Managing Digital Platforms in User Organizations: The Interactions Between Digital Options and Digital Debt

References

• Aanestad M, Jensen TB (2011) Building nation-wide information infrastructures in healthcare through modular implementation strategies. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 20(2):161–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alaimo C, Kallinikos J (2017) Computing the everyday: Social media as data platforms. Inform. Soc. 33(4):175–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alvesson M, Sandberg J (2011) Generating research questions through problematization. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):247–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alvesson M, Sköldberg K (2009) Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Anderson EG Jr, Parker GG, Tan B (2013) Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):152–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Woodard CJ (2009) The architecture of platforms: A unified view. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 19–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrett M, Oborn E, Orlikowski WJ, Yates JA (2012) Reconfiguring boundary relations: Robotic innovations in pharmacy work. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1448–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Political Econom. 81(3):637–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau K (2010) Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Sci. 56(10):1849–1872.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau MC, Robey D (2005) Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organ. Sci. 16(1):3–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Bowman EH, Hurry D (1993) Strategy through the option lens: An integrated view of resource investments and the incremental-choice process. Acad. Management Rev. 18(4):760–782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Huang P, Wu DJ (2012) Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem: The case of enterprise software. MIS Quart. 36(1):263–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ciborra CU (1996) The platform organization: Recombining strategies, structures, and surprises. Organ. Sci. 7(2):103–118.Link, Google Scholar
• Constantinides P, Barrett M (2014) Information infrastructure development and governance as collective action. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):40–56.Link, Google Scholar
• de Reuver M, Sørensen C, Basole RC (2017) The digital platform: A research agenda. J. Inform. Tech., https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eaton B, Elaluf-Calderwood S, Sorensen C, Yoo Y (2015) Distributed tuning of boundary resources: The case of Apple’s iOS service system. MIS Quart. 39(1):217–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2006) Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(10):2–11.Google Scholar
• Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2007) Platform envelopment. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Evans DS (2003) Some empirical aspects of multi-sided platform industries. Rev. Network Econom. 2(3):191–209.Google Scholar
• Evans DS, Hagiu A, Schmalensee R (2006) Invisible Engines: How Software Platforms Drive Innovation and Transform Industries (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farjoun M (2010) Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Acad. Management Rev. 35(2):202–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Jain S, Tuertscher P (2008) Incomplete by design and designing for incompleteness. Organ. Stud. 29(3):351–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A (2009) Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A (2014) Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Res. Policy 43(7):1239–1249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Cusumano MA (2014) Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. J. Product Innovation Management 31(3):417–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghazawneh A, Henfridsson O (2013) Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model. Inform. Systems J. 23(2):173–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Spínola RO, Seaman C (2016) Exploring the costs of technical debt management—A case study. Empirical Software Engrg. 21(1):159–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Lyytinen K (2010) Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building Internet. J. Inform. Tech. 25(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henfridsson O, Bygstad B (2013) The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quart. 37(3):907–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hepsø V, Monteiro E, Rolland KH (2009) Ecologies of e-infrastructures. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 10(5):430–446.Google Scholar
• Howcroft D, Light B (2010) The social shaping of packaged software selection. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 11(3):122–148.Google Scholar
• Kallinikos J, Aaltonen A, Marton A (2013) The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Quart. 37(2):357–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein HK, Myers MD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quart. 23(1):67–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruchten P, Nord RL, Ozkaya I (2012) Technical debt: From metaphor to theory and practice. IEEE Software 29(6):18–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Z, Avgeriou P, Liang P (2015) A systematic mapping study on technical debt and its management. J. Systems Software 101(March):193–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin M, Li S, Whinston AB (2011) Innovation and price competition in a two-sided market. J. Management Inform. Systems 28(2):171–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luehrman TA (1998) Strategy as a portfolio of real options. Harvard Bus. Rev. 76(September–October):89–101.Google Scholar
• Markus ML, Robey D (1988) Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Sci. 34(5):583–598.Link, Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Myers MD, Newman M (2007) The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Inform. Organ. 17(1):2–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman M, Robey D (1992) A social process model of user-analyst relationships. MIS Quart. 16(2):249–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Iacono S (2001) Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inform. Systems Res. 12(2):121–134.Link, Google Scholar
• Pan SL, Tan B (2011) Demystifying case research: A structured–pragmatic–situational (SPS) approach to conducting case studies. Inform. Organ. 21(3):161–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW, Choudary SP (2016) Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy–and How to Make Them Work for You (WW Norton, New York).Google Scholar
• Parnas DL (1972) On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Comm. ACM 15(12):1053–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pickering A (1993) The mangle of practice: Agency and emergence in the sociology of science. Amer. J. Sociol. 99(3):559–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramasubbu N, Kemerer CF (2016) Technical debt and the reliability of enterprise software systems: A competing risks analysis. Management Sci. 62(5):1487–1510.Link, Google Scholar
• Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V, Bharadwaj A, Grover V (2003) Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. 27(2): 237–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandberg J, Mathiassen L, Napier N (2014) Digital options theory for IT capability investment. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15(7):422–453.Google Scholar
• Sarker S, Xiao X, Beaulieu T (2013) Guest editorial: Qualitative studies in information systems: A critical review and some guiding principles. MIS Quart. 37(4):iii–xviii.Google Scholar
• Selander L, Henfridsson O, Svahn F (2013) Capability search and redeem across digital ecosystems. J. Inform. Tech. 28(3):183–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C, Varian HR (1998) Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Song P, Xue L, Rai A, Zhang C (2018) The ecosystem of software platform: A study of asymmetric cross-side network effects and platform governance. MIS Quart. 42(1):121–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen C, De Reuver M, Basole RC (2015) Mobile platforms and ecosystems. J. Inform. Tech. 30(3):195–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spagnoletti P, Resca A, Lee G (2015) A design theory for digital platforms supporting online communities: A multiple case study. J. Inform. Tech. 30(4):364–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Star SL, Ruhleder K (1996) Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Inform. Systems Res. 7(1):111–134.Link, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Svahn F, Lindgren R, Mathiassen L (2015) Applying options thinking to shape generativity in digital innovation: An action research into connected cars. 48th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci., 4141–4150.Google Scholar
• Swanson EB, Ramiller NC (2004) Innovating mindfully with information technology. MIS Quart. 28(4):553–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas L, Autio E, Gann D (2014) Architectural leverage: Putting platforms in context. Acad. Management Perspect. 28(2):198–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C (2010) Research commentary—Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):748–759.Link, Google Scholar
• Tilson D, Sørensen C, Lyytinen K (2013) Platform complexity: Lessons from the music industry. 46th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci., 4625–4634.Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2014) Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy (Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2015) Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):266–281.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Research commentary–Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Tom E, Aurum A, Vidgen R (2013) An exploration of technical debt. J. Systems Software 86(6):1498–1516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toppenberg G, Henningsson S, Eaton B (2016) Reinventing the platform core through acquisition: A case study. 49th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci., 4634–4643.Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH (2007) Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Huber GP (1990) Longitudinal field research methods for studying processes of organizational change. Organ. Sci. 1(3):213–219.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Schewick B (2012) Internet Architecture and Innovation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Walsham G (1993) Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Walsham G (2006) Doing interpretive research. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 15(3):320–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wareham J, Fox PB, Giner JLC (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1195–1215.Link, Google Scholar
• Williams R, Pollock N (2012) Research commentary–Moving beyond the single site implementation study: How (and why) we should study the biography of packaged enterprise solutions. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):1–22.Link, Google Scholar
• Woodard CJ, Ramasubbu N, Tschang FT, Sambamurthy V (2013) Design capital and design moves: The logic of digital business strategy. MIS Quart. 37(2):537–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin RK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) Research commentary—The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Boland RJ Jr, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1398–1408.Link, Google Scholar
• Zittrain J (2008) The Future of the Internet–and How to Stop It (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar