Research Commentary—The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research

References

• Adomavicius G., Bockstedt J. C., Gupta A., Kauffman R. J. Making sense of technology trends in the information technology landscape: A design science approach. MIS Quart. (2008) 32(4):779–809Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B.Design Rules, Vol. 1: The Power of Modularity (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. The resource-based theory of the firm. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):469Link, Google Scholar
• Benkler Y.The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom (2006) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
• Boland R. J., Lyytinen K., Yoo Y. Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering and construction. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(4):631–647Link, Google Scholar
• Broadbent M., Weill P., Clair D. St. The implications of information technology infrastructure for business process redesign. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(2):159–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler A. D., Cortada J. W., Chandler A., Cortada J. W. The information age: Continuities and differences. A Nation Transformed by Information: How Information Has Shaped the United States from Colonial Times to the Present (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) 281–300Google Scholar
• Clark K. B. The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Res. Policy (1985) 14:235–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenman T., Parker G., Van Aystyne M. W. Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2006) 84(10):92–101Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Weiser P. J. Modularity, vertical integration, and open access policies: Toward a convergence of antitrust and regulation in the Internet age. Harvard J. Law Tech. (2003) 17(1):86–134Google Scholar
• Gao L. S., Iyer B. Analyzing complementarities using software stacks for software industry acquisitions. J. Management Inform. Systems (2006) 23(2):119–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A., Cusumano M. How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2008) 49(2):28Google Scholar
• Ghazawneh A., Henfridsson O. Governing third-party development through platform boundary resources. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS) 2010 (2010) St. Louis, MOGoogle Scholar
• Hanseth O., Lyytinen K. Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building Internet. J. Inform. Tech. (2010) 25(1):1–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henfridsson O., Lindgren R. User involvement in developing mobile and temporarily interconnected systems. Inform. Systems J. (2010) 20(2):119–135Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R., Grover V. Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the time. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2008) 9(2):23–39Google Scholar
• Kusunoki K., Aoshima Y., Itami H., Kusunoki K., Numagami T., Takeishi A. Redefining innovation as system re-definition. Dynamics of Knowledge, Corporate Systems, and Innovation (2010) (Springer, London) 43–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois R. N. The vanishing hand: The changing dynamics of industrial capitalism. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12(2):351–385Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois R. N., Steil B., Victor D. G., Nelson R. R. Computers and semiconductors. Technological Innovation and Economic Performance (2007) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 265–284Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K., Yoo Y. The next wave of nomadic computing. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(4):377–388Link, Google Scholar
• Malone T. W.The Future of Work: How the New Order of Business Will Shape Your Organization, Your Management Style, and Your Life (2004) (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston) Google Scholar
• Nevo S., Wade M. R. The formation and value of IT-enabled resources: Antecedents and consequences of synergistic relationships. MIS Quart. (2010) 34(1):163–183Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nohria N., Eccles R. G.Networks and Organizations (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Porter M. E.Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (1980) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. W. The organizing logic for an enterprise's IT activities in the digital era-A prognosis of practice and a call for research. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(2):105–114Link, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A., Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):237–264Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M. A. Toward a general modular system theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(2):312–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. A.The Theory of Economic Development (1934) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Simon H. A.The Sciences of the Artificial (1996) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. Near decomposability and the speed of evolution. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(3):587–599Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swanson E. B. Information systems innovation among organizations. Management Sci. (1994) 40(9):1069–1092Link, Google Scholar
• Teece D. The dynamics of industrial capitalism: Perspectives on Alfred Chandler's scale and scope. J. Econom. Literature (1993) 31(1):199–225Google Scholar
• Tilson D., Lyytinen K., Sørenson C. Desperately seeking the infrastructure in IS research: Conceptualization of “digital convergence. Proc. 43rd HICSS (2010) Koloa, Kauai, HIGoogle Scholar
• Tuomi I.Networks of Innovation: Change and Meaning in the Age of the Internet (2002) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Ulrich K. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy (1995) 24(3):419–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verganti R.Design-Driven Innovation: Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating What Things Mean (2009) (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston) Google Scholar
• Wheeler B. C. NEBIC: A dynamic capabilities theory for assessing net enablement. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 13(2):125–146Link, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y. Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing. MIS Quart. (2010) 34(2):213–231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zittrain J. The generative Internet. Harvard Law Rev. (2006) 119:1974–2040Google Scholar