The Impact of Institutional Distance on the Joint Performance of Collaborating Firms: The Role of Adaptive Interorganizational Systems

References

• Abelson R, Black JS (1986) Introduction. Galambos J, Abelson R, Black J, eds. Knowledge Structure (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 1–18.Google Scholar
• Aguinis H (2004) Moderated Regression (Guilford, New York).Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Beaty JC, Boik RJ, Pierce CA (2005) Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. J. Appl. Psych. 90(1):94–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angst CM, Agarwal R (2009) Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: The elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion. MIS Quart. 33(2):339–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antia KD, Frazier GL (2001) The severity of contract enforcement in interfirm channel relationships. J. Marketing 65(4):67–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong S, Overton T (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. 14(3):396–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bala H, Venkatesh V (2007) Assimilation of interorganizational business process standards. Inform. Systems Res. 18(3):340–362.Link, Google Scholar
• Barrett M, Velu C, Kohli R, Salge TO, Simoes-Brown D (2011) Making the transition to collaborative innovation: Issues of readiness, trust and governance. Business Breifing Report, National Endowment for Science, Technology, and Arts (NESTA), London.Google Scholar
• Bechky B (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Bensaou M (1997) Interorganizational cooperation: The role of information technology. Inform. Systems Res. 8(2):107–124.Link, Google Scholar
• Besharov ML, Smith WK (2014) Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy Management Rev. 39(3):364–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhakoo V, Choi T (2013) The iron cage exposed: Institutional pressures and heterogeneity across the healthcare supply chain. J. Oper. Management 31(6):432–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodker S (1998) Understanding representation in design. Human-Comput. Interaction 13(2):107–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boland RJ, Tenkasi RV (1995) Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organ. Sci. 6(4):350–372.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown RD, Hauenstein NM (2005) Interrater agreement reconsidered: An alternative to the rwg indices. Organ. Res. Methods 8(2):165–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busenitz LW, Gomez C, Spencer JW (2000) Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Acad. Management J. 43(5):994–1003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai S, Jun M, Yang Z (2010) Implementing supply chain information integration in China: The role of institutional forces and trust. J. Oper. Management 28(3):257–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (1997) Transforming knowledge in product development: Making knowledge manifest through boundary objects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Chang SJ, Van Witteloostuijin A, Eden L (2010) From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41:178–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Chi L, Holsapple CW, Srinivasan C (2007) Competitive dynamics in electronic networks: A model and the case of interorganizational systems. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 11(3):7–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chi L, Ravichandran T, Andrevski G (2010) Information technology, network structure, and competitive action. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):543–570.Link, Google Scholar
• Chin WW, Marcolin BL, Newsted PR (2003) A partial least square latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inform. Systems Res. 14(2):189–217.Link, Google Scholar
• Choudhury V (1997) Strategic choices in the development of interorganizational information systems. Inform. Systems Res. 8(1):1–24.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2013) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Routledge, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crilly D, Zollo M, Hansen MT (2012) Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures. Acad. Management J. 55(6):1429–1448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davidson R, MacKinnon JG (1993) Estimation and Inference in Econometrics (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Day GS, Schoemaker PJ (2004) Driving through the fog: Managing at the edge. Long Range Planning 37(2):127–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2):179–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Dunlap WP, Burke MJ, Smith-Crowe K (2003) Accurate tests of statistical significance for rwg and average deviation interrater agreement indexes. J. Appl. Psych. 88(2):356–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH (1996) Does governance matter? Keiretsu alliances and asset specificity as sources of Japanese competitive advantage. Organ. Sci. 7(6):649–666.Link, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):660–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earley PC, Ang S (2003) Cultural Intelligence: Individual Interactions Across Cultures (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Fein AJ, Anderson E (1997) Patterns of credible commitments: Territory and brand selectivity in industrial distribution channels. J. Marketing 61(2):19–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Bookstein FL (1982) Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J. Marketing Res. 1:440–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker D (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18:39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frazier GL, Maltz E, Antia KD, Rindfleisch A (2009) Distributor sharing of strategic information with suppliers. J. Marketing 73(4):31–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Straub D, Boudreau M (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Comm. AIS 7(7):1–78.Google Scholar
• Gersick C (1991) Revolutionary change theories: A multi-level exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Acad. Management Rev. 31:9–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gosain S (2004) Enterprise information systems as objects and carriers of institutional forces: The new iron cage? J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 5(4):151–182.Google Scholar
• Gosain S, Malhotra A, El Sawy OA (2004) Coordinating for flexibility in e-business supply chains. J. Management Inform. Systems 21(3):7–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gosain S, Malhotra A, El Sawy OA, Chehade F (2003) Towards frictionless e-business: The impact of common electronic business interfaces. Comm. ACM 46(12):186–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F, Micelotta ER, Lounsbury M (2011) Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):317–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2011) PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. J. Marketing Theory Practice 19(2):369–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson RE, Eden L, Lau CM, Wright M (2000) Strategy in emerging economies. Acad. Management J. 43(3):249–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Im G, Rai A (2008) Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships. Management Sci. 54(7):1281–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Jaccard J, Turrisi R (2003) Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. 69(1):85–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jap SD (1999) Pie-expansion efforts: Collaboration processes in buyer-supplier relationships. J. Marketing Res. 36(4):461–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jap SD, Anderson E (2003) Safeguarding interorganizational performance and continuity under ex post opportunism. Management Sci. 49(12):1684–1701.Link, Google Scholar
• John G, Reve T (1982) The reliability and validity of key informant data from dyadic relationships in marketing channels. J. Marketing Res. 19:517–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson JL, Cullen JB, Sakano T, Takenouchi H (1996) Setting the stage for trust and strategic integration in Japanese-U.S. cooperative alliances. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 27:981–1004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ke R, Zhang W (2002) Trust in China: A cross-regional analysis. Econom. Res. J. (Chinese) 10:59–96.Google Scholar
• Klein R (2007) Customization and real time information access in integrated eBusiness supply chain relationships. J. Oper. Management 25(6):1366–1381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein R, Rai A, Straub DW (2007) Competitive and cooperative positioning in supply chain logistics relationships. Decision Sci. 38(4):611–646.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostova T (1999) Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 24(2):308–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostova T, Roth K (2002) Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Acad. Management J. 45(1):215–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostova T, Zaheer S (1999) Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):64–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostova T, Roth K, Dacin TM (2008) Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Acad. Management Rev. 33(4):994–1006.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Scheer LK, Steenkamp J-BEM (1995) The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers. J. Marketing Res. 32(1):54–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Das TK (2007) Interpartner legitimacy in the alliance development process. J. Management Stud. 44(8):1425–1453.Google Scholar
• Lau C, Tse DK, Zhou N (2002) Institutional forces and organizational culture in China: Effects on change schemas, firm commitment and job satisfaction. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 33(3):533–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Organization and Environments (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• LeBreton JM, Burgess JR, Kaiser RB, Atchley EK, James LR (2003) The restriction of variance hypothesis and interrater reliability and agreement: Are ratings from multiple sources really dissimilar? Organ. Res. Methods 6(1):80–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li JJ, Poppo L, Zhou KZ (2008) Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition, uncertainty, and domestic vs. foreign firms. Strategic Management J. 29:383–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Saraf N, Hu Q, Xue Y (2007) Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quart. 31(1):59–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu H, Ke W, Wei KK, Gu J, Chen H (2010) The role of institutional pressures and organizational culture in the firm’s intention to adopt Internet-enabled supply chain management systems. J. Oper. Management 28(5):372–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni G, Lipparini A (1996) The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. 20(4):317–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo X, Slotegraaf RJ, Pan X (2006) Cross-functional “coopetition”: The simultaneous role of cooperation and competition within firms. J. Marketing 70(2):67–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo YD (2008) Procedural fairness and interfirm cooperation in strategic alliances. Strategic Management J. 29:27–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Podsakoff NP (2011) Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quart. 35(2):293–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Malhotra A, John R (2005) Perceived individual collaboration know-how development through information technology-enabled contextualization: Evidence from distributed teams. Inform. Systems Res. 16(1):9–27.Link, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A, Gosain S, El Sawy OA (2005) Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS Quart. 29(1):145–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A, Gosain S, El Sawy OA (2007) Leveraging standard electronic business interfaces to enable adaptive supply chain partnerships. Inform. Systems Res. 18(3):260–279.Link, Google Scholar
• Markus H, Zajonc R (1985) The cognitive perspective in social psychology. Lindzey G, Aronson E, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology (Random House, New York), 137–230.Google Scholar
• Meyer A, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83:340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer KE, Nguyen HV (2005) Foreign investment strategies and sub-national institutions in emerging markets: Evidence from Vietnam. J. Management Stud. 42(1):63–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murtha T, Lenway S (1994) Country capabilities and the strategic state: How national political institutions affect multinational corporations’ strategies. Strategic Management J. 15:113–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson KM, Ghods M (1998) Measuring technology flexibility. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 7(4):232–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neumann LJ, Star SL (1996) Making infrastructure: The dream of a common language. Blomberg J, Kensing F, Dykstra EA, eds. Proc. Participatory Design Conf., PDC96 (Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, Palo Alto, CA), 231–240.Google Scholar
• North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pawlowski SD, Robey D (2004) Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals. MIS Quart. 28(4):645–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peng MW, Wang DYL, Jiang Y (2008) An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 39(5):920–936.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips N, Tracey P, Karra N (2009) Rethinking institutional distance: Strengthening the tie between new institutional theory and international management. Strategic Organ. 7(3):339–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell A, DiMaggio PJ (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A, Tang X (2010) Leveraging IT capabilities and competitive process capabilities for the management of interorganizational relationship portfolios. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):516–542.Link, Google Scholar
• Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Straub D (2012) A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS Quarterly. MIS Quart. 36(1):iii–xiv.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saeed KA, Malhotra MK, Grover V (2011) Interorganizational system characteristics and supply chain integration: An empirical assessment. Decision Sci. 42(1):7–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sapsed J, Salter A (2004) Postcards from the edge: Local communities, global programs and boundary objects. Organ. Stud. 25(9):1515–1534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saraf N, Langdon CS, Gosain S (2007) IS application capabilities and relational value in interfirm partnerships. Inform. Systems Res. 18(3):320–339.Link, Google Scholar
• Schotter A, Beamish PW (2011) General manager staffing and performance in transitional economy subsidiaries. Internat. Stud. Management Organ. 41(2):55–87.Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2001) Institutions and Organizations (Sage, Thousands Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Selnes F, Sallis J (2003) Promoting relationship learning. J. Marketing 67(3):80–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1996) Institutionalism old and new. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(2):270–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sia SK, Soh C (2007) An assessment of package-organisation misalignment: Institutional and ontological structures. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 16(5):568–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sivo SA, Saunders C, Chang Q, Jiang JJ (2006) How low should you go? Low response rates and the validity of inference in IS questionnaire research. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 7(6):351–414.Google Scholar
• Sodero AC, Rabinovich E, Sinha RK (2013) Drivers and outcomes of open-standard interorganizational information systems assimilation in high-technology supply chains. J. Oper. Management 31(6):330–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Star SL (1989) The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. Huhns M, Gasser L, eds. Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence (Morgan Kaufman, Menlo Park, CA), 37–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939. Soc. Stud. Sci. 19:387–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub DW, Rai A, Klein R (2004) Measuring firm performance at the network level: A nomology of the business impact of digital supply networks. J. Management Inform. Systems 21(1):83–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subramani M (2004) How do suppliers benefit from IT use in supply chain relationships. MIS Quart. 28(1):45–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teo HH, Wei KK, Benbasat I (2003) Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quart. 27(1):19–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Velu C, Barrett M, Kohli R, Salge T (2013) Thriving in open innovation ecosystems: Toward a collaborative market orientation. Working paper, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
• Walsh J (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ. Sci. 6(3):280–321.Link, Google Scholar
• Wathne KH, Heide JB (2000) Opportunism in interfirm relationships: Forms, outcomes, and solutions. J. Marketing 64(4):36–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weill P, Olson MH (1989) An assessment of the contingency theory of management information systems. J. Management Inform. Systems 6(1):59–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wenger EC (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• World Bank (2008) Doing business in China. The World Bank Group, Washington, DC.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright M, Filatotchev I, Hoskisson RE, Peng MW (2005) Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. J. Management Stud. 42(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu D, Shenkar O (2002) Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. 27(4):608–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Su C, Fam K-S (2012) Dealing with institutional distances in international marketing channels: Governance strategies that engender legitimacy and efficiency. J. Marketing 76(3):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, Venkatraman N (1994) Determinants of electronic integration in the insurance industry: An empirical test. Management Sci. 40(5):549–566.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Benton W Jr (2007) Supply chain practice and information sharing. J. Oper. Management 25(6):1348–1365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou KZ, Yim CK, Tse DK (2005) The effects of strategic orientations on technology- and market-based breakthrough innovations. J. Marketing 69(2):42–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu K, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V, Xu S (2006) Migration to open-standard interorganizational systems: Network effects, switching costs, and path dependency. MIS Quart. 30(1):515–539.Crossref, Google Scholar