Real-Time Tactical and Strategic Sales Management for Intelligent Agents Guided by Economic Regimes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0415

References

  • Bapna R., Goes P., Gupta A., Karuga G. Predicting bidders: Willingness to pay in online multi-unit ascending auctions: Analytical and empirical insights. INFORMS J. Comput. (2008) 20(3):345–355LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benisch M., Andrews J., Sadeh N. Pricing for customers with probabilistic valuations as a continuous knapsack problem. Proc. 8th Internat. Conf. Electronic Commerce (2006) Fredericton, NB:38–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benisch M., Greenwald A., Grypari I., Lederman R., Naroditskiy V., Tschantz M. Botticelli: A supply chain management agent designed to optimize under uncertainty. ACM Trans. Comp. Logic (2004) 4(3):29–37Google Scholar
  • Berry P., Conley K., Gervasio M., Peintner B., Uribe T., Yorke-Smith N. Deploying a personalized time management agent. Proc. Fifth Internat. Conf. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (2006) Hakodate, Japan:1546–1571CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bichler M., Gupta A., Ketter W. Designing smart markets. Inform. Systems Res. (2010) 21(4):688–699LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Box G., Jenkins G.Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control (1994) 3rd ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Brown R. G., Meyer R. F., D'Esopo D. A. The fundamental theorem of exponential smoothing. Oper. Res. (1961) 9(5):673–687LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G., Netessine S., Simchi-Levi D., Wu S. D., Shen Z.-J. Game theory in supply chain analysis. Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis Modeling in the eBusiness Era (2004) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) 13–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatzidimitriou K. C., Symeonidis A. L. Data-mining-enhanced agents in dynamic supply-chain-management environments. IEEE Intelligent Systems (2009) 24(3):54–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatzidimitriou K. C., Symeonidis A. L., Kontogounis I., Mitkas P. A. Agent Mertacor: A robust design for dealing with uncertainty and variation in SCM environments. Expert Systems with Appl. (2008) 35(3):591–603CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins J., Ketter W., Gini M. A multi-agent negotiation testbed for contracting tasks with temporal and precedence constraints. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2002) 7(1):35–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins J., Ketter W., Gini M. Flexible decision control in an autonomous trading agent. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. (2009) 8(2):91–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins J., Ketter W., Gini M. Flexible decision support in dynamic interorganizational networks. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2010a) 19(3):436–448CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins J., Ketter W., Sadeh N. Pushing the limits of rational agents: The trading agent competition for supply chain management. AI Magazine (2010b) 31(2):63–80CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins J., Arunachalam R., Sadeh N., Ericsson J., Finne N., Janson S. The supply chain management game for the 2006 trading agent competition. (2005) . Tech. Rep. CMU-ISRI-05-132, Carnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  • Dempster A. P., Laird N. M., Rubin D. B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Royal Stat. Soc. Series B (1977) 39(1):1–38Google Scholar
  • Elmaghraby W., Keskinocak P. Dynamic pricing in the presence of inventory considerations: Research overview, current practices, and future directions. Management Sci. (2003) 49(10):1287–1309LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Enders W.Applied Econometric Time Series (1995) (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Fan M., Stallaert J., Whinston A. B. Decentralized mechanism design for supply chain organizations using an auction market. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(1):1–22LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fine S., Singer Y., Tishby N. The hierarchical hidden Markov model: Analysis and applications. Machine Learn. (1998) 32(1):41–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghani R. Price prediction and insurance for online auctions. Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining (2005) Chicago:411–418CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A., Smith M. D., Telang R. Internet exchanges for used books: An empirical analysis of product cannibalization and welfare impact. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(1):3–19LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbons J. D. Nonparametric statistical inference. Technometrics (1986) 28(3):239–250Google Scholar
  • Gray J. A., Spencer D. E. Price prediction errors and real activity: A reassessment. Econom. Inquiry (1990) 28(4):658–681CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta A., Stahl D. O., Whinston A., Amman H., Rustem B., Whinston A. B. The Internet: A future tragedy of the commons? Computational Approaches to Economic Problems (1997) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 347–361CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He M., Rogers A., Luo X., Jennings N. R. Designing a successful trading agent for supply chain management. Proc. Fifth Internat. Conf. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (2006) Hakodate, Japan:1159–1166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jordan P. R., Kiekintveld C., Wellman M. P. Empirical game-theoretic analysis of the TAC supply chain game. Proc. Sixth Internat. Conf. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (2007) Honolulu:1188–1195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kambil A., van Heck E. Reengineering the Dutch flower auctions: A framework for analyzing exchange organizations. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(1):1–19LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S., Sawhney M. E-hubs: The new B2B marketplaces. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) 78(3):97–103Google Scholar
  • Karmarkar N. A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming. Proc. Sixteenth Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (1984) (ACM, New York) 302–311CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ketter W. Identification and prediction of economic regimes to guide decision making in multi-agent marketplaces. (2007) . Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota, Twin-CitiesGoogle Scholar
  • Ketter W., Collins J., Reddy P., Flath C. The power trading agent competition. (2011) . Tech. Rep. ERS-2011-011-LIS, RSM Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  • Ketter W., Collins J., Gini M., Gupta A., Schrater P., van Heck E., et al. Strategic sales management guided by economic regimes. Edited Volume of the 2nd Smart Business Network Initiative Discovery Event (2006) (Springer Verlag, Berlin) 113–125Google Scholar
  • Ketter W., Collins J., Gini M., Gupta A., Schrater P. Detecting and forecasting economic regimes in multi-agent automated exchanges. Decision Support Systems (2009) 47(4):307–318CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ketter W., Kryzhnyaya E., Damer S., McMillen C., Agovic A., Collins J., Gini M. MinneTAC sales strategies for supply chain TAC. Internat. Conf. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (2004) (ACM, New York) 1372–1373Google Scholar
  • Khreich W., Granger E., Miri A., Sabourin R. On the memory complexity of the forward-backward algorithm. Pattern Recognition Lett. (2010) 31(2):91–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiekintveld C., Miller J., Jordan P. R., Callender L. F., Wellman M. P. Forecasting market prices in a supply chain game. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. (2009) 8(2):63–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kleindorfer P. R., Wu D. J. Integrating long-and short-term contracting via business-to-business exchanges for capital-intensive industries. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1597–1615LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kontogounis I., Chatzidimitriou K. C., Symeonidis A. L., Mitkas P. A. A robust agent design for dynamic SCM environments. Proc. 4th Hellenic Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (SETN) (2006) Heraklion, Greece:127–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kullback S.Information Theory and Statistics (1959) (Dover Publications, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kullback S., Leibler R. A. On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Statist. (1951) 22(1):79–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence R. A machine learning approach to optimal bid pricing. 8th INFORMS Comput. Soc. Conf. Optim. Comput. Network Era (2003) Phoenix, AZ:1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mark B., Perrault R. C. Calo: Cognitive assistant that learns and organizes. (2006) . Accessed on February 27, 2012, http://www.ai.sri.com/project/CALOGoogle Scholar
  • Massey C., Wu G. Detecting regime shifts: The causes of under- and overestimation. Management Sci. (2005) 51(6):932–947LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Muth J. F. Rational expectations and the theory of price movements. Econometrica (1961) 29(3):315–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagali V., Hwang J., Gaskins D. S. M., Pridgen M., Thurston T., Mackenroth P., Branvold D., Scholler P., Shoemaker G. Procurement risk management (PRM) at Hewlett-Packard company. Interfaces (2008) 38(1):51–60LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nogales F. J., Contreras J., Conejo A. J., Espinola R. Forecasting next-day electricity prices by time series models. IEEE Trans. Power Systems (2002) 17(2):342–348CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osborn D. R., Sensier M. The prediction of business cycle phases: Financial variables and international linkages. National Inst. Econ. Rev. (2002) 182(1):96–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pardoe D., Stone P. Bidding for customer orders in TAC SCM: A learning approach. Workshop on Trading Agent Design and Analysis at AAMAS (2004) (New York)52–58Google Scholar
  • Pardoe D., Stone P. Tactex-05: A champion supply chain management agent. Proc. Twenty-First National Conf. Artificial Intelligence (2006) (AAAI, Boston) 1389–1394Google Scholar
  • Pardoe D., Stone P., Adomavicius G., Gupta A. An autonomous agent for supply chain management. Handbooks in Information Systems Series: Business Computing (2007) (Elsevier, Bingley, UK) 141–172Google Scholar
  • Pauwels K., Hanssens D. Windows of change in mature markets. Eur. Marketing Acad. Conf. (2002) Braga, Portugal:1–6Google Scholar
  • Podobnik V., Petric A., Jezic G. An agent-based solution for dynamic supply chain management. J. Universal Comput. Sci. (2008) 14(7):1080–1104Google Scholar
  • Sandholm T. Expressive commerce and its application to sourcing: How we conducted $35 billion of generalized combinatorial auctions. AI Magazine (2007) 28(3):45–58Google Scholar
  • Shannon C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Tech. J. (1948) 27(3):379–423623656CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shmueli G. To explain or to predict? Statist. Sci. (2010) 25(3):289–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sodomka E., Collins J., Gini M. Efficient statistical methods for evaluating trading agent performance. Proc. Twenty-Second National Conf. Artificial Intelligence (2007) Vancouver, Canada:770–775Google Scholar
  • Swaminathan J. M., Tayur S. R. Models for supply chains in e-business. Management Sci. (2003) 49(10):1387–1406LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Swaminathan J. M., Smith S. F., Sadeh N. M. Modeling supply chain dynamics: A multiagent approach. Decision Sci. (1998) 29(3):607–632CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Titterington D., Smith A., Makov U.Statistical Analysis of Finite Mixture Distributions (1985) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wang S., Jank W., Shmueli G. Explaining and forecasting online auction prices and their dynamics using functional data analysis. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (2008) 26(2):144–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang X., Cheung W. K. Learning global models based on distributed data abstractions. Nineteenth Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (2005) Edinburgh, Scottland:1645–1646Google Scholar
  • Zhang D., Zhao K., Liang C.-M., Huq G. B., Huang T.-H. Strategic trading agents via market modeling. SIGecom Exchanges (2004) 4(3):46–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao W., Zheng Y.-S. Optimal dynamic pricing for perishable assets with nonhomogeneous demand. Management Sci. (2000) 46(3):375–388LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.