Leveraging IT Capabilities and Competitive Process Capabilities for the Management of Interorganizational Relationship Portfolios

References

• Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(3):425–456Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interaction (1991) (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Armstrong S., Overton T. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14(3):396–402Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi R. P.Causal Methods in Marketing (1980) (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Bagozzi R. P., Yi Y., Phillips L. W. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(3):421–458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bala H., Venkatesh V. Assimilation of interorganizational business process standards. Inform. Systems Res. (2007) 18(3):340–362Link, Google Scholar
• Barua A., Konana P., Whinston A. B., Yin F. An empirical investigation of net-enabled business value. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(4):585–620Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A., Korn H. J. Competitive dynamics of interfirm rivalry: Linking structural conditions of competition to patterns of market entry and exit. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(2):255–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Calabrese T., Silverman B. S. Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3, Special Issue: Strategic Networks):267–294Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckman C. M., Haunschild P. R., Phillips D. J. Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(3):259–275Link, Google Scholar
• Bensaou M., Venkatraman N. Configurations of interorganizational relationships: A comparison between U.S. and Japanese automakers. Management Sci. (1995) 41(9):1471–1492Link, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A. S. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(1):169–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhatt G. D. An empirical examination of the effects of information systems integration on business process improvement. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management (2000) 20(11):1331–1359Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollen K., Lennox R. Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psych. Bull. (1991) 110(2):305–314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Foster P. C. The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. J. Management (2003) 29(6):991–1013Google Scholar
• Boudreau M.-C., Gefen D., Straub D. W. Validation in information systems research: A state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(1):1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass D. J., Galaskiewicz J., Greve H. R., Wenpin T. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(6):795–817Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broadbent M., Weill P., St. Clair D. The implications of information technology infrastructure for business process redesign. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(2):159–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S.Corporate Profit and Cooptation (1983) (Academic Press Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. The network structure of social capital. Res. Organ. Behav. (2000) 22:345–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrd T. A., Turner D. E. Measuring the flexibility of information technology infrastructure: Exploratory analysis of a construct. J. Management Inform. Systems (2000) 17(1):167–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen M.-J. Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21(1):100–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen M.-J., Su K.-H., Tsai W. Competitive tension: The awareness-motivation-capability perspective. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(1):101–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chi L., Holsapple C., Srinivasan C. The linkage between IOS use and competitive action: A competitive dynamics perspective. Inform. Systems e-Business Management (2007) 5(4):319–356Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ciborra C. U. The platform organization: Recombining strategies, structures, and surprises. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(2):103–118Link, Google Scholar
• Clark T. H., Stoddard D. B. Interorganizational business process redesign: Merging technological and process innovation. J. Management Inform. Systems (1996) 13(2):9–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science (1988) 2nd ed.(Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Coleman J. S.Foundations of Social Theory (1990) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Cortina J. M., Chen G., Dunlap W. P. Testing interaction effects in LISREL: Examination and illustration of available procedures. Organ. Res. Methods (2001) 4(4):324–350Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lengel R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Sci. (1986) 32(5):554–571Link, Google Scholar
• Dent C. Transnational capital, the state and foreign economic policy: Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Rev. Internat. Political Econom. (2003) 10(2):246–277Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos A., Siguaw J. A. Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British J. Management (2006) 17:263–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos A., Winklhofer H. M. Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(2):269–277Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drew S. From knowledge to action: The impact of benchmarking on organizational performance. Long Range Planning (1997) 30(3):427–441Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncan N. B. Capturing flexibility of information technology infrastructure: A study of resource characteristics and their measure. J. Management Inform. Systems (1995) 12(2):37–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H., Hatch N. W. Relation-specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: Creating advantage through network relationships. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27(8):701–719Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H., Nobeoka K. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):345–367Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H., Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):660–679Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Brown S. L. Patching: Restitching business portfolios in dynamic markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) 77(3):72–82Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10/11):1105–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrier W. J. Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(4):858–877Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrier W. J., Smith K. G., Grimm C. M. The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(4):372–388Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman R. G. Real options and IT platform adoption: Implications for theory and practice. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(2):132–154Link, Google Scholar
• Fjeldstad O. D., Haanaes K. Strategy tradeoffs in the knowledge and network economy. Bus. Strategy Rev. (2001) 12(1):1–10Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galunic D. C., Eisenhardt K. M. Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1229–1249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganesan S. Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. J. Marketing (1994) 58(2):1–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glazer R., Weiss A. M. Marketing in turbulent environments: Decision processes and the time-sensitivity of information. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30:509–521Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gnyawali D. R., Madhavan R. Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26(3):431–445Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodhue D. L., Wybo M. D. The impact of data integration on the costs and benefits of information systems. MIS Quart. (1992) 16(3):293–311Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodhue D. L., Lewis W., Thompson R. Statistical power in analyzing interaction effects: Questioning the advantage of PLS with product indicators. Inform. Systems Res. (2007) 18(2):211–227Link, Google Scholar
• Gosain S., Malhotra A., El Sawy O. A. Coordinating for flexibility in e-business supply chains. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 21(3):7–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91(3):481–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2000) 4th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Grover V., Saeed K. A. The impact of product, market, and relationship characteristics on interorganizational system integration in manufacturer–supplier dyads. J. Management Inform. Systems (2007) 23(4):185–216Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(5):397–420Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R., Nohria N., Zaheer A. Strategic networks. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3, Special Issue: Strategic Networks):203–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tathem R. L., Black W. C.Multivariate Data Analysis (1998) 5th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E. Guest editor's introduction to the special issue: The evolution of firm capabilities. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(Special Issue):955–959Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herfindahl O. Concentration in the U.S. steel industry. (1950) . Unpublished dissertation, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Hitt M. A., Keats B. W., DeMarie S. M. Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Acad. Management Executive (1998) 12(4):22–42Google Scholar
• Hoffmann W. H. Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(8):827–856Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jap S. D. Perspectives on joint competitive advantage in buyer-supplier relationships. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2001) 18(1):19–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Stoddard D. B. Business process redesign: Radical and evolutionary change. J. Bus. Res. (1998) 41(1):15–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvis C. B., Mackenzie S. B., Podsakoff P. M. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30(2):199–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaworski B. J., Kohli R. Market orientation—Antecedents and consequences. J. Marketing (1993) 57(3):53–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson J. L. Strategic integration in industrial distribution channels: Managing the interfirm relationship as a strategic asset. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1999) 27(Winter):4–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnston D. A., McCutcheon D. M., Stuart F. I., Kerwood H. Effects of supplier trust on performance of cooperative supplier relationships. J. Oper. Management (2004) 22(1):23–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirzner I. M.Competition and Entrepreneurship (1973) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Kogut B. The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3, Special Issue: Strategic Networks):405–425Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R., Grover V. Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2008) 9(1):23–39Google Scholar
• Koka B. R., Prescott J. E. Designing alliance networks: The influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance. Strategic Management J. (2008) 29(6):639–661Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan M. S., Rai A., Zmud R. The digitally enabled extended enterprise in a global economy. Inform. Systems Res. (2007) 18(3):233–236Link, Google Scholar
• Larson A. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(1):76–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D. Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(12):1187–1212Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D., Rosenkopf L. Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(4):797–818Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee H. Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 20(1):179–228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee H. L. The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82(10):102–112Google Scholar
• Lewis M., Rai A., Forquer D., Quinter D.UPS and HP: Value Creation Through Supply Chain Partnerships (2007) (Ivey Publishing, London, Ontario, Canada) Google Scholar
• Lumpkin G. T., Dess G. G. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21(1):135–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A., Gosain S., El Sawy O. A. Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):145–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A., Gosain S., El Sawy O. A. Leveraging standard electronic business interfaces to enable adaptive supply chain partnerships. Inform. Systems Res. (2007) 18(3):260–279Link, Google Scholar
• Malone T. W., Crowston K. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. Surveys (1994) 26(1):87–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L. Paradigm shifts in e-business and business/systems integration. Comm. AIS (2000) 4(10):1–45Google Scholar
• McEvily B., Marcus A. Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(11):1033–1055Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H. Organizational architecture and success in the information technology industry. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):513–529Link, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. (1995) 19(2/3):179–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore G. C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(3):192–222Link, Google Scholar
• Nadler N., Tushman M. The organization of the future: Strategic imperatives and core competencies for the 21st century. Organ. Dynam. (1999) 28(1):45–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nishiguchi T., Beaudet A. The Toyota Group and the Aisin fire. Sloan Management Rev. (1998) 40(1):49–59Google Scholar
• Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1978) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Patnayakuni R., Rai A., Seth N. Relational antecedents of information flow integration for supply chain coordination. J. Management Inform. Systems (2006) 23(1):13–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penrose E. T.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (M. E. Sharpe, White Plains, NY) Google Scholar
• Petter S., Straub D. W., Rai A. Specification and validation of formative constructs in IS research. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(4):623–656Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (2003) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
• Phillips L. W., Bagozzi R. P., Sheth J. N. On measuring the organizational properties of distribution channels: Methodological issues in the use of key informants. Research in Marketing: A Research Annual: Distribution Channels and Institutions (1986) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 313–369Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and perspectives. J. Management (1986) 12(4):531–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E.Competitive Advantage (1980a) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Porter M. E.Competitive Strategy (1980b) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Rai A., Maruping L. M., Venkatesh V. Offshore information systems project success: The role of social embeddedness and cultural characteristics. MIS Quart. (2009) 33(3):1–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A., Patnayakuni R., Seth N. Firm performance impacts of digitally-enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(2):225–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A., Sambamurthy V., Agarwal R. How CIOs can enable governance of value nets. MIS Quart. Executive (2008) 7(4):193–204Google Scholar
• Rossiter J. R. The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2002) 19:305–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowley T., Behrens D., Krackhardt D. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3, Special Issue: Strategic Networks):369–386Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rozeboom W. W. Sensitivity of a linear composite predictor items to differential item weighting. Psychometrica (1979) 44(3):289–296Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R., Hirschheim R., Goles T. The dynamics of alignment: Insights from a punctuated equilibrium model. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(2):179–197Link, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A. S., Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):237–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M. A. Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(2):312–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M. A., Steensma H. K. The use of modular organizational forms: An industry-level analysis. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1149–1168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. A.The Theory of Economic Development (1934) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Selnes F., Sallis J. Promoting relationship learning. J. Marketing (2003) 67(3):80–95Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C., Varian H. R.Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (1999) 2nd ed.(Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Simchi-Levi D., Kaminsky P., Simchi-Levi E.Designing and Managing the Supply Chain (2007) 3rd ed.(McGraw-Hill, Irwin, CA) Google Scholar
• Simchi-Levi D., Nelson D., Mulani N., Wright J. Crude calculations. Wall Street J. (2008) 252Eastern Edition(70):R8Google Scholar
• Sinha K. K., Van de Ven A. H. Designing work within and between organizations. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(4):389–408Link, Google Scholar
• Smith K. G., Ferrier W. J., Ndofor H., Hitt M. A., Freeman R. E., Harrison J. S. Competitive dynamics research: Critique and future direction. Handbook of Strategic Management (2001) (Blackwell, Malden, MA) 315–361Google Scholar
• Srivastava R. K., Shervani T. A., Fahey L. Market-based assets and shareholder value: A framework for analysis. J. Marketing (1998) 62(1):2–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starbuck W. H.The Production of Knowledge: The Challenge of Social Science Research (2006) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stremersch S., Weiss A. M., Dellaert B. G. C., Frambach R. T. Buying modular systems in technology-intensive markets. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(3):335–350Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subramani M. How do suppliers benefit from information technology in supply chain relationships? MIS Quart. (2004) 28(1):45–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subramani M. R., Venkatraman N. Safeguarding investments in asymmetric interorganizational relationships: Theory and evidence. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46(1):46–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tallon P. P., Kraemer K. L. Fact or fiction? A sensemaking perspective on the reality behind executives' perceptions of IT business value. J. Management Inform. Systems (2007) 24(1):13–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi H., Konana P., Ling G. The choice of sourcing mechanisms for business processes. Inform. Systems Res. (2007) 18(3):280–299Link, Google Scholar
• Taudes A., Feurstein M., Mild A. Options analysis of software platform decisions: A case study. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(2):227–243Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:509–534Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teo H. H., Wei K. K., Benbasat I. Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(1):19–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (1967) (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York) Google Scholar
• Tiwana A. Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity. Strategic Management J. (2008) 29(3):251–272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turnbull P. D. Effective investments in information infrastructure. Inform. Software Tech. (1991) 33(3):191–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):37–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wall T. D., Michie J., Patterson M., Wood S. J., Sheehan M., Clegg C. W., West M. On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psych. (2004) 57(1):95–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts D.Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age (2003) (W. W. Norton & Company, New York) Google Scholar
• Young-Ybarra C., Wiersema M. Strategic flexibility in information technology alliances: The influence of transaction cost economics and social exchange theory. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:439–459Link, Google Scholar
• Yu T., Subramaniam M., Cannella A. A. Rivalry deterrence in international markets: Contingencies governing the mutual forbearance hypothesis. Acad. Management J. (2009) 52(1):127–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A., Venkatraman N. Determinants of electronic integration in the insurance industry: An empirical test. Management Sci. (1994) 40(5):549–566Link, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A., Zaheer S. Catching the wave: Alertness, responsiveness, and market influence in global electronic networks. Management Sci. (1997) 43(11):1493–1509Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu K., Kraemer K. L., Gurbaxani V., Xin Xu S. Migration to open-standard interorganizational systems: Network effects, switching costs, and path dependency. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(Special Issue):515–539Crossref, Google Scholar