Content Provision Strategies in the Presence of Content Piracy

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0406

References

  • Bhatacharjee S., Gopal D. R., Lertwachara K., Marsden R. M., Telang R. The effect of digital sharing technologies on music markets: A survival analysis of albums on ranking charts. Management Sci. (2007) 53(9):1359–1374LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Damiani E., Vimercati D. C. D., Paraboschi S., Samarati P., Violante F. A reputation-based approach for choosing reliable resources in peer-to-peer networks. Proc. 9th ACM Conf. Comput. Commun. Security (CCS '02J) (2002) (ACM)207–216CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenmann T. R. Akamai technologies. (2002) . Harvard Business School Case no. 804–158. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Ercetin O., Tassiulas L. Pricing strategies for differentiated services content delivery networks. Comput. Networks (2005) 49(6):840–855CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallaugher J. M., Auger P., Anat B. Revenue streams and digital content providers: An empirical investigation. Inform. Management (2001) 38(7):473–485CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gopal R. D., Gupta A. Trading higher software piracy for higher profits: The case of phantom piracy. Management Sci. (2010) 56(11):1946–1962LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hosanagar K., Krishnan R., Smith M., Chuang J. Service adoption and pricing of content delivery network (CDN) services. Management Sci. (2008) 54(9):1579–1593LinkGoogle Scholar
  • IAB Internet Advertising Revenue Report (2011) . Accessed April, 2011, http://www.pwc.com/us/en/industry/entertainment-media/publications/iab-internet-advertising.jhtmlGoogle Scholar
  • Jacob V., Asdemir K., Kumar N. Pricing models for online advertising: CPM versus CPC. Inform. Systems Res. (2010) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Julian B. Business uses of peer to peer (P2P) technologies. (2001) . Whitepaper, Netmarkets Europe. http://www.voidstar.com/downloads/PB2B.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Knight S., Burn J. Developing a framework for assessing information quality on the World Wide Web. Inform. Sci. J. (2005) 8:162–172Google Scholar
  • O'Donnell S. An economic map of the Internet. (2002) . Research Paper 162, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Oh J. Profit sharing in a closed content market. J. Media Econom. (2007) 20(7):55–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Padmanabhan V. N., Chou P. A., Wang H. J. Resilient peer-to-peer streaming. (2003) . Technical Report MSR-TR-2003-11, Microsoft Research, Redmond, WAGoogle Scholar
  • Pallis G., Vakali A. Insight and perspectives for content delivery newtorks. Comm. ACM (2006) 49(1):101–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pan J., Hou T. Y., Li B. An overview of DNS-based server selections in content distribution networks. Internat. J. Comput. Telecommunications Networking (2003) 43(6):695–711Google Scholar
  • Parmeswaran M., Susarla A., Whinston A. B. P2P networking: An information sharing alternative. Comput. (2001) 34(7):31–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pipino L. L., Lee Y. W., Wang Y. R. Data quality assessment. Comm. ACM (2004) 45(4):211–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stolarz D. Peer-to-peer streaming media delivery. Proc. 1st Internat. Conf. Peer-to-Peer Comput. (IEEE) (2001) Linkoping, Sweden:48–52Google Scholar
  • Vakali A., Pallis G. Content delivery networks: Status and trends. IEEE Internet Comput. (2003) 7(6):68–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wallach S. D. A survey of peer-to-peer security issues. (2002) Proc. 2002 Mext-NSF-JSPS Internat.Conf.Soft. Security: Theories and SystelmsTokyoGoogle Scholar
  • Yang Z., Cai S., Zhou Z., Zhou N. Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting web portals. Inform. Management (2005) 42:575–589CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.