The Framing Effects of Multipart Pricing on Consumer Purchasing Behavior of Customized Information Good Bundles

References

• Adams WJ, Yellen JL. Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quart. J. Econom. (1976) 90(3):475–498Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akst D. Unbundles of joy. The New York Times (2005) December 11). http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/11/business/yourmoney/11cont.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Ariely D. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions (2006) (HarperCollins, New York) Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Loewenstein G, Prelec D. Coherent arbitrariness: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118(1):73–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arkes HR, Blumer C. The psychology of sunk cost. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1985) 35(1):124–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Auerbach AJ, Pellechio AJ. The two-part tariff and voluntary market participation. Quart. J. Econom. (1978) 92(4):571–587Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babin BJ, Darden WR, Griffin M. Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. J. Consumer Res. (1994) 20(4):644–656Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y, Brynjolfsson E. Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency. Management Sci. (1999) 45(12):1613–1630Link, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y, Brynjolfsson E. Bundling and competition on the Internet. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(1):63–82Link, Google Scholar
• Barker LE, Luman ET, McCauley MM, Chu SY. Assessing equivalence: An alternative to the use of difference tests for measuring disparities in vaccination coverage. Amer. J. Epidemiology (2002) 156(11):1056–1061Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellenger DN, Korgaonkar PK. Profiling the recreational shopper. J. Retailing (1980) 56(3):77–92Google Scholar
• Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (2004) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Ben-Haim Y. Information-Gap Theory: Decisions Under Severe Uncertainty (2001) (Academic Press, London) Google Scholar
• Berk RA, Newton PJ. Does arrest really deter wife battery? An effort to replicate the findings of the Minneapolis spouse abuse experiment. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1985) 50(2):253–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernoff J. Few iPod owners are big iTunes buyers. (2006) . Report, Forrester Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Bodily S, Mohammed R. I can't get no satisfaction: How bundling and multipart pricing can satisify consumers and suppliers. Electronic Commerce Res. (2006) 6(2):187–200Crossref, Google Scholar
• Box GEP, Hunter JS, Hunter WG. Statistics for Experimenters: Design, Innovation, and Discovery (2005) 2nd ed.(Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ) Google Scholar
• Chakravarti D, Rajan K, Pallab PJS. Partitioned presentation of multicomponent bundle prices: Evaluation, choice and underlying processing effects. J. Consumer Psych. (2002) 12(3):215–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clarke EH. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice (1971) 11(1):17–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• D'Agostino RB. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Statist. Medicine (1998) 17(9):2265–2281Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ. Optimal pricing of new subscription services: Analysis of a market experiment. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(2):119–138Link, Google Scholar
• DelVecchio D, Krishnan HS, Smith D. Cents or percent? The effects of promotion framing on price expectation and choice. J. Marketing (2007) 71(3):158–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drumwright M. A demonstration of anomalies in evaluation of bundling. Marketing Lett. (1992) 3(4):311–321Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elberse A. Bye-bye bundles: The unbundling of music in digital channels. J. Marketing (2010) 74(3):107–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geng X, Stinchecombe MB, Whinston AB. Bundling information goods of decreasing value. Management Sci. (2005) 51(4):662–667Link, Google Scholar
• Gilbride TJ, Guiltinan JP, Urbany JE. Framing effects in mixed price bundling. Marketing Lett. (2008) 19(2):125–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grewal D, Monroe KB, Krishnan R. The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers' perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. J. Marketing (1998) 62(2):46–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guiltinan JP. The price bundling of services: A normative framework. J. Marketing (1987) 51(2):74–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanson W, Martin RK. Optimal bundle pricing. Management Sci. (1990) 36(2):155–174Link, Google Scholar
• Heath TB, Chatterjee S, France KR. Mental accounting and changes in price: The frame dependence of reference dependence. J. Consumer Res. (1995) 22(1):90–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ. Selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47(1):153–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hilbe JM. Negative Binomial Regression (2007) 1st ed.(Cambridge University Press, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt LM, Chen PY. Bundling with customer self-selection: A simple approach to bundling low marginal cost goods. Management Sci. (2005) 51(10):1481–1493Link, Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Zhang J. Designing pricing contracts for boundedly rational customers: Does the framing of the fixed fee matter? Management Sci. (2008) 54(4):686–700Link, Google Scholar
• Huang P, Lurie NH, Mitra S. Searching for experience on the Web: An empirical examination of consumer behavior for search and experience goods. J. Marketing (2009) 73(2):55–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Jedidi K, Kohli R. A conjoint approach to multipart pricing. J. Marketing Res. (2008) 45(2):195–210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janiszewski C, Cunha M. The influence of price discount framing on the evaluation of a product bundle. J. Consumer Res. (2004) 30(4):534–536Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Schkade DA. Bias in utility assessments: Further evidence and explanations. Management Sci. (1989) 35(4):406–424Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalyanaram G, Winer RS. Empirical generalizations from reference price research. Marketing Sci. (1995) 3(2):161–169Link, Google Scholar
• Kelton CML, Rebelein RP. Can we have a high-end retail department store? Econ. Dev. J. (2007) 6(1):22–29Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Skiera B. Paying too much and being happy about it: Existence, causes, and consequences of tariff-choice biases. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(2):212–223Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Seim K, Skiera B. Does uncertainty matter? Consumer behavior under three-part tariffs. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(5):698–710Link, Google Scholar
• Loomes G, Sugden R. Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econom. J. (1982) 92(4):805–24Google Scholar
• Lopes LL. Toward a procedural theory of judgment. (1982) . Technical report no. 17, Wisconsin Human Information Processing Program, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
• Moe WW. Buying, searching, or browsing: Differentiating between online shoppers using in-store navigational clickstream. J. Consumer Psychol. (2003) 13(1):29–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monroe KB. Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions (1990) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Monroe KB, Chapman JD, Wallendorf M, Anderson P. Framing effects on buyers' subjective product evaluations, in advances in consumer research. Proc. Assoc. Consumer Res. (1987) Provo, UT:193–197Google Scholar
• Mulhern FJ, Leone RP. Implicit price bundling of retail products: A multiproduct approach to maximizing store profitability. J. Marketing (1991) 55(4):63–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullahy J. Specification and testing of some modified count data models. J. Econometrics (1986) 33(3):341–365Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muller JE, Turi ZG, Stone PH, Rude RE, Raabe DS, Jaffe AS, Gold HK, et al. Digoxin therapy and mortality after myocardial infarction. New England J. Medicine (1986) 314(5):265–271Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Chintagunta PK, Miravete EJ. The role of self selection, usage uncertainty and learning in the demand for local telephone service. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2007) 5(1):1–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niedrich RW, Sharma S, Wedell DH. Reference price and price perceptions: A comparison of alternative models. J. Consumer Res. (2001) 28(3):339–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D, Loewenstein G. The red and the black: Mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(1):4–28Link, Google Scholar
• Redden JP, Hoch SJ. Simplifying difficult calculations: Consumer choice of two-part tariffs. J. Product Brand Management (2011) 20(7):549–556Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers JL, Howard KI, Vessey JT. Using significance tests to evaluate equivalence between two experimental groups. Psychol. Bull. (1993) 113:553–565Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalensee R. Monopolistic two-part pricing arrangements. Bell J. Econom. (1981) 12(2):445–466Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalensee R. Gaussian demand and commodity bundling. J. Bus. (1984) 57(suppl. 1 part 2):S211–S230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Unequal group sizes in randomised trials: Guarding against guessing. The Lancet (2002) 359(9310):966–970Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA. History of Economic Analysis (1954) (Allen & Unwin, London) Google Scholar
• Shapiro C, Varian H. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Soman D, Gourville JT. Transaction decoupling: How price bundling affects the decision to consume. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(1):30–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suri R, Monroe KB, Feurderer R, Herrmann A, Wuebker G. Consumer prior purchase intentions and their evaluation of savings on product bundles. Optimal Bundling: Marketing Strategies for Improving Economic Performance (1999) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 177–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Svenson O, Benson L, Svenson O, Maule AJ. Framing and time pressure in decision making. Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making (1993) (Springer, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler R. Towards a positive theory of consumer choice. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1980) 1(1):39–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler R. Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(3):199–214Link, Google Scholar
• Tirole J. The Theory of Industrial Organization (1988) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Train KE, McFadden DL, Ben-Akiva M. The demand for local telephone service: A fully discrete model of residential calling patterns and service choices. RAND J. Econom. (1987) 18(1):109–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science (1981) 211(4481):453–458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J. Bus. (1986) 59(4):251–278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quart. J. Econom. (1991) 106(4):1039–1061Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wald A. Contributions to the theory of statistical estimation and testing hypotheses. Ann. Math. (1939) 10(4):299–326Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wald A. Statistical decision functions which minimize the maximum risk. Ann. Math. (1945) 46(2):265–280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yadav MS. How buyers evaluate product bundles: A model of anchoring and adjustment. J. Consumer Res. (1994) 21(2):342–353Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yadav MS. Bundle evaluation in different market segments: The effects of discount framing and buyers' preference heterogeneity. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1995) 23(3):206–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yadav MS, Monroe KB. How buyers perceive savings in a bundle price: An examination of a bundle's transaction value. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(3):350–358Crossref, Google Scholar