Exit, Voice, and Response on Digital Platforms: An Empirical Investigation of Online Management Response Strategies

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0749

References

  • Abadie A (2005) Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators. Rev. Econom. Stud. 72(1):1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(5):1369–1401.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson EG Jr, Parker GG, Tan B (2013) Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):152–172.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson ET, Simester D (2013) Advertising in a competitive market: The role of product standards, customer learning, and switching costs. J. Marketing Res. 50(4):489–504.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson ET, Simester DI (2014) Reviews without a purchase: Low ratings, loyal customers, and deception. J. Marketing Res. 51(3):249–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson M, Magruder J (2012) Learning from the crowd: Regression discontinuity estimates of the effects of an online review database. Econom. J. 122(563):957–989.Google Scholar
  • Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Auh S, Menguc B (2005) Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. J. Bus. Res. 58(12):1652–1661.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Autor DH (2003) Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. J. Labor Econom. 21(1):1–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R, Umyarov A (2015) Do your online friends make you pay? A randomized field experiment on peer influence in online social networks. Management Sci. 61(8):1902–1920.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R, Ramaprasad J, Umyarov A (2018) Monetizing freemium communities: Does paying for premium increase social engagement? MIS Quart. 42(3):719–735.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borah A, Tellis GJ (2016) Halo (spillover) effects in social media: Do product recalls of one brand hurt or help rival brands? J. Marketing Res. 53(2):143–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown GK, Mergoupis T (2010) Treatment interactions with nonexperimental data in Stata. Stata J. 11(4):545–555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2009) Microeconometrics Using Stata (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
  • Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL (2008) Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Rev. Econom. Statist. 90(3):414–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen H, De P, Hu YJ (2015) IT-enabled broadcasting in social media: An empirical study of artists’ activities and music sales. Inform. Systems Res. 26(3):513–531.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemons EK (1991) Evaluation of strategic investments in information technology. Comm. ACM 34(1):22–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Vries L, Gensler S, Leeflang PS (2012) Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. J. Interactive Marketing 26(2):83–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dranove D, Gron A, Mazzeo MJ (2003) Differentiation and competition in HMO markets. J. Indust. Econom. 51(4):433–454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duncan G (2011) Survey: Negative online reviews change 80 pct of shoppers’ minds. Digital Trends. Accessed July 18, 2016, http://www.digitaltrends.com/social-media/survey-negative-online-reviews-change-80-pct-of-shoppers-minds.Google Scholar
  • Duranton G, Morrow PM, Turner MA (2014) Roads and trade: Evidence from the U.S. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81(2):681–724.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elejalde-Ruiz A (2015) Survey says more than half of shoppers check online reviews. Chicago Tribune (June 2). Accessed July 18, 2016, http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-mintel-online-reviews-0603-biz-20150602-story.html.Google Scholar
  • Evans D, Oviatt J, Slaymaker J, Tapado C, Doherty P, Ball A, Saenz D, Wiley E (2012) An experimental study of how restaurant-owners’ responses to negative reviews affect readers’ intention to visit. Four Peaks Rev. 2(1):1–13.Google Scholar
  • Feldman JM, Lynch JG (1988) Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 73(3):421–435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forman C, Ghose A, Goldfarb A (2009) Competition between local and electronic markets: How the benefit of buying online depends on where you live. Management Sci. 55(1):47–57.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Garg R, Smith MD, Telang R (2011) Measuring information diffusion in an online community. J. Management Inform. Systems 28(2): 11–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gatignon H, Xuereb JM (1997) Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. J. Marketing Res. 34(1):77–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gensler S, Völckner F, Liu-Thompkins Y, Wiertz C (2013) Managing brands in the social media environment. J. Interactive Marketing 27(4):242–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goes PB, Lin M, Au Yeung CM (2014) “Popularity Effect” in user-generated content: Evidence from online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 25(2):222–238.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goh KY, Heng CS, Lin Z (2013) Social media brand community and consumer behavior: Quantifying the relative impact of user- and marketer-generated content. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):88–107.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goldfarb A, Xiao M (2011) Who thinks about the competition? Managerial ability and strategic entry in U.S. local telephone markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(7):3130–3161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood BN, Wattal S (2017) Show me the way to go home: An empirical investigation of ride-sharing and alcohol related motor vehicle fatalities. MIS Quart. 41(1):163–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gu B, Ye Q (2014) First step in social media: Measuring the influence of online management responses on customer satisfaction. Production Oper. Management 23(4):570–582.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinckley D (2015) New study: Data reveals 67% of consumers are influenced by online reviews. MOZ. Accessed July 18, 2016, https://moz.com/blog/new-data-reveals-67-of-consumers-are-influenced-by-online-reviews.Google Scholar
  • Hosanagar K, Fleder D, Lee D, Buja A (2014) Will the global village fracture into tribes? Recommender systems and their effects on consumer fragmentation. Management Sci. 60(4):805–823.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hu N, Zhang J, Pavlou PA (2009) Overcoming the J-shaped distribution of product reviews. Comm. ACM 52(10):144–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu N, Bose I, Koh NS, Liu L (2012) Manipulation of online reviews: An analysis of ratings, readability, and sentiments. Decision Support Systems 52(3):674–684.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iacovou CL, Benbasat I, Dexter AS (1995) Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quart. 19(4):465–485.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koenker R, Hallock K (2001) Quantile regression: An introduction. J. Econom. Perspect. 15(4):43–56.Google Scholar
  • Lewis R, Nguyen D (2015) Display advertising’s competitive spillovers to consumer search. Quant. Marketing Econom. 13(2): 93–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li X (2016) Could deal promotion improve merchants’ online reputations? The moderating role of prior reviews. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(1):171–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Z, Agarwal A (2017) Platform integration and demand spillovers in complementary markets: Evidence from Facebook’s integration of Instagram. Management Sci. 63(10):3438–3458.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liu Y (2006) Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. J. Marketing 70(3):74–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu Z, Duan JA, Ter Hofstede F (2014) Marketing spillovers of location-based mobile services. Working paper, University of Texas at Austin, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2578335.Google Scholar
  • Lowensohn J (2009) Yelp: Businesses may publicly respond to reviews. CNET (April 9). Accessed July 18, 2016, http://www.cnet.com/news/yelp-businesses-may-publicly-respond-to-reviews/.Google Scholar
  • Luca M, Zervas G (2016) Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Sci. 62(12):3412–3427.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mallett T, Sen A (2001) Does local competition impact interest rates charged on small business loans? Empirical evidence from Canada. Rev. Indust. Organ. 19(4):435–450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malthouse EC, Haenlein M, Skiera B, Wege E, Zhang M (2013) Managing customer relationships in the social media era: Introducing the social CRM house. J. Interactive Marketing 27(4):270–280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mantena R, Sankaranarayanan R, Viswanathan S (2010) Platform-based information goods: The economics of exclusivity. Decision Support Systems 50(1):79–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayzlin D (2006) Promotional chat on the Internet. Marketing Sci. 25(2):155–163.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mayzlin D, Dover Y, Chevalier J (2014) Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(8):2421–2455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Menon K, Dubé, L (2000) Ensuring greater satisfaction by engineering salesperson response to customer emotions. J. Retailing 76(3):285–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2009) From association to causation via a potential outcomes approach. Inform. Systems Res. 20(2):295–313.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moretti E (2011) Social learning and peer effects in consumption: Evidence from movie sales. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(1):356–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mukherjee A, Kumar A, Liu B, Wang J, Hsu M, Castellanos M, Ghosh R (2013) Spotting opinion spammers using behavioral footprints. Proc. 19th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 632–640.Google Scholar
  • Naylor RW, Lamberton CP, West PM (2012) Beyond the “like” button: The impact of mere virtual presence on brand evaluations and purchase intentions in social media settings. J. Marketing 76(6):105–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pizzutti C, Fernandes D (2010) Effect of recovery efforts on consumer trust and loyalty in e-tail: A contingency model. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 14(4):127–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qiu L, Tang Q, Whinston AB (2015) Two formulas for success in social media: Learning and network effects. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(4):78–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rafaeli A (1989) When clerks meet customers: A test of variables related to emotional expressions on the job. J. Appl. Psych. 74(3): 385–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reynolds FD, Wells WD (1977) Consumer Behavior (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Rishika R, Kumar A, Janakiraman R, Bezawada R (2013) The effect of customers’ social media participation on customer visit frequency and profitability: An empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):108–127.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roehm ML, Tybout AM (2006) When will a brand scandal spill over, and how should competitors respond? J. Marketing Res. 43(3):366–373.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sahni NS (2016) Advertising spillovers: Evidence from online field-experiments and implications for returns on advertising. J. Marketing Res. 53(4):459–478.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shen W, Hu YJ, Rees J (2015) Competing for attention: An empirical study of online reviewers’ strategic behaviors. MIS Quart. 39(3):683–696.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherman E, Mathur A, Smith RB (1997) Store environment and consumer purchase behavior: Mediating role of consumer emotions. Psych. Marketing 14(4):361–378.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorce P, Perotti V, Widrick S (2005) Attitude and age differences in online buying. Internat. J. Retail Distribution Management 33(2):122–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stock JH, Wright JH, Yogo M (2002) A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 20(4):518–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas JB, Peters CO, Howell EG, Robbins K (2012) Social media and negative word of mouth: Strategies for handling unexpecting comments. Atlantic Marketing J. 1(2):Article 7.Google Scholar
  • Tucker C, Zhang J (2011) How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment. Management Sci. 57(5):828–842.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Turner M (2016) An unlikely source predicted Chipotle’s disastrous quarter, and it says a lot about the future of investing. Business Insider. Accessed July 18, 2016, http://www.businessinsider.com/foursquare-data-predicted-chipotle-results-2016-4.Google Scholar
  • Van Alstyne MW, Parker GG, Choudary SP (2016a) Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work For You (Norton, New York).Google Scholar
  • Van Alstyne MW, Parker GG, Choudary SP (2016b) 6 reasons platforms fail. Harvard Bus. Rev. (March 31), https://hbr.org/2016/03/6-reasons-platforms-fail.Google Scholar
  • Walter E (2014) 40 eye-opening customer service quotes. Accessed August 11, 2016, http://www.blackcoffee.com/brand-related/branding-quotes/675.Google Scholar
  • Wang L, Gopal R, Shankar R, Pancras J (2015) On the brink: Predicting business failure with mobile location-based checkins. Decision Support Systems 76:3–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang A, Zhang M, Hann IH (2018) Socially nudged: A quasi-experimental study of friends’ social influence in online product ratings. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):641–655.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xia L (2013) Effects of companies’ responses to consumer criticism in social media. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 17(4):73–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ye Q, Gu B, Chen W (2010) Measuring the influence of managerial responses on subsequent online customer reviews—A natural experiment of two online travel agencies. Working paper, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1639683.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yelp (2016) 10 things you should know about Yelp. Accessed July 18, 2016. http://www.yelp.com/about.Google Scholar
  • Zahra SA (1993) Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: A taxonomic approach. J. Bus. Venturing 8(4):319–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeithaml VA, Berry LL, Parasuraman A (1996) The behavioral consequences of service quality. J. Marketing 60(2):31–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang X, Zhu F (2011) Group size and incentives to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1601–1615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.