What's in a “Name”? Impact of Use of Customer Information in E-Mail Advertisements

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0384

References

  • Acquisti A., John L. K., Loewenstein G. The impact of relative standards on the propensity to disclose. J. Marketing Res. (2011) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Albert J. S., Chib S. Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1993) 88(422):669–679CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ansari A., Mela C. E-customization. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(2):131–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Australian, The Cisco says 90 per cent of email is spam. (2008) December 17). http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it-old/cisco-says-90-per-cent-of-email-is-spam/story-e6frgamx-1111118343852Google Scholar
  • Awad N. F., Krishnan M. The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(1):13–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ba S., Pavlou P. Evidence on the effect of trust building in electronic markets: Price premium and buyer behavior. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(3):243–268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berlyne D. E. Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Attention, Perception Psychophysics (1970) 8(5):279–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M., Karlin D., Mullainathan S., Shafir E., Zinman J. What's psychology worth? A field experiment in the consumer credit market. (2005) . Working Paper Series 11892, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacherjee A. Individual trust in online firms: Scale development and initial trust. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19(1):213–243Google Scholar
  • Bugental J., Zelen S. Investigations into the self-concept: The W-A-Y technique. J. Personality (1950) 18(4):483–498CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chellappa R. K., Sin R. Personalization versus privacy: An empirical examination of the online consumer's dilemma. Inform. Tech. Management (2005) 6(2–3):181–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen P.-Y., Hitt L. M. Measuring switching costs and the determinants of customer retention in Internet-enabled businesses. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):255–274LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y., Narasimhan C., Zhang Z. J. Individual marketing with imperfect targetability. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(1):23–41LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chintagunta P. K., Jain D. C., Vilcassim N. J. Investigating heterogeneity in brand preferences in logit models for panel data. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28(3):417–428CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cowles M. K. Accelerating Monte Carlo Markov chain convergence for cumulative-link generalized linear models. Statist. Comput. (1996) 6(2):101–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Culnan M. J. How did they get my name? An exploratory investigation of consumer attitudes toward secondary information use. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(3):341–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Culnan M. J., Bies B. J. Consumer privacy: Balancing economic and justice considerations. J. Soc. Issues (2003) 59(2):323–342CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeCew J., Zalta E. N. Privacy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008) Fall 2008 ed.Accessed November 10, 2009, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/privacy/Google Scholar
  • Dewan R., Jing B., Seidmann A. Product customization and price competition on the Internet. Management Sci. (2003) 49(8):1055–1070LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dinev T., Hart P. An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(1):61–80LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Federal Trade Commission Online profiling: A report to Congress. (2000) . Report, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC. http://www.ftc.gov/os/2000/06/onlineprofiling-reportjune2000.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Gartner Gartner says number of identity theft victims has increased more than 50 percent since 2003. (2007) . Press release (March 6), http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=501912Google Scholar
  • Gefen D. E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust. Omega (2000) 28(6):725–737CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geweke J., Bernardo J. M., Berger J. O., Dawid A. P., Smith A. F. M. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments. Bayesian Statistics 4 (1992) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 169–193Google Scholar
  • Gonul F., Srinivasan K. Modeling multiple sources of heterogeneity in multinomial logit model: Methodological and managerial issues. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(3):213–229LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2003) 5th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Heidelberger P., Welch P. D. Simulation run length control in the presence of an initial transient. Oper. Res. (1983) 31(6):1109–1144LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Howard D. J., Gengler C., Jain A. What's in a name? A complimentary means of persuasion. J. Consumer Res. (1995) 22(2):200–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsiao C.Analysis of Panel Data (1986) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Jensen C., Potts C. Privacy policies as decision-making tools: A usability evaluation of online privacy notices. Proc. Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (CHI '04) (2004) (ACM Press, New York) 471–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A., Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. The simulation heuristic. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 201–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lai H. J., Liang T., Ku Y. C. Customized Internet news services based on customer profiles. Proc. 5th Internat. Conf. Electronic Commerce (2003) (ACM Press, New York) 225–229CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laudon K. C., Traver C. G.E-Commerce: Business, Technology, Society (2009) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Levy M., Weitz B. A.Retailing Management (1992) (McGraw-Hill, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Liu J. S. The collapsed Gibbs sampler in Bayesian computations with applications to a gene regulation problem. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1994) 89(427):958–966CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra N. K., Kim S. S., Agarwal J. Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(3):336–355LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McFadden D., Zarembda P. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics (1974) (Academic Press, New York) 105–142Google Scholar
  • McKinsey Quarterly How companies are marketing online: A McKinsey global survey. (2007) September). http://www.sata.ca/file/HowCompaniesAreMarketingOnline.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • McNamara W. Personalizing, my ass. Sea Monkey Rodeo (2005) . (blog), January 17, http://seamonkeyrodeo.blogspot.com/2005/01/personalizing-my-ass.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Milne G. R., Gordon M. E. Direct mail privacy-efficiency trade-offs within an implied social contract framework. J. Public Policy Marketing (1993) 12(2):206–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murthi B. P. S., Sarkar S. Role of management sciences in research. Management Sci. (2004) 49(10):1344–1362LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nowak G. J., Phelps J. Direct marketing and the use of individual-level consumer information: Determining how and when “privacy” matters. J. Direct Marketing (1995) 9(3):46–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parfeni L. Spending on email marketing will increase to $2 billion by 2014. (2009) . Softpedia (June 15), http://news.softpedia.com/news/spending-in-Email-Marketing-Will-Increase-to-2-Billion-by-2014-114217.shtmlGoogle Scholar
  • Perez J. C. Facebook's Beacon more intrusive than previously thought. PCWorld (2007) November 30). http://www.pcworld.com/article/140182/facebooks_beacon_more_intrusive_than_previously_thought.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Pitkow J., Schutze H., Cass T., Cooley R., Turnbull D., Edmonds A., Adar E., Breuel T. Personalized search. Comm. ACM (2002) 45(9):50–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Posner R. A. Privacy, surveillance and law. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. (2008) 75(1):245–260Google Scholar
  • Poulton E. C.Bias in Quantifying Judgments (1989) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove, UK) Google Scholar
  • Rogers T. B., Kuiper N. A., Kirker W. S. Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1977) 35(9):677–688CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rossi P., McCulloch R. E., Allenby G. M. The value of purchase history data in target marketing. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(3):321–340LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shaffer G., Zhang Z. J. Competitive coupon targeting. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(4):395–416LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Slovic P., Fischhoff B., Lichtenstein S. Behavioral decision theory. Annual Rev. Psych. (1977) 28:1–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith H. J., Milberg S. J., Burke S. J. Information privacy: Measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(2):167–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Söderlund M. Customer familiarity and its effects on satisfaction and behavioral intentions. Psych. Marketing (2002) 19(10):861–879CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strandburg K. J., Strandburg K. J., Raicu D. Social norms, self control, and privacy in the online world. Privacy and Technologies of Identity: A Cross-Disciplinary Conversation (2005) (Springer Science + Business Media, New York) . http://works.bepress.com/katherine_strandburg/8Google Scholar
  • Tam K. Y., Ho S. Y. Web personalization: Is it effective? IT Professional (2003) 5(5):53–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tam K. Y., Ho S. Y. Understanding the impact of Web personalization on user information processing, behavior and judgment. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(3):865–890CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walters R. G., Rinne H. J. An empirical investigation into the impact of price promotions on retail store performance. J. Retailing (1986) 62(3):237–266Google Scholar
  • Wang P., Petrison L. Direct marketing activities and personal privacy. J. Direct Marketing (1993) 7(1):7–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wattal S., Telang R., Mukhopadhyay T. Information personalization in a two-dimensional product differentiation model. J. Management Inform. Systems (2009) 26(2):69–95CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weil D. Typical response rates for email marketing. 1to1 Media (2001) November 19). http://www.1to1media.com/View.aspx?docid=20461Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.