nerkar A., Shane S. Determinants of invention commercialization: An empirical examination of academically sourced inventions. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(11):1155–1166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevens T. M., Summe G. L., Uttal B. Commercializing technology: What do the best companies do? Harvard Business Review on Entrepreneurship (1990) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) 175Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan D. Framework for managing business development in the networked organisation. Comput. Indust. (2002) 47(1):77–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penner-Hahn J., Shaver J. M. Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(2):121–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perreault W. D., Leigh L. E. Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(2):135–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell T. C., Dent Micaleff A. Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(5):375–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(2):240–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations (1995) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Ryan G. W., Bernard H. R., Denzin N., Lincoln Y. Data management and analysis methods. Handbook of Qualitative Research (2000) 2nd ed.(Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 769–802Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R., Becerra-Fernandez I.Business Intelligence: Practices, Technologies, and Management (2010) (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ) Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R., Sabherwal S. Knowledge management using information technology: Determinants of short-term impact on firm value. Decision Sci. (2005) 36(4):531–567Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R., Sabherwal S. How do knowledge management announcements affect firm value? A study of firms pursuing different business strategies. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2007) 54(3):409–422Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Subramani M. R. Special issue on information technologies and knowledge management. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):1–7Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schachter A. D., Ramoni M. F. Clinical forecasting in drug development. Nature Rev. Drug Discovery (2007) 6:107–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmookler J.Invention and Economic Growth (1966) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. A.Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (1942) (Harper and Brothers, New York) Google Scholar
• Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Statist. (1978) 6(2):461–464Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott J. Facilitating interorganizational learning with information technology. J. MIS (2000) 17(2):81–113Google Scholar
• Shaver J. M. Testing for mediating variables in management research: Concerns, implications, and alternative strategies. J. Management (2005) 31(3):330–353Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shneiderman B. Creativity support tools: Accelerating discovery and innovation. Commun. ACM (2007) 50(12):20–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sileshi G. Selecting the right statistical model for analysis of insect count data by using information theoretic measures. Bull. Entomological Res. (2006) 96(5):479–488Google Scholar
• Smith K. G., Ferrier W. J., Ndofor H., Hitt M. A., Freeman R. E., Harrison J. S. Competitive dynamics research: Critique and future directions. Handbook of Strategic Management (2001) (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA) 315–361Google Scholar
• Songini M. L. GM locomotive unit puts ERP rollout back on track. Computerworld (2002) February 11Google Scholar
• Sorescu A. B., Chandy R. K., Prabhu J. C. Sources and financial consequences of radical innovation: Insights from pharmaceuticals. J. Marketing (2003) 67(4):82–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subramani M. R. How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships? MIS Quart. (2004) 28(1Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi H. Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multibusines firms. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(2):311–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tarafdar M., Gordon S. R. Understanding the influence of information systems competencies on process innovation: A resource-based view. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2007) 16:353–392Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taschek J. Accelrys products embellish data. eWeek (2003) February 10Google Scholar
• Tippins M. J., Sohi R. S. IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(8):745–761Crossref, Google Scholar
• Todorova G., Durisin B. Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(3):774–786Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M. Patents, citations and innovations: Tracing the links. (1987) . NBER Working Paper W2457, NBER, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in interorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(5):995–1004Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E. Economics of product development by users: The impact of “sticky” local information. Management Sci. (1998) 44(5):629–644Link, Google Scholar
• Wasserman L. Bayesian model selection and model averaging. J. Math. Psych. (2000) 44(1):92–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson H. J., Goodhue D. L., Wixom B. H., Barko C., Nemati H. Data warehousing: The 3M experience. Organizational Data Mining: Leveraging Enterprise Data Resources for Optimal Performance (2004) (Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA) 202–216Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A., George G. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(2):185–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zelner B. A., Heinz W. J., Holburn G. L. F. Contentious implementation and retrenchment in neoliberal policy reform: The global electric power industry, 1989–2001. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2009) 54(3):379–412Crossref, Google Scholar