Fighting Fire with Fire: Commercial Piracy and the Role of File Sharing on Copyright Protection Policy for Digital Goods

References

• Alvisi M, Argentesi E, Carbonara E. Piracy and Product Differentiation in the Market of Digital Goods. J. Italian Econom. Assoc. (2003) 2(August):219–244Google Scholar
• August T, Tunca TI. Let the pirates patch? An economic analysis of software security patch restrictions. Inform. Systems Res. (2008) 19(1):48–70Link, Google Scholar
• August T, Tunca TI. Who should be responsible for software security? A comparative analysis of liability policies in network environments. Management Sci. (2011) 57(5):934–959Link, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y, Brynjolfsson E, Lichtman D. Shared information goods. J. Law Econom. (1999) XLII(1):117–155Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee DS. Software piracy: A strategic analysis and policy instruments. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2003) 21(1):97–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baskerville D. Music Business Handbook and Career Guide (2006) 8th ed.(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Ben-Shahar D, Jacob A. Selective enforcement of copyrights as an optimal monopolistic behavior. Contributions Econom. Anal. Policy (2004) 3(1):1–18Google Scholar
• Bender T. How to cope with China's (alleged) failure to implement the TRIPS obligations on enforcement. J. World Intellectual Property (2006) 9(2):230–250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besen SM, Kirby SN. Private copying, appropriability, and optimal copying royalties. J. Law Econom. (1989) 32(2):255–280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S, Gopal RD, Sanders GL. Digital music and online sharing: Software piracy 2.0? Comm. ACM (2003) 46(7):107–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S, Gopal RD, Sanders GL. Do artists benefit from online music sharing? J. Bus. (2006) 79(3):1503–1534Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S, Gopal RD, Lertwachara K, Marsden JR. Using P2P sharing activity to improve business decision making: Proof of concept for estimating product life-cycle. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. (2005) 4(1):14–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S, Gopal RD, Lertwachara K, Marsden JR. Consumer search and retailer startegies in the presence of online music sharing. J. Management Inform. Systems (2006) 23(1):129–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S, Gopal RD, Lertwachara K, Marsden JR, Telang R. The effect of digital sharing technologies on music markets: A survival analysis of albums on ranking charts. Management Sci. (2007) 53(9):1359–1374Link, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S, Gopal RD, Marsden JR, Sankaranarayanan R, Telang R. To theme or not to theme: Can theme strength be the music industry's “killer app”? Decision Support Systems (2009) 48(1):141–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S, Gopal RD, Sanders GL. Do artists benefit from online music sharing? J. Bus. (2006) 79(3):1503–1534Crossref, Google Scholar
• BSA/IDC Second annual BSA and IDC global software piracy study. (2005) May). http://www.bsa.orgGoogle Scholar
• BSA/IDC Sixth annual BSA and IDC global software piracy study. (2009) May). http://www.bsa.orgGoogle Scholar
• Chellappa RK, Shivendu S. Economic implications of variable technology standards for movie piracy in a global context. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 20(2):139–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chellappa RK, Shivendu S. Managing piracy: Pricing and sampling strategies for digital experience goods in vertically segmented markets. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(4):400–417Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Png I. Information goods pricing and copyright enforcement: Welfare analysis. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(1):107–123Link, Google Scholar
• Cheng HK, Sims RR, Teegen H. To purchase or pirate software: An empirical study. J. Management Inform. Systems (1997) 13(4):49–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• China Sourcing News Microsoft goes after pirated software distributors in China. (2010) December 7). http://www.chinasourcingnews.com/2010/12/07/462565-microsoft-goes-after-pirated-software-distributors-in-china/Google Scholar
• CIA The World Factbook 2005. (2006) . http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/Google Scholar
• Connor KR, Rumelt RP. Software piracy: An analysis of protection strategies. Management Sci. (1991) 37(2):125–139Link, Google Scholar
• Curien N, Laffond G, Laine J, Moreau F. Towards a new business model for the music industry: Accomondating piracy through ancillary products. Laboratoire d'econometrie Conservatoire National de Arts et Metiers (2004) 1(4–5):1–21Google Scholar
• Davis W. Movie studios win copyright lawsuit against isohunt. (2009) December). http://www.mediapost.com/publications/Google Scholar
• Dixit A. Analytical approximations in models of hysteresis. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1991) 58:141–151Crossref, Google Scholar
• EFF RIAA vs. The people: Four years later. (2007) . http://www.eff.orgGoogle Scholar
• FTC Peer-to-Peer filesharing technology: Consumer protection and competition issues. (2005) June). http://www3.ftc.govGoogle Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J. Game Theory (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Gelman JR, Salop SC. Judo economics: Capacity limitation and coupon competition. Bell J. Econom. (1983) 14(2):315–325Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geuss M, Daw D. File-sharing site MegaUpload indicted for internet piracy, shut down by U.S.. PC Magazine (2012) January 19). http://www.pcworld.com/article/248443/filesharing_site_megaupload_indicted_for_internet_piracy_shut_down_by_us.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Givon M, Mahajan V, Muller E. Software piracy: Estimation of lost sales and the impact on software diffusion. J. Marketing (1995) 59(1):29–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonsalves A. Piracy verdict gets student fined $675,000. (2009) August 1). http://www.informationweek.comGoogle Scholar
• Gopal RD, Sanders GL. Preventive and deterrent controls for software piracy. J. Management Inform. Systems (1997) 13(4):29–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopal RD, Sanders GL. International software piracy: Analysis of key issues and impacts. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(4):380–397Link, Google Scholar
• Gopal RD, Bhattacharjee S, Sanders GL. Do artists benefit from online music sharing? J. Bus. (2006) 79(3):1503–1534Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamel G, Prahalad CK. Competing for the Future (1994) (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Harbaugh R, Khemka R. Does copyright enforcement encourage piracy? J. Indust. Econom. (2010) 58(2):306–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holsing NF, Yen DC. Software asset management: Analysis, development and implementation. Inform. Resources Management J. (1999) 12(3):14–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hui K-L, Png I. Piracy and the legitimate demand for recorded music. Contributions Econom. Analysis Policy (2003) 2(1, Article 11). http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/contributions/vol2/iss1/art11Google Scholar
• IFPI The recording industry 2005 commercial piracy report. (2005) . http://www.ifpi.org/site-content/library/piracy2005.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Johnson W. The economics of copying. J. Political Econom. (1985) 93(1):158–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang C. House introduces internet piracy bill. Washington Post (2011) October 26). http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-tech/post/house-introduces-internet-piracy-bill/2011/10/26/glQA0f5xJM_blog.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Kelly K. Warner Bros. plan targets DD piracy in China. The Wall Street J. (2005) February 23Google Scholar
• Kravets D. Indie filmmakers sue thousands of bittorrent users. (2010) March). http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/03/bittorrent-legal-attack/Google Scholar
• Levy D, Bergen M, Dutta S, Venable R. The magnitude of menu costs: Direct evidence from large U.S. supermarket chains. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 112(1):791–815Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz SJ. Copying and indirect appropriability: Photocopying of journals. J. Political Econom. (1985) 93(5):945–957Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marron DB, Steel DG. Which countries protect intellectual property? the case of software piracy. Econom. Inquiry (2000) 38(2):159–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCullagh D. Senate bill amounts to death penalty for web sites. CNET News (2011) May 12Google Scholar
• Mennecke T. Interest in filesharing at all time high. (2005) April 27). http://www.slyck.com/news.php?story=763Google Scholar
• MPA-LEK The cost of movie piracy. (2008) January). http://www.mpaa.orgGoogle Scholar
• Novos IE, Waldman M. The effects of increased copyright protection: An analytic approach. J. Political Econom. (1984) 92(2):236–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Connell J, Kidd J, Stephenson E. An economic model costing “early offers” medical malpractice reform. New Mexico Law Rev. (2005) 35(2):260–299Google Scholar
• OECD OECD Information Technology outlook 2004. (2004) December). http://www.oecd.orgGoogle Scholar
• Peitz M, Waelbroeck P. Making use of file sharing in music distribution. (2003) . Mimeo, University of Mannheim and ECARES, Free University of BrusselsGoogle Scholar
• Peitz M, Waelbroeck P. Piracy of digital products: A critical review of the economics literature. Inform. Econom. Policy (2006) 18(4):449–476Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips W. Grokster gone, RIAA gloats. (2005) November 20). http://www.stereophile.comGoogle Scholar
• Poddar S. Network externality and commercial software piracy. (2005) . Working paper No. 05-16, National University of Singapore, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
• Porteus E, Shin H, Tunca TI. Feasting on leftovers: Strategic use of shortages in price competition among differentiated products. MSOM (2010) 12(1):140–161Link, Google Scholar
• Prasad A, Mahajan V. How many pirates should a software firm tolerate? An analysis of piracy protection on the diffusion of software. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2003) 20:337–353Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao SS. Copyright: Its implications for electronic information. Online Inform. Rev. (2003) 27(4):264–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandoval G. Limewire gets at least two-week reprieve. (2010) June). http://news.cnet.com/%8301-31001_3-20006958-261.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Scherer FM, Ross D. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (1990) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston) Google Scholar
• Shy O, Thisse J-F. A strategic approach to software protection. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1999) 8(2):163–190Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slive J, Bernhardt D. Pirated for profit. Canadian J. Econom. (1998) 31(4):886–899Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith T. RIAA admits CD-R more a threat than P2P. (2005) August 15). www.theregister.co.ukGoogle Scholar
• Sundararajan A. Managing digital piracy: Pricing and protection. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(3):287–308Link, Google Scholar
• Takeyama LN. The welfare implications of unauthorized reproduction of intellectual property in the presence of demand network externalities. J. Indust. Econom. (1994) 62:155–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takeyama LN. The intertemporal consequences of unauthorized reproduction of intellectual property. J. Law Econom. (1997) 40(2):511–522Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tirole J. The Theory of Industrial Organization (1988) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• USCC Testimony of Jason Berman and the RIAA before the U.S.-China economic and security review commission. (2006) June 7). http://www.uscc.govGoogle Scholar
• Varian HR. Buying, renting and sharing information goods. J. Indust. Econom. (2000) 48:473–488Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varian HR. Copying and copyright. J. Econom. Perspect. (2005) 19(2):121–138Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisman J. After an online firestorm, congress shelves antipiracy bills. New York Times (2012) January 20). http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/21/technology/senate-postpones-piracy-vote.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Wu S, Chen P. Versioning and piracy control for digital information goods. Oper. Res. (2008) 56(1):151–172Link, Google Scholar
• Yoskowitz A. Torrentspy set to appeal mpaa lawsuit. (2009) February). http://www.afterdawn.comGoogle Scholar