Research Note—Partial Least Squares and Models with Formatively Specified Endogenous Constructs: A Cautionary Note

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2013.0493

References

  • Aguirre-Urreta M, Marakas G (2012) Revisiting bias due to construct misspecification: Different results from considering coefficients in standardized form. MIS Quart. 36(1):123–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollen K (1984) Multiple indicators: Internal consistency or no necessary relationship. Quality Quantity 18:377–385.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollen K (2011) Evaluating effect, composite, and causal indicators in structural equation models. MIS Quart. 35(2):359–372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollen K, Lennox R (1991) Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psych. Bull. 110(2):305–314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cenfetelli R, Bassellier G (2009) Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Quart. 33(4): 689–708.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chengalur-Smith I, Nevo S, Demertzoglu P (2010) An empirical analysis of the business value of open source infrastructure technologies. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 11:708–729.Google Scholar
  • Chin W (1993) PLS-Graph User’s Guide, Version 3.0 (Soft Modeling, Inc.).Google Scholar
  • Chin W (1998) Issues and opinions in structural equation modeling. MIS Quart. 22(1):vii–xvi.Google Scholar
  • Choi S, Lee H, Yoo Y (2010) The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: A field study. MIS Quart. 34(4):855–870.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Cohen P, Cohen J, Teresi J, Marchi M, Velez C (1990) Problems in the measurement of latent variables in structural equations causal models. Appl. Psych. Measurement 14(2):183–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Curtis R, Jackson E (1962) Multiple indicators in survey research. Amer. J. Soc. 68(2):195–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diamantopoulos A, Winklhofer H (2001) Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. J. Marketing Res. 38:269–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards J (2011) The fallacy of formative measurement. Organ. Res. Methods 14(2):370–388.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fan X, Fan X (2005) Using SAS for Monte Carlo simulation research in SEM. Structural Equation Model 12(2):299–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feller J, Finnegan P, Fitzgerald B, Hayes J (2008) From peer production to productization: A study of socially enabled business exchanges in open source service networks. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4):475–493.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Henseler J (2010) On the convergence of the partial least squares path modeling algorithm. Comput. Statist. 25(1):107–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iacovou C, Thompson R, Smith H (2009) Selective status reporting in information systems projects: A dyadic-level investigation. MIS Quart. 33(4):785–810.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • James L, Mulaik S, Brett J (1983) Causal Analysis: Assumptions, Models, and Data (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
  • Jarvis C, MacKenzie S, Podsakoff P (2003) A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J. Consumer Res. 30:199–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim D, Benbasat I (2010) Trust-assuring arguments in B2C e-commerce: Impact of content, source, and price on trust. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(3):175–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim G, Shin B, Grover V (2010) Investigating two contradictory views of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Quart. 34(2):345–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein R, Rai A (2009) Interfirm strategic information flows in logistics supply chain relationships. MIS Quart. 33(4):735–762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee G, Xia W (2010) Toward agile: An integrated analysis of quantitative and qualitative data on software development agility. MIS Quart. 34(1):87–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liang H, Saraf N, Hu Q, Xue Y (2007) Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quart. 31(1):59–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Limayen M, Hirt S, Cheung C (2007) How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance. MIS Quart. 31(4):705–737.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Little T, Slegers D, Card N (2006) A non-arbitrary method of identifying and scaling latent variables in SEM and MACS models. Structural Equation Model. 13(1):59–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lohmöller J (1989) Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares (Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lowry P, Romano N, Jenkins J, Guthrie R (2009) The CMC interactivity model: How interactivity enhances communication quality and process satisfaction in lean-media groups. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(1):155–195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacCallum R, Browne M (1993) The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: Some practical issues. Psych. Bull. 114(3):533–541.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacKenzie S, Podsakoff P, Jarvis C (2005) The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. J. Appl. Psych. 90(4):710–730.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra A, Gosain S, El Sawy O (2007) Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS Quart. 29(1):145–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marakas G, Johnson R, Clay P (2007) The evolving nature of the computer self-efficacy construct: An empirical investigation of measurement construction, validity, reliability and stability over time. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 8(1):16–46.Google Scholar
  • Marakas G, Johnson R, Clay P (2008) Formative vs. reflective measurement: A reply to Hardin, Chang, and Fuller. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 9(9):535–543.Google Scholar
  • Mithas S, Krishnan M (2009) From association to causation via a potential outcomes approach. Inform. Systems Res. 20(2): 295–313.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Muthén L, Muthén B (1998–2011) Mplus User’s Guide (Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
  • Pedhazur E (1997) Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research (Thomson Learning, Stamford, CT).Google Scholar
  • Pee L, Kankanhalli A, Kim H (2010) Knowledge sharing in information systems development: A social interdependence perspective. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 11(10):550–575.Google Scholar
  • Petter S, Straub D, Rai A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quart. 31(4):623–656.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rai A, Brown P, Tang X (2009) Organizational assimilation of electronic procurement innovations. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(1):257–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rönkkö M, Ylitalo J (2010) Construct validity in partial least squares path modeling. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, St. Louis, http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2010_submission/155.Google Scholar
  • Sia C, Lim K, Leung K, Lee M, Huang W, Benbasat I (2009) Web strategies to promote Internet shopping: Is cultural-customization needed? MIS Quart. 33(3):491–512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Ramesh V (2006) Web and wireless site usability: Understanding differences and modeling use. MIS Quart. 30(1):181–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whitaker J, Mithas S, Krishnan M (2010) Organizational learning and capabilities for onshore and offshore business process outsourcing. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(3):11–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wold H (1982) Soft modeling—The basic design and some extensions. Jöreskorg K, Wold H, eds. Systems Under Indirect Observation—Part II (North-Holland Publishing, New York), 1–54.Google Scholar
  • Yi M, Davis F (2003) Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition. Inform. Systems Res. 14(2):146–169.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu K, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V, Xin Xu S (2006) Migration to open-standard interorganizational systems: Network effects, switching costs, and path dependency. MIS Quart. 30(SI):515–538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.