Effect of Knowledge-Sharing Trajectories on Innovative Outcomes in Temporary Online Crowds

References

• Afuah A, Tucci CL (2012) Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):355–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 10(1):123–167.Google Scholar
• Andriopoulos C, Lewis MW (2010) Managing innovation paradoxes: Ambidexterity lessons from leading product design companies. Long Range Planning 43(1):104–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avital M (2000) Dealing with time in social inquiry: A tension between method and lived experience. Organ. Sci. 11(6):665–673.Link, Google Scholar
• Avital M, Te’eni D (2009) From generative fit to generative capacity: Exploring an emerging dimension of information systems design and task performance. Inform. Systems J. 19(4):345–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP, Dholakia UM (2006) Open source software user communities: A study of participation in Linux user groups. Management Sci. 52(7):1099–1115.Link, Google Scholar
• Bogers M, Afuah A, Bastian B (2010) Users as innovators: A review, critique, and future research directions. J. Management 36(4): 875–893.Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lakhani KR (2009) How to manage outside innovation. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 50(4):68–76.Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lacetera N, Lakhani KR (2011) Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 57(5):843–863.Link, Google Scholar
• Brabham DC (2010) Moving the crowd at Threadless: Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. Inform., Comm. Soc. 13(8):1122–1145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruns A (2008) Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage, Vol. 45 (Peter Lang Publishing, New York).Google Scholar
• Buchanan R (1992) Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues 8(2):5–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bullinger AC, Neyer AK, Rass M, Moeslein KM (2010) Community-based innovation contests: Where competition meets cooperation. Creativity Innovation Management 19(3):290–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgess J, Green J (2013) YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Butler B, Joyce E, Pike J (2008) Don’t look now, but we’ve created a bureaucracy: the nature and roles of policies and rules in Wikipedia. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 1101–1110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabanac G, Chevalier M, Chrisment C, Julien C (2010) Social validation of collective annotations: Definition and experiment. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 61(2):271–287.Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H, Crowther AK (2006) Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management 36(3):229–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough HW (2006) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronin MA, Weingart LR (2007) Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):761–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crowston K, Howison J (2005) The social structure of free and open source software development. First Monday 10(2). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/1207/1127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• da Cunha JV, Clegg SR, Cunha MP (2002) Management, paradox, and permanent dialectics. Clegg S, ed. Management and Organization Paradoxes (John Benjamins, Amsterdam), 11–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, Frederiksen L (2012) The core and cosmopolitans: A relational view of innovation in user communities. Organ. Sci. 23(4):988–1007.Link, Google Scholar
• Dunnette MD, Campbell J, Jaastad K (1963) The effect of group participation on brainstorming effectiveness for 2 industrial samples. J. Appl. Psych. 47(1):30–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebner W, Leimeister JM, Krcmar H (2009) Community engineering for innovations: The ideas competition as a method to nurture a virtual community for innovations. R&D Management 39(4):342–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (2000) Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: The new language of change and pluralism. Acad. Management Rev. 25(4): 703–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Enkel E, Gassmann O, Chesbrough H (2009) Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management 39(4):311–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Johnson SL (2011) Network exchange patterns in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1464–1480.Link, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2011) Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1224–1239.Link, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger TR (2014) Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Res. Policy 43(5):914–925.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finke RA, Ward TA, Smith SA (1992) Creative Cognition (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ford CM (1996) A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Acad. Management Rev. 21(4):1112–1142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forte A, Larco V, Bruckman A (2009) Decentralization in Wikipedia governance. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(1):49–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franke N, Shah S (2003) How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Res. Policy 32(1):157–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franke N, von Hippel E (2003) Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: The case of Apache security software. Res. Policy 32(7):1199–1215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franke N, Von Hippel E, Schreier M (2006) Finding commercially attractive user innovations: A test of lead-user theory. J. Product Innovation Management 23(4):301–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franklin MJ, Kossmann D, Kraska T, Ramesh S, Xin R (2011) CrowdDB: Answering queries with crowdsourcing. Proc. 2011 ACM SIGMOD Internat. Conf. Management Data (ACM, New York), 61–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Füller J, Jawecki G, Mühlbacher H (2007) Innovation creation by online basketball communities. J. Business Res. 60(1):60–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Füller J, Hutter K, Hautz J, Matzler K (2014) User roles and contributions in innovation-contest communities. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(1):273–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallupe RB, Dennis AR, Cooper WH, Valacich JS, Bastianutti LM, Nunamaker JF (1992) Electronic brainstorming and group size. Acad. Management J. 35(2):350–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galunic DC, Rodan S (1998) Research notes and communications: Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management J. 19(12):1193–1201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardner HK, Gino F, Staats BR (2012) Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: Transforming resources into performance. Acad. Management J. 55(4):998–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George J (2007) Creativity in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 1(1):439–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gleave E, Welser HT, Lento TM, Smith MA (2009) A conceptual and operational definition of “social role” in online community. System Sci. (HICSS), 2009, 42nd Hawaii Internat. Conf., 1–11.Google Scholar
• Gong Y, Kim T-Y, Lee D-R, Zhu J (2013) A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity. Acad. Management J. 56(3):827–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey S (2014) Creative synthesis: exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 39(3): 324–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hautz J, Hutter K, Füller J, Matzler K, Rieger M (2010) How to establish an online innovation community? The role of users and their innovative content. System Sci. (HICSS), 2010 43rd Hawaii Internat. Conf., Kauai, HI, 1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertel G, Niedner S, Herrmann S (2003) Motivation of software developers in open source projects: An Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Res. Policy 32(7):1159–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howison J, Crowston K (2014) Collaboration through open superposition: A theory of the open source way. MIS Quart. 38(1): 29–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutter K, Hautz J, Füller J, Mueller J, Matzler K (2011) Communitition: The tension between competition and collaboration in community-based design contests. Creativity Innovation Management 20(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa SL, Lang KR (2011) Boundary management in online communities: Case studies of the Nine Inch Nails and ccMixter music remix sites. Long Range Planning 44(5):440–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jay J (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Acad. Management J. 56(1): 137–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Frederiksen L (2006) Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organ. Sci. 17(1):45–63.Link, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.Link, Google Scholar
• Kane GC, Johnson J, Majchrzak A (2014) Emergent life cycle: The tension between knowledge change and knowledge retention in open online coproduction communities. Management Sci. 60(12):3026–3048.Link, Google Scholar
• Kennedy L, Naaman M, Ahern S, Nair R, Rattenbury T (2007) How Flickr helps us make sense of the world: Context and content in community-contributed media collections. Proc. 15th Internat. Conf. Multimedia (ACM, New York), 631–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kittur A, Kraut RE (2008) Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in Wikipedia: Quality through coordination. Proc. 2008 ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (ACM, New York), 37–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kittur A, Nickerson JV, Bernstein M, Gerber E, Shaw A, Zimmerman J, Lease M, Horton J (2013) The future of crowd work. Proc. 2013 Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (ACM, New York), 1301–1318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3): 383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Kuk G (2006) Strategic interaction and knowledge-sharing in the KDE developer mailing list. Management Sci. 52(7):1031–1042.Link, Google Scholar
• Lakhani K, Fayard AL, Levina N, Pokrywa SH (2012) OpenIDEO. Harvard Business School Case 612-066.Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, von Hippel E (2003) How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy 32(6):923–943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, Boudreau KJ, Loh PR, Backstrom L, Baldwin C, Lonstein E, Lydon M, MacCormack A, Arnaout RA, Guinan EC (2013) Prize-based contests can provide solutions to computational biology problems. Nature Biotechnology 31(2):108–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamastra CR (2009) Software innovativeness. A comparison between proprietary and Free/Open Source solutions offered by Italian SMEs. R&D Management 39(2):153–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee GK, Cole RE (2003) From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development. Organ. Sci. 14(6):633–649.Link, Google Scholar
• Leimeister JM, Huber M, Bretschneider U, Krcmar H (2009) Leveraging crowdsourcing: Activation-supporting components for IT-based ideas competition. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(1):197–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard D, Swap W (1999) When Sparks Fly—Harnessing the Power of Group Creativity (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Warglien M (1999) Landscape design: Designing for local action in complex worlds. Organ. Sci. 10(3):342–357.Link, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A, Rusnak J, Baldwin CY (2006) Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Management Sci. 52(7):1015–1030.Link, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Malhotra A (2013) Towards an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 22(4):257–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, More PH, Faraj S (2012) Transcending knowledge differences in cross-functional teams. Organ. Sci. 23(4):951–970.Link, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A, Majchrzak A (2014) Managing crowds in innovation challenges. California Management Rev. 56(4):103–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Metzger MJ, Flanagin AJ, Medders RB (2010) Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. J. Comm. 60(3): 413–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor E, Gino F, Argote L (2011) Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 116(2):229–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I, Toyama R, Konno N (2000) SECI, Ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning 33(1):5–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Ferraro F (2007) The emergence of governance in an open source community. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1079–1106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pacanowsky M (1996) Team tools for wicked problems. Organ. Dynam. 23(3):36–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paletz SB, Schunn CD (2010) A social-cognitive framework of multidisciplinary team innovation. Topics Cognitive Sci. 2(1):73–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paulus P (2000) Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups. Appl. Psych. 49(2):237–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paulus PB, Brown VR (2003) Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research on brainstorming. Paulus PB, Nijstad BA, eds. Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 110–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paulus PB, Nijstad BA (2003) Group creativity: An introduction. Paulus PB, Nijstad BA, eds. Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 3–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paulus PB, Levine DS, Brown V, Minai AA, Doboli S (2010) Modeling ideational creativity in groups: Connecting cognitive, neural, and computational approaches. Small Group Res. 41(6): 688–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole MS, Van de Ven AH (1989) Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4): 562–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Alexy O, Reitzig M (2014) What’s “new” about new forms of organizing? Acad. Management Rev. 39(2):162–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ransbotham S, Kane GC (2011) Membership turnover and collaboration success in online communities: Explaining rises and falls from grace in Wikipedia. MIS Quart. 35(3):613–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Kraut R, Kiesler S (2007) Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organ. Stud. 28(3):377–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross J, Irani L, Silberman M, Zaldivar A, Tomlinson B (2010) Who are the crowd workers?: Shifting demographics in Mechanical Turk. CHI’10 Extended Abstracts Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 2863–2872.Google Scholar
• Salazar MR, Lant TK, Fiore SM, Salas E (2012) Facilitating innovation in diverse science teams through integrative capacity. Small Group Res. 43(5):527–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah SK (2006) Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Sci. 52(7):1000–1014.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Lewis MW (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):381–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Tushman ML (2005) Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. 16(5):522–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Stasser G, Birchmeier Z (2003) Group creativity and collective choice. Paulus PB, Nijstad BA, eds. Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 85–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart KJ, Gosain S (2006) The impact of ideology on effectiveness in open source software development teams. MIS Quart. 30(2):291–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stieger D, Matzler K, Chatterjee S, Ladstaetter-Fussenegger F (2012) Democratizing strategy. California Management Rev. 54(4):44–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Surowiecki J (2005) The Wisdom of Crowds (Anchor Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• Thom-Santelli J, Muller MJ, Millen DR (2008) Social tagging roles: Publishers, evangelists, leaders. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 1041–1044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H (2009) A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organ. Sci. 20(6):941–957.Link, Google Scholar
• van Ginkel W, Tindale RS, van Knippenberg D (2009) Team reflexivity, development of shared task representations, and the use of distributed information in group decision making. Group Dynam.: Theory, Res., Practice 13(4):265–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E, von Krogh G (2003) Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. 14(2):209–223.Link, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G, Spaeth S, Lakhani KR (2003) Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Res. Policy 32(7):1217–1241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wallin MW, von Krogh G (2010) Organizing for open innovation: Focus on the integration of knowledge. Organ. Dynam. 39(2): 145–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeileis A, Hothorn T (2002) Diagnostic checking in regression relationships. R News 2(3):7–10.Google Scholar