Research Commentary—Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics

References

• Armstrong M., Wright J. Two-sided markets, competitive bottlenecks and exclusive contracts. Econom. Theory (2007) 32(2):353–380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C. Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms. Indust. Corporate Change (2008) 17(1):155–195Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C., Clark K.Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C., Clark K. The architecture of participation: Does code architecture mitigate free riding in the open source development model? Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1116–1127Link, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C., Woodard J., Gawer A. Platforms, markets and innovation. The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View (2009) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) 19–44Google Scholar
• Cardinal L. B. Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(1):19–36Link, Google Scholar
• Cusumano M., Gawer A. The elements of platform leadership. Sloan Management Rev. (2002) 43(3):51–58Google Scholar
• Eisenmann T., Parker G., van Alstyne M. Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2006) 84(10):1–10Google Scholar
• Fama E. F., Jensen M. C. Separation of agency and control. J. Law Econom. (1983) 26(2):301–325Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman R. Real options and IT platform adoption: Implications for theory and practice. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(2):132–154Link, Google Scholar
• Gamba A., Fusari N. Valuing modularity as a real option. Management Sci. (2009) 55(11):1877–1896Link, Google Scholar
• Gawer A.Platforms, Markets and Innovation (2009) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz M., Shapiro C. Systems competition and network effects. J. Econom. Perspect. (1994) 8(2):93–115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirsch L. J. Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):215–239Link, Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Pathak P., Tirole J. The dynamics of open-source contributors. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2006) 96(2):114–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Messerschmitt D., Szyperski C.Software Ecosystem (2003) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Mihm J., Loch C., Huchzermeier A. Problem-solving oscillations in complex projects. Management Sci. (2003) 49(6):733–750Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W., Iacono S. Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(2):121–134Link, Google Scholar
• Pil F., Cohen C. Modularity: Implications for imitation, innovation, and sustained advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31(4):995–1011Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. Arrangements for technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(2):261–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez R., Mahoney J. Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product organization and design. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(1):63–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M. Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(2):312–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. (1962) 106(6):467–482Google Scholar
• Simon H. Rational decision making in business organizations. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1979) 69(4):493–513Google Scholar
• Simon H. Near decomposability and the speed of evolution. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(3):587–599Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A. Does interfirm modularity complement ignorance? A field study of software outsourcing alliances. Strategic Management J. (2008a) 29(11):1241–1252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A. Does technological modularity substitute for control? A study of alliance performance in software outsourcing. Strategic Management J. (2008b) 29(7):769–780Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A. Governance-knowledge fit in systems development projects. Inform. Systems Res. (2009) 20(2):180–197Link, Google Scholar
• Ulrich K. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy (1995) 24(3):419–440Crossref, Google Scholar