Social Networks and the Diffusion of User-Generated Content: Evidence from YouTube

References

• Angrist J., Krueger A. Does compulsory school attendance affect schooling and earnings? Quart. J. Econom. (1991) 106(4):979–1014Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong C. P., Sambamurthy V. Information technology assimilation in firms: The influence of senior leadership and IT infrastructures. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(4):304–327Link, Google Scholar
• Bala V., Goyal S. Learning from neighbors. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1998) 65(3):595–621Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baluja S., Seth R., Sivakumar D., Jing Y., Yagnik J., Kumar S., Ravichandran D., Aly M. Video suggestion and discovery for YouTube: Taking random walks through the view graph. Proc. 17th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (2008) Beijing:895–904 http://www.conference.org/www2008/papers/pdf/p895-svakumarA.pdfCrossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O., Rasul I. Social networks and technology adoption in Northern Mozambique. Econom. J. (2006) 116(514):862–902Google Scholar
• Bass F. A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Sci. (1969) 15(5):215–227Link, Google Scholar
• Bemmaor A. C., Lee J. C. The impact of heterogeneity and ill-conditioning on diffusion model parameter estimates. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(2):209–220Link, Google Scholar
• Bernheim D. A. A theory of conformity. J. Political Econom. (1994) 102(5):841–877Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S., Gopal R. D., Lertwachara K., Marsden J. R., Telang R. The effect of digital sharing technologies on music markets. Management Sci. (2007) 53(9):1359–1374Link, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J. Political Econom. (1992) 100(5):992–1026Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonacich . Power and centrality: A family of measures. Amer. J. Sociol. (1987) 92(5):1170–1182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P. Centrality and network flow. Soc. Networks (2005) 27(1):55–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G. A graph-theoretic framework for classifying centrality measures. Soc. Networks (2006) 28(4):466–484Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C.Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis (2002) (Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA) Google Scholar
• Boulding W., Christen M. Sustainable pioneering advantage? Profit implications of market entry order. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):371–392Link, Google Scholar
• Bramoulle Y., Djebbari H., Fortin B. Identification of peer effects through social networks. J. Econometrics (2009) 150(1):41–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. Amer. J. Sociol. (1987) 92(6):1287–1335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Centola D., Macy M. Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (2007) 113(3):702–734Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cha M. H., Kwak P., Rodriguez Y. A., Moon S. I Tube, YouTube, everybody Tubes: Analyzing the world's largest user generated content video system. Proc. ACM Special Interest Group Data Comm. (SIGCOMM) Internet Measurement Conf. (2007) San DiegoGoogle Scholar
• Chevalier J., Mayzlin D. The effect of word of mouth online: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(3):345–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman J. S., Katz E., Menzel H.Medical Innovation: Diffusion of a Medical Drug Among Doctors (1966) (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis) Google Scholar
• Crane R., Sornette D. Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (2008) 105(41):15649–15653Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan S., Ramaprasad J. Consumer blogging and music sampling. (2008) . Working paper, University of California at Irvine, IrvineGoogle Scholar
• Dodds P. S., Watts D. J. Universal behavior in a generalized model of contagion. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2004) 92(21). http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v92/i21/e218701Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dodds P. S., Watts D. J. A generalized model of social and biological contagion. J. Theoret. Biol. (2005) 232(4):587–604Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dodds P. S., Watts D. J. Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. J. Consumer Res. (2007) 34:441–458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Easley D., Kleinberg J.Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World (2010) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman R. G., Zmud R. W. The diffusion and assimilation of information technology innovations. Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past (2000) (Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Inc., Cincinnati, OH) Google Scholar
• Forman C., Ghose A., Wiesenfeld B. Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity information. Inform. Systems Res. (2008) 19(3):291–313Link, Google Scholar
• Freeman L. C. Centrality in social networks: A conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks (1979) 1(3):215–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A., Hill J.Data Analysis Using Regression and Mulitlevel/Hierarchical Models (2007) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Gladwell M.The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference (2000) (Little Brown, Boston) Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1360–1380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman J. A., Taylor W. E. Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica (1981) 49(6):1377–1398Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendricks K., Sorenson A. Information and the skewness of music sales. J. Political Econom. (2009) 117(2):324–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H., Andrews S. B. Power, social Influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(2):277–303Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalish S. A new product adoption model with price, advertising and uncertainty. Management Sci. (1985) 31(12):1569–1585Link, Google Scholar
• Kraut R. E., Rice R. E., Cool C., Fish R. S. Varieties of social influence: The role of utility and norms in the success of a new communication medium. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(4):437–453Link, Google Scholar
• Liu H., Maes P., Davenport G. Unraveling the taste fabric of social networks. Internat. J. Semantic Web Inform. Systems (2006) 2(1):42–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahajan V., Muller E., Bass F. M. New product diffusion models in marketing: A review and directions for research. J. Marketing (1990) 54(1):1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P., Xie Y., Youn N. The role of targeted communication and contagion in new product adoption. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(6):950–961Link, Google Scholar
• Manski C. F. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1993) 60(3):531–542Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson P. Information and consumer behavior. J. Political Econom. (1970) 78(2):311–329Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman M. E. J. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. (2003) 45(2):167–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oestreicher-Singer G., Sundararajan A. The visible hand of social networks in electronic markets. (2008) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Parameswaran M., Whinston A. B. Social computing: An overview. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2007) 19:762–780Google Scholar
• Peck R. S., Zhou L. Y., Anthony V. B., Madhukar K. Consumer Internet, Bear Stearns equity research report. (2008) . Bear Stearns, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Putnam R.Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (2000) (Simon and Schuster, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raymond E.The Cathedral and the Bazaar (2001) (O'Reilly, Sebastopol, CA) Google Scholar
• Reagans R. E., Zuckerman E. W. Why knowledge does not equal power: The network redundancy trade-off. Indust. Corporate Change (2008) 17(5):903–944Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resnick P., Zeckhauser R., Friedman E., Kuwabara K. Reputation systems. Comm. ACM (2000) 43(12):45–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers E.Diffusion of Innovations (1995) 4th ed.(The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M., Kincaid L. D.Communication Networks (1981) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Sacerdote B. Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(2):681–704Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salganik M., Dodds P. S., Watts D. Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science (2006) 311(5762):854–856Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strang D., Tuma N. B. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in diffusion. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 99(3):614–639Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A. Local network effects and complex network structure. Berkeley Electronic J. Theoret. Econom. (2007) 7(1). Article 46. http://www.bepress.com/bejte/vol7/iss1/art46Google Scholar
• Szabo G., Huberman B. A. Predicting the popularity of online content. Comm. ACM (2009) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Talukdar D., Sudhir K., Ainslie A. Investigating new product diffusion across products and countries. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(1):97–114Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C., Lilien G. Medical innovation revisited: Social contagion versus marketing effort. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 106(5):1409–1435Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C., Stremersch S. Social contagion and income heterogeneity in new product diffusion: A meta-analytic test. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):530–544Link, Google Scholar
• Wang F.-Y., Carley K. M., Zeng D., Mao W. Social computing: From social informatics to social intelligence. IEEE Intelligent Systems (2007) 22(2):79–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts D. J. A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (2002) 99(9):5766–5771Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts D. J., Dodds P. S., Newman M. E. J.Science (2002) 296(5571):1302–1305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wejnert B. Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2002) 28):297–326Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wells J. It's crunch time. Globe Mail (2009) February 13). http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/article971011.eceGoogle Scholar
• Wooldridge J. M.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar